PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : New Minnesota Twins Ballpark Approved!



MNdude
05-22-2006, 03:53 PM
The new Ballpark was approved on sunday!

Twins ballpark dream comes true
Early Sunday, the team's stadium plan finally cleared its last legislative hurdle: Senate passage of the ballpark's financing.
Mike Kaszuba, Mark Brunswick and Paul Levystar Tribune Staff Writers

It was sunrise on Sunday. Jerry Bell, the Minnesota Twins chief stadium negotiator, had paced the Capitol floors all night as a new open-air ballpark for his team cleared its last legislative hurdle: passage by the Minnesota Senate.
"You work on something for 10 years and now it's finally over, it's finally happened. ... How can you sleep?" asked Bell.

This was the moment that Twins officials and many fans have dreamed about. By a narrow 34-32 vote, the Senate put the final touches on a $522 million stadium that will be largely built with a sales tax increase in Hennepin County to be put in place without a referendum. When the vote was announced, nearly six hours after the House had backed the proposal, the team's lengthy, controversial and at times improbable march for a new stadium had finally ended.

"Kirby Puckett's number. How appropriate is that?" Bell said, referring to the uniform number worn by the team's late Hall of Fame player. "That's perfect. I didn't want 35. We got the 34 vote. Perfect."

The stadium's estimated price tag includes $390 million for the facility's construction, $90 million for infrastructure and $42 million for financing.

The vote came the morning after the University of Minnesota also scored an impressive victory late Saturday, winning Senate and House approval to build an open-air stadium that would return football to campus after a quarter-century.

For Bell, the vote came after 10 years of consulting with lawmakers and lobbyists, fretting through meetings and occasionally, as he did Saturday, catching glimpses of Twins games just to keep calm.

Even when Bell was told Friday, as he had been several other times in the past weeks, that the deal for a new stadium was as good as done, he refused to believe it. Bell kept telling himself: "It's not a sure thing until the final moment."

But this morning, when Twins officials meet, there will be no doubt. "We've had some very tough, very tense meetings," Bell said. "But this one won't be tough."

For stadium opponents, such as Dave Bicking, there was little to celebrate the day after the vote.

"It's not entirely done," said Bicking, a Minneapolis auto mechanic. "Has Governor Pawlenty signed it yet? He hasn't, so there's a glimmer of hope."

For the Twins, the first victory came late Saturday when the House approved the stadium on a 71-61 vote. As the early morning hours wore on, the Twin stadium's prospects in the Senate seemed to hit several snags. Sen. Steve Kelley, DFL-Hopkins, an early Senate author of the Twins stadium proposal, said some senators -- sensing the importance of the stadium to legislative leaders -- were withholding votes in an elaborate series of political horse-trading.

Other legislators were reportedly concerned about language in the Twins legislation that, while not officially sanctioning a new Minnesota Vikings stadium in Blaine, went further than many preferred in outlining a potential Vikings stadium deal that could face legislators next year.

Saturday, it was university officials who were doing the celebrating. As the final vote on the Gophers stadium was announced in the House, Gophers Athletic Director Joel Maturi clenched his fist and smiled.

University President Robert Bruininks, wearing a maroon blazer, watched from the gallery. He told reporters later: "I think this is the right thing to do, and this is the right time to do it."


mkaszuba@startribune.com • 612-673-4388 mbrunswick@startribune.com • 651-222-1636 plevy@startribune.com • 612-673-4419

©2006 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.

http://www.startribune.com/587/story/446442.html

MNdude
05-22-2006, 03:56 PM
Ballpark will cater to fans with food and a view


With their outdoor stadium plan approved, the Twins turn their attention to the design.


Rochelle Olson, Star Tribune

Kiss the Dome Dog goodbye.
When the Minnesota Twins' new ballpark opens, probably for the 2010 season, nouvelle cuisine will be one of the obvious changes for fans.

In the baseball industry, an expanded stadium food menu adds to what's known as "the fan experience." It's a big reason the team has wanted a new baseball-only ballpark for the past decade.

Ask Twins President Dave St. Peter what it will be like for fans in the new park and he said, "In a sentence, the antithesis of the Metrodome."

With legislative passage of the ballpark bill over the weekend and a prompt signing expected from Gov. Tim Pawlenty, the 10-year Minnesota Twins lobbying effort comes to a close. Now the team will pick an architect and spend the next year designing a new ballpark. The finer points will have to wait, but much already is known about the new home.

"Tremendous intimacy" will be the feeling in the new park, St. Peter said. Situated on a mere 11 acres, this ballpark will be a snug fit for 42,000 fans, meaning they will be oh-so-close to the players and the field.

The concourse will be wide open, so fans can grab more chow without missing action. The concourses will be wider so fans won't feel like they're in a rugby scrum when they make their way in and out. There will be many more restrooms, especially for the ladies, St. Peter said.

It's estimated to cost $522 million to erect the ballpark -- $390 million for construction, $90 million for infrastructure and $42 million for financing.

So far, the most attention has been paid not to the interior of the park, but how it fits together with the North Star commuter rail, the Hiawatha light-rail corridor, the Cedar Lake bike trail and the existing buildings in the Warehouse District where it will be built.

A sense of place

A signature piece will be a new pedestrian bridge across I-394 from Target Center to the ballpark. St. Peter said the key passageway will be a much more than a walkway and will usher fans in with a dazzling view of the entire field. "The front door to the ballpark will be from the outfield," he said.

At San Francisco Giants home games, fans have a view of the Bay. In Denver, Colorado Rockies fans can see the mountains. In Seattle, Mariners fans look out over Puget Sound. In Minneapolis, the seats will look toward the downtown skyline. "When our games are televised, it will immediately resonate that this game is being played in downtown Minneapolis," St. Peter said.

Chuck Leer, a downtown developer and chairman of New Ballpark Inc., which has pushed for an urban stadium for years, said the new ballpark is going to be knitted into the Warehouse District. "It's going to be completely different than the Metrodome, which is like this gigantic orb that emerges from the ground," he said. The new ballpark, he added, "will make everything around it so much more than it is today."

Leer sees opportunities for the ballpark to help weave the Farmers Market and the Heritage Park housing development into downtown.

"The Metrodome seals you off with this terrible wall and you have to go up to get into it. The most inviting places, you go down to get inside," he said.

Twins public relations consultant Mark Andrew said the new ballpark is going to be better than fans expect. "It's like feeding a dog a meal and they're about to get steak," he said. "Everybody understands this is about raising money for the team, but the experience of the fan is never off their radar screen."

Dessert à la cart?

"A happy fan will keep coming back," Andrew said.

The team has had plenty of time to dream about what it might want in a ballpark, including the food. Will it be margaritas and dessert carts à la U.S. Cellular Field in Chicago, the luscious Polish sausages at Boston's Fenway Park or the Nathan's and Hebrew Nationals at Yankee Stadium?

The team is -- ahem --salivating over the array of options. "We've never had the ability to contract with a concessionaire directly," St. Peter said. The Twins didn't control Metrodome concessions.

Fans will have to adjust to some things. "A generation of fans has never experienced baseball outdoors. That whole generation has never experienced a rainout," St. Peter said.

Options will be explored for heating the park either through the seats or radiant heat, possibly through the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center (HERC), which is next door. A sun screen will be installed on a portion of the upper deck, too. The Twins originally wanted a retractable roof ballpark, but they gave that up because of cost. Current technology doesn't allow one to be added later.

"We've been thinking about this for 10 years, we have a lot of things in mind," St. Peter said.

When the team looks for the gold standard of fan experience, it's looks not to another baseball park, but to the Xcel Energy Center in St. Paul. St. Peter said Xcel upped fan expectations for games while also serving as a hockey shrine. In the St. Paul arena, fans have food options ranging from simple sandwiches to high-end restaurants. Rows of hockey jerseys line the walls. Fans can see the game well no matter where they sit or stand.

"April 2010 will mark our 50th season in Minnesota," St. Peter said. "We certainly will want to celebrate our history with this franchise."


Staff Writer Paul Levy contributed to this report. Rochelle Olson • 612-673-1747

©2006 Star Tribune. All rights reserved.

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/446356.html

--------------------------------------------



For renderings of the new Twins Ballpark in the Warehouse District in Downtown Minneapolis go here:

Ballpark Renderings (http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/min/ballpark/index.jsp)

wrendog
05-24-2006, 05:09 PM
awesome! congrats MPLS!

Biff
05-30-2006, 05:36 PM
Congrats, i've been waiting for this for a long time, been going to twins games for 20 years and the dome is no place to watch baseball. I can already picture sitting in the stands looking out on downtown Minny on a beautiful summer evening with a beer and hotdog.

James Bond Agent 007
05-30-2006, 08:44 PM
Great news!

Can't wait for some renderings! :D

MNdude
05-30-2006, 09:04 PM
Great news!

Can't wait for some renderings! :D


Here ya go!

Ballpark Renderings (http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/min/ballpark/index.jsp)

brian_b
05-30-2006, 09:48 PM
I was just talking to a Minneapolis resident none-too-happy about public financing this weekend.

Congrats to MN for getting an appropriate stadium for the Twins, but I hope you know what you are getting into.

metzgda
05-30-2006, 11:01 PM
Wow, looks nice!

Too bad it looks like Baltimore's, Pittsburgh's, and now STL's new stadiums...hmm, am I seeing a trend here?

Sirus
05-30-2006, 11:38 PM
They are just now designing the stadium, everything up to this point is preliminary.

trueviking
05-31-2006, 06:18 AM
awesome...cant wait to head down for a game...

you guys shouldnt have gotten rid of koskie....fun to cheer for a local boy.

Latoso
05-31-2006, 08:10 AM
Nice design!

James Bond Agent 007
06-01-2006, 11:47 PM
Here ya go!

Ballpark Renderings (http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/min/ballpark/index.jsp)
Not bad!

http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/min/images/ballpark/ph_gallery05_690.jpg

http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/min/images/ballpark/ph_gallery07_690x446.jpg

http://minnesota.twins.mlb.com/min/images/ballpark/ph_gallery10_667x500.jpg

I still like Safeco Field better though. :D

Sirus
06-02-2006, 05:17 AM
Here's one that's a bit more recent. Shows what's envisioned to go along with the stadium as well.
Guys, remember that they are just now choosing an architect!!

http://www.minnescraper.com/forum/files/twinsville_142.jpg

Stephenapolis
06-02-2006, 08:28 PM
I really hope that if HOK is chosen to design the stadium, they will use the design they used in the above renderings. I do not want to see another retro stadium. They are getting to look alot alike. They are nice but getting boring. The one shown above by 007 is more contemporary in design and I love it.

ltsmotorsport
06-02-2006, 10:24 PM
Get those fans outside. Hurray for sunburns at the ballgame!

James Bond Agent 007
06-10-2006, 06:17 AM
^^^
Wow, that's an impressive development project!

Stroskey
06-10-2006, 06:42 PM
my family has been a Twins season ticket owner for over 20 years. This is a terrible idea. I dont know how many of you have ever been to the Twin Cities in April or September, or at the very least on a cold, rainy night, but an open-air stadium in Minnesota is a bad idea. Lots of Twins fans come from hours away or out of state. With a dome or closed stadium, they are gauranteed the game will take place, with an open air stadium the game may not even happen, or it will be far too cold to make it enjoyable. At mid-june, sure an outdoor stadium looks great, but lets get realistic here. In a few years the new owner (Pohlad will sell soon) will demand a retractable roof or leave. Lawyers seldom see a contract they cant break.

MNMike
06-10-2006, 08:43 PM
its not any worse(weatherwise) than many other cities with open air stadiums...

I can't find it now, but I did a comparison to other cities with open air stadiums a while back, I compared avg early season temps/rain in Mpls, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Denver, Cincinatti, and NYC. All mid april avg highs were between 60 and 65, and mid may highs between 67 and 74, MInneapolis fell right in the middle. Also, Mpls averages less rainy days than any of those cities besides Denver. So basically, any of these places, especially ones near the great lakes(lake breeze) are prone to early baseball season rain/cold, some more so than Minneapolis. Boston was the coldest and wettest.
I got my numbers from weather.gov(national weather service)

biam2
06-11-2006, 12:17 AM
Theres too much foul territory, the fans need too be closer

Stroskey
06-11-2006, 12:20 AM
Theres too much foul territory


QFT

toggie
06-11-2006, 10:13 PM
yeah, those conceptual renderings suck, lets hope HOK doesn't make so many mistakes when they actually design the thing (which they haven't yet).

BTinSF
06-14-2006, 07:04 AM
I like the fact that it's sandwiched in among several tall buildings giving it a very urban look and feel. I hate sports stadiums that are surrounded by acres of parking lots.

SJPhillyBoy
06-14-2006, 05:11 PM
It's great that it is downtown, but if they continue the retro trend, which is so overdone, I will be very disappointed for the Twin cities.

MiamiSpartan
08-20-2006, 04:37 PM
Well, I'll take the retro designs any day over the flying saucers of the 60s and 70s. At least these parks are built with better site lines for baseball.

SteelCity15
08-20-2006, 07:40 PM
I liked the old design of the retractable roof more. This one looks almost like the new Busch Stadium, or even PNC Park. It has the nice view of the skyline in the outfield, which makes excellent pictures!

Can't wait for it.

mSeattle
08-20-2006, 07:44 PM
Good density planned around there.

Renton
08-21-2006, 12:02 PM
Ballpark looks cool. But i think the outfield view should shift to the right more so you have those tall buildings in the background. That would look really nice.

Stephenapolis
08-21-2006, 06:59 PM
One thing to remind people. This is by no means the final plan. These are just preliminary drawings. The design won't be selected for another couple of months. I do hope they go in the direction of these drawings though. It is not too retro. I am very sick of the retro designs.

biggiebear
08-29-2006, 01:58 AM
In regards to the weather complaint. I recall watching games in Winnipeg when it was -30C so if you are a fan ya go or you stay home in your own dome and watch it on TV. Being outside in the elements is the way baseball should be played.

So congratulations Minny.:cheers:

P.S So are the Vikes pursuing a new stadium as well? I thought I had heard that somewhere a while ago.

SEA-TOWN
08-31-2006, 09:57 AM
Wow it looks a lot like Safeco Field, Especially the location of the bullpens, scoreboard, and the open air concourses. Its great for the Twins though!!

zerokarma
08-31-2006, 02:56 PM
Not that many outfield seats, I wish there was better renderings.

SFBoy
09-18-2006, 11:29 AM
Who the hell goes to a baseball game to look at tall buildings?

Thskyscraper
09-18-2006, 05:45 PM
yeah, those conceptual renderings suck, lets hope HOK doesn't make so many mistakes when they actually design the thing (which they haven't yet).
HOK? Is it just me or are they designing almost every stadium. I think they did the new Yankees and Mets stadiums. That's why so many of these stadiums look a like, one firm is designing them ALL!!! They did At&T (Giants), PNC (Pirates), Petco (Padres), Great American Ball Park (Reds), Minute Maid Park (Astros), Citizens Bank Park (Phillies), Busch Stadium (Cardinals). They're also doing the Nationals new stadium!!! WHAT THE HELL!

Renton
09-19-2006, 10:34 AM
Who the hell goes to a baseball game to look at tall buildings?
Unless your a total idiot, views from a ballpark play a big factor in these new stadiums. You think people would give a crap about the new frisco ballpark if it was rebuilt at the old spot at Hunters Point. Look at the views of the new parks in Seattle, Pittsburgh, even Baltimore. So obviously you never go to baseball games.

Thskyscraper
09-19-2006, 04:49 PM
Unless your a total idiot, views from a ballpark play a big factor in these new stadiums. You think people would give a crap about the new frisco ballpark if it was rebuilt at the old spot at Hunters Point. Look at the views of the new parks in Seattle, Pittsburgh, even Baltimore. So obviously you never go to baseball games.
The Cards new stadium has one of the best views of a skyline that I've seen. I haven't actually been there, but from the pictures the view looks great.

brian_b
09-19-2006, 05:59 PM
HOK? Is it just me or are they designing almost every stadium. I think they did the new Yankees and Mets stadiums. That's why so many of these stadiums look a like, one firm is designing them ALL!!! They did At&T (Giants), PNC (Pirates), Petco (Padres), Great American Ball Park (Reds), Minute Maid Park (Astros), Citizens Bank Park (Phillies), Busch Stadium (Cardinals). They're also doing the Nationals new stadium!!! WHAT THE HELL!

It is really unfortunate that HOK seems to have a monopoly on stadium designs in the US.

Anyway, I think that US Cellular in Chicago is to blame for all of the newer stadiums having the same retro design. I don't recall who designed it, but the modernistic design had too many mistakes in it. I think that people blamed the modernism, not the specific design. Go to a White Sox game today and you can see that with the relatively minor renovations done to the stadium it's actually a pretty nice place to watch a game.

SFBoy
09-21-2006, 08:15 AM
Unless your a total idiot, views from a ballpark play a big factor in these new stadiums. You think people would give a crap about the new frisco ballpark if it was rebuilt at the old spot at Hunters Point. Look at the views of the new parks in Seattle, Pittsburgh, even Baltimore. So obviously you never go to baseball games.
Nice try

I've been to 10 games this year and my eyes are always on the field. :tup:

Ronin
09-21-2006, 10:46 AM
Nice try

I've been to 10 games this year and my eyes are always on the field. :tup:

And what exactly on the field is worth watching at a Giants game?! :haha:

SFBoy
09-21-2006, 11:22 AM
And what exactly on the field is worth watching at a Giants game?! :haha:
A team that's in the playoff hunt. :shrug:

Heatonator
09-22-2006, 04:55 AM
Not like the Twins are!

Marcu
10-03-2006, 07:44 AM
I'm generally against public financing of stadiums (I don't think gov't should subsidize professional sports), but the park looks great.

Black Box
10-03-2006, 07:32 PM
Aww, yes, the great stadium debate of the Twin Cities. I remember all of the talk swirling about during my Minneapolis days. If most of that development gets built, it will surely animate that part of downtown Minneapolis. They should make the area coming off I-394 a soft, welcoming, tree-lined experience. This will be a great project for Minneapolis. Now, what are they going to do with the Metrodome? Oh, and congratulations on landing the Republican National Convention in 2008.

MNdude
12-06-2006, 04:59 PM
New Model of the Stadium:

http://www.startribune.com/media/2006/12/05/20/3225067.standalone.jpg

Link: http://www.startribune.com/509/story/856550.html

Owlhorn
12-06-2006, 06:25 PM
why is everyone in the friggin majors smart enough to build a downtown stadium except for the Rangers. We suck again!!

WQ5668
03-04-2007, 10:15 PM
If it weren't for the stupid NIMBY's in Philly their stadium would of been down town or along the river.

Beautiful park, horrible location

ardecila
03-05-2007, 01:39 AM
Hey, I like this stadium. It looks to be very streamlined and modern, while still trying to integrate into the surrounding neighborhood. Most new ballparks try to integrate with the neighborhood, but they also choose a traditional brick and ivy design. I like the idea of using modern design for this stadiums, being progressive.

MNdude
04-12-2007, 04:19 AM
I am bumping this thread because tomorrow the renderings of the new ballpark will be unveiled!!!!

MNdude
04-12-2007, 05:20 PM
Here are the designs!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.startribune.com/10136/gallery/1116544.html

MNdude
04-12-2007, 05:27 PM
http://www.minnescraper.com/forum/files/3_195.jpg

http://www.minnescraper.com/forum/files/2_544.jpg

http://www.minnescraper.com/forum/files/1_148.jpg

Biff
04-12-2007, 05:55 PM
Nice, I love that it is oriented to face downtown. Great design! I can't wait to attend some games.



Forums Directory