PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Canadian Cities: population living in tall buildings (5 storey+)



trueviking
Dec 2, 2006, 9:05 AM
i thought this was interesting....

population of each canadian city living in buildings of 5 storeys or higher (2005):

toronto: 982 705 - 21%
ottawa-gatineau: 112 470 - 11%
hamilton: 74 010 - 11%
london: 45 545 - 10%
winnipeg: 51 280 - 8%
vancouver: 147 675 - 8%
kitchener: 29 625 - 7%
montreal: 195 005 - 6%
halifax: 20 365 - 6%
quebec: 25 245 - 4%
calgary: 36 300 - 4%
edmonton: 33 225 - 4%
victoria: 9 485 - 3%
saskatoon: 6 295 - 3%
regina: 4 795 - 3%


source:
http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/famil55i.htm

1ajs
Dec 2, 2006, 9:14 AM
intresting winnipeg is beating vancouver on the list statisticaly lol

Only The Lonely..
Dec 2, 2006, 9:52 AM
Good for The Peg.

squeezied
Dec 2, 2006, 10:15 AM
wow congrats to ottawa-gatineau, hamilton, london, and winnipeg!! i would've never guessed u guys made it up there!

jeremy_haak
Dec 2, 2006, 2:07 PM
I'm not too surprised by Ottawa and Hamilton. They both have a lot of residential high rise buildings. I am quite a bit surprised that Vancouver doesn't have a higher proportion of residents in tall buildings though. I guess their predominance ends when you leave downtown?

Nouvellecosse
Dec 2, 2006, 5:13 PM
Would've thought Hfx would be higher, but I guess 6% isn't too shabby. Still higher than Calgary or Edmonton...

Btw, I'm not sure how accurate this is, since the population numbers (and potentially the percentages) are pretty old.

MonkeyRonin
Dec 2, 2006, 6:02 PM
....

softee
Dec 2, 2006, 9:25 PM
North Bay has approximately 2000 people living in buildings with 5+ storeys, which is just under 4%.

alps
Dec 2, 2006, 11:19 PM
Those numbers are a bit old, Halifax's population only adds up to 339,000 there. I guess 6% isn't too bad, but it's not especially good either :D. I think we'd be a little bit higher these days with the new development around Clayton Park and on the peninsula.

habsfan
Dec 2, 2006, 11:27 PM
i'd like to see a similar study for % of people living in 3 story buildings!?

ambiguoustraveller
Dec 2, 2006, 11:46 PM
hmm i swear i read some statistics just the other day that put Vancouver into a 20% range for that issue....I will try to find it.

ambiguoustraveller
Dec 3, 2006, 12:01 AM
I couldn't find the link, but I did find this...it compares a neighbourhood in Vancouver to the rest of the city, thus revealing the statistics.

This following article states that 34% of the Vancouver housing stock is less than 5 story apartments.

And the chart that accompanies it states that 56% of Vancouverites live in apartments...Therefore does that not mean that 22% of Vancouverites live in 5+ story apartments?


http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d128/ambiguoustraveller/statistics.jpg

Housing Profile
Structural Mix

64% of all Hastings-North dwelling units are apartments, while only 4% are semi-detached and 32% are detached housing. Figure 11 illustrates. The dominant dwelling type in the Hastings-North area is apartments less than five stories. Hastings-North has a greater percentage (41%) of this type of housing as compared with the Vancouver average (34%); however, it has slightly less than the GVRD average (43%). Many large, formerly single-family homes have been converted to multiple apartments.

Densification in the Hastings-North catchment area is expected to continue. New residential 4-storey residential developments with commercial ground floor units are occurring along Hastings. In addition, some conversion from single-family detached housing to attached and apartments is taking place north of Hastings between Nanaimo and Semlin where RM-3A zoning exists. For example, 2000 Franklin (formerly 2010 and 2018) is under development as a 10-unit townhouse complex.

Current market conditions and predictions for the foreseeable future indicate that this form of redevelopment likely will continue to take palace for several more years.

MonkeyRonin
Dec 3, 2006, 12:15 AM
And the chart that accompanies it states that 56% of Vancouverites live in apartments...Therefore does that not mean that 22% of Vancouverites live in 5+ story apartments?


These stats are based on CMAs, so yes, I could easily see the majority of Vancouver living in 5+ storey buildings.

Doady
Dec 3, 2006, 12:16 AM
Obviously, the numbers in first post are for whole CMAs, not just the cities.

Wooster
Dec 3, 2006, 12:49 AM
Toronto's number is extremely high. Although not surprising - there seems to be an infinite sea of commie blocks scattered all over the GTA.

Andy6
Dec 3, 2006, 1:41 AM
Yes. It's nothing to brag about, although at SSP if you did a thread on the number of cockroaches in each CMA (or, say, the number of murders), the people from the town with the most would be proudly trumpeting the fact.

trueviking
Dec 3, 2006, 2:52 AM
winnipeg has a crazy amount of suburban commie blocks....i only recently came to the realization that not every city does....i always just thought it was normal.

http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3673/apjn3.jpg

Only The Lonely..
Dec 3, 2006, 3:08 AM
I like a lot of those suburban high-rise clusters, even if they were designed with the proletariat in mind. I know I’m quite fond of the mini Minsk at the end of my street.

LordMandeep
Dec 3, 2006, 3:16 AM
Mississauga and Brampton have a ton of high rises especially Mississauga along its city limits along Toronto. Burlington has many south of the QEW. Brampton has many near its main shopping center. Also expect that number to grow fast.

trueviking
Dec 3, 2006, 3:32 AM
i bet most cities in the country will have their number increase over the next few years....seems to be a trend.

winnipeg will likely move up between half and one percent in the next year, as there are more than 15 buildings (most between 7-10 storeys) either under construction or scheduled for a spring start.

LordMandeep
Dec 3, 2006, 3:35 AM
Toronto will likely top a million very soon... and 40-45% of all population growth will likely come from High rise development.

raggedy13
Dec 3, 2006, 5:19 AM
According to those numbers and percentages in the first post, Greater Vancouver only has 1,846k people. Where are the other 400k at?

renthefinn
Dec 3, 2006, 5:29 AM
Victoria would be higher, but most apartments and condos are limited to 4-storeys!

MonkeyRonin
Dec 3, 2006, 5:46 AM
Toronto will likely top a million very soon... and 40-45% of all population growth will likely come from High rise development.

Considering how old the population figures are here, and how much the city and highrises have grown, it already has.

DrJoe
Dec 3, 2006, 5:53 AM
These numbers are pretty damn low. I imagine Cobourg would be around 5%. I have no idea really.

miketoronto
Dec 3, 2006, 6:41 AM
Interesting stats.

I wonder why apartment living even in smaller Canadian centres is still higher then comparable places in the USA?

Wonder why Canadian imbrace apartment/condo living more.

squeezied
Dec 3, 2006, 7:53 AM
american dream=automobiles=suburbian lifestyle

???

Boris2k7
Dec 3, 2006, 7:54 AM
While we haven't fully embraced the American Dream, we certainly aren't Europe. We're somewhere between the two.

trueviking
Dec 3, 2006, 8:19 AM
According to those numbers and percentages in the first post, Greater Vancouver only has 1,846k people. Where are the other 400k at?

yeah, i was wondering that too....all the cities seem a bit short....this is what it lists as the communities included in vancouver's numbers....total population 'living in households' was 1,963,645...maybe the rest are homeless. :)

Vancouver [Census Metropolitan Area]
Langley District municipality
Langley City
Surrey City
White Rock City
Delta District municipality
Richmond City
Greater Vancouver A Regional district electoral area
Vancouver City
Burnaby City
New Westminster City
Coquitlam City
Belcarra Village
Anmore Village
Port Coquitlam City
Port Moody City
North Vancouver District municipality
North Vancouver City
West Vancouver District municipality
Bowen Island Island municipality
Lions Bay Village
Pitt Meadows District municipality
Maple Ridge District municipality
Semiahmoo Indian reserve
Tsawwassen Indian reserve
Musqueam 2 Indian reserve
Coquitlam 2 Indian reserve
Coquitlam 1 Indian reserve
Burrard Inlet 3 Indian reserve
Mission 1 Indian reserve
Capilano 5 Indian reserve
Barnston Island 3 Indian reserve
Musqueam 4 Indian reserve
Seymour Creek 2 Indian reserve
Katzie 2 Indian reserve
McMillan Island 6 Indian reserve
Matsqui 4 Indian reserve
Katzie 1 Indian reserve
Langley 5 Indian reserve
Whonnock 1 Indian reserve

trueviking
Dec 3, 2006, 8:37 AM
it shows that there are almost 15 000 people in 'moveable dwellings' in edmonton....way more than most cities....weird.

softee
Dec 3, 2006, 9:30 AM
The Quebec side of Ottawa-Gatineau brings the Ottawa CMA's % down since slab apartments are not as common in Quebec as they are in Ontario.

jeremy_haak
Dec 3, 2006, 3:47 PM
^ If anyone has access to the 2001 Census, it should be fairly straight forward to obtain the count for just Ottawa. Statscan always provides the data for Ottawa and Gatineau separately and jointly. Since this is just by CMA, they don't have the data listed separately. As far as I can tell, the data available on the Community Profile part of the Statscan website is only from the shortform, and possibly select parts of the longform. This data isn't available for free though.

SteelTown
Dec 3, 2006, 5:19 PM
No surprised Hamilton is at the top 3. Considering Hamilton still has the tallest residental tower in Canada outside of the GTA.

photos from WZ1
http://mattshaverphotography.zenfolio.com/img/p794399176-4.jpg

http://mattshaverphotography.zenfolio.com/img/p907666226-4.jpg

feepa
Dec 3, 2006, 6:21 PM
No surprised Hamilton is at the top 3. Considering Hamilton still has the tallest residental tower in Canada outside of the GTA.



got any stats to prove your fact?
How tall is this residential tower?

SteelTown
Dec 3, 2006, 6:42 PM
Landmark Place which is that skyscraper with the Christmas lights on the top of it is 43 storey. It's not a mixed used building it's completely a residential building.

http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=landmarkplace-hamilton-canada

Tone
Dec 3, 2006, 6:54 PM
its 5 meter taller than Le port royal in mtl maybe because of the christmas tree?:jester:

SteelTown
Dec 3, 2006, 6:58 PM
No there's a pole on top of that tower so during Christmas they decorate it by throwing some Christmas lights around it to make it look like a gaint Christmas tree. That constant flashing red light at the top of the pole is the star of the Christmas tree lol.

Tone
Dec 3, 2006, 6:59 PM
(just kidding)nice Christmas look for sure

MolsonExport
Dec 4, 2006, 7:10 PM
very interesting, with surprising findings.

DC83
Dec 4, 2006, 8:09 PM
winnipeg has a crazy amount of suburban commie blocks....i only recently came to the realization that not every city does....i always just thought it was normal.

http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3673/apjn3.jpg


Hey. Stoney Creek (suburb of Hamilton) is pretty much full of commie blocks too... take a look (pics by Flar)

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/DC_83/sc1.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/DC_83/sc2.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/DC_83/sc3.jpg

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b270/DC_83/sc4.jpg

trueviking
Dec 4, 2006, 8:50 PM
cool...that could easily be suburban winnipeg.

miketoronto
Dec 6, 2006, 5:54 AM
You guys ever worry all these Canadian high-rise condos/apartments will turn into nasty slums at one point?

I know here in Toronto there are a number of these old high-rises that are not very choice buildings to live in, and already kinda slummy.

Do you see this being a bigger problem as our cities age more?

Snashcan
Dec 6, 2006, 6:55 AM
You guys ever worry all these Canadian high-rise condos/apartments will turn into nasty slums at one point?

I know here in Toronto there are a number of these old high-rises that are not very choice buildings to live in, and already kinda slummy.

Do you see this being a bigger problem as our cities age more?

I actually heard a lecture today at my school from the former Head of Planning in Vancouver, Larry Beasley and he is basically travelling and lecturing to make sure this doesn't happen, was really interesting to see what he had done with Vancouver and why the downtown has become so liveable.

I would imagine these buildings will either be torn down or renovated.

I also see that Toronto number rising, especially with developments such as Cityplace.

DC83
Dec 6, 2006, 6:21 PM
You guys ever worry all these Canadian high-rise condos/apartments will turn into nasty slums at one point?

I know here in Toronto there are a number of these old high-rises that are not very choice buildings to live in, and already kinda slummy.

Do you see this being a bigger problem as our cities age more?


I think it depends on the area. All these High Rise Commie Blocks in Stoney Creek aren't all that ghetto.

There are a COUPLE that are ghetto (known as Jerome Crescent) mainly b/c it was packed with Yugoslavians during the exodus back in the late 90's. I think Stoney Creek has the highest concentration of Eastern Euro ppl in Canada or something like that (thanks to these commie blocks).

But the fact that Stoney Creek (mainly in the core) is PACKED with seniors, and more & more boomers, makes the other buildings nice as Seniors tend to care more about their living environment and have more disposable income that say refugees like those over in the Jerome Crescent area.

Mike K.
Dec 6, 2006, 7:51 PM
We'll start knocking down the old buildings, recycling whatever we can and building anew :)

IntotheWest
Dec 6, 2006, 8:18 PM
Landmark Place which is that skyscraper with the Christmas lights on the top of it is 43 storey. It's not a mixed used building it's completely a residential building.

http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=landmarkplace-hamilton-canada

Calgary is way down on that list (right now), but Arriva - currently under construction at about the 27th floor - will be one foot taller...according to Emporis.;)

miketoronto
Dec 6, 2006, 9:31 PM
Some of the commie's here in Toronto are really nice to. The ones near Yonge-Eglinton are very well kept and have middle class people.

But in the inner suburbs you can tell that a large number of these apartment towers have seen much better days and are just housing the down and out of Toronto. Once middle class buildings are now full of drugs, etc.

So I wonder what will be done with these buildings, because its a shame that whole blocks of these buildings are all in decay.

Doady
Dec 6, 2006, 10:03 PM
There are a COUPLE that are ghetto (known as Jerome Crescent)

Are you serious? My uncle lives there, and he's never complained about it.

Bad Grizzly
Dec 6, 2006, 10:22 PM
i bet most cities in the country will have their number increase over the next few years....seems to be a trend.

winnipeg will likely move up between half and one percent in the next year, as there are more than 15 buildings (most between 7-10 storeys) either under construction or scheduled for a spring start.

Agreed. This is a good trend for the country to have.

Calgary's numbers will move up, but unfortunately the percentage probably won't. With respect to new buildings over 5 storeys, we have several thousand units planned or u/c. I believe the number is around 10,000, with almost all in the core. This is a good sign, but suburban single family housing is still going strong as well.

Surrealplaces
Dec 6, 2006, 10:56 PM
Would've thought Hfx would be higher, but I guess 6% isn't too shabby. Still higher than Calgary or Edmonton...

Btw, I'm not sure how accurate this is, since the population numbers (and potentially the percentages) are pretty old.

These numbers are from 2001, I can tell by the total number of dwellings, for Calgary, they are using 2001 numbers.

Since 2001, Calgary has added at least 3,000 dwellings (maybe more) in buildings that are over 5 storeys. It will be interesting to see where Calgary comes in today, and where they will in 5 years.
Of course Calgary has also added over 50,000 dwellings of all types since then, but at least the percentage will be going.

osmo
Dec 9, 2006, 9:52 AM
it dosnt surprise me regina is last my city has probley 2 building in its downtown core that have units in it k maybe 3.. its a new focus in out city to get ppl living downtown so hopefully the number rises



Forums Directory