PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Empty Nesters Planning a New Life in the City



Jularc
Dec 23, 2006, 6:58 AM
Planning a New Life in the City


By VIVIAN S. TOY
December 24, 2006

WHEN developers talk about who will buy all the high-end condominiums that they are building or planning to build in Manhattan, empty nesters invariably make the list.

And since the oldest baby boomers turned 60 this year, more and more of them are becoming empty nesters, in many cases with more disposable income than their parents had before them.

But not all of the baby boomers being drawn to New York City are wealthy retirees seeking aeries on Central Park. The city is also luring middle-class suburbanites on the lookout for houses and condos in Brooklyn and Queens. Not yet of retirement age, but with children grown up, they see the city as the place where they want to grow old, and they are making the move as part of a future retirement plan.

They are wooed not only by the city’s cultural attractions, but also by lower property taxes, better public transportation, a highly accessible health care system and the chance to be closer to city-dwelling children.


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/22/realestate/24cov650.2.jpg
Lou and Susan Greer with their dog Cagney in the backyard of their Campbell Hall, N.Y. home.


Louis and Susan Greer are empty nesters who have decided to pack up their five-bedroom house on a six-acre spread in Campbell Hall, N.Y., in Orange County, and move to Brooklyn. They are seeking either a one-family house for under $600,000, or a two-family for under $800,000.

Mr. Greer’s 2-hour-and-15-minute “commute from Hades” to his job in Lower Manhattan was one factor, but he said it was rising property taxes that finally persuaded him and his wife to start their Brooklyn house hunt. “That was the nail in the coffin,” he said, “because we don’t have children at home anymore, and most of the taxes go to schools.”

William H. Frey, a demographer with the Brookings Institution in Washington, said people like the Greers are at the leading edge of a baby boomer trend of “young seniors” with grown children. (Baby boomers are generally defined as people born in 1946 through 1964.)

“Especially as they reach early retirement, as in ages 50 to 55,” Mr. Frey said, “baby boomers will be testing out areas like New York for the longer term.”

According to a report issued by Mr. Frey with the Mortgage Bankers Association in Washington last month, the baby boomers who do not age in place or, like previous generations, move to sunnier climes, will be lured into big cities.

“You can’t really compare baby boomers with previous generations,” Mr. Frey said, “because boomers are forever young. They also have education levels and cultural interests that would suggest they might be more likely to find cities attractive.”

The number of older residents moving into New York and other cities is still smaller than the number who move out to the suburbs or to places like Florida and Arizona, but demographers, economists and gerontologists say that “in migration” numbers are sure to grow as baby boomers age.

Ken Dychtwald, a gerontologist and founder of Age Wave, a consulting firm that focuses on baby boomers’ retirement, described them as generally wanting more out of the experience than the typical resort lifestyle associated with golf courses and recreation rooms. As a result, he said, boomers will probably move in increasing numbers to cities and college towns.

“Life that is nothing but leisure is not appealing to them,” he said. “They’re dreaming of action. They want to be around bookstores and coffee shops and art galleries, and they will be less about showing up at senior centers and more about taking classes at N.Y.U. or finding a way to the Cream reunion at Madison Square Garden,” which he noted was sold out for three nights straight last year.


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/24/realestate/24cov600.1.jpg
SICK OF COMMUTING Louis and Susan Greer are leaving Campbell Hall, N.Y., for Brooklyn, and have seen
more than 50 houses, many in Bay Ridge, above.


The Greers, who have three grown children, started their search for a house in the city in May and have already seen more than 50 houses, mostly in Bay Ridge and Dyker Heights. They chose Brooklyn because they lived in Dyker Heights until three years ago and Mr. Greer’s mother still lives in the Bensonhurst house where he grew up.

They originally moved out of the borough because they were fed up with the rumbling and rattling of trucks — their house was on a favored detour off of the Belt Parkway. They love having a huge garden in Orange County, but deer have eaten everything they have planted. Besides, they said, they never have enough time to enjoy the outdoors.

Mrs. Greer admits that she has been extremely particular in their Brooklyn hunt. “You can ask my husband — I can find something wrong with any house,” she said. To which Mr. Greer responded with a nod, “You can quote that.”

But she is unapologetic — because, she said, “when I move this time, I want it to be the last time.” They are still years away from retirement — Mr. Greer is 55 and Mrs. Greer 45 — but they nonetheless want their next home to be the place they retire to.

“We think that New York City is a great place to be if you’re an older person,” Mr. Greer said.

Mrs. Greer said they had already resigned themselves to having a smaller kitchen and even forgoing a garage, as long as they found a house with a decent-sized backyard.

“We want to be able to go for walks in parks, be near the express bus and the subway, and be able to walk to restaurants,” Mr. Greer said, adding: “It’s beautiful out where we are now. The air is great and we can see the mountains, but there’s nowhere to go and nobody to do it with.”

Brokers across the city who have worked with empty nesters moving in from the suburbs say that while retirees may move lock, stock and barrel to be near their grown children and grandchildren, younger boomers may initially use the apartments they buy as pieds-à-terre.

Alan Nickman, an executive vice president at Bellmarc Realty, said he had helped many empty nesters buy apartments in the city. “These are people who have done reasonably well, but they don’t have to be gazillionaires,” he said. “They can spend $500,000 to $600,000 for a studio or a one-bedroom before they’re fully retired, but the majority of them are thinking about making this a permanent place when they finally do retire.”

For baby boomers moving from other parts of the country, or from suburban areas where home prices have not reached the dizzying heights that they have in Manhattan, moving to the city can be a financial stretch.


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/22/realestate/24cov650.3.jpg
Pat and Manny Fuchs, Midwesterners who retired early and moved to Manhattan, find it “like Chicago on steroids.”


Pat and Manny Fuchs knew when they decided to leave Rochester Hills, Mich., last year that their real estate dollars wouldn’t go as far in New York City. They sold their 2,400-square-foot Michigan home for about $325,000 and paid about twice as much for less than half the space in Lincoln Towers, near Lincoln Center.

“Rochester Hills was a nice, comfortable middle-income area,” Mr. Fuchs said. “But we knew we were in for a price shock, so we factored it in.”

He and his wife are retired and in their 50s. They are originally from the Chicago area, but chose New York because, Mrs. Fuchs said, it “has more of all the good things that we love about Chicago — it’s like Chicago on steroids.” They love being within walking distance of Broadway shows and museums. “In some ways,” Mr. Fuchs said, “it was very liberating to get rid of the cars and to downsize.”

Joe and Debbie Karp are another active couple in their 50s who see themselves someday retiring to New York City. The Karps are born-and-bred New Yorkers who moved to Florida in the 1970s and now live in Palm Beach. With their two sons nearly out of college, they decided last fall to buy a one-bedroom apartment near Lincoln Center.

They plan to start by spending about 12 weeks a year in the city, but their eventual goal is to spend only their winters in Florida. “We see what happens to people in the suburbs,” said Debbie Karp, who is 55. “When you lose your car, you become a prisoner. If and when we retire in an official sense, I would want to do it in New York.”

Mr. Karp, who turns 60 next month and practices elder law, agrees. “Although all of my clients are moving to Florida from New York,” he said, “I’m going to be the Floridian moving to Manhattan.”


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/22/realestate/24cov650.5.jpg
Shelley Morris, right, whose house in Bedford, N.Y., has become a lot quieter with her daughter in college. She has
been looking at Manhattan apartments like this one on East 30th Street.


Shelley Morris and her husband, Seth, have just started the process of reversing the typical migration from city to suburb. They are still debating whether to give up their suburban lives in Bedford, N.Y., and get a large two-bedroom apartment in the city, or to get a smaller apartment and still keep a country house for weekend use.

Either way, they’re ready for a big change, because their house has become very quiet since their daughter graduated from college and moved into the city.

“It just crept up on me that I was living in a community with a lot of young families and fewer and fewer empty nesters my age,” said Ms. Morris, who is 49. “And I worry that if you’re in an isolated place, you can become reclusive and that’s not really a good thing, especially as you get older.”

Others are making the switch more gradually. In Kew Gardens, Queens, for instance, many of the Long Island homeowners who have considered moving into the Park Lane Tower, a new condominium, have been reluctant to downsize so significantly from their large suburban homes, said Aroza Sanjana, the broker for the building.

“At the end of the day,” she said, “no matter how many closets we have, it can’t compare to the space they have in the suburbs.” Instead, many have bought apartments for their grown children but are keeping the apartments in their own names. “The parents are very picky about it because it’s not just for their child,” she said. “They envision moving into it themselves eventually.”

Vincent Koo, owner of Exit Kingdom Realty in Forest Hills, said that his office had worked with many Long Islanders looking to downsize and move to Queens. “We see a lot of people who want to cut down on the commute,” he said, “and property taxes are a big issue for them.”

Gary Englehardt, an economist at Syracuse University who has studied housing trends among baby boomers, foresees “a lot of competition for suburbanite baby boomers” among developers. Even though cities like New York may attract many of them, he said, builders are working hard to create retirement communities to keep them in the suburbs.

Mr. Dychtwald of Age Wave said cities might have to do some retrofitting to accommodate an aging population better. “Cities are really geared for people in their early 20s,” he said. To make things easier for people with weakening vision and slower gaits, he suggested, restaurants might consider better lighting, city officials might want to lengthen the time it takes for a traffic light to change.

“We’re not talking about a new alien form of baby boomer,” he said, “just older people who will have more time and probably more money to spend who are looking to take in all that the city has to offer.”


http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/24/realestate/24cov50.4.jpg
GREAT AT ANY AGE Judy and Jay Greenfield, retirees who moved to the city from Mamaroneck, N.Y., love being
nearer their children’s families.


But Judy and Jay Greenfield, who moved to the Upper East Side from Mamaroneck, in Westchester, last summer to be closer to their children and grandchildren, said they had found the city perfectly suited for a couple in their early 70s.

“When you reach our age,” Mr. Greenfield said, “everything has a reduced price. You get these big reductions in transportation and in the subway, even pregnant women offer me their seats. But I don’t take them.”


Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

Jularc
Dec 23, 2006, 8:09 AM
Is this happening in your city aswell? Do you know anybody (Like family) that are planning to make a move into the city?

My Parents are seriously thinking of buying a place in Jackson Heights in Queens to retired there. They are in the 60's and this year will finally sell their three bedroom/2 garage home, their car and their restaurant business in Philadelphia and then buy an apartment in Queens.

I am actually surprice they are choosing NYC over Florida. :cool: Must be cause they want to be closer to me. :)

miketoronto
Dec 23, 2006, 6:41 PM
I believe the tax thing. The inner cities in the USA have amazing cheap tax rates compared to the suburbs.

I say moving into the city makes total sense even with kids, once they hit the teen years. Because then your kids are always in the city anyway :)

Nice to see the older people moving into the city and enjoy the life the city offers.

No doubt it will keep them probably more alive and with it, then living out in the middle of no where.

J. Will
Dec 23, 2006, 7:00 PM
My parents want to move from their huge suburban home to downtown Toronto in a couple years.

ctman987
Dec 23, 2006, 7:01 PM
Ive tried convincing but my parents want to stay put where they are. They are just outside of Hartford in Wethersfield in a single family home and want to stay there. They dont want to move to downtown Hartford or into NYC (where I go to school).

But there are some people who are moving back into Hartford for example.

An article just appeared in the Hartford Courant about a couple who decided to move to Hartford from the Detroit suburbs. These individuals are not retired but looked at all of the classy and appealing Hartford suburbs from Glastonbury to Avon and West Hartford and finally settled on a condo in the city. The next nice thing is that they both work and live in downtown Hartford...at companies still located in the city.

The article can be found here.....
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-ctrealestate1221.artdec21,0,5775438.story

There have also been stories before about retired individuals or new empty nesters who have sold their large suburban homes to move into the city.

seaskyfan
Dec 23, 2006, 9:26 PM
I've heard that a lot of the folks buying condos in Downtown Seattle are empty nesters from both the burbs and single family neighborhoods inside the City.

My folks live in suburban Boston and I'd love to see them get a place in Cambridge.

passdoubt
Dec 24, 2006, 5:55 AM
My parents live in Northeast Philly, and they want to move out to the burbs, not into Center City.

Attrill
Dec 24, 2006, 6:18 AM
I think this article overstates the case a bit, but makes a lot of good points.

My parents are from the pre-boomer generation and retired to Arizona, but chose Tucson over retirement communities so they can walk to coffee shops, bookstores, and restaurants. A good night out for them is going to a lecture at the U of A about astronomy or petroglyphs, getting dinner, and then getting some coffee or drinks afterwards. They don't want to drive at all, and where they live they don't have to. I can definitely see a significant portion of boomers making the same choice when they retire.

I work with a lot of people in Chicago whose parents have bought a condo for them to live in - but they are just caretakers. Their parents have bought the place as an investment or a retirement house.

bryson662001
Dec 24, 2006, 7:02 AM
A large proportion of the population/condo boom in downtown Philly is fueled by empty nesters from the suburbs.....of course. Isn't that the case everywhere?

roner
Dec 24, 2006, 7:52 AM
:previous: to a certain extent yes.

DruidCity
Dec 24, 2006, 3:57 PM
The inner cities in the USA have amazing cheap tax rates compared to the suburbs.


I guess it's different everywhere. Here (admittedly a small city, where the dynamics are different from major urban areas) , people move away from the city limits for lower property taxes.

Zerton
Dec 25, 2006, 5:31 PM
So the generation that fled the city is returning? Or are these that generations children?

Either way I want that college girls apartment.

SuburbanNation
Dec 26, 2006, 12:01 AM
So the generation that fled the city is returning? Or are these that generations children?

Either way I want that college girls apartment.

both, i would imagine. it depends on the city/ family. some people left immediately before/after ww2 (or earlier), or during the turbulent 1960s, the collapsing 70s or stagnant 80s and early 90s or the gentrification of the late 90s, early/mid 2000s. some cities peaked in population later than others. kansas city, for instance, (of course counting annexation), peaked a generation later than st. louis. in addition, black flight is quite apparent in many cities, so you still have hundreds/thousands of people leaving the central cities depending on the race and or socio-economic status.

EastSideHBG
Dec 26, 2006, 3:25 PM
I believe the tax thing. The inner cities in the USA have amazing cheap tax rates compared to the suburbs.

Not true at all.

Steely Dan
Dec 26, 2006, 4:12 PM
Is this happening in your city aswell? Do you know anybody (Like family) that are planning to make a move into the city?


yep. my folks made the move to the city last year, and they didn't head for a downtown highrise luxury condo either. they sold the old family home up in suburban wilmette and settled into a nice condo in a vintage chicago 3-flat in rogers park, on chicago's far northside. their move from wilmette down to rogers park was only a distance of ~6 miles, but the two areas are worlds away from each other in just about every respect.

miketoronto
Dec 26, 2006, 4:23 PM
Is this happening in your city aswell? Do you know anybody (Like family) that are planning to make a move into the city?


I can't say I see this happening much with my family. My sisters moved into the city. But aside from that my entire family extended family keeps moving further and further out(basically leaving the older suburbs for newer ones). My parents are one of the few in my family who do value being close to the city, and my parents have no intention of moving out of our house(which is inner suburban).

My mom would love to live in a inner city neighbourhood. But there is no way my parents would move at this point. And ontop of that my parents don't like condos. So they are content in our home, which is still close to pubic transit, close to downtown, etc. So its not bad.

But in my family it has gone in reverse. My aunts and uncles have raised kids in small inner city or inner suburban homes. Once all the kids moved out, and my aunts and uncles were older, then they moved to the outter burbs and bought huge monster 3000 sq foot houses. And they don't seem to want to downsize, eventhough one will be pushing 80 in a couple years :) And the trend has continued. Two of my dads cousins have done the same thing, getting monster homes after the kids are grown up and leaving.

So forget condos for the Binetti family :)

passdoubt
Dec 26, 2006, 9:17 PM
Not true at all.
Philly's property taxes are lower than most of its inner ring suburbs on the PA side, and astronomically lower than property taxes in the New Jersey suburbs.

(Wage taxes are another issue of course.)

miketoronto
Dec 26, 2006, 9:34 PM
Philly's property taxes are lower than most of its inner ring suburbs on the PA side, and astronomically lower than property taxes in the New Jersey suburbs.

(Wage taxes are another issue of course.)

You can bet that. My cousin in Philly went from paying $900 bucks a year in taxes when she lived in city limits, to over $6000 a year in taxes when she moved to a smiliar sized house in the Philly burbs. And she gets less service out in the burbs, like no more 24 hour transit service, etc.

I have noticed that in alot of American cities. Our cousins in NYC pay less taxes then our cousins that live in suburban NYC on Long Island.

Same in Toronto. Residents in the outter suburbs pay higher tax rates then people in inner Toronto.

EastSideHBG
Dec 28, 2006, 3:05 AM
Philly's property taxes are lower than most of its inner ring suburbs on the PA side, and astronomically lower than property taxes in the New Jersey suburbs.

(Wage taxes are another issue of course.)
Well in Harrisburg it is the exact opposite, and the city is almost double the suburbs'. I think Pittsburgh's property taxes are pretty rough too.

Anyway, the point is mike is not correct in his statement.

brian_b
Dec 29, 2006, 7:12 PM
In the Chicago region property taxes in the city are lower than property taxes in the burbs.

I don't think that's a big reason why empty nesters would move though.

There's a lot of stuff to do in the city, and I notice that a lot of older people take the bus everywhere. It seems to me that a person can stay independent much longer in a big city than in the suburbs. I know that independence is a huge issue to many older people.

You could also look at it from the income perspective. In the suburbs you would need to have a car (and be able to drive it - but lets just assume you can drive it). Your insurance is probably $100 a month, gas is probably $150 a month. Parking is probably free (lets assume you have a house) and lets assume you own the car outright. Figure on $75 a month in maintenance and other expenses and you have $325 a month just to get yourself around. A monthly transit pass in Chicago is only $35 for people over 65 years old. To a retired person on a fixed income, that $295 a month savings can be huge.