PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Murky future for transport authority (translink)



SpongeG
Jan 4, 2007, 12:29 AM
http://www.surreyleader.com/



Exactly who will control regional transportation, how much money they’ll have to spend, and whose pockets it will come from are the big unanswered questions as TransLink enters 2007.

The future of the transportation authority’s power structure will remain cloudy while a governance review panel finalizes its recommendations and transportation minister Kevin Falcon then unveils the long-awaited overhaul.

As a result, major efforts to plan for 2008 and beyond will be on hold until later in the new year.

But meanwhile, there’s no shortage of demands and pressures on the system.

The bus and SkyTrain system is already heavily congested, yet ridership is projected to grow another 4.7 per cent in 2007.

While TransLink has 373 new buses on order, only a quarter are earmarked to expand the fleet, with most replacing old buses due to be taken off the road.

Nearly three dozen more SkyTrain cars are also on order and 56 new HandyDART mini-buses are due to arrive.

TransLink claims the deliveries will bring its total fleet size to 1,400 – the target set at the beginning of the current 2005-2007 plan.

But chair Malcolm Brodie admits TransLink will struggle to keep pace with demand.

“The simple fact is that we need more buses in the region,” he said.

Although work continues on the Canada Line and the Golden Ears Bridge, other key initiatives that were to be under way by now remain up in the air.

Foremost among them, Brodie says, is TransLink’s plan to build the Evergreen light rail line from the current Millennium SkyTrain line through Port Moody to Coquitlam.

“It is a critical missing piece of our rapid transit network,” Brodie said.

But the price tag has grown to nearly $1 billion – $400 million more than what has so far been committed by TransLink and the province.

TransLink faces demands to make the Pattullo Bridge safer and eventually replace the aging span.

Planners have also tabled a long list of major projects that may have to be axed from the next 10-year plan without improved long-term funding.

In addition to the Evergreen line, they include: a Surrey bus rapid transit system along 104 Avenue and King George Highway, a third SeaBus, more buses and SkyTrain cars, more road and bridge work, and a move to smart card fare collection.

And if those demands were not enough, pressure is growing from Vancouver to extend rapid transit west along congested Broadway and from cities south of the Fraser River for a major leap forward in transit service there.

College students also want the same cheap transit U-Passes their university colleagues get, but that hinges on further increases in bus system capacity.

Where will the money come from?

Every past effort to raise new money locally has generated major opposition, particularly the failed attempt to add a vehicle levy and the recent hotly fought imposition of a business parking stall tax.

TransLink plans call for further ratcheting up of transit fares in its next three-year plan, and the collection of more money from property taxes.

But officials warn much more is required to carry out needed expansion.

Brodie hopes Ottawa and Victoria will step up and enshrine a new permanent source of funding, likely through a bigger share of fuel taxes already collected from local motorists.

One possible source of future cash is regional tolling or road pricing – which transportation experts and a growing number of local politicians agree is ultimately the best way to control congestion.

Brodie said the decision on how to remake TransLink’s board and its funding sources will be “pivotal” to the future direction.

One thing is clear.

As the GVRD’s population grows rapidly to an estimated 3.1 million by 2021, demand for major transportation infrastructure and services will only continue to increase.

SpongeG
Jan 4, 2007, 12:30 AM
Major revamp doubted

Transportation minister Kevin Falcon won’t fire all the locally elected mayors and councillors who serve on TransLink’s board, one political analyst predicts.

David Schreck says appointing all unelected directors from business or technical backgrounds – similar to health authorities or the Vancouver airport authority – would be untenable.

“It would be true taxation without representation if the government overturns at least indirectly elected local politicians and replaces them with business leaders,” he said.

Schreck said that would set up Victoria to take “enormous criticism” and to directly wear the transportation woes of the region in the future.

“You can’t spend that much tax money and have it spent by unelected people,” he said.

Still, he concedes, there is some precedent.

The provincial government in recent years wrested control of school property taxes away from elected school boards, leaving trustees only in charge of spending the money.

Victoria could take total control of TransLink’s funding sources and leave a board that would be “little more than an advisory body.”

Local city councils around the region almost universally oppose a move to an all-appointed system.

A report by the Sustainable Communities Initiative (SCI), comprised of labour unions, suggests a hybrid is more likely, with a blend of appointed and elected directors.

It predicts Victoria’s aim is to exert more control over TransLink, reduce political opposition and speed projects like Gateway and port expansion, while forcing major works to be done as private-public partnerships.

One solution that might make an appointed board more palatable, says SCI, would be to eliminate the property taxes that go to TransLink, but notes that would leave a $235-million budget hole to be filled. Higher fuel taxes or road tolls would be the most likely replacements, and the report says it’s not clear Victoria would gain politically.

One other scenario, says SCI’s analysis, is to expand TransLink’s boundaries east into the Fraser Valley.

That would bring in much more money in property tax, parking tax and fuel tax from residents of places like Abbotsford and Mission, although more service would also have to be provided.

A move east would inject reps from more conservative areas, diluting the influence of Burnaby and Vancouver.

“This change in political orientation may well suit the province’s desired outcome,” the report says.

Schreck says Falcon must decide what he wants most – to be able to control TransLink or to criticize what it does.

Taking control means taking responsibility, and Schreck argues it would make more sense to leave TransLink’s elected board to take the heat for transit and transport troubles.

That’s what the NDP government that created TransLink concluded, he said. It set aside three seats for government on the board but the NDP MLAs quit and no government since has filled the seats.

“They’d be prudent to stick with the devil they know,” he said.

The problem for Falcon, Schreck said, is that launching the review created the expectation something will happen.

“They’re between a rock and a hard place,” Schreck said. “If they don’t change it they have to eat their words and live with this entity.”

Plans for 2007

n Another $55 million for major and local road work

n $20.5 million to upgrade and rehabilitate the Knight and Pattullo Bridges.

n Continue construction of the $800 million Golden Ears Bridge

n Continue work on the $1.9 billion Canada Line, including a tunnel under False Creek, cut-and-cover construction on Cambie St. and elevated guideways in Richmond.

n $5 million for more widening of Fraser Highway in Surrey

n Finish 204 St. railway overpass in Langley

n Build Coast Meridian Overpass in Port Coquitlam

n Seek partners to build Murray/Clarke connector and North Fraser Perimeter Road

n Increase bus service hours by 4.8 per cent and expand fleet by 75 conventional buses as well as 14 community shuttles. Another 284 vehicles on order are to replace older ones.

n Increase HandyDART service hours by 5.9 per cent.

http://www.surreyleader.com/

tokie
Jan 4, 2007, 9:07 PM
I think it would be better for Translink to be run like YVR (unelected businesspeople making the decisions). When you have all the mayors voting on a project, they all take into account what their city gets out of it. They only want what is good for their city and what brings more money there. A YVR-like way of running things would probably be more efficient and toss politics out the window.

CC420
Jan 5, 2007, 1:49 AM
:previous: Your idea doesnt work because like the above article stated, unelected officials should not and will not be put in a position to spend the amount of money translink gets. I think when we vote for our mayors', we should also vote for translink chairs. They would be accountable but also seperate from making decisions regarding their city and rather the good of the region.

queetz@home
Jan 6, 2007, 11:46 PM
:previous: Yeah, no kidding, eh? The only thing I see wrong with the current structure now is lack of funding, something which that bastard Kevin Falcon has help create at the first place.

smasher000
Jan 7, 2007, 12:37 AM
That's terrific that congestion is getting worse! I've always wanted more rapid transit in Vancouver..

twoNeurons
Jan 7, 2007, 2:36 AM
/rant on/
The whole thing is retarded... The province wants Translink to be culpable but refuses to use its three seats to influence any change. If Falcon actually wanted it to work (instead of his real motive, which seems rather self-serving... take control away from the city centre and give it to the South of Fraser, *sarcasm on * which is where co-incidentally, he lives *sarcasm off*) he would appoint three privincial seats in Translink.

But why doesn't he?

Easy, so he can continue to sabotage Translink without taking any heat... and when Translink fails (due to his sabotage) Translink bears the full brunt... if he appointed Provincial officials the province would bear some culpability

On the other hand, were there 3 provincially appointed members, he might actually have to HELP Translink because his name or rather, the Provincial government's name with him as the Transportation minister, would be at stake.

/rant off/

SFUVancouver
Jan 19, 2007, 9:09 AM
You've hit the nail on the head: The Province already has three potential seats on the Translink Board, the same as Vancouver, that would allow the Province to wield considerable power and also see from the inside the chronic, painfully obvious funding problems with the transit and transport system in this region. But instead the Province, under both the NDP and the Liberals has never once exercised their right to the seats. I swear to god they have probably had three physically empty seats at each one of their board meetings for going on eight years now.

What Translink, or whatever else they may rebrand it as (at huge, stupidly unnecessary cost) needs is a massive sustained increase in funding for capital projects. I also think the municipalities should have the power to introduce and partially fund their own transit projects, such as Vancouver's planned downtown streetcar, and Translink would be obligated to integrate it into the regional fare system. We're stuck in traffic, packed together on SkyTrain, waiting a quarter of an hour for SeaBus, and getting passed up by full buses. Something has to be done and soon.

Has anyone fully appreciated how much of a disaster the Olympic transportation plan will be if it is going to rely on public transit to move visitors to the venues? The VANOC Transport plan is more than a year overdue and I would put my own money on the line that it is the public transit component that is the problem. The sustainability initiatives that won us the games are being compromised one step at a time and there is no need. How can the Province and Feds claim to be running huge surpluses when there is a critical need for transit funding? We could have huge municipal budget surpluses too if we canned the fire department. We need it. It will be expensive, yes, but transit is an economic multiplier. Transit does not make any money by itself, nor do roads, schools, water pipes, the police and firemen, but the activities they enable ads up to billions and billions and is non-negotiable.

Why Don’t They Get It?

cornholio
Jan 25, 2007, 9:35 AM
Two choices.

1- Amalgamate
2- Have a seperate GVRD vote during the municipal elections for translink, GVRD, etc. officials, where these people will represent all GVRD residents and will not be involved politicly in any municipality at the same time.



Forums Directory