PDA

View Full Version : NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361

NYguy
Mar 10, 2010, 5:10 PM
Here's a cam shot from a couple of minutes ago:

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122638202/original.jpg

NYguy
Mar 10, 2010, 5:21 PM
http://www.observer.com/2010/daily-transom/port-authority-punts-vornado-brookfield-one-wtc

Port Authority Punts Vornado, Brookfield From One WTC

By Eliot Brown
March 10, 2010

The race to sell off a portion of the Freedom Tower - officially, One World Trade Center - has kicked into a new gear.

The Port Authority, the New York-New Jersey-controlled bureaucracy that is developing the tower and shopping around an ownership stake, late last month dropped two developers vying to take a piece of the 1,776-foot tower, according to people familiar with the process. Out of the running: Steven Roth's Vornado Realty Trust and Brookfield Properties, run by CEO Ric Clark.

That leaves four developers standing: Mort Zuckerman, Douglas Durst, Stephen Ross and Gerald Hines, who respectively control Boston Properties, the Durst Organization, the Related Companies and Texas-based Hines Interests.

The skyscraper is on the rise in Lower Manhattan, with a hulk of steel currently more than 200 feet above ground. With symbolism and security guiding its design and purpose, it is surely a money drain for the Port Authority, at least in the short run, and costs more than $3 billion, twice the price of the 2,716-foot Burj Khalifa in Dubai, where labor is cheaper.

Thus the agency, searching for the developers with brokerage Cushman Wakefield, wants to bring in some money-it's looking for an investment of about $100 million to take a piece of equity-and to install a well-known developer as the public face of the tower.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 10, 2010, 5:38 PM
Wow, great image. Do those tracks bring new steel on site??

37TimPPG
Mar 10, 2010, 7:16 PM
Wow, great image. Do those tracks bring new steel on site??

They sure do!

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 10, 2010, 9:05 PM
Amazing! Can´t wait to see it rising taller and taller and taller, ´til its getting taller than all others in the city and country!:cheers:

JZeig1
Mar 10, 2010, 10:22 PM
asterix611 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28722563@N05/page2/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2758/4420948407_e3f7a33969_b.jpg

I don't know whether it's the lense your using or if it's the light, but these photos realy show the angle on the base of the tower. I mean it's really prominent.

colemonkee
Mar 11, 2010, 5:35 AM
^ It's the focal length of the lens. A wide-angle lens like that will exaggerate certain angles that move toward or away from the camera. So the angles of the corners are not that pronounced as they look there. You can tell by the angles on the WFC tower behind it, which obviously doesn't have any acute angles.

hunser
Mar 11, 2010, 2:42 PM
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4043/4423228507_6a41694b66_b.jpg
Tonyatnn (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonyatnn/)

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/7590/44239949880c426de406b.jpg
korea2002

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 11, 2010, 2:47 PM
WOW, the blue light on 7WTC´s base looks lovely! Will 1 WTC have this too?

NYguy
Mar 11, 2010, 3:23 PM
Not likely, although Silverstein has previously said his other towers would be blue...

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66753715/original.jpg

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 11, 2010, 3:30 PM
The base of 1 WTC looks unrealistic on this rendering.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 11, 2010, 3:37 PM
A shot from Wikopedia, taken a few days ago: (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/1WTC_Construction_march10.jpeg)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/1WTC_Construction_march10.jpeg

FerrariEnzo
Mar 11, 2010, 5:39 PM
The base of 1 WTC looks unrealistic on this rendering.

Agreed, though we are speaking about renderings here which as someone pointed out, are works of art in of them selves.

Vesey
Mar 11, 2010, 8:50 PM
OLD BASE

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/34056536/large.jpg

Was just reading through some older pages and saw this. Awesome! A shame it had to change, haha. Still no sense dwelling on the past, all the progress is looking great.

steveve
Mar 11, 2010, 10:20 PM
WOW, the blue light on 7WTC´s base looks lovely!

I totally agree! It looks really really cool!

Excellent progress on the tower and the memorials.. they look awesome! :D

Can't wait to see the site in a few years when all the grass/trees are planted and when the memorials are fully functional (and of course, not to mention 1WTC itself! :banana: )

Zensteeldude
Mar 11, 2010, 11:08 PM
is it me or the steel beems of tower 1 look bigger and more massive then the steel beems of tower 4.

It's not you, they are. Tower One well be twice as tall as Four.:)

Lecom
Mar 12, 2010, 2:55 AM
Here's a cam shot from a couple of minutes ago:

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122638202/original.jpg

Those trucks and people put in perspective how huge the structure, and the lower columns, really are.

NYguy
Mar 12, 2010, 4:29 AM
^ And we're just looking at the "feet" of the tower.


brian.house (http://www.flickr.com/photos/brianhouse/4425025621/sizes/o/)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4003/4425025621_23806e7f85_o.jpg


Some of the people working in and around the tower...
http://www.newsday.com/long-island/liers-working-at-ground-zero-in-2010-1.1806828

http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1801302.1268359242!/image/1369478323.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/1369478323.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806852.1268359281!/image/2503869707.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/2503869707.JPG__http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806847.1268359323!/image/1197329503.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/1197329503.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806849.1268359724!/image/3256859754.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/3256859754.JPG__http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806782.1268354942!/image/1727639443.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/1727639443.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806809.1268355557!/image/1019786363.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/1019786363.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806798.1268353639!/image/2730181825.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/2730181825.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806793.1268353612!/image/4132241211.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/4132241211.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806788.1268353603!/image/2793894391.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/2793894391.JPG


http://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1806785.1268353593!/image/2605950103.JPG_gen/derivatives/display_600/2605950103.JPG

Henkka
Mar 12, 2010, 8:38 AM
Those trucks and people put in perspective how huge the structure, and the lower columns, really are.

Yeah, never realised how massive WTC One is until I saw that picture. Can't wait to see it in person this Autumn.

Calgarian
Mar 12, 2010, 3:53 PM
Good to see this one starting to rise, looks like a massive building.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 4:03 PM
Good to see this one starting to rise, looks like a massive building.

Oh it is a very massive building!

Calgarian
Mar 12, 2010, 4:23 PM
How many square feet when it's done? this bad boy looks like it could be around 3 million.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 4:27 PM
How many square feet when it's done? this bad boy looks like it could be around 3 million.

2,600,000 sq ft (242,000 m2)

Calgarian
Mar 12, 2010, 4:31 PM
2,600,000 sq ft (242,000 m2)

That is a hell of a lot of space in a single building!

bkraig4life
Mar 12, 2010, 4:32 PM
New tower crane at south east side of 1wtc, is it for wtc memorial or 1wtc?

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 4:39 PM
GREAT! But I think it´s for the memorial.

I guess they will build 1 WTC with those two cranes. We will see in the next days.

You Need A Thneed
Mar 12, 2010, 4:41 PM
I'm enjoying watching this one go up, and comparing the similarities between it and The Bow (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131013) in Calgary.

Similarities:
Both will be cities tallest
Almost all steel construction (1WTC is getting a concrete core poured after the fact, the Bow is not)
Using the exact same Favco cranes.
Both have some gigantic peices of steel

They seem to be the two most photographed buildings in their specific forum sections.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 4:44 PM
I'm enjoying watching this one go up, and comparing the similarities between it and The Bow (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131013) in Calgary.

Similarities:
Both will be cities tallest
Almost all steel construction (1WTC is getting a concrete core poured after the fact, the Bow is not)
Using the exact same Favco cranes.
Both have some gigantic peices of steel

They seem to be the two most photographed buildings in their specific forum sections.


This one will be the tallest in the country, The Bow not. 1WTC will be tallest in the Americas and the tallest in the Western Himsiphere!:banana: :banana:

RockMont
Mar 12, 2010, 4:49 PM
I'm enjoying watching this one go up, and comparing the similarities between it and The Bow (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=131013) in Calgary.

Similarities:
Both will be cities tallest
Almost all steel construction (1WTC is getting a concrete core poured after the fact, the Bow is not)
Using the exact same Favco cranes.
Both have some gigantic peices of steel

They seem to be the two most photographed buildings in their specific forum sections.



I don't think that "Bow" in Calgary will equal this one. It is an interesting piece of art, in an architecural sense however.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 4:50 PM
New images on wtcprogress.com!!

RockMont
Mar 12, 2010, 4:52 PM
Awesome! I can seen now, that the thing is about ready to blast off.

RockMont
Mar 12, 2010, 5:02 PM
Yes Calgary is a very nice city. I spent some time there about 1983. Even then it was an attractive city to go to.

You Need A Thneed
Mar 12, 2010, 5:08 PM
2,600,000 sq ft (242,000 m2)

How much floor area did one of the old World Trade Centre Towers have? IIRC, it's significantly more.

Domamania
Mar 12, 2010, 5:24 PM
wow look at this video of the progress of the tower. its amazing its like being right there. check it out
http://www.panynj.gov/wtcprogress/video-gallery.html

Calgarian
Mar 12, 2010, 6:24 PM
The bow may only be half as tall, but it is still a massive building, just under 2 million sqft. Both buildings are going to be of the highest quality and both cities should be very happy with their new tallest once complete.

So what is the estimated completion date?

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 12, 2010, 6:28 PM
The bow may only be half as tall, but it is still a massive building, just under 2 million sqft. Both buildings are going to be of the highest quality and both cities should be very happy with their new tallest once complete.

So what is the estimated completion date?

For this one? Mid-2013

scalziand
Mar 12, 2010, 7:41 PM
How much floor area did one of the old World Trade Centre Towers have? IIRC, it's significantly more.

Each original World Trade Center Tower had 4msf.

Calgarian
Mar 12, 2010, 7:49 PM
For this one? Mid-2013

So after the world ends then? :rolleyes:

I look forward to visiting NYC in the future and seeing this beaut.

You Need A Thneed
Mar 12, 2010, 7:49 PM
Each original World Trade Center Tower had 4msf.

That's what I guessed. The reduce office floor count and the tapering sides really take away from the overall area. But, It sounds like NYC doesn't need a huge chunk of new office space.

Dac150
Mar 12, 2010, 7:59 PM
But, It sounds like NYC doesn't need a huge chunk of new office space.

Actually it’s quite the opposite, especially in Lower Manhattan.

CalibratedZeus
Mar 12, 2010, 8:32 PM
Well, with the wind I don't see them doing much more work today, or the next two days for that matter considering the forecast. Come on mother nature help us out here and cooperate!

NYguy
Mar 12, 2010, 11:29 PM
Yeah, it was windy, cold, and damp out today. But that was nice compared to what's forecast for the weekend.

MARCH 12, 2010

1.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685069/large.jpg

2.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685073/large.jpg

3.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685079/large.jpg

4.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685119/large.jpg

5.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685289/large.jpg

6.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685315/large.jpg

7.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685325/large.jpg

8.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685355/large.jpg

9.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685400/large.jpg

10.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685414/large.jpg

11.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685453/large.jpg

12.
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122685471/large.jpg



275Y1WNKgr0

Bucktown718
Mar 13, 2010, 12:06 AM
^^^ Amazing can't wait till first floor will be done, wonder how will it look like.
One quick question i heard that they don't work on the tower on Saturday's and Sunday's is that true?

Plokoon11
Mar 13, 2010, 1:29 AM
It looks like there doing two floors!

2-TOWERS
Mar 13, 2010, 5:33 AM
Well They Say A Floor A Week So It Seems Like They Are Doing 2 Floors At A Time So My Guess Is It Will Be 2 Weeks For The Double Floor.... Still Will Go Fast......i Will Be In The City In December So I Should See A Major Impact In The Skyline......

kenratboy
Mar 13, 2010, 5:38 AM
To paraphrase Sarah Palin:

'Build baby build!'

;)

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 13, 2010, 2:06 PM
Will they now install a new tower crane?

Zensteeldude
Mar 13, 2010, 5:29 PM
:previous: We should know the answer to that question in a month or so.

Great pics NYGuy.

I see that the "wind frame" design of the office floors allowed them to put up the next section of corner node on the SW . (The mechanical floors are a braced wind frame)

The perimeter steel resists almost all of the wind load and about half of the gravity load (the core takes the rest).

Domamania
Mar 13, 2010, 8:23 PM
one quick question why is the steel from the office floors are not red like the base floors of the tower?

Zensteeldude
Mar 13, 2010, 8:33 PM
The red paint is intumescent fire proofing, the unpainted steel well get spray on fire proofing ( basically a layer of cement sprayed onto the steel).

A BLANKET OF INSULATION
Intumescent coatings start turning to insulating foam at a temperature of 300°F - less than a hundred
degrees higher than boiling water. The heat sensitive ingredients in the smooth coating react and froth
up into a foam containing millions of tiny hollow cells. The expansion incredibly rapid. What was once
a smooth, decorative surface turns into a thick protective layer of insulation.



http://www.fireretardantsinc.com/fire_retardants101.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaVblCHQjVY

The core steel is unpainted because it well be encased in concrete.

NYguy
Mar 14, 2010, 12:31 AM
One quick question i heard that they don't work on the tower on Saturday's and Sunday's is that true?

I've seen them working weekends on some towers around town, (440 West 42nd is a recent example), but I haven't seen any weekend activity here.


I see that the "wind frame" design of the office floors allowed them to put up the next section of corner node on the SW .

I'm just waiting for that next section, the one we saw in your diagram. Then we will have arrived..:)

malec
Mar 14, 2010, 1:25 AM
I was in NYC 2 weeks ago and visited this area. Of course it was very sad thinking about what happened here and you could definitely feel something uneasy about everyone walking past, etc.

Am very glad this is now being built and look forward to the day this area goes beyond being a construction site.

:yes:

MadGnome
Mar 14, 2010, 4:47 PM
Would the change in fireproofing at this point be because of the steel going below a certain thickness? Or because it's office floors now instead of mechanical floors?

hunser
Mar 14, 2010, 8:17 PM
tallest1776
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/154/workwiththis.png
[/QUOTE]

uaarkson
Mar 14, 2010, 8:55 PM
I like how that guy basically just stole CULWULLA's work.

hunser
Mar 14, 2010, 9:14 PM
I like how that guy basically just stole CULWULLA's work.

indeed, he did. maybe culwulla needs better protection of the copyright for his diagrams. :rolleyes:

Muskavon
Mar 15, 2010, 12:12 AM
Looking over NYguy's photos, you can start to see the true angle change/transition between the base and the office floors. Even with just a few of steel members up.

MadGnome
Mar 15, 2010, 1:37 AM
The scale of the cranes in that diagram must be way off. Even Red Jr. is tall enough to put the next corner piece up.

Zensteeldude
Mar 15, 2010, 4:00 AM
Would the change in fireproofing at this point be because of the steel going below a certain thickness? Or because it's office floors now instead of mechanical floors?

It has to do with how much room there is for the insulation. Spray on fireproofing adds about 2 inches to the size of the beam/column. Intumescent paint adds about an 1/8th of an inch.

kenratboy
Mar 15, 2010, 4:51 AM
This is a very basic question - was this building designed with the metric or imperial system? Obviously we convert figures either way, but are the blue prints imperial or metric?

uaarkson
Mar 15, 2010, 4:57 AM
Judging by Zen's prints, it's all imperial.

Innsertnamehere
Mar 15, 2010, 2:11 PM
another thing is that its hieght is 1,776 feet, not metres, so i'm guessing its imperial.

MadGnome
Mar 15, 2010, 3:03 PM
another thing is that its hieght is 1,776 feet, not metres, so i'm guessing its imperial.

Too bad. 1776 meters would have been something to behold.

Domamania
Mar 15, 2010, 3:51 PM
Too bad. 1776 meters would have been something to behold.

imagine if it were 1776 meters tall it would be 5,328 feet high. that would have been a masssive building of epic porportions. thats like 3 freedom towers combined.

xnyr
Mar 15, 2010, 4:46 PM
one quick question why is the steel from the office floors are not red like the base floors of the tower?

Thanks for asking this question, as I've been wondering about this for months.


The red paint is intumescent fire proofing, the unpainted steel well get spray on fire proofing ( basically a layer of cement sprayed onto the steel).

A BLANKET OF INSULATION
Intumescent coatings start turning to insulating foam at a temperature of 300°F - less than a hundred
degrees higher than boiling water. The heat sensitive ingredients in the smooth coating react and froth
up into a foam containing millions of tiny hollow cells. The expansion incredibly rapid. What was once
a smooth, decorative surface turns into a thick protective layer of insulation.


And thanks Zensteeldude for your clear and thorough explanation.

So MY question is - if the fireproofing on the base is meant to be "a smooth decorative surface" , it will be visible behind the glass panels that will be attached to the facade. Is this correct?

If this is so, I have never seen it (the red steel) in any renders to date (except the drawing posted recently).

Thanks in advance.

NYguy
Mar 15, 2010, 5:25 PM
Jantine vH (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jf_jantine/4433118881/sizes/l/)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2688/4433118881_debd758b28_b.jpg

Deuling towers..

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2782/4433117853_c36b29bf12_b.jpg

Dac150
Mar 15, 2010, 5:32 PM
When trying to get a grasp of the size of the building in comparison to its neighbors, the key is the angle you are looking at it from. From the angle above, it’s clear that it fits in just fine.

Zensteeldude
Mar 15, 2010, 9:14 PM
This is a very basic question - was this building designed with the metric or imperial system? Obviously we convert figures either way, but are the blue prints imperial or metric?

As uaarkson stated all the prints are in imperial units. Even the German elevator manufacturer has to submit prints in imperial units.

Thanks for asking this question, as I've been wondering about this for months.




And thanks Zensteeldude for your clear and thorough explanation.

So MY question is - if the fireproofing on the base is meant to be "a smooth decorative surface" , it will be visible behind the glass panels that will be attached to the facade. Is this correct?

If this is so, I have never seen it (the red steel) in any renders to date (except the drawing posted recently).

Thanks in advance.

Intumescent paint is almost always exposed to view on the finished product, but not in this case. It was used on the mechanical floors to allow the column covers to be as close fitting as possible.

Column covers are just sheet metal wrappers.

When trying to get a grasp of the size of the building in comparison to its neighbors, the key is the angle you are looking at it from. From the angle above, it’s clear that it fits in just fine.

I find it useful to look at pics of the Twins to get a feel for the scale of Tower One, it is only a few feet smaller in footprint and well be the same hight, minus the spire.

Zensteeldude
Mar 15, 2010, 9:18 PM
someone hid the delete button:haha:

Mr Man
Mar 16, 2010, 1:06 AM
This building is growing on me (no pun intended). Silly question... why is it listed as 108 floors when it's only 80ish? Or did I miss something?

BrownTown
Mar 16, 2010, 1:27 AM
This building is growing on me (no pun intended). Silly question... why is it listed as 108 floors when it's only 80ish? Or did I miss something?

To try and make people feel like it isn't a downgrade from the original.

JSsocal
Mar 16, 2010, 1:34 AM
Ok seriously guys, as Zen put it, its just a number on an elevator button, almost every other building does it, (when was the last time you stayed on the 13th floor of a hotel). The base is about the equivalent of a 20 story building, and so it is numbered accordingly, even though floors 7-19 don't exist.

The average Joe doesn't think of a building as how many feet it is, (except for this one), but by how many stories it has. To say this building only has 80 or so stories would just be deceptive to the average person, based on how tall the building actually is.

Mr Man
Mar 16, 2010, 1:42 AM
Ok seriously guys, as Zen put it, its just a number on an elevator button, almost every other building does it, (when was the last time you stayed on the 13th floor of a hotel). The base is about the equivalent of a 20 story building, and so it is numbered accordingly, even though floors 7-19 don't exist. Seriously, it's just a number on a button.

I've always been an odd ball on this issue. I care more about the actual number of stories and the square footage than the height of the building. Thanks for answering my question though.

Since we're on the topic, anyone know what is the total square footage of the new WTC complex (WTC 1-7)?

Zensteeldude
Mar 16, 2010, 2:03 AM
14,200,000 square feet and Tower One well have 92 actual floors, or floors an elevator can actually stop at.:D

That's about 1 million square feet more the the origonal WTC had.

Mr Man
Mar 16, 2010, 2:35 AM
14,200,000 square feet and Tower One well have 92 actual floors, or floors an elevator can actually stop at.:D

That's about 1 million square feet more the the origonal WTC had.


Thanks!! I was under the false impression that it would have be a lot less. I use to be extremely anti-Freedom Tower, but I'm really starting to like it.

uakoops
Mar 16, 2010, 3:41 AM
14,200,000 square feet and Tower One well have 92 actual floors, or floors an elevator can actually stop at.:D

That's about 1 million square feet more the the origonal WTC had.

Is that just the towers or does it include all the underground space as well? (Memorial, parking, VSC etc.)

NYguy
Mar 16, 2010, 1:32 PM
This building is growing on me (no pun intended). Silly question... why is it listed as 108 floors when it's only 80ish? Or did I miss something?

The breakdown is given on the first page. It's always best to check the first page if you haven't been following a development.



Busy morning...(cam shot)

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122778437/original.jpg

J.M.
Mar 16, 2010, 2:04 PM
Does this One World Trade Center actually have more space then the older one?? I just can't seem to belive that statement.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 16, 2010, 2:29 PM
Does this One World Trade Center actually have more space then the older one?? I just can't seem to belive that statement.

The old one had more space. It had 400,000 m2. This one has about 250.000 m2. That´s because the higher floors are smaller.

colemonkee
Mar 16, 2010, 2:46 PM
Looks like pieces of another crane in that webcam snapshot. Could they be installing an additional crane soon?

NYguy
Mar 16, 2010, 3:05 PM
Looks like pieces of another crane in that webcam snapshot. Could they be installing an additional crane soon?

I wondered about that also...

CalibratedZeus
Mar 16, 2010, 3:10 PM
Well in the bottom left of the snap-shot is the black body steel support and actual crane, the arm steel is sitting right below the tower.

So my guess, is yes that is a crane.

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 16, 2010, 3:11 PM
I saw the crane!!! Is it for the tower or the Memorial???:shrug: :shrug:

NYguy
Mar 16, 2010, 3:14 PM
SteveDale (http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephendale/4438213116/sizes/o/)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4438213116_157afbb1b7_o.jpg

BiggieSmalls
Mar 16, 2010, 3:36 PM
I saw the crane!!! Is it for the tower or the Memorial???:shrug: :shrug:


Memorial.. Near the opening for the Visitors Pavilion. By where they put the platform to the south of the current black crane.

NYguy
Mar 16, 2010, 3:53 PM
I don't know if this will be for the memorial. Probably more for the PATH terminal, if not the tower. Here's a wider cam shot of the crane in waiting...

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122780005/original.jpg

OneWorldTradeCenter
Mar 16, 2010, 4:13 PM
The tower needs another crane!

Perhaps it´s for the South-Tower´s Memorial-Pool. But those cranes are usally used for building towers (as well as on other buildings in the USA and Canada).

xnyr
Mar 16, 2010, 4:38 PM
The tower needs another crane!

Perhaps it´s for the South-Tower´s Memorial-Pool. But those cranes are usally used for building towers (as well as on other buildings in the USA and Canada).


I believe OneWorldTradeCenter is right - here is the base of the new crane:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4049/4437879477_d32eab768c_m.jpg

mac78130
Mar 16, 2010, 4:42 PM
Here's a better view

http://i544.photobucket.com/albums/hh359/mac78130/wtcmemorial.jpg

The North One
Mar 16, 2010, 5:07 PM
I wonder when this building is done, if it will be number 1 on the emporis skyscraper list in 2012 (or whenever it is done) this thing is solid as a rock!

uaarkson
Mar 16, 2010, 7:22 PM
lol holy shit, where is all this steel coming from? Four days straight of rain and wind and now steel is flying up all over the site.

RockMont
Mar 16, 2010, 8:35 PM
No doubt about it! The future New World Trade Center, is really kicking Bin Laden's ass now!

CalibratedZeus
Mar 16, 2010, 10:05 PM
morrongiello (http://www.flickr.com/photos/morrongiello/4439174322/sizes/l/)3/16

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2759/4439174322_b0b7d14315_b.jpg

evanmack
Mar 16, 2010, 10:52 PM
Looks like the 'one floor a week' is finally coming true

Bucktown718
Mar 16, 2010, 11:04 PM
looks like there's 2 floors, if they are going to go at this speed we're going to see some serious progress by June

uaarkson
Mar 16, 2010, 11:27 PM
Yeah, this is a pretty significant step forward in speed. And it had been raining since Friday!

NYguy
Mar 17, 2010, 12:20 AM
morrongiello (http://www.flickr.com/photos/morrongiello/4439174322/sizes/l/)3/16

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2759/4439174322_b0b7d14315_b.jpg

Yeah, it's evident looking at this photo that they will be getting a couple of floors done at a time.

NewYorker2009
Mar 17, 2010, 12:24 AM
I tend to think it's going to rise two floors every two weeks, meaning that they are working on two floors at once instead of just one so about every week or so two office floors will be about half complete. It's actually a more efficient process and will definetely speed things up there.

NYguy
Mar 17, 2010, 12:25 AM
^ Right, the average comes to about a floor a week, according to the Port Authority. So you likely won't see individual floors going up a week at a time.

Here's a better view

http://i544.photobucket.com/albums/hh359/mac78130/wtcmemorial.jpg

They did in fact install more of the crane, but I believe it may have more to do with the station than the memorial. But we'll see.

Plokoon11
Mar 17, 2010, 12:26 AM
Thank god, the speed HAS COME!