PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Philadelphia's lessons for Pittsburgh (Business Improvement Districts)



Evergrey
01-24-2007, 04:56 AM
http://www.popcitymedia.com/features/45bid.aspx

The Philadelphia Story
By: LIsa Collins

January 24, 2007
Philadelphia has revitalized in ways that would make make most American cities envious.

Rents are still fairly cheap compared to Chicago and New York but the downtown is bustling. Day and night, the "center city" district enjoys workers, shoppers, visitors and partiers. Suburbanites from rural areas and from out-of-state are moving downtown, significantly increasing the residential population over the last decade with childless couples, young people and students providing a large percentage of the growth.

Yet as recent as 16 years ago, there wasn't a single outdoor café in downtown Philadelphia. Then in 1990 business owners, tenants, employers and city officials got together and started a downtown Business Improvement District. Since then, the downtown has witnessed mad growth.

The 120-block district formed when city business owners agreed to create a special taxing district; extra taxes would be levied on businesses in the area to clean up graffiti, beautify streets and sidewalks with seven-day-a-week uniformed service, enhance landscaping and lighting, and increase police protection in the area.

Now, the 3-square-mile area of the 100-square mile city is Philadelphia's economic engine, Levy says. The center city tax on more than 2,000 businesses raises $14 million a year for such amenities as community service representatives with radios to notify police of problems.

"Little changes in the environment can create big psychological changes in how people think of downtown," says Paul Levy, president of Philadelphia’s business improvement area dubbed the Center City District.

Philly's BID success includes such markers:

• Since 2001, there's been a 171 percent increase in outdoor eateries in the "center city" district, to 187 today.
• Since 1997, when a 10-year tax break was offered on residential development, center city reports more than 8,300 new residential units downtown and 11,000 new residents, for a total population of 88,0000.
• Serious crime has been cut in half and auto theft was cut by 80 percent, Levy says. Nuisance crimes were greatly reduced with help from computerized crime mapping paid for by the BID. "A ton of crimes get committed any place when the criminal thinks nobody is watching," Levy says.

Improving the local psyche

Business Improvement Districts are common in cities throughout the country, including Pittsburgh. “Philadelphia is one of the best programs in the country but it has a lot of resources,” says Mike Edwards, executive director of Pittsburgh Downtown Partnerships (PDP). The BID in Philadelphia was organized differently than most, he explains. Due to more of a legal than size issue, Philadelphia is of the first class and Pittsburgh is the second class, so it’s not a direct comparison.

While Philadelphia’s is the most mature and most respected BID in the country, Edwards says, “Pittsburgh has not developed as sophisticated a program as Philly. We have a BID; it’s just not had the same effect as the one in center city.”

Edwards notes two reasons: he is the fourth director in four years, for one, and the initial BID possibly lacked sufficient resources to meet expectations.

Not that Downtown Pittsburgh isn’t experiencing its own phenomenal growth these days. With nearly a billion dollars invested in new projects downtown, the future is very bright indeed. “For the last 18 months we’ve been trying to expand services to approach Downtown as a comprehensive initiative,” Edwards says. “Philly is a good model for it."
Edwards has solid faith in Downtown’s Business Improvement District and the PDP in general. “We have a strategic plan in place, know exactly where we are going and expanded our services to meet the new demand. I’m feeling good,” he concludes.


A BID for Oakland



In Oakland, the hub of Eds and Meds in Pittsburgh, a BID formed in 1999 has helped launch a number of successful initiatives. It started with an initial clean up campaign that rid the area of graffiti and other nuisances, says Georgia Petropoulos, executive director of the Oakland Business Improvement District. Another point of pride is the Only in Oakland marketing campaign with a web site that lists more than 200 retail spots and restaurants.


Additionally, a beautification of the business district resulted in 15 storefront renovations, (seven of which were through the URA and Community Design Center) and the public art project with its latest work, the Sprout Fund’s new “Oakland Mural” on the Strand Building on Forbes.

The BID has exceeded expectations, says Petropoulos. “Every year we evolve with new initiatives, new projects. One success piggybacks onto another.”
Boosting Confidence

Business Improvement Districts' benefits are many, says Levi, and provide more than physical improvements. Promotion and marketing of downtown is very important, he says.

"It has a disproportionately positive effect," he says."There's a gigantic psychological impact. When cities decline, there's a psychological decline. When there's a BID, in Philadelphia it built confidence in downtown."

In many ways, Philadelphia isn't different than Pittsburgh or other industrial cities. It's an old city that suffered when industry moved out along with people who fled to the suburbs and elsewhere. Downtown businesses slowly closed up shop never to re-open. BIDS can help reverse the trend.

"BIDS take responsibility for the public environment in a way that has been neglected for a long time," Levy says. "Cleveland launched a BID in the spring, and things are so upbeat. They've dramatically improved the confidence of investors in downtown.

"If you are depressed,” he says, “You let your house turn into a mess. When you have company coming over, you clean up. You need to have company coming all the time to downtown because it puts a positive spin on things."

Of course there are major hurdles, primarily the need for business owners to agree to paying more taxes. Levy says when business owners ask, "Are you crazy?" you must answer, "What are the consequences for not paying for this? Do you want to continue to see downtown as a place that's dangerous and not a place to go?"

Secondly, there must be assurance from the city government that it will continue to provide the base level of services — police, fire and etc. — when the BID begins to supplement those services, Levy says. "The city must agree not to pull the rug and cut services when there are supplemental services provided.”

And finally, you must get effective business leadership. "You need a handful of leaders to step forward who say that this is something we need, and they start a parade that others follow," he says. "Big businesses have to pay the lion's share of this. That's always the big challenge. Everyone is cost-conscious today."

Philadelphia's BID started with simple goals — cleaning up and providing police protection, and later providing increased lighting, directional signs and landscaping.
A major element of the district was a 10-year tax abatement offered to developers converting properties to residential housing. Since then, 110 buildings have been converted, Levy says. "We built from the simple, which was clean and safe, to promotion and marketing, to physical improvements," he says.

Cooperation from the city and state governments was also key, Levy says, noting the downtown convention center the government built.

Despite their many benefits, BIDs are no panacea, he adds. There are many factors that go into the revitalization of a downtown, but BIDS can provide important steps. "A BID doesn't change market realities. But a BID can make graffiti go away, it can eliminate fear and put crime behind you. It's one tool of many. You have to be focused on walkability and have a competitive tax structure. You have to have a competitive environment, because that's what the competition is doing."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lisa Collins is a writer from New York City. Pop City staff contributed to this article.

PA Pride
01-24-2007, 07:48 AM
It would be great if we could even have a fraction of the number of people who have moved to Center City; I am optimistic and think downtown Pgh and Oakland will start to look like mini Philly neighborhoods in the next few years. It is a great trend happening in the urban re-settling across this whole country, but I hope it is a permanent movement that includes families coming back to cities so that children will be brought up used to urban life, which includes better diversity, better job/career prospects and a respect for dense, sustainable living.

Good job Philly! You are a role model!

PhillyRising
01-24-2007, 02:12 PM
I can attest to the fact that it was unthinkable to have any sidewalk cafe in Center City in the early 90's. The Special Services District is one of the major reasons of CC's transformation into one of the best downtowns in the country. I still remember the first times I saw the workers power washing the sidewalks...I almost fell over. Center City in the late 80's and early 90's was a litter strewn mess. The new streetscape lighting installed to make it feel safer was a big boost too. The streets used to be dimly lit and gave an ominous feeling years ago. Any city I have ever been to since this all happened comes off as a disappointment in their downtown in comparison to Center City to me. Downtown Pittsburgh has huge potential!

Wheelingman04
01-24-2007, 10:44 PM
Great article. Philly and Pittsburgh have one of the best downtowns in the country. Pittsburgh is a little behind Philly in vitality downtown, but it is going to get much better in the future. There is so much going on. I hope Peduto gets elected mayor too.

markdv
01-24-2007, 11:18 PM
Hallelujah ! Philly and Pittsburgh arise from the ashes ! Buy your homes now before everyone realizes what great cities they are and want to move !

volguus zildrohar
01-26-2007, 05:35 AM
I'd rather do Asheville.

Evergrey
02-14-2007, 04:51 PM
we're stealing an idea from philly

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07045/761922-53.stm

Competing mayoral candidates' plans forgive realty taxes to boost city housing
Wednesday, February 14, 2007

By Elwin Green and Rich Lord, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette



Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl and city Councilman William Peduto yesterday introduced competing plans for giving 10-year tax breaks on new housing, primarily Downtown.

Both men, candidates for mayor in this year's election, proposed plans that would give housing developers abatements of 100 percent on their city property taxes for 10 years.

Though the intention of both plans is to boost Downtown housing, Mr. Ravenstahl's would include 20 city neighborhoods, while Mr. Peduto's would be concentrated in the Downtown, lower Hill District, Uptown, Strip District, and on the North Shore and South Side.

The tax breaks would aid not only developers but also people who buy the units.

Mr. Ravenstahl's plan, which he outlined at the annual meeting of the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership yesterday morning, calls for the tax breaks for new construction, conversions from office space to housing, and residential rehabilitation projects launched between now and 2012. The abatements would apply to the first $250,000 of each housing unit's market value.

"It's not just Downtown Pittsburgh," the mayor said. "It's 20 other communities throughout Pittsburgh that have been neglected."

The mayor also wants to offer low-interest loans to help add housing in buildings that have businesses on the first floor, but whose upper floors are vacant. He said the city has identified as many as 130 such structures, and low-interest loans would come from a $5 million fund to be created by the city, local foundations and private lenders.

He also wants to offer deferred second mortgages of up to $10,000 for middle-income Downtown home buyers. Those eligible could have incomes no higher than $46,200 for one person, or $52,800 for two. The program would initially be limited to 50 households.

Mr. Peduto will discuss his plan at a special council meeting at 1:30 p.m. today and present a 64-page report put together by consultant Steven Zecher. The councilman said he paid for the consultant, using $9,000 in city funds, and an 18-member task force guided his work.

He would give a tax abatement for new housing in Downtown and five surrounding neighborhoods for 10 years, and would offer the same break on new industrial and commercial buildings for five years. Mr. Peduto said if it works in those areas, it can be expanded.

It also calls for state action allowing the city to give developers credit against their tax bills for spending on historic preservation, environmentally friendly features and public art.

Both men said they based their plans on a model enacted in Philadelphia in 1997. That plan, implemented citywide, froze a property's taxes at its pre-development level for 10 years, and has been credited with spurring development and a 24 percent increase in the number of Center City households.

"We're still looking at an affordable housing component," Mr. Peduto said. That could include tax credits or subsidies for less expensive housing, or a requirement that abatement recipients make some units affordable to middle-income families.

A showdown is ahead for the plans. Because they would give tax breaks, both would have to be approved by City Council.

The mayor and councilman disagreed on the extent of the tax breaks. Both would exempt city property taxes, but Mr. Peduto said the lure won't be big enough unless Allegheny County and the Pittsburgh Public Schools also grant abatements.

"Certainly if the school district and county buy in, that's more incentive to the home buyer," the mayor said. "However, we can proceed without the school board and the county."

"The incentive is not great enough with just the city's involvement," said Mr. Peduto, noting that the city's levy makes up just one-third of the typical property tax bill.

Neither county nor city school district officials had seen the plans yesterday.

"Dan [Onorato] is more than willing to sit down and take a look at the proposals and see what they're all about," said Kevin Evanto, spokesman for county Chief Executive Onorato.

A tax abatement would probably require school board action, said district Chief of Staff Lisa Fischetti.

According to the study Mr. Peduto presented, all three taxing bodies would see tax revenue go up, in part because people will move in and pay wage taxes. By 2021, the consultant estimated, the city, county and school district would be getting a combined $56.8 million more in property and wage taxes than they would without the abatement plan.

The Ravenstahl administration did not have exact figures on the tax impact of its plan. Chief of Staff Yarone Zober said the plan is expected to triple the average construction of Downtown homes to 270 a year, and that the new wage taxes would offset the revenue the city would pass on because of the property tax abatement.

The city has used favorable tax treatments to encourage Downtown housing development before.

In 2000, the city passed an abatement giving developers who build or improve Downtown housing a 10-year break on the increased taxes resulting from the higher property value. The tax advantage would disappear as soon as the property was sold, meaning it aided apartment developers but didn't help much with for-sale housing.

By allowing homeowners to receive the abatement, the mayor's plan taps into a crucial aspect of the Downtown housing market, the growth of condominiums alongside rental units, said Aaron Stauber, principal of Rugby Realty.

"The dynamics of our city are such that most of the developments that you would pencil in would be condominium developments," he said.

On the whole, attendees at the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership's meeting applauded the mayor's plan. Partnership Executive Director Mike Edwards said the plan would "help accelerate what's going on."

He said that whereas developers are now focused on high-end housing Downtown, the abatement would reduce the risk inherent in building more affordable housing.

But Meagan Moore, who manages 1.5 million square feet of office space in the Gateway Towers complex for the Hertz Investment Group, cautioned that while "any improvement in residential is going to enhance office space," more housing alone would not revive Downtown's office market, which has languished for years.

Council is expected to get both tax plans by month's end, and could hold public hearings in the early spring before putting them to a vote.

The emergence of two tax abatement plans in one day is good news, said Downtown architect Robert Pfaffman.

"Any kind of incentive you can provide is worthwhile," he said, since Downtown construction costs are high and the profitability of housing there isn't as high as in some other cities.

"The competition for ideas is the good thing about having a mayor's race."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Elwin Green can be reached at egreen@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1969. Rich Lord can be reached at rlord@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1542. )

http://www.post-gazette.com/images4/20070214TwoTax_chart.gif



Forums Directory