PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Japan: Micro-Homes in the Big City



LostInTheZone
03-20-2007, 06:01 PM
I know this topic's been covered before, but I thought this article was pretty good:

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/mar2007/gb20070313_145902.htm

Houses designed to fit on postage-stamp-sized plots offer Japanese an affordable way to live in bustling, crowded, and hugely expensive downtown areas

by Hiroko Tashiro

Small has always been beautiful in Japan, whether you think of the mini-component audio systems the country pioneered in the 1970s, its cultural love affair with miniaturized potted plants known as bonsai, or the current rage for small-engine mini-cars. Now you can add to the list the current home-design craze: ultra-compact micro-homes on plots so small they could fit into the garage space of your typical, sprawling McMansion in the U.S.

Living small is in, especially among younger Japanese with modest budgets who no longer want to cope with the grueling commutes by train from far-off suburbs outside Tokyo as their parents did. Demand for ultra-compact homes, known as kyo-sho-jutaku in Japanese, is likely a small portion right now of the $1.2 billion Japanese currently spend on homes designed by architects.
Staying Close to Top Schools

But architects, home design magazines, and even some major Japanese companies are starting to take notice of the trend. It is being driven by the surprising fact that, despite Japan's already astronomical (by international standards) land prices, the four prefectures that comprise the Tokyo metropolitan area are among the fastest-growing nationally.

Suitable land for housing in Tokyo is incredibly scarce, however. So some families are hiring architects to build the tiniest homes imaginable to live closer to the cultural amenities and excellent school systems available in Tokyo. "Recently, an increasing number of people, especially in their 30s and early 40s, desire to live in central Tokyo," says Shigeru Kimura, an independent real estate agent who specializes in micro-homes. "And more people are thinking of how to live on a small plot of land."

Others are already based in Tokyo, clinging to a tiny patch of land, and want to replace decades-old wooden homes with new ones, but for the lowest cost possible. Take the case of Mayumi Takayanagi, an electronics company engineer who had lived with her parents for about 30 years in a two-story wooden house in the central Tokyo district of Sumida.
"This Was the Tiniest"

The thought of leaving her lively and thriving downtown neighborhood with her parents for cheaper and far more spacious housing in the soulless, strip-mall-festooned outlying suburbs of Tokyo just wasn't an option. So she turned to architect Satoshi Kurosaki, 36, to design a new home for no more than $170,000 on a plot that measured only 32 square meters (or 344 sq. ft.). "I'd worked on compact houses before, but this was the tiniest," says Kurosaki.

It wasn't easy but he came up with a design for a three-level home, constructed with light-gauge steel, that was finished in 2004. It features a simple but sturdy spiral staircase that runs up the center of the home and has no dead space. Kurosaki managed to free up enough room to design a living space for Takayanagi's father on the ground floor and a living room, kitchen, and bedroom on the second for her mother. The top floor is where she sleeps, and there is access to a wood deck.

Kurosaki also designed this tiny structure with big windows on the front of the home to maximize sunlight exposure. Make no mistake: The home is incredibly narrow and would seem claustrophobic to some. But for Takayanagi, the new digs are just fine. "We get sunshine all the time, which is great," she says.
Catering to the Trend

Kurosaki used to work for Japan's biggest homebuilder, Sekisui House, and started catering to the "living small" crowd back in the late 1990s. One of his first compact homes involved building an abode on a 249 sq. ft. site that was basically a large parking space in Tokyo's central Jimbocho neighborhood. A 27-year-old woman had inherited the small patch of land, and Kurosaki managed to design a five-story home on the site. These days he gets about 50 inquiries a year, mostly from younger couples looking for new homes to sit on small parcels of land.

Other home design firms and even some major Japanese companies are starting to take notice of the less-is-more trend in the Japanese housing market. A Japanese factory automation equipment maker called SUS has developed aluminum, cube-like frames called tsubomi that can be arranged into stand-alone homes or used as attachments to existing houses. A 27 cubic meter (952 cu. ft.) attachment costs $17,000 and can be assembled in a single day.

Yamaha, the world's largest manufacturer of musical instruments, for the last two years has been selling soundproof rooms that can fit into existing homes or be added to an abode's exterior. The standard-size unit (1.4 meters wide, 1.8 meters in depth, 2 meters high) goes for $3,700.
Design for Irregular Lots

Yasuyuki Okazaki is founder of Tokyo-based Commdesign, which sells custom-designed homes over the Internet that can work on tiny plots of land measuring about 320 sq. ft. "Hitherto, a house designed by architects was up-market" and expensive, he says. He and his team of architects have also designed slightly larger homes for oddly shaped strips of land, not unusual in land-scarce Tokyo.

One home design is called unagi (as in "eel") that works on long but narrow strips of land. Another is called kado (or "corner") for a triangular and small plot. The price of Commdesign homes ranges from $171,000 to $214,000. (Those who need to buy land, however, will need to spend two or even three times as much above the cost of home construction.)

Securing affordable housing likely will remain a colossal headache in Tokyo, but micro-homes are an option for those willing to sacrifice space for the convenience and amenities of city life. "Compact houses can meet people's fundamental living needs," says architect Kurosaki. It may not be for everyone, but plenty of younger Japanese seem to be warming up to the idea.

LostInTheZone
03-20-2007, 06:13 PM
Here's a sampling of work by architect Satoru Kurosaki and others (view slide show (http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/index_01.htm))

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-bes.jpg

This three-level house was built in 2004 in central Tokyo for a retired couple and their daughter in her 20s and was designed by Satoshi Kurosaki. It sits atop a plot of land measuring just 41 sq. m. (441 sq. ft.) and faces two narrow roads, and is only a three-minute walk to a nearby train station. To pack more into the space, the first floor is actually partially underground, and there's an attic room as well. Total construction cost: $257,000 for the house, plus $240,000 for the land:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-k-b.jpg

This tight space serves as a bedroom in one micro-home designed by Satoshi Kurosaki. It's big enough for a Japanese futon that can be stored during the day to free up this space for other uses. The window is set high to prevent people looking in, and to minimize street noise:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-k-a.jpg

Kurosaki developed an open-air stairway system that ascends to an attic room for one home he designed. This approach frees up more space and opens up the house to more sun exposure:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-home-housekgrat.jpg

This stand-alone home, designed by Kurosaki, is about as small as they come. It fits on a 32 sq.m. (344 sq. ft.) piece of land in central Tokyo. A young, Japanese office worker lives there with her parents. This home cost a mere $170,000 to build:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-housemini.jpg

Stairway design is crucial when it comes to designing a space-conscious mini-home in Japan. In this home, Kurosaki came up with this open-air design and sturdy, metallic steps:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-min.jpg

Back in 2002, Japan approved the use of aluminum as a construction material (rather than just an exterior siding). Sensing an opportunity, a factory automation company called SUS launched a new business offering cube-like aluminum frames called “tsubomi” that can be arranged into stand-alone homes or used as attachments to existing abodes. A 27 cu.m. (952 cu. ft.) attachment costs $17,000, and can be assembled in a single day:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-aluminum-.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is really modernism at its best: simple, beautiful, functional, using modern technology to bring down costs and find creative solutions to old problems.

arbeiter
03-20-2007, 07:06 PM
This is real innovation. I loved reading this article and seeing the pictures, because for the first time in so long, I was like "wow, now that's something!"

brian_b
03-20-2007, 07:09 PM
I think that's awesome! I'd like to see this take off in the US, perhaps as a coach house on an existing lot.

A high-rise or a mid-rise is probably more space efficient. But if you have a lot that's too small for anything... This is awesome.

skylife
03-20-2007, 07:10 PM
Awww, that's my dream to have a teeny-tiny house in the city. I love e'm.

Except hopefully no rooms would look like this prison cell. :yuck:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-k-a.jpg

waterloowarrior
03-20-2007, 07:17 PM
Awww, that's my dream to have a teeny-tiny house in the city. I love e'm.

Except hopefully no rooms would look like this prison cell. :yuck:




I think many prison cells are more luxurious than that room :haha:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/ca/Day53cpenitentiary12.jpg/250px-Day53cpenitentiary12.jpg

(source: wikipedia)

Frisco_Zig
03-20-2007, 10:18 PM
For anyone interested in urban planning and design Japan is the most amazing place

I can't wait to go back there. Everything from the housing and transporation netwoks down to the design of vending machines, freeway, trucks and washing machines-you name it- amazes

And the food is great too

someone123
03-20-2007, 10:35 PM
Isn't it easier just to build apartments? What's the advantage of a house when it is so tiny and has no extra land attached?

AZheat
03-20-2007, 11:26 PM
I also really like the designs of these buildings. I'm sure we could learn a thing or two about how to make the most use of space from the Japanese. As far as the question that someone123 asked about building apartments is concerned, that's what millions of Japanese already do but you can't expect everything to look alike and everyone to live alike. People need a little variety in their environment and these little houses probably fit the needs of certain people very well. What I like the most is the fact that even though the spaces are extremely small by western standards they are modern and sylish in appearance.

brian_b
03-21-2007, 03:08 AM
What I like the most is the fact that even though the spaces are extremely small by western standards they are modern and sylish in appearance.

I love the modern and stylish design, but I disagree with your assessment of size. These are being built in a very urban environment, and in the dense urban areas of the US, the usable sq footage is right in line with what these homes are providing.

[quote]This stand-alone home, designed by Kurosaki, is about as small as they come. It fits on a 32 sq.m. (344 sq. ft.) piece of land in central Tokyo. A young, Japanese office worker lives there with her parents. This home cost a mere $170,000 to build[\quote]

From the photo, it appears to be a 3-level home that comes right up to the lot lines. Let's give it a little breathing room and say it takes up 90% of the lot. With the HVAC, staircase, walls, etc, let's say that 80% of the house is usable space. That's 250 sq feet per level. 3 levels and you get 750 sq feet of usable space.

In Chicago, there are probably about 50,000-100,000 1-bedroom and studio apartments and condos (that's important - people are more than willing to buy) that measure 750 sq feet or less. Just as an example, my wife and I currently live in a 650 sq ft place, and we moved here from a 450 sq ft place. In neither apartment did we feel cramped or lacking in space! It most certainly takes a certain lifestyle and attitude. You definitely cannot accumulate a lot of stuff, but we have a full-sized couch, a full-size leather chair, a full-sized kitchen with all the appliances, a full-sized bathroom, a full-sized washer and dryer (stacked of course).

Basically, what I'm saying is that there are 100,000+ Americans just in Chicago alone who are currently living the lifestyle required for such a home as these here. I would be surprised if the number across the United States was less than 1 million. In effect, such buildings like these could easily take off in the US if we had tiny lots for sale.

zilfondel
03-21-2007, 05:26 AM
I would be surprised if that number was less than 5 million, nation-wide. You forgot what Manhattan is like... plus LA and SF.

edluva
03-21-2007, 05:42 AM
yeah here in LA there have been numerous architectural studies on using backyard lots for mini-homes such as these. Current zoning requirments prohibit this, however, there's been talk of changing this given our housing shortage and lack of affordable housing.

MolsonExport
03-21-2007, 01:24 PM
An interesting solution to the vexing problem of affordable housing, but this is an utterly depressing bedroom:

http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/03/0314_microhomes/image/japan-micro-homes-house-k-a.jpg

HomeInMyShoes
03-21-2007, 01:43 PM
^But not really anything that can't be improved with a different choice of finishing materials and lighting. Design aesthetics are very personal. What's austere and cold to someone, is clean and zen-like to another. I'd personally probably go insane in that room, but to each their own.

These concepts are very cool, but the chance of this stuff catching on in any significant way in North America is very slim or very far off. Until the culture of needing 2,000 sq ft and three bathrooms for two people disappears it's not going to happen much.

Steely Dan
03-21-2007, 04:28 PM
In Chicago, there are probably about 50,000-100,000 1-bedroom and studio apartments and condos (that's important - people are more than willing to buy) that measure 750 sq feet or less. Just as an example, my wife and I currently live in a 650 sq ft place, and we moved here from a 450 sq ft place. In neither apartment did we feel cramped or lacking in space! It most certainly takes a certain lifestyle and attitude. You definitely cannot accumulate a lot of stuff, but we have a full-sized couch, a full-size leather chair, a full-sized kitchen with all the appliances, a full-sized bathroom, a full-sized washer and dryer (stacked of course).


yep. and i'm one of those happy 100,000. my downtown chicago studio condo is roughly 550 sq. ft. and it works great for me (though i probably wouldn't have bought it without the attached 200 sq. ft. balcony, as outside living space is critically important to me). the location of where i live is a billion times more important to me than the ability to accumulate lots of random useless crap.

i was just thinking about the absurdity of the american obsession with space the other day when i was at my sisters house out in the boondock wastelands of lake county illinois. now, she has a family of 5 + 1 dog, so i certainly don't begrudge her the fact that she lives in a single family home, but here's where the outright insanity comes in. i was doing some rough calculations in my head of the master suite in her home and i figured out that the master bath and closet complex attched to the master bedroom was around 400 sq. ft.! just to shit, shower, shave and store their clothes, my sister and brother-in-law have almost as much space devoted to these mundane tasks as i manage to live in outright.

what is the deal with these obscenely large bathrooms? since when did human beings require 250 sq. ft. to take a dump? i have to believe that it's the female half of our species that's driving this bathroom insanity because, as a man, i tend to spend as little time as possible in the room that i shit and piss in. what's next, master bathrooms with their own dedicated attached secondary bathrooms just in case you happen to be in the master bathroom and you need to use an actual bathroom.

AZheat
03-21-2007, 04:34 PM
Basically, what I'm saying is that there are 100,000+ Americans just in Chicago alone who are currently living the lifestyle required for such a home as these here.
I think you make a good point. I have seen condos in different cities on real estate websites that have very small square footage and probably aren't any bigger than these Japanese houses. I guess I was thinking in terms of typical American homes which are often far larger than they really need to be from a practical standpoint. There probably would be a market for these types of homes, particularly in very expensive and densely populated cities. I stand corrected.:)

Coyett
03-21-2007, 05:05 PM
Yasuhiro Yamashita's interpretation of the micro-home.

cell brick
http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/3.jpg

http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/4.jpg

crystal brick
http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/5.jpg

http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/6.jpg

Japan's most famous micro-home - "lucky drops" (236 sq feet)

http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/7.jpg

http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/8.jpg

images: http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto.html

mhays
03-21-2007, 08:30 PM
I like the concept of micro-homes. I'd even live in one. Well, a part of me would. I'm currently going from a 607 sf condo to a 880 sf condo, waiting for the building to be built. Yet something is attractive about efficiency.

Another thread talked about houses in the 80 sf range. These are prebuilt, then placed onsite. I suppose that might be ok, with a little patio, preferably somewhere warm enough to make the patio hospitable year-round. Still, I'd only live there if I was poor.

I noticed communities of these mini-mini houses (meaning 80 sf) in Germany along train tracks. My guess is that they give them to poor people, and that train land just happens to be the most-available public land, or the cheapest. That looks way better than the streets or a homeless shelter.

brian_b
03-21-2007, 09:10 PM
I think you make a good point. I have seen condos in different cities on real estate websites that have very small square footage and probably aren't any bigger than these Japanese houses. I guess I was thinking in terms of typical American homes which are often far larger than they really need to be from a practical standpoint. There probably would be a market for these types of homes, particularly in very expensive and densely populated cities. I stand corrected.:)

Well you certainly aren't wrong in the fact that much of the US does not live in anything resembling this amount of space - and the average size of a home in the US continues to grow!

Chicago103
03-21-2007, 09:21 PM
yep. and i'm one of those happy 100,000. my downtown chicago studio condo is roughly 550 sq. ft. and it works great for me (though i probably wouldn't have bought it without the attached 200 sq. ft. balcony, as outside living space is critically important to me). the location of where i live is a billion times more important to me than the ability to accumulate lots of random useless crap.

i was just thinking about the absurdity of the american obsession with space the other day when i was at my sisters house out in the boondock wastelands of lake county illinois. now, she has a family of 5 + 1 dog, so i certainly don't begrudge her the fact that she lives in a single family home, but here's where the outright insanity comes in. i was doing some rough calculations in my head of the master suite in her home and i figured out that the master bath and closet complex attched to the master bedroom was around 400 sq. ft.! just to shit, shower, shave and store their clothes, my sister and brother-in-law have almost as much space devoted to these mundane tasks as i manage to live in outright.

what is the deal with these obscenely large bathrooms? since when did human beings require 250 sq. ft. to take a dump? i have to believe that it's the female half of our species that's driving this bathroom insanity because, as a man, i tend to spend as little time as possible in the room that i shit and piss in. what's next, master bathrooms with their own dedicated attached secondary bathrooms just in case you happen to be in the master bathroom and you need to use an actual bathroom.

I am another one of these happy people that live in small spaces, I share a large studio with a roomate (750 square feet) and I never feel cramped at all. Also if you ever get tired of just being in the apartment there are alot of common spaces in the building I live in like a swimming pool, exercize room, sitting lounge, etc not to even mention the shit loads of things there is to do outside of the building. Still in the winter months I spend alot of time in my apartment and I didnt get cabin fever any worse than when I lived in suburban home growing up, in some ways less.

I dont understand the need for all this extra space to do mundane activities like shit, shower, shave, our bathroom is the size of a small prison cell, just big enough for a sink, toilet and shower/bath. Its alot easier to get messy with two people in a small space but even that is more a matter of discipline than sheer ability. I prefer living a space efficient lifestyle, thats why I like living in the city, I also view location as a billion times more important than living space and whatever material junk I dont need I can accumulate in it or show off (if I want to show off, I show off where I live and my view and not the fact that I can do ballroom dancing in the place I take a shit).

Boris2k7
03-22-2007, 01:06 AM
Yasuhiro Yamashita's interpretation of the micro-home.

cell brick
http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/3.jpg

http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/tekuto/4.jpg

OMG, that is awesome. Yum~!

Miu
03-22-2007, 11:51 AM
I noticed communities of these mini-mini houses (meaning 80 sf) in Germany along train tracks. My guess is that they give them to poor people, and that train land just happens to be the most-available public land, or the cheapest. That looks way better than the streets or a homeless shelter.

No...those "mini-houses" belong to allotment gardens. People don't live in them.

SHiRO
03-22-2007, 03:55 PM
I noticed communities of these mini-mini houses (meaning 80 sf) in Germany along train tracks. My guess is that they give them to poor people, and that train land just happens to be the most-available public land, or the cheapest. That looks way better than the streets or a homeless shelter.
Funny stuff!

Don't worry, you're not the first one who think people actually live in them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allotment_%28gardening%29

CGII
03-22-2007, 04:04 PM
Well you certainly aren't wrong in the fact that much of the US does not live in anything resembling this amount of space - and the average size of a home in the US continues to grow!

What about the studio apartment?

Kilgore Trout
03-22-2007, 10:19 PM
Isn't it easier just to build apartments? What's the advantage of a house when it is so tiny and has no extra land attached?

these are strictly infill, built in the leftover spaces between existing houses and buildings.

Derek
03-22-2007, 10:36 PM
i like the concept a lot



Forums Directory