PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Midwest Transit Thread



the urban politician
03-31-2007, 05:12 AM
http://www.midwestbusiness.com/news/viewnews.asp?newsletterID=16895
Midwest’s Great New Form of Transportation Again is the Train 3/30/2007
CHICAGO – If I had shared it out loud, a recent shock I had experienced probably would’ve been laughed out of the room at last Saturday’s joint conference of the Midwest High-Speed Rail Association (MHSRA) and the National Association of Rail Passengers (NARP).

Ten days earlier, I had driven to an interview in Rockford that took less than 90 minutes one way but more than three hours round trip because of the afternoon rush. Because I may make that drive fairly often, I looked up the train schedule to Rockford for times when inclement weather, fatigue or boredom might contraindicate driving in the future.

What’s the joke? There’s no train to Rockford (at least for passengers). However, if I was a ton of lettuce, 20,000 lumps of coal or 5,000 gallons of milk, I’ll be all set.

http://www.midwestbusiness.com/news/img/f16895/lrl.jpg
The St. Louis light rail line.
Photo courtesy of Milwaukee alderman Robert Bauman

“Welcome to the shrinking world of passenger rail,” NARP President George Chilson would say. I realized that this is what rail passengers and aficionados have been enduring arguably for the 36 years since Amtrak kicked in back in 1971. Chilson reported that new Amtrak President Alex Kummant phoned him on his first day on the job.

He also cited the need for private-public partnerships, much greater involvement at the state level and tax-credit bonds to help support and expand ridership.

Fortunately, this model may find real-world support since the trend of shrinking passenger routes has been reversed. Still, any futuristic visions of bullet trains or other high-speed rail systems will have to wait on the back burner a while longer. In essence, we’re still functioning on centuries-old technologies and millennia-old standards: the old saw about railroad tracks being “as wide as a Roman horse” is still accurate and true.

Nonetheless, passenger train ridership is on the increase and it appears that the number of runs and lines will continue to expand within the foreseeable future. This is good news for all types of businesses throughout the Midwest where the greatest resurgence appears to be happening.

This repeated message kept the 200-plus attendees at last Saturday’s conference enthused, engaged and hopeful. Reports from Chilson, MHSRA executive director Rick Harnish and Anne Canby (president of a national initiative called the Surface Transportation Policy Project) detailed acknowledgment by governments and civilians alike that “trains aren’t such a bad idea”.

Some of the main factors contributing to the return of passenger rail include unstable gasoline prices, increasingly unbearable lines and security procedures at airports, the gridlock-level congestion on our highways and the worsening environmental effects of greenhouse gasses and corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards.

Here, Chicagoans have been able to boast one of the best transportation systems in the U.S. Of course, there are high-speed trains in Europe and Asia that put Amtrak’s predictably late-running systems to shame. It’s no secret that the CTA’s crumbling infrastructure is barely able to carry its burgeoning ridership. This past Monday, for example, the New York Times reported:


…deteriorating tracks and trains, chronic budget shortfalls and a region ever more dependent on rail service are forcing Chicagoans to confront the possibility that the system (commonly known as the “El” or the “L”) may be at a breaking point. “We’re living on borrowed time,” said Frank Kruesi, the president of the Chicago Transit Authority.
The fact is there’s no magic wand when we’re looking at modernizing a system that’s 100 years old in a very dense urban environment.

The El, with its 1,190 rail cars and 222 miles of track, is the … second-largest public transit system in the country after New York’s. The CTA’s trains and buses serve the city and 40 suburbs. [They log] 1.55 million rides daily. The El alone accounted for more than 195 million rides last year.

“We call this ‘the year of decision,’” said Stephen E. Schlickman, executive director of the RTA. “The choice,” Schlickman said, “is between a ‘world-class transit system’ and an economic downturn that … a hobbled transit system would most likely bring about.”

The Regional Transit Authority’s Schlickman was in attendance on Saturday. We briefly discussed the fact that the Chicago 2016 committee, which is in the process of wooing the International Olympics Committee, has not yet specified a method of either upgrading or adding to the CTA infrastructure in order to deal with the incredible additional congestion those Olympics would create.

Still, other Midwest cities are playing catch up to Chicago when it comes to developing a rapid-transit system. For example, when Minneapolis finally launched its Hiawatha Line light-rail transit (LRT) system two years ago, officials expected 10,000 riders on the first day. There were 15,000.

Speaking strictly in terms of speed and convenience, most folks are willing to put up with the risk of delays and accidents if they can count on a public transportation system that predictably runs on time. Chicago Amtrak media relations manager Marc Magliari used a PowerPoint presentation to review several encouraging trends including an uptick in ridership just in the four months from late last Oct. 6 through Feb. 7:


Five Chicago-St. Louis round trips (up from three) saw an increase in ridership of 62,309 passengers
Three Chicago-Carbondale round trips saw an increase of 40,604 passengers, and
Two Chicago-Quincy round trips (up from one) saw an increase of 47,437.
Overall ridership growth so far this year, according to Magliari, totals 150,350.

Amtrak is now undergoing its first funding reauthorization hearings since 1997. More than simple budgetary legislation, serious updates to the system (including the development of a state corridor system), demands for on-time performance, strengthening of long-distance routes and serious labor contracts (the last ones having expired in 2000) are on the table.

Alderman Robert Bauman of Milwaukee, who is a staunch advocate of advanced rail systems, provided an encouraging report regarding that city’s progress. He added: “We should be building a seamlessly connected intermodal transportation system based on public service rather than profitability.”

“Since the early 1990s, Milwaukee has been studying and restudying light rail transit. Ironically, during this time over a dozen new light rail systems have been studied and built in other mid-sized cities,” Bauman said. “The study process seems destined to continue for at least several more months as another alternatives analysis – known as the ‘downtown transit connector study’ – is about to be completed.”

According to Bauman, this study proposes the expenditure of significant sums of public money and recommends transportation technologies that may or may not be in the public interest.

For example, there’s a rather absurd concept called the guided bus. Bauman added: “Suffice it to say that guided buses are not a cheap form of light rail but a very expensive version of a bus service.” Fortunately, that concept has been abandoned in favor of several light rail and standard passenger rail routes.

These include commuter routes along the Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) corridor and in downtown Milwaukee, a vision to expand throughout southeast Wisconsin into northeastern Illinois and even a line linking Milwaukee to state capitol Madison. Also, the downtown Milwaukee train station’s $15 million renovation will be completed later in 2007.

Other experts included Bill Hutchinson of All Aboard Ohio (who related plans for a commuter line along Lake Erie from Cleveland to Lorraine) and Mike Whims of the Michigan NARP chapter (who described a commuter line from Detroit to Ann Arbor as well as an Ann Arbor internal line).

Joe Shacter of the Illinois Fast-Track Initiative discussed five-year plans to increase or build passenger lines including Joliet-Springfield, Springfield-St. Louis as well as Rockford, the Quad Cities, Galena-Dubuque, Peoria and Decatur.

The event’s greatest call to arms, however, came from Seattle-based author Alfred Runte, who calls himself a “consulting environmental historian”. A former candidate for mayor of Seattle and ex-professor at the University of Washington, Runte called for a returned to Theodore Roosevelt-styled progressivism by echoing Alderman’s call for “public service rather than profitability” as the guidepost for rebuilding our nation’s railroads.

Oddly enough, Runte was addressing the conference in the same ballroom in which he had celebrated his wedding dinner 36 years earlier. “For the record,” he said, “that marriage ended.” Of equal irony, Runte went on, the railroads were instrumental in the allocation and development of our national park system thanks to President Roosevelt.

Runte’s new book “Allies of the Earth: Railroads and the Soul of Preservation” traces this partnership between the railroads of 100 years ago to the Sierra Club in developing the parks including Yosemite, Sequoia, Glacier, the Grand Canyon and Denali. He is in fact consulting with PBS filmmaker Ken Burns on the latter’s latest documentary “The Best Idea Ever,” whose subject is the U.S. National Parks system.

The coolest new transportation technology at the moment currently appears to be our revived rail system, which will be playing catch up for the next five to 10 years using existing tracks before we see any true, new approaches. Environmentally, in terms of recycling and reuse, this makes more sense than starting from scratch any way.

zaphod
03-31-2007, 11:36 PM
I agree

rail travel can fill the gap between cars and airplanes. medium distances that are a hassle to drive on a regular basis, yet too short to fly.

I wonder what would happen if amtrak moved away from cross country service like they have now and changed the system to focus on services that would be more useful

Latoso
04-01-2007, 10:02 AM
Cool new thread TUP. I thought it was going to be all about Megabus. lol

Robert Pence
04-01-2007, 03:22 PM
I attended that meeting in Chicago, and thought it was well worth the time and effort to get there. I drove from Fort Wayne to South Bend and took the South Shore from there, and then walked the short distance from Van Buren Station to the meeting venue at the Union League Club. Travel-wise, it would have been more convenient to take Amtrak from Waterloo, but the unreliability of that service time-wise ruled it out for me.

After a near-steady diet of hearing people lament what we've lost, it was refreshing and encouraging to hear people there talking of possibilities and positive changes in the political environment and in public perception of rail. Alfred Runte's address was inspiring; he has an almost-evangelical passion for progressive ideals, and he's an eloquent speaker. I bought his book, and I'm about halfway through it. I'm already familiar with much of what he wrote in it, but I hope more people with less familiarity read it; it should help open their eyes.

The comment by Milwaukee's Alderman Bauman caught my attention: “Suffice it to say that guided buses are not a cheap form of light rail but a very expensive version of a bus service.” I wish more people would wake up to that, although if BRT can be used to stake out future light rail ROW and build ridership toward eventual rail implementation, I'm not totally opposed to it. Sometimes baby steps are necessary.

Regarding long-distance trains, the perception that they're counterproductive to effective passenger rail service in the US, and not an important, integral, productive part of a national system is, to a large degree, the result of accounting manipulations that distort the facts. Runte covers that quite effectively in his book.

Critics of long-distance passenger trains tend to compare traveling from New York to Chicago or Chicago to Los Angeles by train with making the same trip by air, from the perspective of the business traveler. What they neglect is that unlike airplanes, passenger trains connect intermediate cities and towns that sometimes are not well-served by airlines, and they provide a valued service to non-business travelers who make up more than half the long- and intermediate-distance travelers in the United States.

the urban politician
04-02-2007, 05:36 AM
^ Interesting.

When you talk about optimism in this latest meeting, did you get any impression whether these pro-transit leaders actually sense a true long-term changing of perspective towards transit or is this more likely perceived to be just a fad?

jpIllInoIs
04-11-2007, 05:38 PM
http://www.midwesthsr.org/index.htm

No news to report, but the web link above is great. Many of the SSP members already no of it, but we should pass it on to all.

The Midwest Highspeed Rail Association has an open membership progrm. For $25.00 you can join in and support the initiatives. This website alone is worth that. Spend some time and go deep into this website for a look at what is planned. Especially the corridors plans and the Gate 7 plan for Ohare



Forums Directory