PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : B.C. to buy run-down hotels to house Vancouver's homeless



SpongeG
Apr 5, 2007, 4:45 AM
VANCOUVER -- Just a few blocks from where the city devolves into the social chaos of the Downtown Eastside, Premier Gordon Campbell and Mayor Sam Sullivan announced a major new initiative yesterday aimed at the homelessness problem plaguing Vancouver.

The province is providing $80-million to purchase 15 buildings, mostly single-room-occupancy (SRO) hotels in the Downtown Eastside, which will provide nearly 1,000 units for the homeless. The project also includes developing new social housing on three properties owned by the city.

Officials said it is the largest single commitment to social housing in the history of British Columbia.

Ten of the SRO buildings are in Vancouver (including the historic Marble Arch Hotel on Richards Street and the Savoy Hotel on East Hastings) with four in Burnaby and one in Victoria.

Mr. Sullivan, whose council has been pursuing a plan to purchase at least one SRO hotel each year for 10 years -- a program he was falling behind on and which has triggered protests in the streets -- seemed overwhelmed.

"Thank you, thank you, thank you," the mayor said to Mr. Campbell and two senior cabinet members who were attending, Rich Coleman, Minister Responsible for Housing, and Claude Richmond, Minister of Employment and Income Assistance.

"Today is the day we begin to turn the tide on homelessness," said Mr. Sullivan, who plans to ask council to direct $5-million to the project.

"Think about it. In one day we've done 10 years worth of effort," he said.

Cheap SRO hotel rooms are often the last stop before people end up living on the street. The buildings have been under increasing pressure in the Downtown Eastside where developers have been converting them into condominiums or more expensive hotels.

There are an estimated 2,174 homeless people living in the Greater Vancouver region, double the number that was counted in 2002. The figure has been projected to triple by 2010, the year Vancouver plays host to the Olympics, giving protest groups a rallying point that has led to clashes with police, the theft of the Olympic flag from city hall grounds and the defacement of a countdown clock that is marking the time until the Games start.

In announcing the housing strategy at the Salvation Army's Belkin House, Mr. Campbell said his government was not spurred to action by the recent protests.

"It was really no factor at all, to be quite honest about it. We have been investing significantly more in housing . . . [and] this is really the results of months and months of work."

He said that, if anything, the protests have hindered the effort by causing a distraction from the hard policy work that had to be done.

"I don't think, frankly, the protesters have helped their cause. I think they take away from it. I think the community generally wants to support [homeless] people, they want to find answers, and the way to find answers is to work together and that's what we're doing here."

Mr. Campbell said more housing projects will follow, but this action was needed to secure the SRO hotels before they were sold or converted to less affordable housing.

He said the SRO buildings, and the new facilities to be built on city property, will be linked to social support programs so that occupants can begin rebuilding their lives.

"It really, I think, takes us a leap forward in terms of providing support . . . so when people come and live there they will have a chance to connect with the health-care providers and the social supports they need and hopefully we'll be able to make a transition to healthier housing in the long term for everyone."

Critics said the government's plan isn't enough.

NDP MLA Jenny Kwan said homelessness doubled in Greater Vancouver between 2002 and 2005, and about 700 units of low-income housing have been lost in the Downtown Eastside since the Olympics were awarded to Vancouver.

Jean Swanson, co-ordinator of the Carnegie Community Action Project, described the initiative as "a baby step in the right direction."

She said purchasing existing SROs that are already full doesn't do anything to reduce the problem.

"What we really need is new affordable housing," she said.

Ms. Swanson said a committee that has been advising VANOC on housing issues recently recommended the building of 3,200 affordable housing units, the purchase of 800 SROs and a 50-per-cent increase in the welfare payment rate.

"So they have acquired the SROs, but now there is a lot more that has to be done," she said.

SRO units have been in decline in Vancouver. In 1970, there were 13,300 SROs, but by 2005 there were only 5,000.

Anna Hunter, of the Anti-Poverty Committee, said the government is finally acknowledging there is a housing crisis in B.C., but "as usual, their response is too little, too late." :koko: :shrug: :rolleyes:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070404.BCHOUSING04/TPStory/National

crazyjoeda
Apr 5, 2007, 6:05 AM
Morons.

Why are they opening more shelters/low income housesing on the Downtown Eastside? That is part of the problem, there is a community impoverished people living on the DTES and lets face it many of them are drug users and pettie crooks. It is a cancer on our otherwise beautiful downtown core, I think we need to have more shelters/ low income houseing but spread through out the Lower Mainland.

The DTES side needs to be redevelopment, ordinary people should feel comfortable to walk anywhere.


BTW - I think the Anti Poverty Committee should be shut down, they are a terrorist group IMO. Do they serve a purpose to anyone?? They instigate hate towards homeless people and they terrorize anyone who can afford to pay rent or morgage.

renthefinn
Apr 5, 2007, 6:24 AM
Funny they're buying 14 times as many in the GVA, than in Victoria, I think they should look at the homless problems in each area before investing this money not to mention per capita wise it doesn't make much sense. GVA isn't even 10 times the size of the Greater Victoria Area let alone 14 times the size, also I don't really see many homeless hanging around in Burnaby, maybe it'd be better spent in Surrey. Per Capita wise as well, I'd bet Victoria is in more need of these sorts of initiatives than anywhere else in the province besides Vancouver. Just saying the province has been ignoring Victoria since the Liberals came to power, thought that might change a little, not like the Lower Mainland doesn't deserve most of this stuff, but it gets harder and harder to hear announcments for other areas of the province that per capita wise is much more generous than what the Island communities have gotten. Maybe this is punishment for us getting the Island highway from the NDP, but there's many people on the Island that agree it was a waste of money, but it wasn't our choice.

Lee_Haber8
Apr 5, 2007, 7:36 AM
I don't see how this is going to help. It doesn't matter how cheap the housing is - if you are drug addicted and have no income you are not going to be able to afford anything.

jlousa
Apr 5, 2007, 2:33 PM
I'm not too concerned about the Government buying these properties up, they aren't adding to the supply. Those buildings are already there, the only difference is they will be fixed up and run better then they are currently, while quieting the opponents while other developments in the area take place. In fact the government will probably come out ahead as instead of paying a landlord they simply keep the money inhouse, of course they have higher overhead, but in 5-10 years watch for them to slowly offload them one at a time for a nice appreciation.

MolsonExport
Apr 5, 2007, 4:45 PM
1/16 star hotels, anyone?

leftside
Apr 5, 2007, 5:02 PM
I'm kinda in agreement here with crazyjoeda. On the surface this does seem like further government endorsement of the ghetto, but if we see other SRO's converted to market housing there still might be hope that this area improves in the next 5-10 years.

djh
Apr 5, 2007, 5:33 PM
I'm not too concerned about the Government buying these properties up, they aren't adding to the supply. Those buildings are already there, the only difference is they will be fixed up and run better then they are currently, while quieting the opponents while other developments in the area take place. In fact the government will probably come out ahead as instead of paying a landlord they simply keep the money inhouse, of course they have higher overhead, but in 5-10 years watch for them to slowly offload them one at a time for a nice appreciation.

PRECISELY
The Government spin on it - particularly loudmouth Sullivan, who probably had nothing to do with the process but is trying to take all the credit - is as if they've just magicked-up 1000 new homes. These buildings almost all are already in use, with people living in them. All that is changed is the name of the landlord. There will still be a couple of thousand people who are homeless in the GVRD.

Even so, it's a very very promising start, especially if it leads to NEW beds being supplied, and as people have mentioned, OUTSIDE of the GVRD.


Does everybody realise that within the Concord Master Plan there were specific sites that the city/province forced the developer to leave as potential affordable housing? Just look at the Concord sites and notice all of those undeveloped plots that you are probably assuming are the "next phase" of the development (I think somebody posted a map about 6 or 7 pages back, FYI). Well they're waiting for government funding for housing. Now is the perfect time to start building them.

SpongeG
Apr 6, 2007, 3:02 AM
yes - they built one next to the cambie street bridge

not exactly the best place for selling homes

leftside
Nov 7, 2007, 10:30 PM
I recently received this in an email today. I'm amazed that only 2-3 of these properties are in the DTES. Well done.
http://www.bchousing.org/resources/Programs/PHI/Vancouver_MOU/12_sites_map.pdf

The majority of the 12 city sites were identified as part of the City’s Supportive Housing Strategy, approved by City Council in June 2007. The strategy focuses on providing more safe, secure and affordable housing plus support services in response to the current homelessness situation. Today, Vancouver has an estimated 2,000 homeless people living on the street or in emergency shelters on any given night.
The new units will be social and supportive housing to accommodate the homeless and those at risk of homelessness who are living on the streets or in shelters, and those living in inadequate single room occupancy hotels.
“Supportive housing is an effective way to help break the cycle of homelessness and enables people to regain their dignity and independence,” said Mark Smith, executive director of Triage Emergency Services & Care Society, operator of a range of supportive housing services, including the newly-opened development at Fraser and 39th Ave. “Fraser House is a great example of how well-planned supportive housing can integrate into the community and alleviate the concerns local residents may have about homelessness and the related issues that go with it.”
The proposal, outlined in a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the City and the Province, provides several opportunities for public input. In addition to the Dec. 12 City Council public meeting, there will be project-specific open houses in the first few months of 2008, where the community can review the proposed designs, building programs and management plans. It is anticipated the first projects will be considered by the Development Permit Board in June, where the public can provide comment. There will also be opportunities for public input for the properties that require rezoning.
The MOU and an accompanying city staff report are available at:

http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20071113/documents/rr3.pdf and
http://www.bchousing.org/programs/homelessness/municipal_approvals.

officedweller
Nov 7, 2007, 11:22 PM
Thanks for the link.

I could see opposition to 1050 Expo Blvd (triangle site between Expo & Pacific Blvds) - although the site has been long slated as a social housing site.

The 1308 Seymour site is listed as being 4 lots - I guess that includes the Saturna/Mars/??? nightclub site?

And I guess that the 1233-251 Howe site is the Odyssey nightclub?

David
Nov 7, 2007, 11:33 PM
1251 Howe is the Odyssey. I guess 1233 is the old house right next door.
I'll be sad to see it go but I've heard rumours that they're going to move somewhere else within 2-3 years.