|
| | You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum. For the full version follow the link below.
View Full Version : The Olympic Flame: Where?
| |
|
Rusty Gull
Apr 9, 2007, 5:48 AM
One of the most iconic images from any Olymics Games is the Olympic flame. And so the question needs to be asked: Where should the Games organizers place the flame during the 2010 Games?
The IOC requires the Olympic flame be visible to the spectators of the Opening Ceremony, therefore, the flame will be located inside the dome. A secondary flame can always be located at one of the locations you just mentioned.
A flame for the Whistler Celebration Plaza, location of the Whistler Olympic medal ceremonies, Paralympic medal ceremonies, and Paralympic Closing Ceremony, has already been confirmed.
Holden West
Apr 9, 2007, 6:56 AM
Revolving atop the Woodward's "W".
Teh awesome.
Distill3d
Apr 9, 2007, 5:13 PM
during the Calgary games in 88, we had the flame atop the Calgary Tower (ironically, the Olympic torches were styled similarly to the tower). Whats that building in Vancouver with the observation thing on top, Harbour Centre or something? why not fit it with a flame bowl there and have the flame on top?
Rusty Gull
Apr 9, 2007, 5:40 PM
Interesting, Distill3d. That's why the flame might find its best home atop Greater Vancouver's highest "tower" (or one of its highest) -- Grouse Mountain.
raggedy13
Apr 9, 2007, 5:59 PM
I think they should setup a cauldron in the middle of False Creek. That way it could be seen from all surrounding areas including around BC Place and the Athlete's Village. It would look nice with Science World as a backdrop as well. Somewhere around where this boat is turning perhaps...
http://images.worldofstock.com/slides/TAW2600.jpg
http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/commsvcs/southeast/images/sefc.jpg
crazyjoeda
Apr 9, 2007, 6:02 PM
yah in False Creek would be cool.
during the Calgary games in 88, we had the flame atop the Calgary Tower (ironically, the Olympic torches were styled similarly to the tower). Whats that building in Vancouver with the observation thing on top, Harbour Centre or something? why not fit it with a flame bowl there and have the flame on top?
The thing is, that has been done....by Calgary. We want to keep it original.
Would be cool if we could have a big flame atop Grouse Mountain for all the Lower Mainland to see (hehe, reminds me of Lord of the Rings). VANOC is also planning to erect massive Olympic rings along the mountainside of Grouse as well as Olympic rings onto False Creek.
vanman
Apr 9, 2007, 7:12 PM
Haven't you guys seen this video before?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOdFtcEYe1k
At about 1:40 it shows BC Place completely ringed with flames. I think this is already the official plan.
^ after the roof deflation, i don't think they're gonna risk another deflation with that idea.
vanman
Apr 9, 2007, 7:56 PM
As far as I know, teflon doesn't burn.
As far as I know, teflon doesn't burn.
Still, it's a huge risk with 55,000 spectators inside, 3,000 of the world's best in winter sports, 10,000 performers, 2,000 volunteers, 2,000 media personnel, and IOC delegates, our politicians, world dignitaries, and a world audience of 3 billion.
Distill3d
Apr 9, 2007, 8:07 PM
As far as I know, teflon doesn't burn.
doesn't stick either :haha:
http://scutopus.com/scutopics/gas_stove.jpg
Distill3d
Apr 9, 2007, 9:26 PM
i could see this:
http://scutopus.com/scutopics/gas_stove.jpg
in this:
http://images.worldofstock.com/slides/TAW2600.jpg
would be kinda cool lookin...
SpongeG
Apr 9, 2007, 10:06 PM
a flame around the BC place would be easy to control - first sign of anything bad and the gas can be cut off
i thought they would have it at the medal podium wherever that is going
mr.x
Apr 9, 2007, 10:30 PM
a flame around the BC place would be easy to control - first sign of anything bad and the gas can be cut off
i thought they would have it at the medal podium wherever that is going
If the Olympic flame goes out during the Olympics (before the Closing), how does that make us look?
ReginaGuy
Apr 10, 2007, 12:07 AM
I voted for Stanley Park
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2913/forestfireoe5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
squeezied
Apr 10, 2007, 12:08 AM
hehe
feepa
Apr 10, 2007, 12:40 AM
I voted for Stanley Park
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2913/forestfireoe5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Too bad your picture is from Montana
SpongeG
Apr 10, 2007, 12:43 AM
If the Olympic flame goes out during the Olympics (before the Closing), how does that make us look?
i just don;t think there is any risk for the idea
i really don't care what they do with it
maybe they can light up teh DTES so no one has to see how gross it is
mr.x
Apr 10, 2007, 3:37 AM
i just don;t think there is any risk for the idea
i really don't care what they do with it
maybe they can light up teh DTES so no one has to see how gross it is
It is a huge risk. Not only that but there's cost....the Sydney cauldron, for 17 days, used up nearly half a million dollars worth of natural gas. To provide the same effect in the video, the BC Place "Ring of Fire" cauldron would probably use up tens of millions of dollars worth of natural gas......not to mention, it's not exactly good for the environment.....you can be sure that activists and protesters will be there...
Rusty Gull
Apr 10, 2007, 3:50 AM
It's interesting to note that over 10 percent of respondents have voted for Main and Hastings. Is this in jest, or do some SSP members sincerely believe that having the Olympic flame at that intersection would be VANOC's olive branch, if you will, to the disenfranchised members of that community, as well as some of the protester groups associated with the DTES.
Canadian Mind
Apr 10, 2007, 4:11 AM
It is a huge risk. Not only that but there's cost....the Sydney cauldron, for 17 days, used up nearly half a million dollars worth of natural gas. To provide the same effect in the video, the BC Place "Ring of Fire" cauldron would probably use up tens of millions of dollars worth of natural gas......not to mention, it's not exactly good for the environment.....you can be sure that activists and protesters will be there...
have it powered by wood-pellets laced with an accelerant, and have hot water pipes strung through it to give the illusion of environmental freindlyness.
as for grouse mountain... light the forest on fire.
ckkelley
Apr 10, 2007, 4:27 AM
I would have voted for Grouse Mountain but depending on the weather there might be long stretches when you won't be able to see it.
So I voted for Robson Square instead. Mostly because I can see Robson Square from my condo.:redface:
Hourglass
Apr 10, 2007, 5:02 AM
I would have voted for Grouse Mountain but depending on the weather there might be long stretches when you won't be able to see it.
Umm... yeah. In the highly unlikely event it's foggy or overcast (in Feb??? Never!), you might not see the flame on Grouse Mountain at all for days at a time.
Robson Square makes a lot of sense. Or how about at the top of one of the bridges eg. Burrard or even Lion's Gate?
I also like the idea of a cauldron in False Creek.
ctown.myth
Apr 10, 2007, 5:06 AM
Too bad there isn't a choice named 'Calgary' :D.
mr.x
Apr 10, 2007, 5:11 AM
have it powered by wood-pellets laced with an accelerant, and have hot water pipes strung through it to give the illusion of environmental freindlyness.
as for grouse mountain... light the forest on fire.
http://www.city.kelowna.bc.ca/CityPage/Images/%5CFire/Okanagan%20Mountain%20Fire.jpg
http://www.bbcanada.com/pics/2652g.jpg
hehe.
biggiebear
Apr 10, 2007, 5:13 AM
Go grab that floating McDonalds and drag it out to False Creek and light it. The amount of grease in there should keep it burning the entire games. "I'm lovin it":haha:
mr.x
Apr 10, 2007, 8:16 AM
Go grab that floating McDonalds and drag it out to False Creek and light it. The amount of grease in there should keep it burning the entire games. "I'm lovin it":haha:
I've heard rumours that it sank during one of winter storms.:haha:
Nutterbug
Apr 10, 2007, 5:01 PM
APC headquarters.
A nice big bonfire.
Nutterbug
Apr 10, 2007, 5:05 PM
I would have voted for Grouse Mountain but depending on the weather there might be long stretches when you won't be able to see it.
It should be big and bright enough to glow through the clouds then.
Does it have to be an authentic combustion flame? Would some other less energy consuming optical simulation do?
deasine
Apr 22, 2007, 12:37 AM
Hi I'm new:
Wouldn't outside of BC Place around Pacific Blvd. @ Cambie St. be good? I mean, people can see it from the Olympic Village too... (The area where sun runners run off down the ramp down to the finish line).
clooless
Apr 23, 2007, 2:45 AM
It's interesting to note that over 10 percent of respondents have voted for Main and Hastings. Is this in jest, or do some SSP members sincerely believe that having the Olympic flame at that intersection would be VANOC's olive branch, if you will, to the disenfranchised members of that community, as well as some of the protester groups associated with the DTES.
Main and Hastings would be hilarious. You'd see all the crack/meth/whatever users struggling to get their pipes over the flame to use the heat. The flame at Main and Hastings? Get serious. You may as well just throw a metal drum down, fill it will wood and light in on fire as put it there. :(
In my opinion, nothing short of cancelling the Olympics and channeling the money into building mansions for each and every downtown eastside resident complete with a lifetime supply of drugs would appease DERA. Obviously, I am being facetious here but what has the DERA ever really done for the residents of the downtown eastside other than perpetuate lives filled with drug addiction and poverty? They need to get people out of the downtown eastside and away from the culture of drugs and crime and into fulfilling lives.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.