PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : United's CFO says merger still a goal



roadwarrior
06-13-2007, 11:23 PM
United's CFO says merger still a goal
By DAVE CARPENTER
AP BUSINESS WRITER

CHICAGO -- United Airlines remains interested in industry consolidation and would like to team up with a U.S. carrier with a strong presence in the Northeast and a hub in the South, its chief financial officer said Wednesday.

Jake Brace told analysts there are candidates for such a merger but indicated United has no intention of attempting a hostile takeover, citing the recent failed bid by US Airways Group Inc. to acquire Delta Air Lines Inc.

"Consolidation is not something that one company can do in isolation," he said at the Merrill Lynch Global Transportation Conference in New York. "We don't believe that ... hostiles in the airline industry are very successful. Our belief is that you have to do something on a consensual basis."

United, a unit of Chicago-based UAL Corp., publicly began touting the need for industry consolidation even before ending a three-year bankruptcy restructuring last year. But the nation's second-largest carrier has taken a lower profile on the subject in recent months with conditions less ripe for a merger.

Not only are U.S. airlines financially more stable than in recent years, both Delta and Northwest Airlines Corp. completed their restructurings this spring, thus eliminating rivals' ability to acquire them in bankruptcy and slash costs more readily in court.

Brace rejected a suggestion that United has downgraded consolidation as a priority and shed some light on what it has in mind if it can find a willing merger partner. He said it would like to combine with another airline that is strong in the Atlantic and needs a southern-tier hub to strengthen its service to the Caribbean and Latin America, where it has a smaller presence than other U.S. airlines.

"Our focus is on the Northeast, a southern-tier hub and helping us in Latin America," he said.

Delta, US Airways and Continental Airlines Inc. all have been mentioned as possible merger partners for United, although Brace didn't name names.

Airline consultant Robert Mann said Delta is the likeliest candidate, with strengths in both areas.

"If you're just taking the (Brace) hints, you'd say Delta," said Mann, who is based in Port Washington, N.Y.

"He's basically saying the same thing that (CEO Glenn) Tilton's been saying for a long time, which is 'Please, someone write us a big check.'"

Tilton and other advocates of consolidation say the industry would be financially stronger and more efficient by a merger that would eliminate excess capacity and help boost fares and revenue.

Delta CEO Gerald Grinstein disclosed last October that United had contacted the Atlanta-based airline about a possible merger in 2005, which Delta rejected. United also hired Goldman Sachs & Co. last year to explore strategic options.

Shares in UAL Corp. rose 43 cents to $35.03 Wednesday, down from $44 at the start of the year.

---

On the Net:

http://www.united.com

Marcu
06-13-2007, 11:37 PM
Fine with me. Just stay in Chicago.

SnyderBock
06-15-2007, 01:13 PM
Or move to Denver, where they are better suited.

Saddle Man
06-15-2007, 01:18 PM
United management should focus on running the airline, and forget about mergers. Instead, they're out begging co/dl/nw to merge with them.

nergie
06-15-2007, 01:43 PM
Or move to Denver, where they are better suited.

Please explain this, the DIA O &D market and metro size is nowhere close to ORD.

roadwarrior
06-15-2007, 01:59 PM
United management should focus on running the airline, and forget about mergers. Instead, they're out begging co/dl/nw to merge with them.

I doubt they'd merge with Northwest. There is too much overlap in their Asia Pacific routes and Northwest doesn't have the strength in the South/Latin America that they are looking for.

trvlr70
06-15-2007, 02:49 PM
United has royally f'd up. They had the benefit of bankruptcy and after two years, they are barely staying afloat. All the while, the other legacy carriers are making huge strides and have longterm goals and plans. UA's terrible management simply readied the airline to be a takeover target, but nobody has any interest in such a screwed up airline with terrible labor relations and very poor customer service.

Tilton should be fired by the board. He had no goals for the airline except to be taken over. What a loser!

Daquan13
06-15-2007, 03:04 PM
And don't forget his predecessrs, such as Wolf and Goodwin, both of whom had already planted the seeds for the carrier to go into financial ruins.

The only one who seemed to be caring for the co. and its employees was Jerry Greenwald.

roadwarrior
06-15-2007, 03:41 PM
United has royally f'd up. They had the benefit of bankruptcy and after two years, they are barely staying afloat. All the while, the other legacy carriers are making huge strides and have longterm goals and plans. UA's terrible management simply readied the airline to be a takeover target, but nobody has any interest in such a screwed up airline with terrible labor relations and very poor customer service.

Tilton should be fired by the board. He had no goals for the airline except to be taken over. What a loser!

Well, as a frequent flier on United, I see both sides of the story. I do not think that it isn't a great idea to have no long term strategy, but I do like some of the extra perks that customers get on United, that aren't available on other US carriers. With this in mind, I don't think that rapid organic growth and capital investment is necessarily a good thing in the airline industry. It is if you're a low cost carrier, but not necessarily if you're a United, American, Delta, etc. From a customer perspective, it would be better to have 6 major carriers, to keep down prices, drive competition, etc. However, from a business perspective, I don't think this is a good idea. You're talking about an "empty-core" industry that stays around for a while, even while losing money. With more and more carriers expanding internationally, this will increase competition and lower prices. From a business perspective, this will also eat into the long-term profits of the airlines, that are banking on the lucrative international routes as their bread and butter. Industry analysts say that there really needs to be only 3 major US-based carriers (not 6), with the low cost carriers picking up the rest of the slack. So, while you can fault United's management for other blunders, I'd say that trying for a merger is actually a smart strategic move. The airlines that get left out of the mergers are those that will falter long-term. While I can understand Delta's reluctance to merge with US airways (i.e. executives don't want to lose their jobs), with a business sense, it wasn't a smart move by the creditors. Personal egos get in the way of sound business decisions. It is inevitable that within the next 2-3 years, we will see some major mergers in the industry and United is just being proactive about this.

nergie
06-15-2007, 06:49 PM
United has royally f'd up. They had the benefit of bankruptcy and after two years, they are barely staying afloat. All the while, the other legacy carriers are making huge strides and have longterm goals and plans. UA's terrible management simply readied the airline to be a takeover target, but nobody has any interest in such a screwed up airline with terrible labor relations and very poor customer service.

Tilton should be fired by the board. He had no goals for the airline except to be taken over. What a loser!

While I agree that Tilton should get canned. I am a frequent flyer on UA/Star Alliance and I think United has some very lucrative assets the other major carries do not have. The Chicago market is the 2nd largest air market in N. America, and is the home hub for UA. UA has major hubs on both coasts, most of the major carriers have hubs on one coast not the other. UA has the greatest access of any US airline to the Chinese market. Furthermore, UA has one of the best route structures to the Pacific. UA's weeknesses, management aside, is lack of routes in the North East and a sustainable Latin American Hub.

Customer service, outside of Continental the other major airlines all have some major work ahead of them. I am Global Services on United which means two things. I travel way too much, but I am also on top of the Frequent Flyer Pyramid. I get very good service, but when I fly Continental what is considered special at UA is normal service at CO.

trvlr70
06-15-2007, 07:57 PM
While I agree that Tilton should get canned. I am a frequent flyer on UA/Star Alliance and I think United has some very lucrative assets the other major carries do not have. The Chicago market is the 2nd largest air market in N. America, and is the home hub for UA. UA has major hubs on both coasts, most of the major carriers have hubs on one coast not the other. UA has the greatest access of any US airline to the Chinese market. Furthermore, UA has one of the best route structures to the Pacific. UA's weeknesses, management aside, is lack of routes in the North East and a sustainable Latin American Hub.

Customer service, outside of Continental the other major airlines all have some major work ahead of them. I am Global Services on United which means two things. I travel way too much, but I am also on top of the Frequent Flyer Pyramid. I get very good service, but when I fly Continental what is considered special at UA is normal service at CO.Without doubt, UA has the BEST route network, the best alliance, the best hub strongholds of any airline in the world. ORD, SFO, NRT, LHR, IAD....you can't beat this. Yet, even with all those benefits, UA's weak management is so terrible that the ship is still sinking.

Tilton tried to make UA a sellable takeover target. That to me seems the path the airline has been on. Tilton is managing the company is a classic way that suggests that this is the ultimate goal. Think about all the speechaes about loosening foreign investment restrictions in the airline industry.

At this point, UA is only managing cashflow...not investing in the future, That says a lot. Also, it's depressing how uncompetative in cost and operations that UA remains, despite a prolongued bankruptcy and huge pain for the employees. Despite the bankruptcy and all it bought, UA is quickly loosing more ground. It is heartbreaking to witness.



Forums Directory