PDA

View Full Version : Why is this not in the primary?


Patrick
Sep 21, 2003, 12:27 AM
I drew the Spear and Stewart Towers in San Fran and I think mine are more accurate, can someone who can change the drawings please put these two drawings in the primary Diagram?

Thanks

The Real Thing
http://www.equityoffice.com/images/ONEMARKE_352.jpg
Mine -
1710617105

LM's
7965 7966

LMich
Sep 21, 2003, 12:35 AM
Hey Patrick, you towers are how they look during a sunset, mine were drawn how they look in a normal light. I'm planning on redrawing and refining my diagram soon anyway.

http://www.skyscraperpicture.com/sf21.jpg

John Hinds
Sep 21, 2003, 1:21 AM
LMichigan's drawings have the correct amount of floors for the base of the buildings.

Kelvin
Sep 21, 2003, 2:06 AM
Another example where one unified diagram would look better than two separate ones...

LMich
Sep 21, 2003, 4:16 PM
I remember specifically making a conjoined diagram and everyone told me to enter them as two different buildings. My question is how would we represent the shorter tower?

mpls
Sep 21, 2003, 4:43 PM
i remember that thread. :)

Jared
Sep 21, 2003, 6:06 PM
LM, what i do is put the first one down under roof height, then at the bottom of the height entry thing, you can add custom heights. so put "short building" x metres tall, and then under the comments put "building has y floors"

LMich
Sep 21, 2003, 6:40 PM
Oh, ok. I think I'll redraw mine later today. I need to change the color a bit too.

Kelvin
Sep 22, 2003, 3:45 PM
Yes, Jared's remarks are how you would do it, but until we have a way of removing the other entry (i.e. the shorter tower) from the database it's best to keep the two submissions separate. I have a whole list of pairs & triplets that I think should be shown under one unified diagram...