View Full Version : Some tunning corrections.

Jul 27, 2007, 6:29 PM
According to my thread http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?p=2974324#post2974324 please do some small corrections:

1) http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=1528

The correct Neighborhood this CENU 3 towers complex is Brooklin Novo
or Campo Belo.

As the tower is situated exactly in corner of Marginal Pinheiros and Av. Águas Espraiadas (now Av. Roberto Marinho) next to the new bridge complex Complexo Viário Roberto Marinho and near Av. Berrini, it is far away the Itaim Bibi city part.

See those Addresses in this tower: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=CENU+Torre+Norte+S%C3%A3o+Paulo+endereco

2) http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=64440

After doing my drawing I consider 120m to roof the concrete base tower too much comparing to the restaurant level between 80m upto 100m, even estimate.

So please change Height as follow:

Telecommunication Tower: 160m
Roof Concrete Base tower: 110m
Restaurant level: ~90m, about 90m in 2 glassy floors for Restaurant use at top base concrete tower part.

upper Floors: 2
Elevators: 1

Materials: Reinf. Concrete (Base tower), Steel ( Telecommunication tower atop concrete round cilindrical base of SBT eminations), Glass (2 floors of Restaurant).

3) http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=11076

According FGV high business school website, the correct Address is like:

Address: Av. 9 de Julho, 2029 – CEP: 01313-902 Bela Vista

Materials: Glass, Concrete, Granit, Steel, Aluminium

Thanks for reviewing. :tup:

Jul 27, 2007, 11:17 PM
So, which neighborhood is it for the CENU complex, Brooklin Novo
or Campo Belo? If you're to post a correction, the least you should know is the correct answer to your own correction.

Also, unless a tower structure has multiple evenly spaced floors, we don't use floor numbers for towers.

Jul 28, 2007, 7:38 AM
Brooklin Novo is the most correct.

The Torre do SBT has 2 floors of restaurant in one tower.

Could you also please put the Faria Lima Premium drawing as primary as it has the most correct height of 96m and a front-side view instead of the other just front view and in 102m??? Thanks.

Jul 28, 2007, 8:56 AM
I don't know what you're talking about, your most recent drawing is the primary for the Faria Lima Premium.

Jul 28, 2007, 9:30 AM
up to yesterday was not, but today i had problems accessing the diagrams part to see. When the bugs for me works properly again, I will have a chance to see. Thanks anyway. :cheers:


In the entry above could you correct the word company in text? comapny many thanks again.