PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Vancouver's Turn / 1153 West Georgia | 188m | 67 fl | U/C



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

sacrifice333
Nov 18, 2008, 4:23 AM
We'll have to keep our fingers crossed.

RC still needs a builder, yes?

Seeing this thing above grade with some glazing would be nice.

Mike K.
Nov 18, 2008, 5:31 AM
:hyper:

SpongeG
Nov 18, 2008, 6:55 AM
This is incredible news -- RC is back, baby!!!! Crack open the bubbly... if there's one project that needs to live in British Columbia, this is THE one...

someone tell CTV

what do we mean its back?

LeftCoaster
Nov 18, 2008, 4:24 PM
We'll have to keep our fingers crossed.

RC still needs a builder, yes?

Seeing this thing above grade with some glazing would be nice.

Not necessarily, Westbank is building Fairmont Pacific Rim without a construction manager. It can certainly be done, you just need to have the right staff on hand... which i doubt Holborn does.

I will reserve all celebration and 'bubbly' until i see this thing at least several floors above grade. This project is still miles from being on stable ground.

thefly
Nov 19, 2008, 11:52 PM
Rumour has it that there is an application with cityhall to increase the amount of hotel rooms. If this is true then it bolds well. I have no insight on it though.

It's long been known that the Ritz wanted more rooms, and as the Residences didn't sell out it would be easy enough to remove some condo units and increase the hotel by a few floors. Of course this would reduce the amount of profit by the developer by a sizeable amount. Either way there is quite a lot of activity brewing behind the scenes on this project at the moment so I imagine we will learn something shortly and be able to end all this suspense.

I've looked into this and while it may eventually come true this sounds like it is just a rumour at this point. One big issue is that it would mean the filing of an amended disclosure statement which of course brings rescission rights with it.

sacrifice333
Nov 19, 2008, 11:59 PM
I've looked into this and while it may eventually come true this sounds like it is just a rumour at this point. One big issue is that it would mean the filing of an amended disclosure statement which of course brings rescission rights with it.

Could the developer "upgrade" people on the lowest residential floors for now, and then after construction is complete, apply, and make the appropriate changes to provide the hotel with the additional space it wanted to thereby avoiding the need to file an amended disclosure statement?

thefly
Nov 20, 2008, 3:39 PM
Could the developer "upgrade" people on the lowest residential floors for now, and then after construction is complete, apply, and make the appropriate changes to provide the hotel with the additional space it wanted to thereby avoiding the need to file an amended disclosure statement?

No, if any of the floors allocations are changed this would require the filing of an amended DS. The simple fact is that everyone's space is different then what they bought at the time and this would also change their unit entitlement so their monthly fees would change.

TwoFace
Nov 20, 2008, 5:10 PM
No, if any of the floors allocations are changed this would require the filing of an amended DS. The simple fact is that everyone's space is different then what they bought at the time and this would also change their unit entitlement so their monthly fees would change.

Good point, "re-selling" the project in current market conditions could be an Olympic feat in itself.

towrguy3
Nov 27, 2008, 9:00 PM
The foundation is going deeper

Canadian Mind
Nov 27, 2008, 10:27 PM
The foundation is going deeper

You are back?

Thanks for the update.

mr.x
Nov 27, 2008, 10:41 PM
You are back?

Thanks for the update.

What appears to be only for a little while.:cool: :cheers:

LeftCoaster
Nov 27, 2008, 10:44 PM
What appears to be only for a little while.:cool: :cheers:

Yoda? Is that you?

mr.x
Nov 28, 2008, 12:23 AM
Yoda? Is that you?

Lost a planet Master Obi-Wan has. How embarrassing…

MapleLeaf
Dec 7, 2008, 12:15 AM
I really like the vitality of the building on the renderings. I can´t wait to see this being built. :tup:

subdude
Dec 7, 2008, 6:53 AM
Cool, they're still working on it. Activity from yesterday, photo by me:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3062/3088141267_1f81a0eeae_o.jpg

flight_from_kamakura
Dec 8, 2008, 1:14 AM
don't tease us you bastards! have some pity!

mr.x
Dec 8, 2008, 1:50 AM
^ news just in: Terasen Gas building next door topples in on the Ritz Carlton site.

squeezied
Dec 8, 2008, 2:04 AM
?

mr.x
Dec 8, 2008, 2:05 AM
Taken by yellow fever over at ssc:

http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr71/yellowfever_2008/2054244464_451ffe2f8a_m-1.jpg

http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr71/yellowfever_2008/2053465433_2d8c152005.jpg

giallo
Dec 8, 2008, 2:14 AM
That's a beautiful model.
Keep digging, guys. Don't stop!

mr.x
Dec 8, 2008, 2:15 AM
Keep diggin till we hit Hong Kong! Maybe the 2 IFC will invert itself into Vancouver!

Hong Kongese
Dec 8, 2008, 2:43 AM
Oops! Sorry guys, I didn't take those pics, I got them from flickr and the credit goes to Ahmad Kavousian. :)

Waterloo_Guy
Dec 8, 2008, 6:29 AM
I thought this got canceled? Is this thing still a go? I'd love to see it in the Vancouver skyline.

Yume-sama
Dec 8, 2008, 6:46 AM
I thought this got canceled? Is this thing still a go? I'd love to see it in the Vancouver skyline.

Nobody knows :sly: I wish we knew.

I think it will get built eventually. I hope so, anyways.

Hot Rod
Dec 8, 2008, 6:48 AM
I thought this got canceled? Nope :shrug:

Is this thing still a go?Yep :tup:

I'd love to see it in the Vancouver skyline. Mee too! :yes:

mr.x
Dec 8, 2008, 6:49 AM
I thought this got canceled? Is this thing still a go?

Blasphemy!

jlousa
Dec 8, 2008, 6:54 AM
It's not cancelled yet. ;)

raggedy13
Dec 8, 2008, 11:56 AM
^That "yet" is a bit unsettling. :P

city-dweller
Dec 8, 2008, 4:35 PM
I heard on the weekend from an engineer (who I doubt would throw me spin) that the whole issue was: RC was to have 8 levels of underground parking and they hit bedrock at 3 (whatever the level they stopped at) The neighbors got wind of some more explosive solutions to this problem and looked for to stall the project until they were comfortable with the construction again.


Any thoughts? (I didn't think 8 levels of parking sounded realistic anyway)

wrenegade
Dec 8, 2008, 4:58 PM
8 levels underground sounds about right. Shangri-La is 7, and the first level there is double height (18') for tour buses.

WarrenC12
Dec 8, 2008, 5:12 PM
8 sounds like a stretch, but 3 is too few levels anyway, so they need to get into that bedrock to a certain extent.

jlousa
Dec 8, 2008, 5:14 PM
The issue with RC is not the parking, that was a mere snag. The problem is much more complex and impossible to explain completely, not that I even know everything anyways. But it is very worrisome that the people close to this project don't have complete faith it's still going to happen.

phesto
Dec 8, 2008, 5:39 PM
^Yeah, some apparent 'restructuring' at Holborn recently is not exactly an encouraging sign.

In any event, the excavators were roaring away at 7:30 this morning.

LeftCoaster
Dec 8, 2008, 5:48 PM
To be honest if the restructuring is occuring at the top it might actually be an encouraging sign.

This project is an elephant on thin ice. The cracks have been forming for quite some time now, lets just hope it can scamper to shore before being swallowed up.

city-dweller
Dec 8, 2008, 11:23 PM
I forgot that SL was 7 levels. As for bedrock, isn't the downtown area siting mostly on sandstone? I thought those back-hoe jackhammers were the standard approach to clearing it.:shrug:

Pinion
Dec 9, 2008, 12:25 AM
HSBC building has more than three levels of parking too, possibly five. Can't find the exact number but one site says 435 stalls.

jlousa
Dec 9, 2008, 12:36 AM
Office Towers require more parking then residential, picture how many workers there are per office floor as opposed to a high end condo tower like the ritz that probably has 4-8 people living per floor.

agrant
Dec 9, 2008, 12:36 AM
I forgot that SL was 7 levels. As for bedrock, isn't the downtown area siting mostly on sandstone? I thought those back-hoe jackhammers were the standard approach to clearing it.:shrug:Doesn't make sense to me that you'd have bedrock across the street from Shangri-la, which didn't seem to experience this problem.

phesto
Dec 9, 2008, 1:15 AM
Doesn't make sense to me that you'd have bedrock across the street from Shangri-la, which didn't seem to experience this problem.

As I recall, the same excavation company (Bel Pacific) encountered a vein of rock during the Shangri-la dig that they had not anticipated - which led to some delays.

officedweller
Dec 9, 2008, 1:48 AM
There was blasting for excavation at the Shangri-La site.

agrant
Dec 9, 2008, 2:12 AM
^^ Well there you go.

city-dweller
Dec 9, 2008, 4:17 PM
:cheers: As long as the work keeps moving along I am happy :banana:

Mike K.
Dec 31, 2008, 4:56 AM
Any updates for us non-locals?

mr.x
Dec 31, 2008, 5:03 AM
Any updates for us non-locals?

All the snow, melting, and rain plus the inactivity at the site may have created Downtown's new duck pond?:shrug:

Mike K.
Jan 14, 2009, 7:20 PM
Still nothing new to report?

LeftCoaster
Jan 14, 2009, 8:03 PM
No, which with this project I would say is a good thing.

I think the verbal lashing Lim got from his father in law may have straightened him out some.

AlexYVR
Jan 14, 2009, 10:43 PM
JLousa reported in the 'Downtown Updates' thread that they had hooked up hydro to the site - seems like good news?

jlousa
Jan 14, 2009, 10:49 PM
I think it was the Hotel Georgia thread, but yes Hydro has been run to the site line. Excavation looks to be wraping up any day now as well, they have also updated the completion date to 2012 so at least there is some movement.

Rusty Gull
Jan 14, 2009, 11:59 PM
I think the verbal lashing Lim got from his father in law may have straightened him out some.

Details? :hyper:

thefly
Jan 15, 2009, 12:03 AM
Details? :hyper:

This is just one of many rumors flying around.

LeftCoaster
Jan 15, 2009, 12:33 AM
Its not much of a Rumour. It is well known that Lim married into the money that is being used to fund Holburn... Which is also the reason he holds the position he does. It certainly isnt for any professional merrit. Apparently a few months ago Lim's father in law flew in from Asia during the time that the Ritz Carlton was all over the news and tore a strip off his back for seemingly bungling the entire project. Of course this was behind closed doors, but I have heard about it from several different sources within the industry.

phesto
Jan 15, 2009, 12:41 AM
It's probably not a coincidence that excavation was halted the day after Lim's father-in-law flew into town...nor is it a coincidence that work has continued since his departure...

Walked by the site the other day and excavation definitely seems to have reached bottom, at least on most of the site. They've got some of that horizontal rebar/grating stuff sitting around that goes at the bottom of foundations.

Mike K.
Jan 16, 2009, 8:30 PM
^cool.

phesto
Jan 18, 2009, 7:12 PM
Update from yesterday morning (Jan 17)

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6458/img2240dr1.jpg

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6218/img2241zk5.jpg

officedweller
Jan 19, 2009, 8:07 PM
Is that pic from the alley?
i.e. does the ledge on the right represent the level where the tie-back rods for the shotcrete wall could no longer trespass on the neighbouring property - so the excavation's wall had to be moved inwards (allowing depth for the tie-back rods to wholly remain on Holborn's property)? -> the "redesign" of the parkade?

sacrifice333
Jan 19, 2009, 8:52 PM
That could be the 'redesign'. Hmmm.

Sure would be nice to have this project above grade by Feb 2010, instead of the vacant eyesore that it's been for the last 20 years.

MolsonExport
Jan 19, 2009, 8:55 PM
Update from yesterday morning (Jan 17)

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6458/img2240dr1.jpg

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6218/img2241zk5.jpg

Christ, are they digging a hole to China?

Spork
Jan 19, 2009, 9:08 PM
Christ, are they digging a hole to China?

The Indian Ocean (http://map.talleye.com/bighole.php), actually.

excel
Jan 19, 2009, 9:16 PM
thanks for the updates.

LeftCoaster
Jan 19, 2009, 9:22 PM
^ haha cool site, I always thought it didn't make any sense that you would end up in China. Funny thing is it seems the only place to dig though the earth and end up in china is Southern South America, like Argentina or Chile.

Is that pic from the alley?
i.e. does the ledge on the right represent the level where the tie-back rods for the shotcrete wall could no longer trespass on the neighbouring property - so the excavation's wall had to be moved inwards (allowing depth for the tie-back rods to wholly remain on Holborn's property)? -> the "redesign" of the parkade?


I dont think so, from my understanding the infringment is at every level of the dig, I dont think Holborn has made any concessions at this point, although perhaps someone has a better idea of what has transgressed legally here.

phesto
Jan 19, 2009, 9:29 PM
Is that pic from the alley?
i.e. does the ledge on the right represent the level where the tie-back rods for the shotcrete wall could no longer trespass on the neighbouring property - so the excavation's wall had to be moved inwards (allowing depth for the tie-back rods to wholly remain on Holborn's property)? -> the "redesign" of the parkade?

These photos are from the alley.

btw, they were still blasting today, so there could still be a ways to go down on the eastern portion of the site.

sacrifice333
Jan 19, 2009, 9:31 PM
I dont think so, from my understanding the infringment is at every level of the dig, I dont think Holborn has made any concessions at this point, although perhaps someone has a better idea of what has transgressed legally here.

True... the infringement from commencement of excavation through to the stop work order would have been at every level, but in order to re-commence the digging Holburn would likely have had to back off a little on that side of the land which could indeed explain the "parking lot redesign" and the ledge shown in the picture.

Of course there still may be ongoing legal action regarding the original infringement up to the stop-work order.

officedweller
Jan 19, 2009, 9:56 PM
Agreed. I was looking at it from a "damage is done" perspective - i.e. no additional trespassing while they sort out the penalties/damages for the past trespass (rather than extracting the tieback rods and restructuring the wall above the ledge).

Vancity
Jan 19, 2009, 10:16 PM
So the Ritz Carlton is still a go? I heard that the expected date of completion will be now 2012. I'm hoping that this project is still going ahead, it would be a shame for the project to fall through :(

LotusLand
Jan 19, 2009, 10:34 PM
So the Ritz Carlton is still a go? I heard that the expected date of completion will be now 2012. I'm hoping that this project is still going ahead, it would be a shame for the project to fall through :(

It's still a go! What I'm more curious about is the redesign I keep hearing, all I hope is the tower maintains its twist. Maybe they'll add more floors lol jk.

officedweller
Jan 19, 2009, 10:57 PM
We think that the redesign is that ledge discussed above in the parkade - it would constrain the location of columns as well as parking circulation and stall location. That's it.

Rusty Gull
Jan 19, 2009, 11:14 PM
If that's the case, keep on drinking the bubbly, ladies and gentlemen!

With the Georgia, the Ritz, and dare I say it, Olympic Village, still rising, we will have lots to talk about on this forum over the next year or two!

sacrifice333
Jan 20, 2009, 12:17 AM
With the Georgia, the Ritz, and dare I say it, Olympic Village, still rising, we will have lots to talk about on this forum over the next year or two!

We certainly won't be able to complain too much if 3 of Vancouver's most ambitious projects are indeed completed during some of the most tumultuous times, economically, in the last 100 years.

We'll just have to continue to keep our fingers crossed though. :yes:

agrant
Jan 20, 2009, 12:32 AM
That could be the 'redesign'. Hmmm.

Sure would be nice to have this project above grade by Feb 2010, instead of the vacant eyesore that it's been for the last 20 years.I think the hole is an improvement from where it was a year ago. :)

Yume-sama
Jan 20, 2009, 2:25 AM
:P I talked to a realtor who works for Rennie today, asked him if the Ritz was still going ahead as planned. His answer...

"It'd have a better chance if you bought one!" :haha:

But yes, he apparently thinks it will. :notacrook:

sacrifice333
Jan 20, 2009, 2:41 AM
I'm hoping "saving face" will get this thing built.

Vancity
Jan 20, 2009, 3:27 AM
It's still a go! What I'm more curious about is the redesign I keep hearing, all I hope is the tower maintains its twist. Maybe they'll add more floors lol jk.

haha..wouldn't that be nice ;)

Vancity
Jan 20, 2009, 3:29 AM
:P I talked to a realtor who works for Rennie today, asked him if the Ritz was still going ahead as planned. His answer...

"It'd have a better chance if you bought one!" :haha:

But yes, he apparently thinks it will. :notacrook:

haha..sorry, I really wish I could buy one :yes: but yeah...mmm...can't afford one.

Hed Kandi
Jan 20, 2009, 4:49 AM
Ultimately, if this building does come of fruition, it will be the cladding that "makes or breaks" this tower as an architectural landmark for the city.

LotusLand
Jan 20, 2009, 7:30 AM
We think that the redesign is that ledge discussed above in the parkade - it would constrain the location of columns as well as parking circulation and stall location. That's it.

Cool. Thanks :)

vanman
Jan 20, 2009, 6:42 PM
Ultimately, if this building does come of fruition, it will be the cladding that "makes or breaks" this tower as an architectural landmark for the city.

I agree. It better be reflective, mirrored would be insane.

sacrifice333
Jan 20, 2009, 7:44 PM
The Wall Centre tower would have been amazing had the dark glass continued up the entire structure.

Metro-One
Jan 20, 2009, 9:46 PM
:previous: Yes, that again shows the blunders of city council. forcing developers to use the same colored see through glass!

jlousa
Jan 20, 2009, 9:49 PM
Umm no it shows the blunder of the developer trying to pull a fast one on the city. The city learned from it's mistake and now keeps a sample of the materials that are approved for usage.

LeftCoaster
Jan 20, 2009, 10:49 PM
I thought one of the issues was that the right sample was used, just that it looked different in the dim light inside as opposed to direct sunlight outside?

wrenegade
Jan 20, 2009, 10:50 PM
A fair amount of work going on-site today.

Someone please let me know if these photos show up properly. I seem to be retarded when it comes to posting pics. Also, I am new with this camera, so bear with me.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3475/3213052589_c1781a897d_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3123/3213051975_54239a7c24_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3456/3213051229_b8aee3bfa9_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3373/3213050271_1ea2369499_b.jpg

jlousa
Jan 20, 2009, 10:54 PM
I think that was the developers arguement, unfortunately their was no samples to see which side was telling the truth.

Vancity
Jan 20, 2009, 10:55 PM
:previous: it's looking good :tup:

Canadian Mind
Jan 20, 2009, 10:57 PM
That is a deep hole.

raggedy13
Jan 21, 2009, 8:09 AM
Thanks for the pics, awvan!

vanman
Jan 21, 2009, 6:45 PM
Much appreciated.

metroXpress
Jan 25, 2009, 10:05 PM
Thanks for the update...how many storeys below ground is that?

Mike K.
Jan 26, 2009, 3:10 AM
I was in Vancouver the other day and forgot to scope out the activity for myself. Oops.

Photos much appreciated, awvan.

Phil McAvity
Jan 26, 2009, 7:01 AM
Little wonder you missed it Mike since at this point it is the exact opposite of a skyscraper.

That's a good-looking hole (and thanks to the internet I see lots of them ;) ) but I don't think it rivals the depth of S-L. That thing went so deep I was expecting to see Chinese people to suddenly appear at the bottom.

wrenegade
Feb 6, 2009, 5:18 PM
Walked by the site yesterday, still digging, the hole is big. If the weather improves a bit, I might be able to grab some photos.

Chikinlittle
Feb 20, 2009, 6:23 PM
Are things still progressing here?

I just had a look at the Ritz Carlton being built in Toronto and realized that the design there is almost identical to the original (rejected) design for here in Vancouver. Don't know if that had been commented on previously.

officedweller
Feb 20, 2009, 6:36 PM
Not exactly the same - the Vancouver proposed tower had a triangular floorplate and was described as a "vase".

AlexYVR
Feb 20, 2009, 6:49 PM
I've always been curious about that design - does anyone have any renderings of the original rejected proposal? I've done some google/architects searches and haven't come up with anything. . .

metroXpress
Feb 20, 2009, 7:23 PM
:previous:

Mr X2 has some renderings of the previous designs on the first post of this thread! Quoted here for you...


PREVIOUS DESIGNS:
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a18/provisore/1133WestGeorgia1.jpg

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a18/provisore/1133WestGeorgia2.jpg

http://www.dysarch.com/UserImages/WebImages/ProjectImages/1.%20RESIDENTIAL/Market%20High%20Rise/1133%20West%20Georgia/1133-West-Georgia-Drawing.jpg

raggedy13
Feb 20, 2009, 8:01 PM
^He's talking about the much earlier version. I found some pics in the "Highrise Construction" subforum (originally posted by excel, from his imageshack account):

Initial design:
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/8902/1133westgeorgiastreetscuq4.jpg
http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/1672/4288picture010bif6.jpg
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/8742/4288picture003wr5.jpg
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=136532

Chikinlittle
Feb 20, 2009, 8:11 PM
Thanks Raggedy. That's the one. I had never seen the model before so didn't realize that it was a triangular footprint. Otherwise, from the other images, it does look strikingly familiar to the Ritz Carlton being built in YYZ.

osirisboy
Feb 20, 2009, 8:17 PM
YYZ? is that the airport code for toronto?? lol thats obscure. usually people refer to a city by its name

anyway I walked past ritz today and it was extremely busy with construction, which is always good to see.

Chikinlittle
Feb 20, 2009, 8:21 PM
Yes, YYZ is Toronto. Sorry, force of habit.

mr.x
Feb 20, 2009, 8:28 PM
Thanks Raggedy. That's the one. I had never seen the model before so didn't realize that it was a triangular footprint. Otherwise, from the other images, it does look strikingly familiar to the Ritz Carlton being built in YYZ.

Well yes, they stole/used the same original Vancouver design.


Really though, Vancouver could sure use both the old and new Ritz Carlton designs.

Chikinlittle
Feb 20, 2009, 8:55 PM
Agreed. But if I had to pick one of the two, I think we win :)

Well yes, they stole/used the same original Vancouver design.


Really though, Vancouver could sure use both the old and new Ritz Carlton designs.



Forums Directory