| | You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum. For the full version follow the link below.
View Full Version : Your city's twin city
| | |
kitchener-lrt
Jan 21, 2008, 9:39 PM
I though that this would be an interesting topic, and I was wondering, what is your city's twin city?
*This can also include distant/ sister cities of your city.*
Being from Kitchener (ON), I'd say that our twin city is Waterloo (ON).
LeftCoaster
Jan 21, 2008, 9:44 PM
Isn't it essentially the same city?
I don't think that really counts.
As for vancouver I would have to say San Francisco.
Cambridgite
Jan 21, 2008, 9:53 PM
What are we talking about here? Are we talking about twin cities in terms of a conurbation (ie. the OP's example of K-W) or are we talking about cities that are more distant but show similar traits or culture (ie. Vancouver-SF)?
Jamaican-Phoenix
Jan 21, 2008, 10:04 PM
Ottawa's twin city would be Gatineau, Quebec.
Her sister cities are Beijing and some place in Italy...
le calmar
Jan 21, 2008, 10:05 PM
Sherbrooke-Magog. (even if Magog is way smaller)
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 10:20 PM
Aylmer and Paradise!
(even if Aylmer is WAAAAY better!)
:)
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 10:32 PM
This thread is sorta like my novel: This is my twin :)...
VOTED THE COCAINE THREAD OF THE YEAR!!!
RWin
Jan 21, 2008, 10:39 PM
Calgary and London (UK).
davee930
Jan 21, 2008, 10:58 PM
Calgary and London (UK).
how?
RWin
Jan 21, 2008, 10:59 PM
Oh, sorry, I ment New York.
skrish
Jan 21, 2008, 11:07 PM
Calgary and Denver???
LeftCoaster
Jan 21, 2008, 11:10 PM
Oh, sorry, I ment New York.
Still... how?
kitchener-lrt
Jan 21, 2008, 11:41 PM
What are we talking about here? Are we talking about twin cities in terms of a conurbation (ie. the OP's example of K-W) or are we talking about cities that are more distant but show similar traits or culture (ie. Vancouver-SF)?
Sorry for not clarifying. This thread is about twin cities (ex. Kitchener and Waterloo), as well as distant cities/sister cities (Vancouver-San Fran).
Rusty van Reddick
Jan 21, 2008, 11:44 PM
Vancouver and SF look nothing, nothing, nothing alike.
In terms of built form, the city that looks most like Vancouver is probably- yes- Toronto.
LeftCoaster
Jan 21, 2008, 11:46 PM
Well its good theres more involved than built form then isnt it furry?
rapswin!
Jan 21, 2008, 11:46 PM
Toronto and Chicago
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 11:47 PM
Soooooooo true!
:)
MonkeyRonin
Jan 21, 2008, 11:50 PM
Not at all physically, but in a more cultural/demographic sense, San Francisco seems to me to be quite similar to Toronto, moreso than it does with Vancouver anyway. In terms of built form, a mix of Chicago, Melbourne, Detroit, New York, Boston, Moscow, and Los Angeles perhaps.
RWin
Jan 21, 2008, 11:54 PM
Still... how?
Paris?
rapswin!
Jan 21, 2008, 11:54 PM
well physically toronto and chicago are very similar. their both on great lakes. in a cultural/demographic way i would agree san fran is like toronto
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 11:56 PM
Seattle's skyline always made me think of Toronto...
:)
LeftCoaster
Jan 21, 2008, 11:56 PM
That I dont understand.
Sure both are liberal, but San Fran is a much more laid back west coast city compared to Toronto. I has a heavy asian influence, and a very outdoorsy 'granola' culture... much more Vanocuver I think.
I think Toronto is more like Chicago in both senses. Geographically it speaks for itself, and culturally they are both very business minded cities, and are both quite liberal forward thinking cities.
rapswin!
Jan 21, 2008, 11:56 PM
Paris?
how is calgary like paris
clynnog
Jan 21, 2008, 11:57 PM
Aylmer and Paradise!
(even if Aylmer is WAAAAY better!)
:)
I think you may have been spending too much time at the British Hotel if your opinion of Aylmer is that high.
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 11:58 PM
how is calgary like paris
Good god...
That is a good question, isn't it?
:)
Aylmer
Jan 21, 2008, 11:59 PM
I think you may have been spending too much time at the British Hotel if your opinion of Aylmer is that high.
:rolleyes:
Never been and think that it is being wasted as a bar...
Ayreonaut
Jan 22, 2008, 12:01 AM
For TV, Black Diamond. Probably soon to be one and the same.
RWin
Jan 22, 2008, 12:02 AM
how is calgary like paris
Nairobi?
I love this thread.
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:03 AM
:haha:
Ayreonaut
Jan 22, 2008, 12:07 AM
I love this thread.If you didn't say this he might have still thought you were serious.
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:07 AM
?
Ayreonaut
Jan 22, 2008, 12:09 AM
?I'm pretty sure rapswin thinks he's been serious about his suggestions for Calgary's twin.
Boreal
Jan 22, 2008, 12:10 AM
Winnipeg and Milwaukee. Based on feel. When I'm in Milwaukee, it feels very much like I'm in Winnipeg.
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:16 AM
I don't think so...
Winnipeg and Aylmer!
:)
mr.x
Jan 22, 2008, 12:16 AM
Don't know about twin cities, but Vancouver is SISTER CITIES with:
• Los Angeles
• Guangzhou
• Yokohama
• Edinburgh
• Odessa
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:19 AM
Guangzhuo?
Interesting name...
:)
rapswin!
Jan 22, 2008, 12:20 AM
I'm pretty sure rapswin thinks he's been serious about his suggestions for Calgary's twin.i wont lie, i thought he was serious:haha: :doh:
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:21 AM
Guilty, I did too!
:haha:
:)
RWin
Jan 22, 2008, 12:34 AM
Right! Everyone knows Calgary's twin is Sydney.
rapswin!
Jan 22, 2008, 12:37 AM
Still joking
dennis
Jan 22, 2008, 12:38 AM
Winnipeg and Chicago
Chicago is Arnold Schwarzenegger
and Winnipeg is Danny DeVito
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:38 AM
What?
rapswin!
Jan 22, 2008, 12:43 AM
Winnipeg and Chicago
Chicago is Arnold Schwarzenegger
and Winnipeg is Danny DeVito
:shrug:
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:44 AM
My thoughts exactly.
;)
dennis
Jan 22, 2008, 12:45 AM
My God!!! you people have never seen Twins starring Danny DeVito and Arnold Schwarzenegger (comedy, 1988)?
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:47 AM
I was born in 199*.
Was it funny?
Did you have remote controls that where the size of a printer?
:)
dennis
Jan 22, 2008, 12:48 AM
Hah
RWin
Jan 22, 2008, 12:48 AM
Did you have remote controls that where the size of a printer?
:)
No. We had to walk up to the tv.
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:48 AM
:haha:
rapswin!
Jan 22, 2008, 12:51 AM
Did you have remote controls that where the size of a printer?
:haha: i was born 1991 but i still wacth movies that old
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:53 AM
I still watch movies from the 50's and listen to moetown and the beatles...
But I still have a reasonably sized remote!
:)
kitchener-lrt
Jan 22, 2008, 12:54 AM
No. We had to walk up to the tv.
:haha:
Since we've already stated the obvious (that Aylmer is twins with Toronto, Paris, London, Chicago and Tokyo;) ), are there any cities that could act as your city's twin?
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 12:57 AM
:haha:
Since we've already stated the obvious (that Aylmer is twins with Toronto, Paris, London, Chicago and Tokyo;)
:haha: :haha: :haha: :jester: :jester: :jester: :upload_71700: :banaride: :pepper: :lmao: :thankyouthankyou: :happypunk: :grouphug: :eat: :apple: :cucumber: :iagree: :rock: :eeekk: :drummer: :drunk: :dissy: :banger: :bowtie: :crazy2: :naughty:
Thunder Bay's Twin Cities are Duluth, Minnesota (Port on Lake Superior); Little Canada, Minnesota (a town now engulfed by the Twin Cities, it was founded by a Thunder Bayer); Gifu, Japan (Originally Yanaizu, until it was amalgamated with Gifu. Both cities have a history of paper industries and have a very close relationship, with each city sending delegates almost annually); Seinäjoki Finland, a city from which many Finnish immigrants came to Thunder Bay, and Keelung Taiwan, a large port east of Taipei.
Bunkperugu, Ghana; Bukit Timah, Singapore; and Siderno, Italy were sister cities until their twinning agreements expired last spring. Bunkperugu and Bukit Timah were cultural exchange things, Siderno is the area where from which a lot of Italian immigrants came to the area.
Aylmer
Jan 22, 2008, 1:09 AM
Singapore?
You've got to be kidding.
:)
Ayreonaut
Jan 22, 2008, 1:09 AM
Calgary's actual sister cities:
Phoenix, USA
Daejeon, South Korea
Naucalpan, Mexico
Daqing, China
Jaipur, India
Quebec City, Canada
Singapore?
You've got to be kidding.
:)
Bukit Timah is a neighbourhood around a hill in NW Singapore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukit_Timah
Only The Lonely..
Jan 22, 2008, 1:50 AM
Winnipeg and Milwaukee. Based on feel. When I'm in Milwaukee, it feels very much like I'm in Winnipeg.
I've heard this too from several other people.
Lot's of folks often group Winnipeg and Minneapolis together because its the closest big U.S. city, but the Twin cities are much more clean and suburban than anything you will find in the 'Peg. Plus they bulldozed most of their older buildings and their warehouse district pales in comparison to our Exchange district.
Winnipeg with its grit and Chicago style buildings probably has more in common with a place like Milwaukee.
jeremy_haak
Jan 22, 2008, 2:00 AM
As far as North American cities go, I'll put forward Montreal and Boston.
salvius
Jan 22, 2008, 2:39 AM
As far as North American cities go, I'll put forward Montreal and Boston.
I really don't see any resemblance.
MolsonExport
Jan 22, 2008, 2:51 AM
Waterloo, Montreal, Boston:
"One of these things is not like the others; one of these three is not kinda the same..."
jeremy_haak
Jan 22, 2008, 2:59 AM
Waterloo, Montreal, Boston:
"One of these things is not like the others; one of these three is not kinda the same..."
Sorry, I meant that Montreal and Boston are similar. Waterloo certainly is not.
flar
Jan 22, 2008, 3:04 AM
Sister cities: Hamilton and Flint, MI. I'm not kidding.
wild wild west
Jan 22, 2008, 3:17 AM
for Calgary, actual twin cities aside I think there are a few cities that share certain obvious common aspects with us - such as Edmonton, Denver, Houston and Perth (Australia).
401_King
Jan 22, 2008, 3:21 AM
minus population ~3million vs 1 mill, i think calgary and denver metro are pretty similar.... mountains to the left, a main river flowing through downtown. energy industry is big in both. sprawl. demographics are totally different, denver has a significant hispanic and african american population...while calgary's got more asian and south asian influence.
edit: another difference, the mountains in denver are much closer to the city.
wild wild west
Jan 22, 2008, 3:36 AM
minus population, i think calgary and denver metro are pretty similar.... mountains to the left, a main river flowing through downtown. energy industry is big in both. sprawl. demographics are totally different, denver has a significant hispanic and african american population...while calgary's got more asian and south asian influence.
Very true on all counts. Certainly from a physical/geographic point of view, these two cities look very similar. Even their skylines bear an uncanny resemblance...although, not for long with Calgary's building boom.
kool maudit
Jan 22, 2008, 3:37 AM
philadelphia
LordMandeep
Jan 22, 2008, 3:45 AM
well, I always heard Toronto/Chicago.
They are similar.
Northern, cold, large in population, large urban core.
O-Town Hockey
Jan 22, 2008, 4:40 AM
well, I always heard Toronto/Chicago.
They are similar.
Northern, cold, large in population, large urban core.
There's more than that. They are both on the lakefront, they have large arts/entertainment industries (musicals, art galleries, museums, etc.). They are also both rather isolated from other large urban centres.
Rico Rommheim
Jan 22, 2008, 4:47 AM
Winnipeg and Chicago
Chicago is Arnold Schwarzenegger
and Winnipeg is Danny DeVito
I get it :)
salvius
Jan 22, 2008, 5:06 AM
philadelphia
Yeah, I'd go for Philadelphia and Montreal (Boston, not so much), although Montreal is definitely the cooler twin in this case.
I've got nothing for Toronto. Not Chicago.
Cambridgite
Jan 22, 2008, 5:57 AM
There's more than that. They are both on the lakefront, they have large arts/entertainment industries (musicals, art galleries, museums, etc.). They are also both rather isolated from other large urban centres.
I'd agree on most of that, but Toronto isn't really isolated from other large urban centres. In Canada, it's about as non-isolated as you can get. Buffalo and Detroit are nearby, plus lots of mid-sized cities in between.
Cambridgite
Jan 22, 2008, 6:14 AM
Sorry, I meant that Montreal and Boston are similar. Waterloo certainly is not.
Haha, good that you corrected yourself. I was about to ask you what you were smoking today.
Hmm, for Waterloo Region, I'd say this...
For urban form, I'd say we're a mix between Toronto and Calgary, minus the large downtown. The abundant 1960s/70s apartment slabs are similar to Toronto, while the new subdivisions have a similar look to what's being built in Calgary, and just as dense.
In the inner parts of Kitchener, the architecture is similar to Detroit, except the houses are not abandoned/bulldozed/deteriorating. Very industrial too.
Economically, I'd say its twin is Austin, Texas. It's a fast growing university town with a burgeoning tech sector. It's not particularly well known and overshadowed by Dallas and Houston (Toronto a good comparison?). Austin has a reputation for being a fun city, which brings me to my next point...
In terms of the culture of the city, I dunno...Barrie :( ? Maybe some other local forumers could help me out.
I think Kitchener looks like Sudbury. :) Culturally speaking, it probably has a lot in common with them too. Lots of culture for a city of only 150,000 people.
craner
Jan 22, 2008, 7:34 AM
I agree with:
Toronto - Chicago
Calgary - Denver
Winnipeg - Milwaukee
Vancouver - Sydney (for some reason)
Montreal - ?
I've often wondered if Dallas and Houston have a Calgary - Edmonton thing going on and, if so, which Texas city matches which Albertan equivalent best ?
:)
Ayreonaut
Jan 22, 2008, 7:39 AM
For some reason I imagine Calgary being more similar to Houston, I think maybe because a neighbor of mine moved there (he's back now). Edmonon and Dallas are both more Northerly, although Dallas is bigger than Houston. Then again maybe there are no similarities, I don't know.
craner
Jan 22, 2008, 7:46 AM
For some reason I imagine Calgary being more similar to Houston, I think maybe because a neighbor of mine moved there (he's back now). Edmonon and Dallas are both more Northerly, although Dallas is bigger than Houston. Then again maybe there are no similarities, I don't know.
Yeah - I don't know either (other than the oil and wild west connections). Just throwing it out there for discussion
softee
Jan 22, 2008, 12:11 PM
If I had to pick a far away city that was sort of like North Bay in terms of it's layout, look and feel, I'd go with Bellingham, Washington.
Within Ontario, I'd pick Peterborough.
CONative
Jan 23, 2008, 5:37 AM
Very true on all counts. Certainly from a physical/geographic point of view, these two cities look very similar. Even their skylines bear an uncanny resemblance...although, not for long with Calgary's building boom.
Not sure if you've been paying attention, but Denver also has a building boom right now -- so don't be so sure.. :)
The Jabroni
Jan 23, 2008, 5:55 AM
I think Winnipeg's twin city is Des Moines, Iowa.
As for actual sister cities...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnipeg#Sister_cities
Only The Lonely..
Jan 23, 2008, 9:00 AM
Yeah, I'd go for Philadelphia and Montreal (Boston, not so much), although Montreal is definitely the cooler twin in this case.
I've got nothing for Toronto. Not Chicago.
I agree, Toronto may have more in common with Chicago geographically speaking but in terms of street car neighbourhoods and smaller 10 - 12 story buildings Winnipeg has way more in common with the Windy city.
Let's face it, the Toronto that most of us know is the product of the late 60's and 70's. If Toronto had kept more of its historic buildings the case for the Toronto / Chicago connection might be more compelling.
Originally Posted by dennis
Winnipeg and Chicago
Chicago is Arnold Schwarzenegger
and Winnipeg is Danny DeVito
That's cute. I was in Chitown 12 weeks ago and I have to admit that it felt pretty much like a big Winnipeg. A lot of people that I know who went there feel similarly.
I have always been of the opinion that Chicago and Winnipeg have much more in common than Toronto and Winnipeg. When I'm in T.O. it feels like a very different place from Winnipeg but no so when I visit Chicago.
It probably isn't surprising that Winnipeg doubles for Chicago in a lot of films.
The Paris building is probably one of the best examples of the many Chicago style buildings you can find in our downtown.
http://io.uwinnipeg.ca/~cschulz1/w44.jpg
Overground
Jan 23, 2008, 9:08 PM
I think Vancouver's best fit for a twin would have to be the usual pick, Seattle. They are about the similar age, topography, climate, ferries, Asian influence(similar to other west coast cities). Their population centres are surrounded by water with a bridge connecting it to suburban communities towards the mountains. A major highway running south from the city and one heading east. And an airport close to the city centre to the south.
Visually I see similar characteristics between Vancouver and Honolulu in relation to their mass amount of 60s/70s condos(many look identical) with a close proximity of a mountainous, lush green backdrop, with regular misty clouds stuck to them.
rapswin!
Jan 23, 2008, 10:38 PM
I agree, Toronto may have more in common with Chicago geographically speaking but in terms of street car neighbourhoods and smaller 10 - 12 story buildings Winnipeg has way more in common with the Windy city.
In terms of size and population both Toronto and Chicago are very similar. But there also some buildings in Toronto that are very Chicago like
matt602
Jan 23, 2008, 10:41 PM
Hamilton and Pittsburgh. Both steel cities. Both feature a "mountain" through the city that separates parts of it (actually in the case of Pittsburgh I think it's just hilly portions that run through parts of the area). Detroit is also a close match, but only in the grit aspect. Pretty much any rustbelt city in the US matches Hamilton pretty well. Hamilton doesn't really have any Canadian matches I can think of.
rapswin!
Jan 23, 2008, 10:45 PM
:previous: Thats a good one
AndrewJ3D
Jan 24, 2008, 12:15 AM
I agree, Toronto may have more in common with Chicago geographically speaking but in terms of street car neighbourhoods and smaller 10 - 12 story buildings Winnipeg has way more in common with the Windy city.
:koko: :koko: :koko: Are you for real?
First of all Toronto has many.
Sister cities of Toronto are cities with which Toronto is twinned geographically and politically, with the goal of fostering human contact and cultural interchange.
Partnership Cities:
* Chicago, Illinois, United States
* Chongqing, China
* Frankfurt, Germany
* Milan, Italy
* São Paulo, Brazil
Friendship Cities:
* Amsterdam, Netherlands (Amsterdam Bridge, Toronto and a Toronto Bridge in Amsterdam mark the twin cities)
* Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
* Kiev, Ukraine
* Quito, Ecuador
* Sagamihara, Japan
* Warsaw, Poland
Second of all Toronto has a much larger stock of of pre and post war chicago industrial style buildings then Winnipeg ever had, even with the loss of so many we still out number the Peg. And ad to that we're situated on a great lake. I think when you were in Chicago your were trying to hard to feel like it was a mini Winnipeg. You must have a very active imagination.
Images by http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=2152059644&size=o
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=218871464&size=o
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=3301996
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/63/218871464_adbbcd28a9_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/45/132990717_5ec4e51739.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/52/132990706_7966f50d34.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/147/419558862_73dd28bb42.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/180/419558815_4e34c7dbfa.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/184/419558899_7ee824b0af.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/104/251638835_4ef9998f23.jpg?v=0
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/235/445714005_6b2e85f351_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/197/501301183_9bafcaf7ef_b.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/22/29308248_83621fb0e4_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2013/2149765794_3c081e9737_b.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/223/481803867_7dae343132_b.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/128/368206738_c313ddb90a_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2252/2152059644_72fb984f0f_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/165/437725858_f539c309b4_o.jpg
I look forward to you showing me how Portage and Main are like Chicago. Also, find me a person from Chicago that would agree their city feels like a larger Winnipeg.
:haha:
AndrewJ3D
Jan 24, 2008, 12:17 AM
PS- Toronto doubled for Chicago in Chicago!:cool:
FFX-ME
Jan 24, 2008, 12:59 AM
Aylmer and Paradise!
(even if Aylmer is WAAAAY better!)
:)
Are you implying that Ottawa is Paradise, lol
salvius
Jan 24, 2008, 1:16 AM
Nevertheless, I'd say Toronto and Chicago are an ill fitting match, even though I disagree with the comment of Toronto as the product of the 70s. Most of the inner city folk directly outside the CBD know and think of Toronto as a product of late 19th and early 20th century, and that's how it feels to me, anyway. Yes, Toronto lost a lot, but I do find it fascinating as to how often Toronto gets slagged for its lack of historic architecture when its prewar stock is very high.
At the same time, Chicago grew to be much larger during the same period, and I don't find the same type of built form in Chicago, which is still -- I believe -- denser centrally, and has a industrial ring around it, followed by some interesting neighbourhoods, followed by sprawl. It's not really Toronto's profile at all, and while I'd generally disagree with Chicago as the big Winnipeg, I cannot help but feel that, yes, it may share some similar characteristics.
Toronto, variously and depending on the neighbourhood reminds me of:
- Montreal
- Central and southern English towns
- Manchester
- Buffalo
- Detroit
- New York, outside of Manhattan
- Chicago
- Philadelphia
etc. etc.
Way too hard to pin it down in just one place -- even superficially -- and I can see why it would be a good place to shoot a movie. I've looked at some pictures of Melbourne, and it seems to have at least a superficial similarity to Toronto, but as I've never been, I cannot confirm if it is a good match.
craner
Jan 24, 2008, 1:47 AM
Not sure if you've been paying attention, but Denver also has a building boom right now -- so don't be so sure.. :)
Please elaborate on the current boom, I would be interested.
The "cities" section shows 9 u/c for Denver and 20 proposed, for Calgary it's 42 u/c and 63 proposed.
The two cities definitely have similar topography and skylines IMO.;)
rapswin!
Jan 24, 2008, 4:20 AM
Go to My City Photos- USA and Canada check the Chicago: Alas thread and you find some photos that would make you think that the pictures were taken from toronto
CONative
Jan 24, 2008, 4:31 AM
Please elaborate on the current boom, I would be interested.
The "cities" section shows 9 u/c for Denver and 20 proposed, for Calgary it's 42 u/c and 63 proposed.
The two cities definitely have similar topography and skylines IMO.;)
Trust me...Denver has more than 9 u/c. Denver forumers are not posting every little building throughout the city. The 9 posted are the only ones that the forumers are focusing on. There are even taller buildings in Denver that are u/c that are not posted. I would easily guess that we have at least 42 buildings u/c in the city.
shappy
Jan 24, 2008, 4:39 AM
Nevertheless, I'd say Toronto and Chicago are an ill fitting match, even though I disagree with the comment of Toronto as the product of the 70s. Most of the inner city folk directly outside the CBD know and think of Toronto as a product of late 19th and early 20th century, and that's how it feels to me, anyway. Yes, Toronto lost a lot, but I do find it fascinating as to how often Toronto gets slagged for its lack of historic architecture when its prewar stock is very high.
At the same time, Chicago grew to be much larger during the same period, and I don't find the same type of built form in Chicago, which is still -- I believe -- denser centrally, and has a industrial ring around it, followed by some interesting neighbourhoods, followed by sprawl. It's not really Toronto's profile at all, and while I'd generally disagree with Chicago as the big Winnipeg, I cannot help but feel that, yes, it may share some similar characteristics.
Toronto, variously and depending on the neighbourhood reminds me of:
- Montreal
- Central and southern English towns
- Manchester
- Buffalo
- Detroit
- New York, outside of Manhattan
- Chicago
- Philadelphia
etc. etc.
Way too hard to pin it down in just one place -- even superficially -- and I can see why it would be a good place to shoot a movie. I've looked at some pictures of Melbourne, and it seems to have at least a superficial similarity to Toronto, but as I've never been, I cannot confirm if it is a good match.
I don't see a great deal of Chicago either. Montreal and Chicago have some similarities as well. I would also add certain neighbourhoods in greater London like Tooting (SW) to your list.
craner
Jan 26, 2008, 2:47 AM
Trust me...Denver has more than 9 u/c. Denver forumers are not posting every little building throughout the city. The 9 posted are the only ones that the forumers are focusing on. There are even taller buildings in Denver that are u/c that are not posted. I would easily guess that we have at least 42 buildings u/c in the city.
Hey - thanks for the reply and the info. I look forward to checking things out in D,CO.
GO BRONCOS !!
:cheers:
Nutterbug
Jan 26, 2008, 4:05 AM
Vancouver - Sydney (for some reason)
Canada Place vaguely resembles the Opera House?
They both seem cool but in reality are just tiny dense and interesting downtowns with tonnes and tonnes of suburbs full of foreign people. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)
shreddog
Jan 26, 2008, 6:34 AM
Trust me...Denver has more than 9 u/c. Denver forumers are not posting every little building throughout the city. The 9 posted are the only ones that the forumers are focusing on. There are even taller buildings in Denver that are u/c that are not posted. I would easily guess that we have at least 42 buildings u/c in the city.
Don't want to get into a bun fight however according to commercial real estate experts CB Richard Ellis, it's not much of a comparison.
CBRE - who have offices in both cities and produce local office market reports using the same methodology - report the following as YE 2007 numbers:
Denver at 2.2 M sq feet of office space u/c across the entire metro.
Calgary at 11.1 M sq feet of office space u/c across the entire metro (7.1M in the CBD and 4M in the burbs).
Also of note, in Calgary vacancy/lease rates were 3.1%/$37 whereas in Denver it is 12.6%/$20.
Again, I am only reporting a source that appears to be neutral, but according to CBRE (http://gkc3.cbre.com/search/search.aspx?qs=), it's not even close in the commercial side.
Perhaps it's all residential?
Nutterbug
Jan 26, 2008, 1:24 PM
They both seem cool but in reality are just tiny dense and interesting downtowns with tonnes and tonnes of suburbs full of foreign people. (Not that there is anything wrong with that.)
And a lot of gay people...not that there is anything wrong with that. ;)
CONative
Jan 26, 2008, 4:33 PM
Don't want to get into a bun fight however according to commercial real estate experts CB Richard Ellis, it's not much of a comparison.
CBRE - who have offices in both cities and produce local office market reports using the same methodology - report the following as YE 2007 numbers:
Denver at 2.2 M sq feet of office space u/c across the entire metro.
Calgary at 11.1 M sq feet of office space u/c across the entire metro (7.1M in the CBD and 4M in the burbs).
Also of note, in Calgary vacancy/lease rates were 3.1%/$37 whereas in Denver it is 12.6%/$20.
Again, I am only reporting a source that appears to be neutral, but according to CBRE (http://gkc3.cbre.com/search/search.aspx?qs=), it's not even close in the commercial side.
Perhaps it's all residential?
Most of it is residential in downtown Denver; including the bigger ones...45 story Four Seasons Residence & Hotel, 41 story Spire residential tower, and 32 Story One Lincoln Park residential tower.....All are currently under construction. These are just a few. Commercial vacancy rates are a little lower than 10% in Denver citywide (much lower in downtown) -- so it's obvious CBRE is incorrect or the numbers are outdated. There are several Denver projects that are not mentioned in this forum - mostly because they aren't downtown (including airport hotels, Denver Tech area projects, Denver's Cherry Creek area projects and buildings, etc.).
feepa
Jan 26, 2008, 5:08 PM
Most of it is residential in downtown Denver; including the bigger ones...45 story Four Seasons Residence & Hotel, 41 story Spire residential tower, and 32 Story One Lincoln Park residential tower.....All are currently under construction. These are just a few. Commercial vacancy rates are a little lower than 10% in Denver citywide (much lower in downtown) -- so it's obvious CBRE is incorrect or the numbers are outdated. There are several Denver projects that are not mentioned in this forum - mostly because they aren't downtown (including airport hotels, Denver Tech area projects, Denver's Cherry Creek area projects and buildings, etc.).
I think what they are saying is that for as much as Denver is booming right now, Calgary is still having a much bigger boom. Especially if you look at it per capita
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/2082/developmentlistingqb9.png
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.