PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Mississauga adopts Vancouver planning techniques | Amacon building an urban village



SFUVancouver
Jan 28, 2008, 1:38 AM
I found this in the Ontario section and I thought it was worth posting here.

Because great cities have short blocks and lively sidewalks, Mississauga wants a downtown grid that lures pedestrians – and Amacon's Parkside Village will help launch the vision
Jan 26, 2008 04:30 AM
Dan O'Reilly
Special to the Star

http://multimedia.thestar.com/images/56/a2/36db8d5a4510a6b3ceb6df0ff02c.jpeg
Mississauga: Long blocks and virtually empty sidewalks.


For now, the vacant 12-hectare site just west of Mississauga's Civic Centre looks like most other potential development sites in suburbia – even if it is part of a downtown.

This spring, however, construction of Phase 1 of Mississauga's first "urban village" will begin, heralding a new era in the city centre's evolution.

In recent years, downtown Mississauga has amassed both significant density and a reasonably broad mix of land uses. But its sidewalks remain virtually empty, especially when compared with the attractive central areas of the world's great cities. And it's that lack of street life that Canada's sixth-largest city hopes to address starting with Parkside Village by Vancouver-based developer Amacon.

Just 30 years ago, the newly constructed Square One shopping complex and some vacant farmland was about all there was in this area. Now, this approximately 160-hectare, special-growth district in the Highway 403-Highway 10-Burnhamthorpe Rd. area really is the heart of Mississauga, says Ed Sajecki, the city's planning and building department commissioner.

A place that once provided little more than shopping and parking now has a fairly broad mix of uses. Besides the Civic Centre, the Living Arts Centre, the central library and other facilities, it's now a prime office and residential area, with new retail and restaurants integrated into the taller buildings.

Parkside Village will add a lot more density and broaden the mix of uses. There will be about 5,300 highrise, midrise and townhouse units for about 12,000 people in an 11-block development west of Confederation Parkway, north of Burnhamthorpe. Amacon will also add restaurants, stores, banks, offices and a hotel to the mix, Sajecki says. What makes this development different is the attention being paid to the street grid as part of an effort to enhance street life in an area still dominated by the car.

On one floor at the Civic Centre, there's a large Lego-style model that provides an overview of what the city centre will likely look like in 20 or 25 years. It allows the planning department to add miniature towers as it receives development applications, Sajecki says.

But the less noticeable things at street level may be at least as important to Mississauga's future. They include the planned construction of a new downtown park later this year, the redevelopment of two existing squares sometime in 2009, plus ongoing research into what other cities have accomplished.

Sajecki likes to say the "great cities have good bones," and he has put on presentations that include slides showing how central Mississauga's loose grid differs dramatically from the tight webs of streets common to cities where people like to walk.

"We're looking at what New York, Rome, Barcelona, Toronto, even Portland Ore., are doing," he says. "Our blocks are too long; we know that."

About 2 1/2 years ago, the commissioner and some of his staff travelled to Vancouver to meet with that city's planning department. "Vancouver has a very high standard of urban design," Sajecki says.

Based partly on Vancouver's experience, Mississauga last year created an urban design review panel, made up of architects, landscape architects and planning professionals, to serve as an advisory committee to the city.

As part of the overall review process of the Parkside Village proposal, the Vancouver trip also provided the opportunity to examine the type of projects Amacon and other West Coast developers were doing.

Not only will Parkside Village be one of the largest developments in Mississauga by a single landowner, it will also be one of the densest. But while the scale is large, the amount of detailed planning into the pedestrian-oriented development will set the standards for future development proposals in the city centre, Sajecki says.

Under the "unlimited height and unlimited density" provisions of a secondary plan designed to stimulate the growth of the city centre in the 1990s, Amacon could have pushed ahead with a traditional development. But it chose not to go that route, says Marilyn Ball, the city's design and development director.

"They cut the blocks in half," she says, citing Amacon's decision to divide the development into manageable blocks, which will result in a more urban-style, compact street grid.

There will be nine development blocks and two designated park blocks, which will help form a corridor of green space linking the Mississauga Civic Centre with Zonta Meadows, a city park to the west of the development, she says.

The development blocks will be dotted with "point towers" of varying heights, which will serve as a buffer and transition area for a single-family subdivision, also to the west. Point towers are tall, slender buildings set back from the street on podiums, instead of the more traditional massive condominiums built at grade, Ball says.

"They're more pedestrian-friendly. As you walk by them on the street level, you're not as conscious of the tower."

Another hallmark of Parkside Village will be a "sophisticated mix of uses," including ground-floor retail shops, especially along Confederation Parkway, she says. Other examples of the intensive detailed planning include maintaining a 30-metre space between adjacent residential and commercial towers and the avoidance of blank walls or other "dead spots" at grade.

"The city didn't want areas where there is no life," explains Sal Vitiello, principal, E.I. Richmond Architects Ltd., the Toronto-based architects for the developer.

Amacon has already established a strong presence in the city centre area with two fully occupied condo buildings, a third under construction and a fourth in the planning stages. But the inspiration for Parkside Village are the projects that Amacon and other West Coast firms have undertaken in Vancouver, Vitiello says.

"There is definitely a unique and recognizable approach to planning and urban design principles in Vancouver, and many of these West Coast approaches have been incorporated into the design. These include an emphasis on curb appeal, encouraging an active street life, the use of point-tower architecture and a focus on buildings at grade."

Almost five years of planning and negotiations with the city have been invested in the project. It was a process that encompassed countless meetings with city staff, recreating an original design and the hiring of Urban Strategies, a Toronto planning firm, to create the detailed design components. The result was an urban design document that serves as a guide for the planning principles.

Not only is Amacon the first developer in Mississauga to produce such a document, it's also the first to have its plans reviewed by the city's the new urban design review panel. The document will be incorporated into the development agreement, Vitiello says.

With its planned at-grade retail space on Confederation Parkway and partly along the internal side streets, Parkside Village won't be the type of condo development where residents simply come home at night and don't venture outside again until the following morning, says Lilliana Di Franco, Amacon's marketing and sales vice-president. "It will be true urban village with activity," says Di Franco, who helped create the original concept vision with Amacon president Marcello DeCotiis.

Sidewalks will be between 10 and 12 feet wide but at the corner of Princess Royal Dr. and Confederation Parkway, "the sidewalk will be approximately 30 feet in width to create a focal point and allow for café seating and an active street life and gathering point," she says.

Phase 1, with one 40-storey and two 36-storey condo towers, is scheduled to begin this spring.

officedweller
Jan 29, 2008, 2:03 AM
Whoa - optical illusion with black dots at the intersections.

More info at UrbanToronto:

http://www.urbantoronto.ca/showthread.php?t=5333

SFUVancouver
Feb 11, 2008, 9:31 AM
The (semi)-famous Mississauga curvaceous twin towers.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/109/309517493_a5fc72b58e_b.jpg

It is not part of the Amacon project but they are neat. Those townhouses would look at home in Vancouver.

mr.x
Feb 11, 2008, 10:35 AM
maybe we could disassemble those towers, ship the parts over here, and reassemble them in Vancouver...perhaps bulldozing a city block in the DTES? :D

if a city like Mississauga can get that kind of architectural quality, there should absolutely be no reason why we can't either.

CPE
Feb 11, 2008, 10:48 AM
Damn, the model looks so much better than the rendering. Its so shiny!

vanman
Feb 11, 2008, 3:45 PM
The (semi)-famous Mississauga curvaceous twin towers.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/109/309517493_a5fc72b58e_b.jpg

It is not part of the Amacon project but they are neat. Those townhouses would look at home in Vancouver.

IMO those townhouses ruin the base of the buildings. I'm all in favor of townhouse podiums but those just don't fit and look out of place or an afterthought.

deasine
Feb 11, 2008, 5:03 PM
I still like our Ritz Carlton better - it seems to have more charm to it =)

Yes the townhouses ruin the building.

Yume-sama
Feb 11, 2008, 5:31 PM
They definitely aren't as graceful as the Ritz Carlton. Cool looking, but they look just... fat :P

Kwik-E-Mart
Mar 29, 2008, 4:11 AM
IMO those townhouses ruin the base of the buildings. I'm all in favor of townhouse podiums but those just don't fit and look out of place or an afterthought.

Couldn't agree with you more! After going to the presentation centre in person I realized how out of scale the townhouses are to the towers (the left is nicknamed Marilyn Monroe and the other is supposed to be her male acquaintance)... And that's not to mention about the location (right next to Burnhamthorpe and Hurontario, two of Mississauga's busiest and widest thoroughfares) and the lack of connectivity between the development and the adjacent Square One Mall. It will certainly not generate pedestrian traffic under the current scheme, unless they convert the townhomes into street level retail that is at least a few more floors higher.

cc85
Mar 29, 2008, 4:17 AM
what, did vancouver somehow invent the grid pattern and short streets idea? when was this, id like wiki to tell me.

vanman
Mar 29, 2008, 5:02 AM
what, did vancouver somehow invent the grid pattern and short streets idea? when was this, id like wiki to tell me.

You missed the point of the article.

dreambrother808
Mar 29, 2008, 6:30 PM
These towers are way more forward-thinking and striking than the RC in my opinion. Not to bash the RC though, since it is a beautiful addition to the Vancouver skyline. It's just not up to this level. Vancouver is far too cowardly in it's development so far to attempt this. Toronto (and in this case even blah blah blah Mississauga) wins and as Vancouverites we should take that as a well-deserved kick in the ass, a clear message of how much we need to evolve as a city design-wise. Time to realize how bloody boring and backwards we still are. Time to use that as a fuel for a fire that burns bigger and brighter. No need to get into an argument of Toronto vs. Vancouver, just accept a reality and grow from there.

muzhav84
Mar 30, 2008, 12:14 AM
i think these towers are pretty ugly actually

dreambrother808
Mar 30, 2008, 1:18 AM
^^^^

I think this kind of opinion is what anything genuinely interesting would be up against quite strongly in this city and that's most likely why things of this nature never get built here. Perhaps those of us who want something more for Vancouver should finally come to the realization that it's never going to happen because the majority of people who live here have no concept of what is truly possible.

Kwik-E-Mart
Mar 30, 2008, 3:18 AM
^^^^

I think this kind of opinion is what anything genuinely interesting would be up against quite strongly in this city and that's most likely why things of this nature never get built here. Perhaps those of us who want something more for Vancouver should finally come to the realization that it's never going to happen because the majority of people who live here have no concept of what is truly possible.

The designs would be nice if they are constructed at a smaller scale, but you can't carbon copy the same buildings (at the same size) to Vancouver. I think that's what the people are complaining about in this thread.

dreambrother808
Mar 30, 2008, 4:13 AM
????

cc85
Mar 31, 2008, 4:53 AM
i think these towers are pretty ugly actually

they are ugly; they look alienlike. boo aliens.

raggedy13
Mar 31, 2008, 6:10 AM
I quite like them. While I agree if they were put into Vancouver their scale might clash with our existing slim towers, I also agree with what dreambrother was saying in terms of Vancouver's lack of risk-taking when it comes to creating iconic designs.

That being said, I think our current wave of projects contains some buildings making steps in the right direction. I think the completion of such projects as the Ritz Carlton, Jameson House, and a new (hopefully iconic) Vancouver Art Gallery will help build momentum and inspire the city to take a bit more risk in the future. We've still got quite a ways to go to match the likes of Toronto and Montreal though.