[caltrane74]

Since the top 10 u/c got updated, I guess it's time to update the 11-30 u/c.

11. U Condominiums II (Toronto): 184m/ 604ft
12. INDX Condominums (Toronto): 178.8m/ 587ft
13.Eighth Avenue PLace II (Calgary): 177.1m/ 581ft
14. One York Street (Toronto): 173.5m/ 569ft
15. City Centre I (Calgary): 170m/ 558ft
16. Hullmark Centre I (Toronto): 168m/ 551ft
17. Karma (Toronto): - 165.9m/ 544ft
18. West Lake Village 1 (Toronto): 162.3m/ 532ft
19. Five (Toronto) 161m/ 528ft
20. X2 (Toronto) 160.1m/ 525ft
21. Southcore Delta (Toronto) 159.8m/ 524ft
22. Three Hundred (Toronto): 157.9m/ 518ft
23. Theatre Park (Toronto): 157m/ 515ft
24. The Sovereign (Burnaby): 155.8m/ 511ft
25. U Condominiums I (Toronto): 154m/ 505ft
26. Chaz on Charles (Toronto): 151.4m/ 497ft
27. Pace Condominiums (Toronto): 146.2m/ 480ft
28. The Guardian Condo (Calgary) 146 m /479.5 feet
29. Residences at the RCMI (Toronto): 145.8m/ 478ft
30. MNP Tower (Vancouver) : 143.3 meters / 470ft



Updated by Dwils on April 14th, 2013

[Xelebes]

Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

[caltrane74]

I saw Icon on the Edmonton List , but not Station lands.

Icon came in at 112 Meters.

[caltrane74]

Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

No worries once, it's official (hell even if it's not, you can update the list yourself at anytime )

Just copy and paste
insert
and post!!!

[Calgarian]

Stationlands in Edmonton is 125 m (137 m with spires), I've seen them do some prep work or servicing on that lot.

Icon II - no idea how tall this one is. I think it is around 120+ m. Ian?

It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction.

[caltrane74]

Minto Midtown -160 Meters will be finished in a couple of months.

That should free up some space for some other projects in The big 3 or Montreal & Edmonton.

Cross your fingers.

[caltrane74]

Couple of shots I took last week. It's looking pretty nice so far.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2075/2232118592_d9a0342608_o.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2139/2232118712_ed13c8ea47_o.jpg

from egotrippin on UT

Murano

[Xelebes]

Edit - Delete

[caltrane74]

Hey Maybe we can include everything to #50.

I was just lazy man.

[Coldrsx]

It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction.

give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

[O-Town Hockey]

give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

Welcome to our nightmare!

[Coldrsx]

^born in ottawa and knowing it well i feel your pain. I absolutely cannot stand when "skyscraper/development aficionados" make comments about cities who have significant restrictions.

Edmonton has quite a lot going on...but height isnt one of them for reasons out of our control.

[caltrane74]

Glad to see we're keepin' it civil.



Edmonton has quite a lot going on...but height isnt one of them for reasons out of our control.


Don't worry Stationlands will be on the list as soon as we get confirmation.

and.....

look at Vancouver, with regards to hieght limits, so you never know.

And...

They might just shut that airport down. - It doesn't make sense for a city the size of Edmonton to have 2 airports.
It's ridiculous.

[Kevin_foster]

^ That argument has been going on for the past 10-15 years.

The best we can hope for immediately, is the closure of a runway.

[Calgarian]

give your city a municipal airport overlay of 150m (zenith, most areas are 130 or less) you ignorant bastard and see what you can do.

hey chill out dude, I wasn't insulting your city, I was saying it is unusual to see Edmonton on a tallest list.

[Coldrsx]

"It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction."

fuck you no insult

[Rico Rommheim]

Can someone explain to the meaning of this list? How is it inclusive? Where is the Bow? It doesn't make sense, many if not all of these buildings aren't even u/c!

[LeftCoaster]

Bow is on the 1-10 list....

I dont know about the other cities, but all the Vancouver buildings mentioned are U/C

[caltrane74]

Can someone explain to the meaning of this list? How is it inclusive? Where is the Bow? It doesn't make sense, many if not all of these buildings aren't even u/c!


The reason I made this list was to track the construction progress of tall buildings across Canada that are not on the 1-10 list.

I said inclusive , because of just Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver we get more Canadian cities included and more forumers included.

Even though...in the end it was still mainly Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver.


..anyways...

start posting your pictures of the Montreal building on the list.


btw: all the buildings on the list are U/C

[Calgarian]

"It would be kinda weird to see Edmonton on this list, you are booming, but you seem to have been left far behind the rest of the country in highrise comstruction."

fuck you no insult

Hey, it's not my fault your city decided to build your airport downtown, and as such don't have buildings over 150m. And don't get mad at me because you aren't building tons of highrises like Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver are. You can try to make what I said an insuly all you want, it wasn't intended to be so fuck off.

[caltrane74]

let's be civil.

I didn't create this thread for it to get locked on the first day.

[Coldrsx]

Hey, it's not my fault your city decided to build your airport downtown, and as such don't have buildings over 150m. And don't get mad at me because you aren't building tons of highrises like Calgary, Toronto and Vancouver are. You can try to make what I said an insuly all you want, it wasn't intended to be so fuck off.

FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary...


regardless, all cdn cities are doing much better and im happy to see that.

remind me to buy you a prairie fire we meet for drinks

[wild wild west]

Minto Midtown -160 Meters will be finished in a couple of months.

That should free up some space for some other projects in The big 3 or Montreal & Edmonton.

Cross your fingers.

Much like the top ten, it's still all about the GTA with a smattering of Calgary and Vancouver...

[Rico Rommheim]

The reason I made this list was to track the construction progress of tall buildings across Canada that are not on the 1-10 list.

I said inclusive , because of just Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver we get more Canadian cities included and more forumers included.

Even though...in the end it was still mainly Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver.


.


Ok ok now I get it. Thank you :)

[Calgarian]

FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary...

Because that means a lot doesn't it.

[WhipperSnapper]

Information complied manually from Skyscraperpage.com

Manually sucks

Did you not try clicking on diagrams, set country to Canada and status to construction?

FYI Edmonton has more buildings over 12 storeys than calgary

FYI, Calgary just surpassed Edmonton for completed over 12 storey buildings. (36-7 Calgary for those under construction)

[Coldrsx]

Because that means a lot doesn't it.



i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.

[francely57]

..anyways...

start posting your pictures of the Montreal building on the list.


400 Sherbrooke west, ~120m, 37 floors (Montreal's tallest since 1992)


at 14 floors on January 20, 2008... now it's 15 (around the same level as Bay/Adelaide and RBC?)

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e24/francely57/IMG_3555.jpg


crane seen from McGill University (12th bla bla) on December 20, 2007

http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e24/francely57/UC/IMG_3265.jpg




To me the building is basically the Verve (Toronto) with beige instead of green, and dark grey instead of white.

[Calgarian]

i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.

No to drag this on, but I can't help this one. Would you rather have Edmonton's skyline or Calgary's? cause from the sounds of it you prefer Edmonton's (which seems kinda weird to me).

[Rico Rommheim]

I find it quite bland, the rendering made it seem like it was going to e quality, this looks like yet another pre-fab concrete mindless skyscraper that we've benn getting these past few years :(

[Coldrsx]

^i love the density of calgary's but honestly find Edmonton's much more balanced and given the river valley for more photogenic.

however, the quality and volume of recent projects in calgary does make me green with envy.

[AndrewJ3D]

^i love the density of calgary's but honestly find Edmonton's much more balanced and given the river valley for more photogenic.

however, the quality and volume of recent projects in calgary does make me green with envy.


Some home town biases on this site are so funny. It's obvious that at some point in the last economic boom in Alberta that Calgary's skyline surpassed Edmonton's in style, height, balance, and scale. Their really is no question about it. And if Edmonton's was so photogenic, why do I have a tough time picturing it without googling it? I mean if I saw a picture of it I'd know what city I'm looking at, but if somebody asked me to make a simple sketch I wouldn't know where to begin. Calgary on the other hand I could get most of it right.

Sorry for perpetuating this argument, when I get home I'll try and ad something a bit more constructive.

[Coldrsx]

^not hometown bias...seriously.

[AndrewJ3D]

It just seems small town compared to Calgary. And each year the gap gets greater and greater. Actually it reminds me a lot of North Yorks Skyline.

http://www.bigskyline.com/images/Skyline_Edmonton_Alberta_night_1_z.jpg

[Kevin_foster]

Funny, an Edmonton /Calgary Rivalry? Now there's a new one!

It's part of our heritage. No matter what, Edmonton is better than Calgary, in every aspect, simply because I'm from Edmonton. They teach this in schools here.

And visa versa, if I was from Calgary...

But it's an intimate feud. Only those who enjoy S&M would understand. And in this case, calgary is our bitch. :D

These arguments are a part of Canadian history. Your watching a longstanding tradition carry out here folks. Admission should be charged!

[Coldrsx]

without turning this into an off-topic...the shear length of the skyline is ridiculous and almost impossible to capture in a decent shot....

http://www.globalairphotos.com/images/ab/edmonton/2001/edh2001_196.jpg

[Calgarian]

It just seems small town compared to Calgary. And each year the gap gets greater and greater. Actually it reminds me a lot of North Yorks Skyline.
[/IMG]

It's not that Edmonton is small time, it's just that Calgary's skyline is that of a city 5x the size, we are just so big time (not to get cocky, but it is true) we make Edmonton look small, when in fact it has a skyline of a city 2-3x it's size.

[jeremy_haak]

My God, this thread is flooded with testosterone.

I'm really surprised how close that Montreal tower is being built to its neighbour.

[WhipperSnapper]

i would rather have more towers than fewer with more height.

again ... since Calgary has more of both

[Coldrsx]

^incorrect.

[WhipperSnapper]

SSP is as close to accurate as possible ... I made sure of it!

Cities/12+ storeys
Toronto - 1677
Vancouver - 626
Montreal - 500
Calgary - 227
Edmonton - 224

The boom in Calgary over the last several years is killing you!

[Rico Rommheim]

Montreal would be at around 600-650. Maybe 700 but that's a stretch.

[MonkeyRonin]

SSP is as close to accurate as possible ... I made sure of it!

Toronto - 1677
Edmonton - 224

These still fall short of the 1,718 and 235 listed by Emporis, but the numbers are otherwise higher on SSP (as higher=more accurate in this case).

[Kevin_foster]

Sorry to step in here.. but emporis database reports:

Calgary 221 High Rise
Edmonton 235 High Rise

Calgary - 21 U/C
Edmonton - 8 U/C

When all is finished being built - Calgary will apparently have one more tower than Edmonton. See emporis.com for their definition of Tower.

[TOBoy]

Emporis is by far the most inaccurate site for skyscrapers. As more and more buildings are added to SSP's lists, it will be the primary source for skyscrapers for most cities.

[feepa]

What is the point of this discussion, in it's current form?

Calgary has nice shinny office towers, and Edmonton doesn't have as many.

Calgary has some more height, a big obsession for those in Calgary compensating for something else.

Point? There is none. So everyone (cold, johnnyc) untie the knot in your collective panties.

And yes, that post was an insult, though, not direct, it certain was there, and intentional.

Far far far behind every other city in Canada, but only if looking at Vancouver, Toronto or Calgary? Didn't realize these were the only cities in Canada. Winnipeg, Regina, Saskatoon, Ottawa, montreal, London, Hamilton, etc, pay attention, according to JohnnyC, you don't exist in Canada.

[LordMandeep]

it says city hall phase 2 is approved, which is clearly not true..

[jeremy_haak]

I'm a little confused. SSP lists a highrise as either greater than 12 stories or greater than 35m tall.

Given that definition and consolidated to CMA (roughly):
Toronto - 2140
Vancouver - 980
Montreal - 632
Ottawa - 398
Calgary - 262
Edmonton - 248
Hamilton - 153
Winnipeg - 141
London - 119
Halifax - 79
Kitchener - 63
Quebec City - 59
Windsor - 51
Victoria - 48
Saskatoon - 46
St. Catherines - 41
Regina - 39

[WhipperSnapper]

Montreal would be at around 600-650. Maybe 700 but that's a stretch.

sorry but Montreal (the city not the metro) is 500 +/- 10 at most


Sorry to step in here.. but emporis database reports:

Calgary 221 High Rise
Edmonton 235 High Rise

Calgary - 21 U/C
Edmonton - 8 U/C


You do realize a highrise on Emporis is either 12 storeys or a building with a known height above 35m

I count 226 12+ storey buildings for Edmonton and Calgary is obviously really outdated - tarjan pointe is not under construction

[caltrane74]

We use to have a huge set of Niagara Falls-St.Kitts forumers...what happened?

I would love to see an update of the Hilton Niagara Building....


What happened to our Mississauga Forumers with updates on Absolute world...?

Comon guys''

updates!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[WhipperSnapper]

Cities/12+ storeys/+200

Toronto - 1677
Vancouver - 626
Montreal - 500
Ottawa - 334
Calgary - 227
Edmonton - 224
Mississauga - 213

[401_King]

damn , Sauga is almost there with calgary and edmonton ha

[Jay in Cowtown]

^i love the density of calgary's but honestly find Edmonton's much more balanced and given the river valley for more photogenic.

however, the quality and volume of recent projects in calgary does make me green with envy.

I do feel bad for you poor bastards up there and that fucking height limit thing...

on the bright side, Calgary would make a top ten list of cities over a million with a laughable football stadium!

[wild wild west]

I really don't see how relevant it is how many buildings over 12 floors a city has...particularly when the point of discussion seems to be something along the lines of "Calgary's soon-to-be tallest may be 300 feet taller than ours but we have a few more buildings over 12 floors than you..." followed by "no you don't..." "yes you do..." etc.

Bottom line, Edmonton is a little late out of the starting blocks but it looks like their latest proposals are getting taller - hopefully they will start to see more big boys in the years to come. You can still build to nearly 500' there, which is not too shabby at all. Look at what Vancouver did with a similar limit pre Shangri-la.

[vanman]

Emporis is by far the most inaccurate site for skyscrapers. As more and more buildings are added to SSP's lists, it will be the primary source for skyscrapers for most cities.

Emporis once wrote in it's intro to Vancouver that the downtown peninsula is one of the densest places on earth with more than 1 million people.:haha:
It also said that we had more skyscrapers than Toronto.

[Jay in Cowtown]

Look at what Vancouver did with a similar limit pre Shangri-la.

Yeah, what happened to the height limit there... has been raised to 200m or done away with completely?

[vanman]

^There are now special exceptions for prominent sites. As well the developers have to jump through many hoops for increased density such as superior architecture, public amenities/art, heritage density transfers etc. The city has also hinted that it will allow taller office towers in the future to deal with the lack of space downtown.

[Delirium]

vancouver's Residences at Hotel Georgia was missing from the list. it comes in at #16.

516.5 ft / 157.429 m
http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g296/raggedy13/Misc/nightt.jpg


http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/2820/p1050170ky3.jpg
My photo

[Rico Rommheim]

sorry but Montreal (the city not the metro) is 500 +/- 10 at most






And on just what are you basing this on exactly, because Id be interested to know how you would know better than I do.

[caltrane74]

vancouver's Residences at Hotel Georgia was missing from the list. it comes in at #16.



They are probably still in site prep and demo which is why it didn't update on the SSP list.

[Delirium]

hmm... then why is Trump Toronto listed as #1 tallest u/c? it's no farther ahead in terms of construction.

[caltrane74]

hmm... then why is Trump Toronto listed as #1 tallest u/c? it's no farther ahead in terms of construction.

They (Trump) have put piles in the ground, and they have begun excavation.


That (Georgia) site looks like pure demolition.

That's just my observation, but it's probably the reason it hasn't been listed U/C by skyscraperpage.

[caltrane74]

Murano on Bay Street.

February 5, 2008

Bay Street Canyon! (residential) Looking North.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano1-1.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano2-1.jpg

South Tower
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano3.jpg

North Tower curtainwall, west face.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano6.jpg

Around Back: Addison car dealership, soon to be base of Burano, visible through concrete framework.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano7.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano9.jpg

A worker on the edge.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano10.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano11.jpg

South Tower redux.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano12.jpg

North Tower east face.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano13.jpg

Cladding on North Tower, north-east corner.
http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano14.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x11/CanadianNational/murano15.jpg

courtesy of Canadian National on UT

[vanman]

Murano on Bay Street.



courtesy of Canadian National on UT

Codominiums starting in the low $200,000

For downtown TO? You can't even get a new condo in Burnaby for that price.You guys are lucky.

[caltrane74]

It's a supply thing, you Vancouver guys wouldn't understand.

[Delirium]

They (Trump) have put piles in the ground, and they have begun excavation.


That (Georgia) site looks like pure demolition.

That's just my observation, but it's probably the reason it hasn't been listed U/C by skyscraperpage.

they aren't demolishing the existing building - just tearing down the ballroom. if you look to the right of the picture posted, excavation has begun and is further ahead than Trump.

200K for a downtown condo sounds great. at least the average Joe isn't being squeezed out to the burbs because prices are so high like here in Vancouver. Makes for a more balanced downtown.

[caltrane74]

I'm taking your word for it and have updated the list.

cal.

[Coldrsx]

For downtown TO? You can't even get a new condo in Burnaby for that price.You guys are lucky.

haha...yeah i did the same WTF...downtown Edmonton it hard to get a condo, let alone a new one, for under $250,000.

[caltrane74]

haha...yeah i did the same WTF...downtown Edmonton it hard to get a condo, let alone a new one, for under $250,000.

1 - Get Rid of airport downtown
2 - Build up!!
3 - Problem solved.

[WhipperSnapper]

That $200,000 buys you 500 square feet facing an elevator which I guess is still pretty good

[WhipperSnapper]

1 - Get Rid of airport downtown
2 - Build up!!
3 - Problem solved.


No quite

The airport lands aren't downtown and there really isn't a need to build 400 - 500+ footers (the cause of the nearby airport ) anywhere in Canada in order to build up density

1. smaller units
2. experienced apartment/highrise developers
3. contractors that have more than bathroom/kitchen renovations on their resume/ well connected suppliers

[Delirium]

i checked on mls.ca and there's nothing new downtown here for 200K. the cheapest condo on the market right now is a 585 sq/ft, 3rd floor unit in the west end for $229,000 and the building is 40 years old.

that's pretty bad.

and thanks for updating the list Caltrane74!

[WhipperSnapper]

Hotel Georgia and Epcor (with an unconfirmed height of 139m) have been moved over to construction as I do remember seeing a picture of construction activity for the latter.

[LordMandeep]

It's a supply thing, you Vancouver guys wouldn't understand.


developers have decided instead to build en masse. For one, high condo prices, would just push people to the suburbs so the developers have to keep decent prices.

Nonetheless, 23,000 condos were sold in the GTA last year.

[caltrane74]

I've updated the Epcor building in Edmonton and Hotel Georgia in Vancouver.

Edmonton guys, post your pictures!!!!!

[caltrane74]

Niagara Hilton - 177 Meters

[Coldrsx]

developers have decided instead to build en masse. For one, high condo prices, would just push people to the suburbs so the developers have to keep decent prices.

Nonetheless, 23,000 condos were sold in the GTA last year.

doesnt matter how many are sold...it is to whom they are sold to that counts...

[O-Town Hockey]

That Niagara Falls picture is clearly quite a few years old and that is obviously the Embassy Suites (completed 2003) under construction. Last I saw, the Hilton addition was at about 3 floors above ground. Here is a rendering of the finished tower as well as some (fairly) recent construction photos from October/November.

http://www.niagarafalls.ca/business/new_developments/images/1531/HiltonNorthwestview.JPG

http://www.niagarafalls.ca/business/new_developments/images/1531/Hilton as of November 5_ 2007_003.JPG http://www.niagarafalls.ca/business/new_developments/images/1531/Hilton as of November 5_ 2007_001.JPG

[caltrane74]

This picture is clearly quite a few years old and that is obviously the Embassy Suites under construction. Last I saw, the Hilton was at about 3 floors above ground.

Thanks,

I haven't been to Niagara Falls in months.. and have no clue where this one is at.

And for some reason we have lost our previously huge Niagara Falls continegent on this forum.

[Coldrsx]

glad to see niagara falls building forgetable architecture.

[O-Town Hockey]

Here is a skyline shot that I took back in October. I kind of like the new buildings in Niagara Falls, much classier than things used to be. I remember when I was a kid and the only tall building (other than the Skylon Tower) was the Minolta Tower (the one that looks like a microphone). Things sure have changed.

http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/8477/dsc02455vc5.jpg

[caltrane74]

Yup, looks like a resort town.

[WhipperSnapper]

That Niagara Falls picture is clearly quite a few years old

what picture?

Anywho, the historist Hilton addition is on the 9th floor

http://accessniagara.com/blog/category/niagara-falls-developments/

[caltrane74]

I deleted the picture, once I was informed it was incorrect.

[caltrane74]

Photos taken February 5, looking northwest Casa is at ground level.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2074/2246006216_4604cd8f6b_b.jpg

Looking north with BSN in the background.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2247/2246006222_c67025efa8_b.jpg


Casa - # 21 (138 Meters)

picture courtesy of current on UT

[harls]

I wonder if Ottawa could crack the top 50. Probably not.

Damn boxes.

[caltrane74]

I'll keep expanding the list irregardless. ( I was just lazy getting started so I only went to 30)

....

This is a skyscraperforum after all, and I would like for more peeps to get involved.

[vanman]

That $200,000 buys you 500 square feet facing an elevator which I guess is still pretty good

I wouldn't mind as long as I was downtown.

[Rico Rommheim]

http://www.blade-runner.it/images/tyrell-corp2.jpg

[KrisYYC]

^^ Thunder Bay???

[craner]

sorry but Montreal (the city not the metro) is 500 +/- 10 at most

You do realize a highrise on Emporis is either 12 storeys or a building with a known height above 35m

I count 226 12+ storey buildings for Edmonton and Calgary is obviously really outdated - tarjan pointe is not under construction

AAHHH - If only it never was U/C.:yuck:

[Nicko999]

http://www.blade-runner.it/images/tyrell-corp2.jpg

a proposal???:D

[jeremy_haak]

a proposal???:D

For L.A., and it's in the pipeline for roughly 9-10 years from now. ;)

[204]

For L.A., and it's in the pipeline for roughly 9-10 years from now. ;)

The developer is Tyrell Corporation? ;)

[francely57]

http://www.blade-runner.it/images/tyrell-corp2.jpg

a proposal???:D

Yes, a new proposal near the Old Port. The population will be consulted next week...

[caltrane74]

Pictures C/O Current from SSC

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2155/2246006230_5b7bc11b7e_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2143/2246006234_19ce43fcd6_b.jpg

#22. X Condominum - 137 Meters (Toronto) courtesy of current on SSC

[caltrane74]

Great pics, CN... here's a few more after dark...

http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z133/markus919/DSCN1952.jpg

http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z133/markus919/DSCN1951.jpg

http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z133/markus919/DSCN1950.jpg

#30. Verve Condo - 120 Meters (Toronto) - very bottom of the list
looks ok

pictures courtesy of casaguy on UT

[caltrane74]

http://img486.imageshack.us/img486/8254/rendering06uj4.jpg


http://www.belllightbox.ca/images/rendering01.jpg

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6116/rendering05of5.jpghttp://img240.imageshack.us/img240/5427/rendering04ue8.jpg

http://www.belllightbox.ca/images/rendering07.jpg


The Bell Festival Centre is an integrated development consisting of two major components. A 4-6 storey podium called, "Lightbox" will be the new home for the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF), and will include theatres, exhibition space, a reference library and archives, and office space for the festival. A residential tower of approximately 38 storeys in height will arise from the podium.

Location: King Street West & John Street, Toronto
Developer: Daniels Capital Corp & Toronto International Film Festival
Architect: Kirkor Architects & KPMB
Designation: Condominium, Entertainment
Status: Under construction
Expected Occupancy: Unknown
Height: 165m (541 ft)
Floors: 4 + 38 = 42 above ground, 6 below ground
Website: http://www.belllightbox.ca/ | http://festivaltower.com/


Construction Updates:


Location before construction:
http://www.belllightbox.ca/images/location03.jpg http://www.belllightbox.ca/images/location01.jpg‎



Festival Centre in Toronto. 157 meters and #16 on the list.

updated construction photos needed

[caltrane74]

Absolute World in Mississauga. These models look fantastic, we can only hope the buildings turn out this good when complete.


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/109/309517493_a5fc72b58e_b.jpg

[caltrane74]

Photos taken February 9 from York St looking east with the ACC in the background.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2407/2253165841_208f0a58a7_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2128/2254043212_acb1ec692d_b.jpg

Looking west (north side) with the RBC cranes visible on the right.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2184/2253165849_db90bcd45b_b.jpg

Looking west (south side).
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2301/2254043210_f32f639707_b.jpg

Telus Tower above ground.... courtesy of current on SSC.