| | You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum. For the full version follow the link below.
View Full Version : lighted tops
| | |
SpongeG
Feb 20, 2008, 5:16 AM
is this a trend or a requirement?
seems any new highrise has a lighted top
so is it just a building trend or a requirement?
its a great thing no matter what :tup:
]
just wondering
officedweller
Feb 20, 2008, 5:39 AM
A lot of mechanical penthouses are quite poorly done.
I'd rather see a properly integrated mechanical penthouse than the blank walls of one highlighted by floodlights.
Internal lighting usually works well (Residences on Georgia).
Worst of the bunch is The Bentley - massive ugly concrete box (not lit luckily), Paris Place at International Village, or Jardine's Lookout.
Well integrated: Mondrian I & II, Domus, Eden, Miro, Brava, Genesis, Grace, Space, L'Hermitage.
The most recently lit one I've noticed is the Silver Sea (Concord Pacific next to Granville Bridge) - changing colours like at the Edgewater Casino.
giallo
Feb 20, 2008, 5:40 AM
I'm not normally a grammar Nazi, but 'lighted tops'? I believe the proper way to write it would be 'lit tops'. Lighted means to fall or descend.
Anyway, I think lit tops/crowns are great. Unfortunately, they get turned off pretty quickly on condo towers after a strata forms. No one wants to pay the extra electrical bill. The Melville is a perfect example.
Here in Shanghai it's all the rage. I always keep my eyes open to see what lighting schemes the new buildings come up with.
SpongeG
Feb 20, 2008, 6:26 AM
it's alive and well in burnaby - the OMA's, watercolours, Legacy are all lit up and the highgate village ones
its nice to see when driving down hwy #1 at least
they stick out a lot more than downtown as they don't get lost among the forest of towers
SpongeG
Feb 20, 2008, 6:28 AM
my bad i don't really pay attention to grammar and wording online
vanman
Feb 20, 2008, 6:50 AM
it's alive and well in burnaby - the OMA's, watercolours, Legacy are all lit up and the highgate village ones
its nice to see when driving down hwy #1 at least
they stick out a lot more than downtown as they don't get lost among the forest of towers
I've heard rumours that nimbys are trying to get the exterior lighting at Highate turned off. :hell:
officedweller
Feb 20, 2008, 6:55 AM
Come to think of it - are the light pipes atop the Wall Centre towers still lit? (each one has a lightpipe)
SpongeG
Feb 20, 2008, 7:08 AM
I've heard rumours that nimbys are trying to get the exterior lighting at Highate turned off. :hell:
wouldn't doubt it - they got the skytrain stations art installation lights turned off
i loved those colour changing cube like things
officedweller
Feb 20, 2008, 7:22 AM
@ Holdom? Those were cool.
Is it only after certain hours, or permanently turned off?
vanman
Feb 20, 2008, 7:44 AM
wouldn't doubt it - they got the skytrain stations art installation lights turned off
i loved those colour changing cube like things
That is ridiculous. Who could that possibly bother?
SpongeG
Feb 20, 2008, 10:13 PM
@ Holdom? Those were cool.
Is it only after certain hours, or permanently turned off?
i haven't seen them on in a long while
before the towers went up i think is when i last saw them on
cause you used to be able to see them well from hwy #1
and driving west down lougheed now nothing
officedweller
Feb 20, 2008, 11:17 PM
Even the William Farrell Building (Telus) at Robson & Seymour had a fibre optic lighting system with changing colours when it was renovated - it was functional for maybe a year or less. It wasn't garish, (the lights were focussed on the building from each major mullion junction) so the condos across the street would not have been directly shone into.
I'm not normally a grammar Nazi, but 'lighted tops'? I believe the proper way to write it would be 'lit tops'. Lighted means to fall or descend.
Lighted and lit mean the same thing. Like spelled and spelt.
I think "illuminated" would maybe be more descriptive.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.