PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : "Trek Park" UBC: the new hippy generation



mr.x
Apr 12, 2008, 7:13 AM
From the "We Condemn the Violence" group in Facebook, in response to last week's incident.

Green = sane comments
Red = moronic comments


Most of the pro-violence arguments on this wall are from the conformist perspective: Do as the authority figure tells you, and don't break any laws, and you do not deserve to have violence inflicted on you. Get out of line, break laws, be disobedient and you deserve to get hurt.

Authoritarianism, conformity to social norms, and internalized hegemony are comforting features of a rigid personality that work to alleviate anxiety. Trek Park and Knoll Aid challenge and perturb these rigid structures, evoking anxiety. The consequences are the dehumanizing, sociopathic tendencies evident below, and shortly - above. Crazy, huh?

---------------------

When you rise above the status quo, you will be hammered back down not just by state sanctioned violence like last Friday, but by the angst ridden conformist masses.

I just figure: Non illigitimi corborundum est!

Resistance, persistence, and peaceful coexistence.

---------------------

and the apathetic character of the masses. It is not pretty.

You seem to be confused. Maybe its all the sunlight on the scalp but, I don't think you quite understand what apathy is. All the criticism you have garnered is ACTION, against something that is offensive to us, your rhetoric works great when convincing 17yr old kids from the states to join you, not so great in actually defending yourself. If you want to have your voices and arguments respected, stop with the hyperliberalgreenwash.

---I think you will find a distinct shift in the general UBC population now that this incident is rather public. You assume that the general UBC student is too apathetic to join your cause, when in fact the average student simply disagrees with you, and is merely tolerant. Our tolerance has been pushed to the brink now that our reputations are tarnished by your actions in the news.---

------------------------------

"Yeah, we really pissed off a lot of conformists. We became the focus of what seems to have been a simmering bigotry and hatred. This all came spewing out in the last few days."

This protester-resister, 'non-conformist' language is exactly the kind of thing that makes people generally dislike you. When you verbally bombard other students for not having such an enlightened and 'non-conformist' mind like yourself, it reaps of the elitism which you should ostensibly hate. Basically your saying to students who don't sit in front of police squad cars:

"Hey conformist sheep, I know what's best for you because I have a the skill of super critical thinking - and surprise surprise - you don't because you're a lazy/docile/suburban conformist. You're aren't capable of challenging authority so I'll have to do it for you and assume to represent your interest."

This is radical-left elitism at its worst. And it is not helping you

------------------------

I appreciate the critique of hyperbolic and provocative language. Those of us who were closest to the events have been profoundly affected by our experiences of that night. As I said, we founded this group while 21 protesters were still in jail. We were outraged, shocked and hurt. These feelings continue for all of us.

Trek Park One began in September. We have been trying to establish a voice since then. It is a direct action protest. The language that accompanies it has been, by necessity, hyperbolic and provocative. I regret some of the more provocative things that I have said since the event. I hope that what I have said has not hurt anyone's feelings. If it has, I apologize and hope I can be forgiven.

I hope that we can come together as a community and, together, condemn the violence that characterized the events of April, 4th 2008 at UBC and support everyone who has been affected by them.

-----------

Yeah, we really pissed off a lot of conformists. We became the focus of what seems to have been a simmering bigotry and hatred. This all came spewing out in the last few days.

We have been trying to be heard, on behalf of students in general, for months. We used direct action as well as hyperbole and provocative language, among many other tactics.

We finally broke the surface tension. When we did we exposed the violent nature of the state, and the apathetic character of the masses. It is not pretty.

---------------------

Well youre right that the courts will decide. The officer has a duty to apprehend the situation better than they did however. And you support post 911 security culture laws? says something about you. Yeah there was screaming and profanity but these were 40 big guys with tasers. They couldnt handle some name calling? Sticks and stones will break my bones and all that?

----------------------

Obstruction of a peace officer is obstruction whether you like it or not, it is not up to the officer or the citizen, but for the court to decide who is guilty. It is legal to detain any person for up to 48hrs without pressing charges (post-911). I watched all the video, yelling, kids jumping around, chanting F@CK THE PIGS - looks like a mob to me.

-----------------------

Essentially the SDS has created a UBC student politics "political party". There's a whole bunch of you: Rodrigo Nunes, yourself Nathan Crompton, Stefanie Ratjen, Tristan Markle, Ed Durgan, Matt Filipiak.. just to name a few off the top of my head, who have all banded together and promote the same interests and agenda ("Save the Knoll" is just the latest incarnation). You all come off as wanting power, and attention. Respect is not important, for you do not care about gaining the respect of the average mindless conformist UBC student. As long as you get your power and your attention, you'll be fine to bask in the respect given out in the circle-jerk that is the SDS. And if you don't get your power, complain! (See the frivolous Crompton/Lougheed 'scandal').

This is why you do not have my support, and this is why I am critical of your actions. I look forward to your response.

-------------

Sadly, many aspects of the initial Trek Park protest have not been communicated effectively to the UBC student body. Some clarification about the initial protest is necessary:

1.It is not only about saving the Knoll! The Knoll is supposed to be a symbol of the undemocratic administration structure of the University. The unelected Board of Governors who decide all non-academic decision concerning UBC are selling campus land to build expensive private housing similar to what is going on behind Gage.
2.Members of the Board of Governors have economic interests in the companies that are building private housing on campus. Therefore it is not only undemocratic but also corrupt.
3.Thanks to the efforts of many engaged UBC students the plan to build private housing on the land of the current bus loop has been cancelled. The University still wants build the underground bus loop, for reasons uncertain, even though the new loop won’t fit trolley busses or the Skytrain that is coming

---------------------

Props to Nic Krause. The police have the right and duty to use force when necessary as it is may be required when enforcing laws. When the fire department comes and you step in the way of hoses, or when you actually do something as ridiculous as surround a cop car, you're going to get arrested. They were given warnings, and yes, force was likely used to arrest them. If you take issue with a decision made by the police don't surround a cop car, make a complaint, we live in a democratic society and if the arrest can't be justified then they'll probably get punished for it, but taking action directly against police only removes any ounce of legitimacy from the cause you're seeking to support.

zivan56
Apr 12, 2008, 7:45 AM
Both have *some* good arguments. The RCMP is unaware of cultural norms at a university. If that had happened in some parts of Europe, police cars would have been torched and riot squad called. The police should be scared of the people from time to time to keep them in check, and make sure they don't have too much authority and lack of discipline. In this situation, they should have just backed away and not confronted the protesters in the first place by trying to put out a non threatening fire.

mooks28
Apr 12, 2008, 7:57 AM
[QUOTE=mr.x2;3479891]From the "We Condemn the Violence" group in Facebook, in response to last week's incident.

Green = sane comments
Red = moronic comments


Most of the pro-violence arguments on this wall are from the conformist perspective: Do as the authority figure tells you, and don't break any laws, and you do not deserve to have violence inflicted on you. Get out of line, break laws, be disobedient and you deserve to get hurt.

Authoritarianism, conformity to social norms, and internalized hegemony are comforting features of a rigid personality that work to alleviate anxiety. Trek Park and Knoll Aid challenge and perturb these rigid structures, evoking anxiety. The consequences are the dehumanizing, sociopathic tendencies evident below, and shortly - above. Crazy, huh?

Sounds like someone just finished reading their Political Philosophy 100 textbook and got a little carried away...

AKA-007
Apr 12, 2008, 8:10 AM
3.Thanks to the efforts of many engaged UBC students the plan to build private housing on the land of the current bus loop has been cancelled. The University still wants build the underground bus loop, for reasons uncertain, even though the new loop won’t fit trolley busses or the Skytrain that is coming.

I haven't heard of many plans about it, but I know that it's going to be an improvement from what is there. The loop is too small. That's reason enough to build a new one, and one that is going to be good for now and later.

I like how all the people with red highlights use lots of colourful words. They're essentially trashing "conformists" and being disobediant to persons of authority.
:whip:
The best thing that can be done now is not to give them media coverage. Sweep it under the carpet and people will forget about it in a couple of weeks.

zivan56
Apr 12, 2008, 9:26 AM
The best thing that can be done now is not to give them media coverage. Sweep it under the carpet and people will forget about it in a couple of weeks.

Like the police/CBSA tried with Robert Dziekanski? How about China and the Olympic flame?
Silence is deafening.
Besides the point, everybody has a right to be heard. What make you think only your opinion should be? That's pretty much the attitude the government in China takes on any issues it doesn't agree with.

dreambrother808
Apr 12, 2008, 8:51 PM
Like the police/CBSA tried with Robert Dziekanski? How about China and the Olympic flame?
Silence is deafening.
Besides the point, everybody has a right to be heard. What make you think only your opinion should be? That's pretty much the attitude the government in China takes on any issues it doesn't agree with.

Those are some pretty ungrounded comparisons. Sometimes protesters ARE mal-informed, self-absorbed troublemakers. Lighting a fire in a public place and trying to prevent it's dousing??? Then complaining when you have to be forcibly removed?? That's ridiculous. There is no need for such blatant flouting of the law in this case. They use and thereby demean the tactics necessary for those rallying against far more serious and impenetrable adversities. The tone of these protesters reeks of adolescent angst and a desire to look "cool", to be a "rebel". I've been friends with many of these kinds of people, and for all of their sincerity and positive intent, they are naive, elitist, and suffocatingly self-righteous. They desire the cachet of appearing to be on the same level of struggle as those in past eras or other current situations and so they posture with similar actions and rhetoric. They lack the perspective or ego-restraint to take the time to decipher whether or not what they fight against is a genuine injustice or just the complex balancing of practical realities with divergent human needs and desires.

zivan56
Apr 12, 2008, 9:24 PM
^^ Well if they are just protesting to protest and have a confrontation, then it's definitely not something genuine. However, I was under the impression that they were protesting for months and that nobody gave a damn until this happened. No matter what the comparison is, it's still the same principle; big or small.
Although I still fail to see why the fire department confronted them. It's not like they set a building on fire...they should have not intervened unless necessary and give fines to people who started the fire later on after it died down. Instead, they chose to confront them and made it look like they were the "strikebreakers" of today.

subdude
Apr 13, 2008, 12:21 AM
We finally broke the surface tension. When we did we exposed the violent nature of the state, and the apathetic character of the masses. It is not pretty.

"Now we can see the violence inherent in the system!"

"Help, help I'm being repressed!"

subdude
Apr 13, 2008, 12:36 AM
Both have *some* good arguments. The RCMP is unaware of cultural norms at a university. If that had happened in some parts of Europe, police cars would have been torched and riot squad called. The police should be scared of the people from time to time to keep them in check, and make sure they don't have too much authority and lack of discipline. In this situation, they should have just backed away and not confronted the protesters in the first place by trying to put out a non threatening fire.

pfftt whatever

dreambrother808
Apr 13, 2008, 12:57 AM
^^ Well if they are just protesting to protest and have a confrontation, then it's definitely not something genuine. However, I was under the impression that they were protesting for months and that nobody gave a damn until this happened. No matter what the comparison is, it's still the same principle; big or small.
Although I still fail to see why the fire department confronted them. It's not like they set a building on fire...they should have not intervened unless necessary and give fines to people who started the fire later on after it died down. Instead, they chose to confront them and made it look like they were the "strikebreakers" of today.

it was a rather large fire set next to a construction site. have you seen the video of it? people can't just light fires in public wherever they want to no matter what kind of message they are trying to send. perhaps no one was listening to them because "no one" agreed with them. i do work on campus sometimes and i knew what the protest was about from signs, etc. in addition, they had already staged events on campus to raise awareness. not having the outcome that your particular group wants does not mean that the student body as a whole is being railroaded on this issue. have you looked at the design proposal? it's quite a beautiful improvement on what is currently there.

here is some video of the proposed redevelopment:
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=YJ58fOrwlSw

zivan56
Apr 13, 2008, 1:19 AM
^^ I am not saying anything about this particular development (nor does it affect me), but any protests in general. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it wrong. Clearly there are people that agree with them, hence all the people that showed up.

pfftt whatever

That's your opinion. Personally, I don't agree with your reaction or stance at all. It's small things like this that police and goverment use to test the waters on how far they can go...

mr.x
Apr 13, 2008, 1:24 AM
From the anti-Knoll group on Facebook:



I would just like to thank everyone for coming out to the protest yesterday and making it a grand old time. I really feel like we made a difference and raised a lot of awareness.
Unlike some recent protests that come to mind, everyone stayed onside of the law and at the end of the day, no one was arrested.

We even had our own primary response fire crew with supersoakers, to put out any dangerous fires the hippies might start. I commend you for your thoughtfulness towards everyones safety.

The highlight for me definitely occured shortly after arriving, when that angry hippie chick attacked Rory and started ripping up our signs, and everyone started chanting "peaceful protest!" at her. Oh the irony! That was pretty damn funny.

----------------------

It has become all too easy for those covering the controversy regarding the future of the knoll and University of B.C. campus development plans to frame the issue as a contest between the interests of powerful developers and university administrators and those of helpless students. This will likely continue with the coverage of the disorder and inevitable conflict that came as a result of a clearly unsafe bonfire being lit in the middle of campus last Friday.

That is a shame. The silent majority of students recognize that their interests are indeed served by a plan that will improve transit efficiency and add badly needed capacity to a choked campus housing market, and improve the sadly lacking retail choices on campus. That same silent majority recognizes the value of respect for the rule of law and the good men and women who enforce it.

Until this past weekend, "Trek Park" was little more than a nuisance to most students. Now it is fast becoming a symbol for the kind of unacceptable chaos and mob rule that one hears about at some other universities. In light of that, I doubt the majority will be silent for much longer.

--------------------------


So when the Police broke up our party yesterday, they were fucking awesome. They were asking us who made the song up, it was legendary. The Vancouver Police Department loves your song Erich. In my opinion, they were stoked we were the Kno to the Knoll crowd, and not irrational hippie protesters.

Police > hippies

http://photos-f.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v241/25/71/502595873/n502595873_1127421_5103.jpg

dreambrother808
Apr 13, 2008, 1:50 AM
^^ I am not saying anything about this particular development (nor does it affect me), but any protests in general. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it wrong. Clearly there are people that agree with them, hence all the people that showed up.


I've never said that protest is wrong. I'm a firm believer in protest. My heart rises when I see people joining together and standing up against an injustice. In this instance, I am simply arguing my point of view on this particular protest, especially with regard to the protesters claims of unfair treatment and police brutality.

deasine
Apr 13, 2008, 2:09 AM
Protests = showing that we have a healthy democracy. It's just the kind of protests that we have is worrying: Peaceful protests = very good, and I will support them even if I disagree with them. Violent protests = bad and should be stopped immediately. I think the police stopped the protests was because of the bonfire...

mr.x
Apr 13, 2008, 9:55 AM
A few pictures from Friday's noon pro-development protest:

http://photos-511.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v233/245/78/21002511/n21002511_35794711_3719.jpg



There was a confrontation that eventually needed the RCMP to break up. But before that happened, one of April 4th's protest leaders came in and went on a rampage ripping signs. The Kno to the Knoll protesters then proceeded with chanting "peaceful protest! peaceful protest!", which is what the hippie protesters started doing when police started to arrest them on that night.

http://photos-511.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v233/245/78/21002511/n21002511_35794709_2930.jpg

http://photos-511.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v233/245/78/21002511/n21002511_35794710_3464.jpg

vanlaw
Apr 15, 2008, 9:13 PM
ahhhhh....nothing like some good ol' undergrad idealism.

mr.x
Apr 17, 2008, 5:45 AM
lol, you have to watch this:

YM3fDf8H-jc

Nutterbug
Apr 19, 2008, 3:43 PM
Anything to tempt police into action and claim police brutality, authoritarian oppression and martyrdom.

You know things have to be overall pretty good if students have to take up activism on trivial causes like this to make themselves feel important.

Nutterbug
Apr 19, 2008, 3:45 PM
ahhhhh....nothing like some good ol' undergrad idealism.

Always turn to 20-year-old students for the answers to all of the world's problems while they still know everything.

dreambrother808
Apr 19, 2008, 4:29 PM
thankfully we have a lot of jaded 30something and ups to keep the status quo uncomfortably where it is ;)

Nutterbug
Apr 19, 2008, 4:42 PM
thankfully we have a lot of jaded 30something and ups to keep the status quo uncomfortably where it is ;)

Thankfully, we have you 20-somethings looking out for us when we get led astray. ;)

mr.x
Apr 25, 2008, 6:21 AM
To members of KNO TO THE KNOLL

Today at 9:43pm
Hello Kno to the Knollers,

This is just a reminder to all of you that Kno to the Knoll will be holding a good ol' fashion pub night tomorrow at Koerner's Pub at 7:30-8pm.
We hope you will all come out and join us in peaceful protest against the knoll and those hippies, who are apparently holding their own protest this same night.

Build Bus Loop Now! P.F. Changs for all!





BTW, the hippies who were "oppressed" by the police a few weeks ago are crazy enough to make a documentary about it [warning, watching this will kill brain cells]:
Z2WYr_7zyhs





A must see. The SDS (knoll hippies) swarming former Liberal MP for UBC/Point Grey. As he's trying to listen to hear them out, they shout allegations with a megaphone at him. Remember; its all about democracy and student voices.

Behold the magnitude of stupidity.
RAeECKQydV8
Don't you love how these guys don't even let him respond, and they feel intimidated if they don't use a megaphone? Typical hippies.




Somebody get China to roll in the fucking tanks.