PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : NEW YORK | Grand Central Tower | 1,497 FT | 108 FLOORS | 1956 | NEVER BUILT



M II A II R II K
May 29, 2008, 1:44 AM
http://archrecord.construction.com/innovation/2_Features/images/0411history3.jpg


Developers began seriously exploring the idea of building a skyscraper above Grand Central Terminal in the early 1950s. The idea for a skyscraper on the site, though, had been actually around since the Beaux Arts terminal was completed in 1913. Its architects, Reed & Stem, proposed their own tower which would have elegantly straddled the terminal’s main passenger hall.

Working for developers Webb & Knapp, I.M. Pei proposed an 80-story tower with a circular footprint and, thanks to a taper halfway up the shaft, an hourglass profile. Its facade was crisscrossed by structural supports; overall the building resembled a bundle of sticks. At the base of Pei’s building, and again in its upper levels, the floors were left open and the structure was left exposed. Grand Central Terminal would have been demolished to make room for the tower, just as Penn Station was demolished a few years later to make room for Two Penn Plaza and Madison Square Garden.
Although Pei’s design was passed up, the idea for a Grand Central skyscraper remained. In the late 1960s, the terminal’s owner sold the air rights to developer UGP Properties, which hired architect Marcel Breuer. By this point, however, the terminal had been designated a historic landmark, and with support from the nascent preservation movement, the Landmarks Commission rejected Breuer’s design. However, a skyscraper was built north of Grand Central Terminal: the Pan Am Building (now the Met Life Building), completed in 1963. This high-rise has been said to be the one New Yorkers would most like to see demolished, because it obstructs Park Avenue’s view corridor and dwarfs nearby buildings.

ThreeHundred
May 29, 2008, 4:52 AM
Wow..talk about ahead of it's time. This is in Doha, Qatar. And people say that architects in the middle east are progressive. It's nothing more than a 50 year old design.

Aspire Tower
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/322902047_12371e7753.jpg?v=0

Patrick
May 29, 2008, 6:23 AM
Other proposals:

http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/untitled.jpg

http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/byard1.jpg

http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/byard3.jpg

Wrightguy0
May 29, 2008, 10:50 AM
http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/byard3.jpg

I like the one on the left

latennisguy
May 29, 2008, 1:17 PM
left = :yuck: right = :tup:

JDRCRASH
May 29, 2008, 5:42 PM
^
:sly:

The one on the left is classic!:D

scalziand
May 30, 2008, 5:00 AM
Are there any air rights left in grand central or were they pretty much used up by the bloomburg tower?

The proposal with met-life in the background is one huge ass int. style box.

Wrightguy0
May 30, 2008, 10:07 AM
^^^^

Considering that the PanAm was the largest building in the world at that time.

Complex01
May 30, 2008, 4:08 PM
I like this one. I see a handful of projects out there that looks like this. It would have been awesome...

sabino86
Jun 21, 2008, 3:59 PM
Other proposals:

http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/byard1.jpg

:yuck: :yuck: :yuck:

Apparently, this would have required gutting Grand Central. Now that would have been a loss...

NYguy
Mar 8, 2010, 2:31 PM
Some cool video...
http://therealdeal.com/newyork/articles/27162?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+trdnews+%28The+Real+Deal+-+New+York+Real+Estate+News%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner


Rsj1pkfolxI

NYguy
Mar 9, 2010, 1:38 AM
http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594682/original.jpg

NYguy
Mar 9, 2010, 1:50 AM
What now straddles Park Avenue...(March 6)


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594910/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594920/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594923/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594949/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594954/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/122594910/original.jpg

kickser
Apr 29, 2010, 10:01 PM
They should definately reanimate this design and build this tower somewhere at the hudson yards project, nearby the proposed hotel Penn tower.

Jasoncw
May 4, 2010, 3:31 AM
The Hyperboloid looks cool, and it's very ahead of its time to be proposed in the 50s. If it were being built today in Russia or the middle east or someplace, it would be considered cutting edge. But as far as I can tell it doesn't really have any specificity to the Grand Central Station site, maybe it would have been better off if it were built for a new station someplace else. I wonder if it had been built if we'd could consider it to be an important landmark or an incredible mistake (ala Madison Square Garden). Maybe we'd have mixed feelings over it.

http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/byard3.jpg

I'm surprised at this proposal. It doesn't seem very monumental to me, it just seems like a very normal unspecial building. The modern towers were at least incredibly monumental. Such a massive and unrelenting building on that view on Park Avenue is definitely monumental.

Although if I were putting a tower there I'd probably have the narrow side facing Park Avenue. The MetLife building looks a lot better from the narrow side.


Does anyone know about any proposals from the 20s or 30s? I bet those would be pretty interesting.

TANGELD_SLC
May 30, 2010, 9:47 AM
Wow. Talk about hyper-futuristic. I love it! Too bad it wasn't ever built.

MolsonExport
Sep 16, 2010, 1:32 PM
Starts with U and ends with Y.

wrab
Oct 3, 2010, 3:07 AM
OMG what an amazing structure.

IMBY
Dec 19, 2012, 1:07 PM
The fact that this stunning tower was never built is enough to bring tears to my eyes! And why didn't Chicago go ahead an build it, or some other city?

Sad, sad, sad!!



Forums Directory