PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : TORONTO | Maryon Tower | 2,250' Pinnacle / 1,650' Roof | 140 FLOORS | NEVER BUILT



M II A II R II K
Jun 3, 2008, 5:10 PM
http://i4.tinypic.com/10sbtr6.jpg

Eaton's / John Maryon Tower was a proposed supertall 140-storey office skyscraper, to be built in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In 1971, Eaton's was going to team up with a developer named John Maryon to build a 1,650 ft. (503 m) tower in the College Park area of Downtown Toronto. With a 600 ft. (183 m) communication mast added to the roof, the total proposed height was 2,250 ft (686 m). Plans for the tower were cancelled, because building a structure of this height was considered impossible at the time of its planning. This skyscraper was planned two years before the Sears Tower was completed, and five years before the CN Tower was completed. Had the tower been built, it would have been the world's tallest building to this day. Toronto had visions of grandeur during this era; it eventually got the tall building they so desired when the CN Tower was constructed.

A tower at this site was not a new idea. In the late 1920s, Eaton's College Street (now called College Park) was proposed as a 38-storey tower. In 1978, a residential condo tower was built near College Park, followed by a 30-storey office tower in 1984.

Canadian Mind
Jun 3, 2008, 7:06 PM
looks sorta ugly anyways. something more elegant and I would be saddenedth?at Toronto never got it.

Speaking of whch, any speculation on how long it will take toronto to upsurt Dubai? didn't take that long to beat moscow.

jeffwhit
Jun 20, 2008, 1:05 AM
I've seen a photo (possibly on here) on John Maryon with a model of this tower, looking very slimey.

M II A II R II K
Jun 20, 2008, 1:09 AM
I've seen a photo (possibly on here) on John Maryon with a model of this tower, looking very slimey.

And stroking it too.

Cypherus
Jun 21, 2008, 4:54 AM
It looks like the CN tower is inside the building....

borgo100
Jun 30, 2008, 10:18 PM
It looks like the CN tower is inside the building....

i see it

NDPhilly
Jul 10, 2008, 7:20 PM
i see itme to. do we have a year on this building.

Ronnie Yau
Mar 7, 2010, 6:06 AM
I hope this will get built. :haha:

MolsonExport
May 11, 2010, 4:10 PM
Larger than life but 20 times as ugly.


fugliest thing I've seen in awhile.

JDRCRASH
May 11, 2010, 10:17 PM
Meh...

Flamesrule
Jul 12, 2010, 3:21 PM
ewww that looks gross.

I hope this doesn't built. It could ruin it's skyline but it depends where this building is.

scalziand
Jul 14, 2010, 2:30 AM
do we have a year on this building.

This skyscraper was planned two years before the Sears Tower was completed, and five years before the CN Tower was completed.
That gives us 1970-1971.

Personally, the model is underwhelming, to say the least.

vid
Jul 14, 2010, 3:20 AM
I hope this doesn't built. It could ruin it's skyline but it depends where this building is.

It was going to be the headquarters for Eaton's. I don't think it will get built. :haha:

Innsertnamehere
Jul 20, 2010, 10:36 PM
It was going to be the headquarters for Eaton's. I don't think it will get built. :haha:


also, buildings tend not to get built 40 years after they are proposed, ESPECIALLY if the company wanting to build it goes bankrupt and dissipears in those 40 years.....

i wish they built it, so toronto could have at least 1 supertall.... (first canadain place is 2 meters off.... why didn't they add 1 more floor??? arrrgggg....)

Phil McAvity
Jul 20, 2010, 11:08 PM
^Here's a little something that might make you feel a bit better, I remember for the longest time First Canadian Place was considered 952 feet tall and then years ago they changed it to 978 feet tall (I expect they added the mechanical penthouse and\or elevator roof to the height) which mean't Toronto was about 10 meters shy of having a supertall. Still a bit frustrating but much less so than being denied a supertall by two meters!

That building looks schizophrenic. It looks like Toronto couldn't decide if it wanted a tower or an office building so it tried to get both. Bizarre.

A similar, (albeit much shorter) version actually got built in Vancouver a few years later:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/HarbourNight.jpg/612px-HarbourNight.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HarbourNight.jpg

Flamesrule
Aug 11, 2010, 11:30 AM
^Here's a little something that might make you feel a bit better, I remember for the longest time First Canadian Place was considered 952 feet tall and then years ago they changed it to 978 feet tall (I expect they added the mechanical penthouse and\or elevator roof to the height) which mean't Toronto was about 10 meters shy of having a supertall. Still a bit frustrating but much less so than being denied a supertall by two meters!

That building looks schizophrenic. It looks like Toronto couldn't decide if it wanted a tower or an office building so it tried to get both. Bizarre.

A similar, (albeit much shorter) version actually got built in Vancouver a few years later:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/76/HarbourNight.jpg/612px-HarbourNight.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HarbourNight.jpg

They probably wanted a observaion since it was sooo close to a supertall. But wait thats why they have the CN tower!

But really I really hope this doesn't get built.

Innsertnamehere
Sep 14, 2010, 12:44 AM
They probably wanted a observaion since it was sooo close to a supertall. But wait thats why they have the CN tower!

But really I really hope this doesn't get built.

no worries, it won't... as i said before, eatons doesn't even exist anymore.

gravityenemy
Nov 16, 2011, 7:38 AM
Lol

JayCortese
Jun 5, 2012, 2:15 AM
If I was alive then, i would add a few modifications to make it into a more modern kind of skyscraper.

JayCortese
Jun 5, 2012, 2:17 AM
They probably wanted a observaion since it was sooo close to a supertall. But wait thats why they have the CN tower!

But really I really hope this doesn't get built.

It won't it was cancelled 40 years ago, and the CN Tower doesn't really fill the void though.

JayCortese
Jun 23, 2012, 10:32 PM
Larger than life but 20 times as ugly.


fugliest thing I've seen in awhile.

What is "Fugly"?