PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : BC-Canada Pavilion in Beijing failing to draw crowds



mr.x
Jun 20, 2008, 7:26 PM
Canada's Beijing pavilion fails to draw crowd
Despite a prime location and spectacular façade, Olympic-year investment has barely 200 visitors a day

GEOFFREY YORK
From Friday's Globe and Mail
June 20, 2008 at 2:51 AM EDT

BEIJING — It may be the best location Canada has ever enjoyed in Beijing: prime real estate on the edge of Tiananmen Square, overlooking Mao's tomb, just south of the Forbidden City.

Developers would die for the location, but Canada grabbed the site in an Olympic-year coup. Now the federal and B.C. governments are spending at least $6-million on it, aiming to attract 400,000 visitors to a two-storey pavilion to promote Canada as an investment and tourism location.

Yet the early signs are disappointing. After more than a month of operation, the pavilion is attracting barely 100 to 200 visitors a day. At this pace, visitor numbers will be a tiny fraction of their target by the time it closes in September. Outside, thousands of people walk past the pavilion, often impressed by its spectacular facade of B.C. wood, designed with 13 arches to symbolize Canada's provinces and territories. But few enter.

"It's a good-looking building," 70-year-old pensioner Zhang Xinshou says as he walks past. "I wonder how much it will cost to enter." He walks to the entrance and discovers that the ticket price is 30 yuan (about $4). "I won't go in," he says, walking away.

Another man, a 55-year-old tourist from Hebei province who gives his surname as Luo, was attracted by the pavilion at first glance. "What does it exhibit?" he asks. "Maybe I'll go and have a look." But when he finds out the price, he loses interest and drifts away.

The pavilion is obliged to charge for tickets because it is located within the walls of Beijing's urban planning museum, which has a 30-yuan entrance price. The price is deterring many visitors - but that is not the only reason for the poor attendance.

The pavilion's promoters are finding it tough to capture attention in a booming city of 16 million people, where extraordinary new buildings are sprouting every month.

Organizers are hoping that attendance will jump during the Olympics. But tight security around Tiananmen Square will deter many visitors.

The 1,900-square-metre pavilion, with 62 staff, will cost $14.7-million for its construction and operation. The federal government is paying $3-million, while B.C. is contributing at least $3-million and potentially as much as $11-million, although it is also seeking corporate sponsorships.

At the Winter Olympics in 2006, a similar B.C.-Canada pavilion was created in a log cabin in downtown Turin. It was regarded as a big success, with 100,000 visitors and long lineups. Since the pavilion in Beijing is three times bigger and will be open for twice as long - May to September - the governments felt confident that 400,000 visitors would come.

"That's a good estimate," Colin Hansen, the B.C. Economic Development Minister, said in an interview last month. "It's certainly what we're working for."

But the two cities are very different. Turin is much smaller than Beijing, with a more concentrated downtown, and the log cabin grabbed attention for its novelty value. A pick-up game of street hockey was held in front of the log cabin every day, drawing more attention from passing crowds.

In contrast, Beijing is a sprawling city, and the Olympic venues are far away from the Canadian pavilion. The main floor of the pavilion, filled with tourism videos and promotional material, is not dramatic enough to gain publicity in Beijing by itself. Another problem is the entrance charge, in contrast to the free admission in Turin.

The street hockey idea, meanwhile, could not be attempted in Beijing's clogged streets. Organizers wanted to create an artificial skating rink, but the idea was scrapped to make room for a small stage.

B.C. officials argue that the pavilion's greatest value is its business centre, where visiting Canadian trade delegations are meeting their Chinese counterparts for business discussions. About 400 Canadian companies are participating in 30 delegations at the pavilion from May to September.

"The number of individual Chinese citizens who go through the pavilion is not our main target audience," Mr. Hansen said. "We hope to build a reputation among decision-makers and business people in China."

He predicted that the pavilion will become a "gathering place" for Canadians during the Olympics, as the log cabin did in Turin, but he acknowledged that it faces greater challenges in Beijing because of the tight Chinese security. "It's going to be more difficult for people to get around in Beijing during the actual period of the Games," he said.

John Gruetzner, a veteran Canadian business consultant in Beijing who is helping to invite Chinese business groups to the pavilion, said the second-floor trade centre has been more successful than the exhibitions on the first floor. While the business delegations have been full, the paying visitors have been far fewer.

"I don't think they're getting the traffic downstairs to meet 400,000 people," he said.

"The exhibitions are nicely done, but there's nothing dramatic about it. The numbers might not pick up. To get attention to anything in Beijing is difficult. Even if you're Nokia and you spend $10-million, people forget you the next day. It's very hard to get noticed in a city of 16 million."

Yume-sama
Jun 20, 2008, 8:48 PM
Considering what you can get in China for $4, it is rather obscene they'd require that entrance fee. I don't know why they chose that location if it needs to cost money to enter, it seems a strange idea to make people pay to be marketed to.

mr.x
Jun 20, 2008, 8:56 PM
Considering what you can get in China for $4, it is rather obscene they'd require that entrance fee. I don't know why they chose that location if it needs to cost money to enter, it seems a strange idea to make people pay to be marketed to.

You can build a 36-km six-lane cable-stayed bridge in China for CAN$2-billion.

Over here, it's costing us $800-million to build the 1-km Golden Ears Bridge itself and another $400-million for some roadworks at both ends of the bridge. And of course, we're having quite a hard time with building the Canada Line with a limited $2-billion budget.

It's beyond ridiculous.....and it looks like this pavilion is going to be a flop. If our government has spent nearly $15-million on this exhibit, the very least they could have done would be to subsidize those ticket admissions entirely. I mean, $4.00 x 400,000 is $1.6-million.....that's just a fraction of the entire cost to build and operate it.

LeftCoaster
Jun 20, 2008, 9:09 PM
who cares? The government pisses away 15million on things far more frivilious than this all the time.

HomeInMyShoes
Jun 20, 2008, 9:15 PM
^Which is exactly the point of the criticism. You're advertising. Advertising costs money, unless you use your own power. Anyone want to bid on some billboard ad space on Stephen's head? Someone got paid a lot of money to do a market analysis on the entrance fee and come up with that $4 fee. Too bad the modelling was done using a Canada and not China as the basis.

bils
Jun 20, 2008, 11:24 PM
wasn't there an article posted on here sometime yesterday talking about what a success the BC pavilion has been thus far? now i'm confused.

quobobo
Jun 21, 2008, 4:49 AM
^Which is exactly the point of the criticism. You're advertising. Advertising costs money, unless you use your own power. Anyone want to bid on some billboard ad space on Stephen's head? Someone got paid a lot of money to do a market analysis on the entrance fee and come up with that $4 fee. Too bad the modelling was done using a Canada and not China as the basis.

See:

The pavilion is obliged to charge for tickets because it is located within the walls of Beijing's urban planning museum, which has a 30-yuan entrance price.

mr.x
Aug 24, 2008, 9:57 PM
Where $14.7-million doesn't buy a whole lot

ROD MICKLEBURGH

rmickleburgh@globeandmail.com
August 21, 2008

BEIJING -- Is it time to declare the B.C. Canada pavilion, set up in Beijing just off Tiananmen Square, a fiasco of the first order? Perhaps. A disenchanted Canadian businessman I talked to the other day, who has had a lot of dealings in China over the years, calls it "the biggest waste of Canadian taxpayers' money I've ever seen here."

At a cost of $14.7-million, the attractive pavilion was designed to promote tourism to the Chinese public and Canadian businesses to their counterparts in China.

Except, as has been widely reported, there is a $5 admission charge to the pavilion's public display, which contains little of value beyond feel-good scenic vistas, a few exhibits and interactive information fun. Not much for the soul, and the place is mostly as empty as a politician's promise. "It's an unmitigated disaster," said my businessman friend, who keeps to the age-old custom of foreigners doing business in China by wishing to remain anonymous.

That's half the pavilion. The top half, designed to help B.C. businesses break into the Chinese market, has been less of a failure. The number of handshakes leading to memorandums of understanding has apparently exceeded its target, leading one unimpressed, again anonymous observer, to profess: "Yeah, but that's like all my cousins coming to my wedding. It's a lot of people, but you also end up with a lot of toasters you don't need."

B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, while he was here, showed his gratitude to the people of Beijing for allowing the $14.7-million to be spent by donating the large, $2.8-million cedar arches over the pavilion entrance to the city.

In return, Mr. Campbell received a gourd soccer ball from the vice-mayor of Beijing. It's been that kind of a pavilion.

SpongeG
Aug 24, 2008, 10:31 PM
maybe the locals could care less?

I was watching something that while the games were goiong on in beijing they had these huge screens set up over the city for people to watch and they showed some of them and there was barely a dozen people watching at some of them

they seemed to say the locals had or showed no interest in the games or all that was going on in their city

at least BC tried - they were apparently the only people to do such a set up

vitc
Aug 25, 2008, 12:59 AM
... said my businessman friend, who keeps to the age-old custom of foreigners doing business in China by wishing to remain anonymous.

:haha: ah ok, lets quote the anonymous businessman - that will give the article lots of credibility :koko:

While I think that charging an entrance fee was a bonehead of an idea - to call it "the biggest waste of Canadian taxpayers' money I've ever seen here." is just plain idiotic. At least we tried to promote ourselves and that is NOT easy in China...I say good try - now learn from that and and apply it to future such projects.

Yume-sama
Aug 25, 2008, 1:00 AM
Well, the people in Beijing were crazy for the Olympics, but they were crazy for them because they were in China. It is doubtful that many of them would have any interest in leaving China and coming to the Vancouver Olympics. They are fiercely patriotic and will support whatever is good for their Country, and their athletes. We saw this all through-out the Olympics when the spectators would show up en masse and then leave in droves once the Chinese Olympians had performed. $15 million was a lot to spend, but who could have possibly been so dumb as to put it in a place where admission was required? Do you mean to tell me for $15 million you couldn't find a place in just as good of location in China of all places. $15 million would go a LONG ways. So somebody seriously dropped the ball on this one. However, this is the government we are talking about, $15 million is HARDLY the worst waste of taxpayer money :)