PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Air Travelers Facing Deep Flight Cuts by Summer’s End



Evergrey
06-28-2008, 03:48 PM
http://travel.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/business/28shrink.html

Travelers Facing Deep Flight Cuts by Summer’s End

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/28/business/28shrink-span-600.jpg
Fabrizio Costantini for The New York Times

Eric J. Frankl, the director of the Toledo Express Airport, says the loss of some service “really hurts our ability to serve the business community.”

By MICHELINE MAYNARD
Published: June 28, 2008

With summer barely under way, it may seem too early for travelers to start thinking about Labor Day. But that is when significant cuts in the airlines’ fleets and schedules will begin taking effect, making for a particularly jarring end to summer.

Across the United States, airports from La Guardia in New York to Oakland in California will be affected by flight cuts, bringing the industry down to a size last seen in 2002, when travel fell sharply after the 9/11 attacks.

Over all, the cuts will reduce flights this year by American carriers by almost 10 percent, industry analysts estimate, with even deeper cuts in store for 2009.

And if oil prices keep rising, airlines may have to keep paring their schedules, as they struggle to find ways to make money in light of rapidly rising jet fuel prices, which have climbed more than 80 percent in the last year.

This week, the country’s two biggest airlines, American and United, announced plans to lop cities like Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and San Luis Obispo, Calif., out of their networks. Cuts also are taking place on international routes to cities like London and Buenos Aires, and even to popular vacation destinations in the United States like Las Vegas, Honolulu and Orlando.

With more reductions coming next year, all the domestic industry’s growth over the last decade will most likely be lost. “The U.S. industry is undertaking a historic restructuring,” Gary Chase, an industry analyst with Lehman Brothers, wrote in a research report Friday.

Air fares, which are up about 17 percent this year on average, may rise as much as 40 percent within the next four years, Mr. Chase predicted.

And airlines continue to add fees — Delta said Friday that because of high fuel costs, it will start charging up to $50 to book a frequent-flier awards ticket. American and US Airways also recently announced they would charge to book tickets using miles.

Leisure travel falls in September, so occasional fliers may first encounter the harsh new reality of flying at Thanksgiving, with fewer flights and less-convenient connections.

By year’s end, roughly 100 American communities will be left without regular commercial air service, and that number may double next year, according to the Air Transport Association, the industry trade group.

“The guy who is used to taking a nonstop flight on a small airplane now has to drive an hour to an hour and a half to an airport to take a trip,” said David Castelveter, a vice president with the trade group. “It is a crisis of great magnitude and it is having an impact already.”

At least one major carrier could liquidate, the trade group has warned, on top of eight small airlines that have disappeared or filed for bankruptcy protection this year.

The prospect of losing service alarms passengers and politicians alike. “I implore American Airlines, as well as the other carriers considering various cost-saving scenarios, to take into account more than profit when they evaluate routes,” Gov. David A. Paterson of New York said this week after American announced a series of cuts affecting La Guardia and other state airports.

Airlines know the changes are painful. Said John P. Tague, United’s chief operating officer: “There’s going to be a period of adjustment in the last half of the year that will be unpleasant.” But the downsizing of the airlines is unlikely to be reversed anytime soon. Carriers are selling off hundreds of older, less-efficient planes, so the industry would have trouble growing sharply again even if oil prices were to drop and the economy were to rebound quickly.

Well before jet fuel costs jumped, analysts were saying there were too many carriers and that a round of mergers was needed to consolidate the industry.

In effect, travelers are seeing the likely results of such mergers — reducing operations to save costs — with only one merger occurring, the combination of Delta and Northwest.

“It’s not for the faint of heart,” David Barger, chief executive of JetBlue, said of the current environment.

For the airlines, the steps are an effort to stave off losses this year that could be the worst in industry history, even greater than in 2002, when travel plummeted in the wake of the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The A.T.A. predicts the domestic airlines will collectively lose a minimum of $7 billion this year, and as much as $13 billion, which would eclipse the $11 billion the carriers lost during 2002.

For passengers like Allon Lefever of Harrisonburg, Va., the looming cuts threaten to make his trips even more cumbersome. Mr. Lefever prefers to fly Continental from Washington-Dulles airport to the Toledo Express airport, through Cleveland, for the board meetings he attends four times a year.

But this month, Continental announced it would drop service to Toledo, including the flight Mr. Lefever waited for on Wednesday afternoon.

“It’s disappointing to see another airline walking away from the Toledo airport,” Mr. Lefever said. It is also disappointing to airport officials, who try to persuade Toledo residents not to drive to larger airports in Detroit, Cleveland and Columbus.

They were hoping to attract more passengers when Continental, which used to serve the airport with 19-seat turbo-prop planes, began flying 37-seat aircraft there in February. “We haven’t had much time to really enjoy it,” said Eric J. Frankl, the airport’s director.

The loss of service “really hurts our ability to serve the business community,” Mr. Frankl said. “Most companies that are looking for a location want to have good, convenient access to the air transportation system.”

Mr. Castelveter of the Air Transport Association said the airlines regret having to prune a system that essentially promised Americans — and even international travelers — that they could fly to any corner of the country within a day.

“I don’t think any airline wants to say to any community, ‘We can’t serve you,’ but they’ve got no choice,” he said. “It’s now a matter of survival.”

Mr. Chase at Lehman Brothers said the airlines probably would save about $1 billion by replacing less-efficient planes with newer aircraft and eliminating money-losing routes.

That could help airlines recover lost profits, particularly if they charge more for fares, which he forecast will rise by at least an additional 8 percent this year, and as much as 40 percent higher in 2012 compared with 2007.

That is not much consolation to travelers like Ken Schulze, a farmer from McClure in northwestern Ohio.

Mr. Schulze and his wife, Val, fly three or four times a year, often to visit their son in Utah, and like to start out from Toledo. Otherwise, the Schulzes must drive a minimum of 90 minutes to a bigger airport, he said.

Echoing the wishes of travelers across the country, he added, “We would really like to see the airlines stay here.”

Nick Bunkley contributed reporting from Toledo, Ohio.

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/28/business/0628-nat-sub-clr-SHRINK.jpg

urbanfan89
06-28-2008, 06:14 PM
At this rate we will see long-distance passenger trains reappear as the main mode of transportation. May take three days to cross the country, but people in Russia and China do it all the time.

The Agonist
06-29-2008, 02:09 PM
At this rate we will see long-distance passenger trains reappear as the main mode of transportation. May take three days to cross the country, but people in Russia and China do it all the time.

That will be great. So if you live in Boston and want to visit SF on your 1 week vacation, you can spend 6 of the 7 days on the train.

plinko
06-29-2008, 03:10 PM
Is there a list out there of proposed cuts? I live in one of those smaller regional airport cities (Santa Barbara) and am very concerned. That being said, right now we have very decent air service to every western US hub (with the exception of Houston) and the flights in and out of here are seemingly always full (lots of money here).

Doesn't mean they aren't profitable though.

wsxyz
06-29-2008, 04:27 PM
At this rate we will see long-distance passenger trains reappear as the main mode of transportation. May take three days to cross the country, but people in Russia and China do it all the time.

Long distance routes are not the problem. The article mentions people wanting to fly out of Toledo, OH who don't want to drive to a large city in order to catch a flight.

I wouldn't want to do that either, but that is where you should have the option to take a train. People in Toledo should be able to drive to the train station, get on a train, and be at the Detroit Airport in 45 minutes.

mhays
06-29-2008, 04:46 PM
Flying across the country will simply be less popular as it gets more expensive. There's no solution any time soon.

But we could revitalize train service on the "sweet spot" of 100 to 500 miles. Maybe that becomes 1000 miles due to high fuel costs. Ideally that would be high-speed rail, but realistically it would be moderately fast rail on existing corridors.

For example, in the Vancouver-Seattle-Portland route, which totals around 300 miles, we've added a few more trains (mostly Sea-Por) and continue to make small improvements in the track and route to improve speed. These have resulted in great popularity. We could continue along those lines and carry a ton more people. So could many other regions.

BTinSF
06-29-2008, 05:22 PM
Flying across the country will simply be less popular as it gets more expensive. There's no solution any time soon.

But we could revitalize train service on the "sweet spot" of 100 to 500 miles. Maybe that becomes 1000 miles due to high fuel costs.

One person's "sweet spot" is another person's "needless long distance train service". For example, the train from New Orleans to New York is long distance service and most people (not me) wanting to go the whole distance would rather fly. But as the train moves along the route it picks up lots of passengers wanting to go from NOLA to some small town in Mississippi or Alabama, then it picks up people in those places wanting to go to Atlanta, then people in Atlanta wanting to go home to the Carolinas, then people in the Carolinas and southern Virginia wanting to go to DC.

We need to just "revitalize" the whole route and improve service for all those people--also for Plinko so he can easily get from Santa Barbara to LAX or SFO.

WonderlandPark
06-29-2008, 07:21 PM
SLO seems to be getting cut. SBA, I don't know, but the wealth that is there and a couple of mid size companies and far enough from LAX that SBA might do fine. Alaska seems to be holding onto routes somewhat. Wonder when those 4 daily flights out of Oxnard are going to go bye bye.

plinko
06-29-2008, 10:16 PM
SLO seems to be getting cut. SBA, I don't know, but the wealth that is there and a couple of mid size companies and far enough from LAX that SBA might do fine. Alaska seems to be holding onto routes somewhat. Wonder when those 4 daily flights out of Oxnard are going to go bye bye.

I heard about SLO and I wouldn't be suprised in Oxnard got dropped, but we haven't heard anything yet about SBA.

Sounds like at a minimum, we will lose that daily 11:30pm-1:10AM flight from Las Vegas.

BT, Santa Barbara stands to possibly lose many flights. While alot of flights from SBA go to LAX (UAL and AA) or SFO (UAL), our airport actually has alot of regional service throughout the west (SEA, PDX, SMF, SFO, SJO, LAX, SDG, LAS, PHX, SLC, DEN, DFW). With the airlines seemingly cutting mostly regional jets and props, it might get ugly here. Hopefully we can at least maintain 1X daily service to all of those cities.

Hmmm...maybe I should book my November Italy trip out of LAX instead (we do have convenient airbus service to LAX but it costs $80pp round trip and takes 2+ hours). The flight on UAL or AA to LAX takes 24 minutes. Sadly, booking it from SBA is actually cheaper right now.

BTinSF
06-29-2008, 10:31 PM
maybe I should book my November Italy trip out of LAX instead (we do have convenient airbus service to LAX but it costs $80pp round trip and takes 2+ hours). The flight on UAL or AA to LAX takes 24 minutes. Sadly, booking it from SBA is actually cheaper right now.

I haven't flown in so long I admit I don't know the rules of the game these days, but can you not book both and cancel the LAX booking if the SBA flight is still operating closer to November?

Nutterbug
07-01-2008, 08:44 AM
Flying across the country will simply be less popular as it gets more expensive. There's no solution any time soon.

But we could revitalize train service on the "sweet spot" of 100 to 500 miles. Maybe that becomes 1000 miles due to high fuel costs. Ideally that would be high-speed rail, but realistically it would be moderately fast rail on existing corridors.

For example, in the Vancouver-Seattle-Portland route, which totals around 300 miles, we've added a few more trains (mostly Sea-Por) and continue to make small improvements in the track and route to improve speed. These have resulted in great popularity. We could continue along those lines and carry a ton more people. So could many other regions.

More and more, I'm getting to think that these "sweet spots" (eg. Cascadia and California) should become countries unto themselves. If they're so detached that their principal cities cannot feasibly be connected by a frequent high-speed rail connection, they might as well be a separate country.

LosAngelesBeauty
07-01-2008, 09:05 AM
We need to just "revitalize" the whole route and improve service for all those people--also for Plinko so he can easily get from Santa Barbara to LAX or SFO.


Since we're on the subject of rising fuels costs and why people should conserve more oil as a result, it would be A WHOLE LOT easier and save a lot more fuel for plinko to go to LAX instead of SFO. :slob:

SB -> LAX is 95 miles

SB -> SFO is 325 miles

Just thought I'd mention that BTnSF



Forums Directory