|You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum. For the full version follow the link below.|
View Full Version : skyscraper for poor countries?
Aug 19, 2008, 4:33 PM
skyscraper.....amzingly built,and fascinating structures.maybe its a sign of a progressive country.how about the third world countries?is there a chance like india,cambodia maybe philippines to have one of those?Is there such an affordable Construction?
M II A II R II K
Aug 19, 2008, 5:08 PM
India maybe, after all China ended up building not just skyscrapers but supertalls.
Sep 13, 2008, 3:22 AM
I'm not sure what you mean "is there a chance" because some of those countries have skyscrapers (by my definition)
Oct 27, 2008, 6:16 AM
Correction: PHILIPPINES is now a 2nd World Country...
The Philippines will have a 665m/2145ft tower which will add as the 2nd tallest tower in world.
Mar 7, 2009, 11:38 AM
Huh? Philippines has heaps, India has quite alot and Cambodia will soon get some.
Oct 12, 2010, 8:54 PM
tax. so many people equals alot of tax. which means they can afford tall, supertall or just highrise buildings
Apr 16, 2011, 12:06 AM
India? There going to have a future new york on their hands with a 720m india tower currently under construction in Mumbai.
Jul 10, 2011, 6:25 PM
It seems to me that even relatively poor cities in Asia are all getting a supertall (300 meter +) skyscraper, not because they have figured out how to make an affordable skyscraper, but because the elite controls a lot of money. They need specialized places to live, stay, and do business even if most of the people are riding bicycles.
Europe, which is wealthy, seems to have little interest in skyscrapers. There is not a need for a single complex in the city to announce that you are wealthy. Greece has not built a tall building in decades.
It does strike me as odd that Japan does not build over 300 meters. I suppose it can all be blamed on earthquakes, but when it comes to proposed superstructures, the Japanese seem to have the most fertile imaginations. Given their sophistication in building earthquake resistant buildings under 300 meters, I think they are capable of building higher even in an earthquake zone.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.