PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : GG and senate?



bornagainbiking
Nov 19, 2008, 12:59 AM
Considering our tough economic times, two questions.
one: Should the GG be trapsing off to Europe on an expensive junket for Canadian Arts, especially with all the layoffs and possible bailouts?
two: Do we really need a senate at what cost? Most of these guys are retired and collecting huge pensions. Do we need the cost of the GG's office?
:shrug: :cheers:

DHLawrence
Nov 19, 2008, 1:02 AM
Better than letting the PM run things single-handed. As long as there's a Senate and G-G, there's at least the illusion that no PM can hold a hostile takeover of the country and turn us into a dictatorship.

markbarbera
Nov 19, 2008, 1:10 AM
The Senate's role is more important than most people appreciate. It is a necessary part of our parliamentary system. How it is assembled may be a subject of discussion, but its existence is crucial in a parliamentary democracy.

raisethehammer
Nov 19, 2008, 1:26 AM
I've always wondered what the heck the GG does.

markbarbera
Nov 19, 2008, 1:33 AM
I've always wondered what the heck the GG does.

Just our head of state.

DHLawrence
Nov 19, 2008, 2:52 AM
Or rather, the representative of our head of state, the Queen. Both are mainly ceremonial in status in Canada, and mainly do goodwill tours and use their status to promote causes.

emge
Nov 19, 2008, 5:52 PM
exactly. those trips are very important because of the goodwill and awareness/promotion of causes they generate... and so I wouldn't quibble over that relatively minor expense.

There's an unbelievable response to them oftentimes, and they are certainly not trips made because they enjoy them, or according to their particular personal preferences.

DHLawrence
Nov 20, 2008, 3:11 AM
And even if you do quibble over them, you have to admit that Jean is spending way less than Clarkson did!



Forums Directory