PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : Gastown - Declared National Historic Site



Stingray2004
Jul 14, 2009, 5:34 PM
GOVERNMENT OF CANADA CELEBRATES THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF GASTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, July 14, 2009--The Honourable Jim Prentice, Canada’s Environment Minister and Minister responsible for Parks Canada, today celebrated the national historic significance of Gastown Historic District, which he designated a National Historic Site of Canada, on the recommendation of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada.

“The designation of Vancouver’s Gastown recognizes the role of this special place in shaping the economy and development of western Canada,” said Minister Prentice. “The remarkable collection of architecturally significant buildings is an exceptional and early example of an urban historic district created by civic involvement in the heritage conservation movement.”

Gastown Historic District is an intact urban area of business and commercial buildings dating largely from 1886 to 1914. The area presents, an early Western Canadian city core and the growth of the Western Canadian economy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

“The buildings in Gastown Historic District are handsome, strikingly harmonious in their materials, scale and architectural detailing, collectively splendid examples of Victorian and Edwardian commercial architecture,” said the Honourable Stockwell Day, Minister of International Trade, Minister for the Asia Pacific Gateway and Regional Minister for the Province of British Columbia. “I am delighted to know that, through this designation, future generations will have the opportunity to enjoy them as part of Vancouver’s urban landscape and an integral part of the city’s vibrant tourism industry.”

"Gastown is the birthplace of Vancouver, and our citizens have been instrumental in ensuring that it could be preserved for future generations to enjoy,” said Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson. “It's gratifying to see that all of the work put in to revitalization and preservation measures is now being recognized nationally with this designation.”

In 1867, Captain John “Gassy Jack” Deighton persuaded some mill workers to build him a saloon on the south side of Burrard Inlet. From such modest beginnings, “Gastown”, as it came to be known, grew into the City of Vancouver.

Parks Canada works to ensure that Canada’s historic and natural heritage is presented and protected for the enjoyment, education, appreciation and inspired discovery of all Canadians, today and in the future.

http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/cp-nr/release_e.asp?id=1368&andor1=nr

Gastown Historic District National Historic Site of Canada

Gastown Historic District is an intact urban area of business and commercial buildings dating for the most part from 1886 to 1914, representing, through the visual qualities of the buildings, an early Western Canadian city core and the economic flowering of the Western Canadian economy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The District is an exceptional group of commercial buildings that displays, as a whole, the architectural styles of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and is a rare, harmonious group of buildings in terms of materials, scale and architectural detailing. As an early legally protected historic district, Gastown illustrates the activist heritage movement that emerged in Canada’s urban centres in the years around 1970, and the creation of local organizations intent on protecting the historic fabric of cities and reorienting urban redevelopment.

In 1867, Captain John “Gassy Jack” Deighton persuaded some mill workers to build him a saloon on the south side of Burrard Inlet. From such modest beginnings “Gastown”, as it came to be known, grew, in a location once frequented by large seasonal populations of Squamish and Musqueam. The earliest years of economic growth here were fuelled principally by the lumber industry, but two formative events changed Gastown forever. In 1884 the Canadian Pacific Railway announcement that it would extend its tracks to this area made it a target for speculative investment. And in 1886 a major fire cleared out ramshackle buildings, which made way for rapid development.

The Gastown buildings appeared within a relatively short span of time (1886-1914), responsive to the rapid economic growth characteristic of Western Canada in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These buildings are handsome indeed, strikingly harmonious in their materials, scale and architectural detailing, collectively splendid examples of Victorian and Edwardian commercial architecture. The few skyscrapers that were added in the early 20th century are innovative works of engineering for the time.

The Gastown area fell into decline during much of the 20th century and its buildings degraded into flophouses or were simply left vacant. Large-scale demolitions were proposed, which drew a speedy reaction from the many who wanted to save the area. Beginning in the late 1960s, Gastown once again became a popular destination and the area revitalized rapidly. One by one, individual buildings were rehabilitated for new uses. Finally Gastown (and Chinatown to the east) was designated a provincial historic area, making this an exceptional and early example of an urban historic district that was created by civic involvement in the heritage conservation movement. This signalled a new understanding in Canada that urban renewal did not necessarily mean the destruction of earlier urban fabric.


http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/cp-nr/release_e.asp?bgid=1152&andor1=bg

I wonder what the implications of this designation will be upon redevelopment/heritage preservation.

amor de cosmos
Jul 15, 2009, 3:57 AM
I wonder what the implications of this designation will be upon redevelopment/heritage preservation.

i know with unesco sites, they have to be preserved to a minimum standard or else they'll lose their heritage/historic status. i wouldn't be surprised if national historic sites had similar rules.

Architype
Jul 16, 2009, 1:48 AM
I think it would come with an expectation to not modernize or densify the area with inappropriate structures, something that does not come natural in Vancouver. I don't know offhand of any comparable urban National Historic Site in Canada.

Spork
Jul 16, 2009, 1:51 AM
I think it would come with an expectation to not modernize or densify the area with inappropriate structures, something that does not come natural in Vancouver. I don't know offhand of any comparable urban National Historic Site in Canada.

Old Montreal?

ue
Jul 16, 2009, 1:58 AM
I'm surprised it wasn't already. Our designated historic neighbourhood is Old Strathcona district, and we have Heritage areas like Westmount and the Warehouse District. Don't worry, we have more older areas in Edmonton than that, it's just most are building specific. I just thought I'd give a different perspective if that is ok.

Architype
Jul 16, 2009, 2:22 AM
Old Montreal?

Most heritage/historic areas that I'm aware of are just under municipal jurisdiction (i.e. almost all of downtown St. John's NL). They are not National historic Sites - I wasn't sure about Montreal. National historic sites seem mostly to be confined to one small site, building, or are National Historic Parks.

Spork
Jul 16, 2009, 3:43 AM
Most heritage/historic areas that I'm aware of are just under municipal jurisdiction (i.e. almost all of downtown St. John's NL). They are not National historic Sites - I wasn't sure about Montreal. National historic sites seem mostly to be confined to one small site, building, or are National Historic Parks.

It was just speculation, as it is quite well kept, and sure enough: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ville-Marie,_Montreal

But that is quite impressive to be put on the same level as that awesome part of that city.

Distill3d
Jul 16, 2009, 5:03 AM
Well...looks like Gastown just got a little bit more expensive to live/run a business in.

Architype
Jul 16, 2009, 5:59 AM
It was just speculation, as it is quite well kept, and sure enough: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ville-Marie,_Montreal

But that is quite impressive to be put on the same level as that awesome part of that city.

Not saying you are wrong, but that article doesn't say Ville Marie is a National Historic Site either.

List of Canada's National Historic Sites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Historic_Sites_of_Canada

WaxItYourself
Jul 16, 2009, 6:02 AM
Hopefully this will give Gastown a needed boost in commercial development. This along with the new streetcar going through it should be a draw for developers.

Architype
Jul 16, 2009, 6:09 AM
It will become the only little enclave in the downtown without highrises, maybe more tourists and some historic plaques, and of course more prestige. ;)

VanTowers
Jul 16, 2009, 7:16 AM
We should have a thread dedicated to Gastown!!! Their always renovating and updating something in Gastown and Im always wondering whats going on. I think its a necessary thread.

randito
Jul 16, 2009, 1:45 PM
Not saying you are wrong, but that article doesn't say Ville Marie is a National Historic Site either.

List of Canada's National Historic Sites:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Historic_Sites_of_Canada

Funny I moved from Vancouver to Montréal about 4 years ago. I am typing this from work in Vieux Montréal now. I am on Chemin des Soeurs Grises which I think was layed down as a horse path for quick access around the walls of Montréal in the 1660's.

There are **some** new buildings in old montreal, and some are quite brutalist. I am thinking in particular of the palais de justice (québec court house)

I can say for a fact that the whole of Vieux Montréal is not a national historic site, but there are many individual buildings within Vieux Montréal that are. Vieux Montréal is simply too large in comparison with Gastown.

Here is a pdf map (http://www.vieux.montreal.qc.ca/images/pdf/loc_3a.pdf) of the size of Vieux Montréal

randito
Jul 16, 2009, 2:42 PM
I can say for a fact that the whole of Vieux Montréal is not a national historic site, but there are many individual buildings within Vieux Montréal that are. Vieux Montréal is simply too large in comparison with Gastown.


Actually it is pretty cool to check out the google map of the area with pictures enabled (http://maps.google.ca/maps?q=montreal&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF8&split=0&gl=ca&ei=aDtfSpPFIIyTtgeR_6jgAw&ll=45.503309,-73.548381&spn=0.012918,0.033023&t=h&z=16&lci=com.panoramio.all,com.google.ugc.c752d13e87c4fbd7&iwloc=lyrftr:com.panoramio.all,8091855577934007123,45.502632,-73.558509)

quobobo
Jul 16, 2009, 2:48 PM
Hopefully this will give Gastown a needed boost in commercial development. This along with the new streetcar going through it should be a draw for developers.

Not sure how more restrictive rules about modifying buildings and creating new ones (that seems to be the likely outcome) will help development. Also, I can't imagine that this designation will attract many more tourists, but maybe that's just me - I don't know anyone who would go somewhere just because it's a national historic site.

leftside
Jul 16, 2009, 5:22 PM
I'd also to be interested to know if this actually means anything? I mean what are the implications for businesses, developers, etc if any at all?

Architype
Jul 17, 2009, 1:37 AM
THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA RENEWS THE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES OF CANADA COST-SHARING PROGRAM
March 19, 2009 (http://www.markwarawa.com/EN/7319/84730)

This might help financially to a limited degree -
the Government of Canada will invest $20 million in the National Historic Sites of Canada Cost-Sharing Program. Today’s announcement follows the Budget 2009 commitment to upgrade national historic sites as a means of stimulating growth in the tourism sector...“The Government of Canada also recognizes the importance of stimulating growth through infrastructure investments in key sectors of the economy, and so we are pleased to be investing in national historic sites as a way of boosting Canada’s cultural heritage and tourism sectors.”...The National Historic Sites of Canada Cost-Sharing Program is a contribution program whereby up to 50% of eligible costs incurred in the conservation and presentation of a national historic site are paid by the program in the form of reimbursements to the site owner. . .A recipient can be eligible to receive a maximum of $1,000,000 depending on the extent of conservation work and specific terms and conditions of a signed contributions agreement. Eligible recipients are other levels of government, not-for-profit organizations and not-for-profit aboriginal organizations.

Wooster
Jul 17, 2009, 2:24 AM
I think it would come with an expectation to not modernize or densify the area with inappropriate structures, something that does not come natural in Vancouver. I don't know offhand of any comparable urban National Historic Site in Canada.

Calgary's Stephen Avenue is a very similar type national historic district.

Architype
Jul 17, 2009, 2:53 AM
Water Street commercial district in St. John's NL is also a National Historic Site, although it's just part of a larger heritage area. There are similarities to Gastown in the architecture and the age of the buildings. This is probably more common in Canada than I thought. I think they will choose only districts which are mostly intact from their era.

entheosfog
Jul 17, 2009, 5:46 AM
Calgary's Stephen Avenue is a very similar type national historic district.

I heard it was the first district declared as such in Canada but I could be wrong...

p.horosh
Jul 17, 2009, 5:51 AM
Winnipeg's Exchange District. There's gotta be one in Montreal/ Quebec too...