PDA

You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum.  For the full version follow the link below.

View Full Version : A new Atlanta or is it?



SkylinesBest
Dec 2, 2003, 3:49 PM
http://www.atlanta.feb.gov/images/atlantaskyline.jpg

Atlanta City Council votes to close bars at 3 a.m.
Violence in Buckhead was catalyst

By ERNIE SUGGS
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Dec. 2, 2003

The Atlanta City Council voted 11-4 early today to force bars and nightclubs throughout the city to stop selling alcohol at 2:30 a.m. and close their doors at 3 a.m.

Originally, the council had considered having last call at 2 a.m. and closing the bars at 3 a.m. Until now, bars have been able to serve until 3 a.m. and close by 4 a.m.

The council also shot down a plan that would limit the sale of beer and wine at retail stores to between 8 a.m. and 11:45 p.m. Monday through Saturday.

The council will revisit the issue late next year. Councilman Ceasar Mitchell, who had opposed earlier closing times, said he agreed to the new hours only after his amendment to revisit the issue in a year was accepted.

"I made a commitment to work on this thing," Mitchell said, and this will give the city time to come up with "a citywide policy and vision" about how late Atlanta should stay awake.

Mitchell said the violence and chaos associated by some with 4 a.m. bar closing times cannot be subdued by simply changing bar hours.

Bar owner Warren Bruno said the year's wait will give bar owners a chance to prove their case for staying open later.

"We are going to be able to give them real information," said Bruno. "They don't understand the money side. There are millions of dollars that will leave Atlanta. Businesses will close."

The council vote represents a major change for a city noted for its active and diverse nightlife. Natalyn Mosby Archibong, Howard Shook, Felicia Moore and Derrick Boazman voted against the changes.

"This is unfortunate. A true compromise might have been 3 a.m.," said Mike Taylor, the owner of Moondogs. "I've been up and running for 10 years, and I have never had a shooting, a stabbing or any other problem that would cause us to be lumped in with other bars."

Today's vote came toward the end of a marathon council meeting that lasted more than 12 hours and at times featured heated comments from not only council members, but also members of the bar and club communities.

Bruno was one of many people who made desperate pleas to the City Council to allow bars and clubs to remain open until 4 a.m.

There is no specific "last call" now.

Since two men were killed outside of a Buckhead club hours after the January 2000 Super Bowl, the city government, the Buckhead community and businesses have debated closing bars and clubs earlier.

On Nov. 11 of this year, two men were shot and killed outside a Buckhead club, bringing the total to nine slayings in three years, forcing the hands of the City Council, Mayor Shirley Franklin and a police department struggling to get a handle on the problem.

Councilman Boazman called the city's response to the shootings a knee-jerk reaction that does not address crime in Atlanta.

But with the slayings in Buckhead, involving people frequenting bars in the district, many people contended the violence was isolated.

"A lot of this is politics and Buckhead controls the city," said Robert Russ, who works at the Vortex in Little Five Points.

Atlanta's City Council guts sewer rate plan
http://www.travelbygps.com/premium/Chattahoochee/Devils%20Race%20Course%202.JPG
By TY TAGAMI
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The Atlanta City Council delivered a blow to Mayor Shirley Franklin's $3.2 billion plan to expand and overhaul the city's water and sewer system.
Franklin's plan to renovate the century-old plumbing relied on tripling the maximum water and sewer fees over five years, beginning with a 45 percent rate increase in January. The plan left both residential and business customers howling.

In response, the City Council late Monday night voted 8-7 to keep the mayor's maximum water and sewer rate increase of 45 percent, but the average rate payer will see a much smaller increase and more ratepayers will see no increases because of an expanded conservation discount.


"The people spoke, and we responded to the people," said Councilman C.T. Martin, a sponsor of the amendment to the mayor's rate increase plan.

As 1 a.m. approached and passed, the council was still in session, leaving open the possibility it could revisit the sewer issue yet again.

And Franklin could veto the legislation. The mayor said after the defeat that she needs time to analyze the financial impact of the council's decision, which would cut deep into the city's water and sewer operations.

Franklin said responsible operations are key to meeting the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act and the city's obligation to improve its sewer system.

"If it doesn't make sense," Franklin said of the council's proposal, "I'm obligated by my office not to sign it."

City staff members said the council's plan would cut $25 million from the Watershed Management Department, which operates the water and sewer system.

It was unclear how those cuts would affect the city's efforts to comply with two federal court orders to clean up the sewers.

Franklin's predecessor as mayor, Bill Campbell, entered into two agreements in federal court in 1998 and 1999 that compel Atlanta to limit the untreated wastewater its ancient sewers dump into rivers.

The amendment to Franklin's plan by four council members, led by Councilwoman Felicia Moore, offers a discount to people who are frugal with water use. The average residential user consumes 6,000 gallons of water per month. The Moore proposal would charge users at the current rate if they use 4,500 gallons or less. Each gallon beyond that would be billed at the 45 percent higher rate recommended by the mayor.

About 15,000 customers use 4,500 gallons or less and thus would see no increase in their bill. The average user would see about a 14 percent increase overall.

Franklin had endorsed a conservation rate, but her plan would have offered a discount to consumers who used 3,000 gallons or less per month. The mayor's proposed discount rates would have increased the average user's bill by about 30 percent in 2004.

Council members who voted for the Moore amendment were critical of what they described as lavish spending on consultants for water and sewer operations and capital programs. "Watershed Management's going to have to get very lean and very mean," Moore said.

Franklin attributed much of the department's increased budget to the cost of taking back operations from a private company. The city eliminated a contract with United Water and began taking the operation in-house earlier this year. Franklin noted that all 15 council members had supported ending that contract because there were so many complaints about service.

Karen Handel, newly elected chairwoman of the Fulton County Commission, welcomed the change to the rate plan.

"This appears to be a compromise that would give the City Council and the city officials an opportunity to work through the questions that remain," Handel said in a telephone interview late Monday night. She has spearheaded an effort by the county to review Franklin's water and sewer proposal.

Handel suggested the council would have more time to address questions about Franklin's plan -- questions that Handel said would make it difficult to lobby for outside funding.

"I think to pass a funding plan with so many questions remaining -- that's not going to help at all," Handel said. The County Commission chairwoman noted that city officials presented a $3.2 billion water and sewer plan that was eight pages long. The county produced a 3-inch-thick document, complete with drawings of sewer components, for a much smaller county sewer project.

Council members got an earful during a public comment period earlier in the evening.

State Rep. Doug Dean told the council he couldn't afford to pay the higher water and sewer fees proposed by the mayor. But Georgia-Pacific President Lee Thomas said Atlanta had no choice but to embrace Franklin's proposal.

The two were among hundreds who packed the City Council's chambers Monday, reminding council members there are strong opinions on either side of one of the toughest debates in recent city history.

"Most of the people sitting here are 20 to 30 years older than I am. You know they can't afford it," Dean said, referring to people awaiting their turn to speak.

Thomas, who heads the environmental committee of the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce and once was an administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, raised the specter of construction moratoriums and a federal court takeover of the city's water and sewer system if the funds are not raised to fix it.

"It would be devastating for the reputation of our city if, in fact, we didn't step up and deal with the issue," Thomas said. He was referring to the federal court agreements that compel the city to stop dumping sewage.

City officials say they must sell bonds by April to begin construction in July. If they miss that mark, they'll miss the 2008 deadline to complete a required part of the project and will face court sanctions, officials said.

http://www.nwf.org/chattahoochee/images/construction.jpg

TheNickChannel
Dec 18, 2003, 2:21 PM
Why do I see so little chatter on this forum about the sewer crisis?

If they don't get this thing solved soon, we can kiss Atlanta's urban renaissance goodbye. A moratorium on new sewer hookups would be the kiss of death, either grinding all metro growth to a halt or forcing all growth into the far-flung suburbs.

p-snack
Dec 18, 2003, 11:22 PM
Do you think the mayor has vetoed to create a stalemate to force the state, Fulton or feds to get involved?

cabasse
Dec 19, 2003, 12:02 AM
(if you can't hear the music playing, or if you have a slow connection click (http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~bmo02c/The%20Specials%20-%20Ghost%20Town.mp3).)

<EMBED src="http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~bmo02c/The%20Specials%20-%20Ghost%20Town.mp3" autostart=true hidden=true>

_____________

12/19/03

Council, mayor meet Friday on sewer issue

By TY TAGAMI
Atlanta Journal-Constitution Staff Writer

Atlanta City Council and Mayor Shirley Franklin will meet Friday to try and reach a compromise on water and sewer rate increases.

The called meeting will be held in unusual circumstances: though a quorum of eight council members is expected, there can be no vote.

Atlanta has agreed in federal court to stop dumping untreated sewage into the Chattahoochee and other rivers.

In an 8-7 vote on Dec. 1, the council refused to give Franklin the water and sewer rate increases she said were required for $3.2 billion in water and sewer upgrades. They said their constituents simply could not pay what Franklin wanted and passed a smaller rate increase.

Franklin vetoed the council's rate package last week.

Council President Cathy Woolard called the meeting Friday.

Councilman Jim Maddox, who was among the eight who went against Franklin, said he hopes the city leaders can reach a consensus, so Atlanta can present a united front when lobbying for outside aid.

"I am hopeful, very hopeful, that we can come up with something," Maddox said.

___________

Everyone cross your fingers. Except for DallasTexan.

scguy
Dec 19, 2003, 12:17 AM
As far as the bar issue is concerned, what does this mean for Private clubs that stay open 24 hours, ie. BackstreetAtlanta?

EastSideHBG
Dec 19, 2003, 2:36 AM
:banana: <--- me jammin' to this song. :)

You ATL people are still lucky, though. Here in PA things close promptly at 2 am, with last call at 1:45.

The council also shot down a plan that would limit the sale of beer and wine at retail stores to between 8 a.m. and 11:45 p.m. Monday through Saturday.

Again, you guys are lucky. Here in PA...

Okay okay, I'll stop comparing the apples and oranges now. ;)

I can honestly say I am against the forcing of the bars to close at a certain time, but I'm not that against forcing them to stop serving at a certain time (sort of).

Hopefully you guys won't get to our level of silliness in regards to hours of operation, which I can tell you, really sucks and does nothing but add to the problems (especially DUIs).

TheNickChannel
Dec 19, 2003, 1:09 PM
As far as the bar issue is concerned, what does this mean for Private clubs that stay open 24 hours, ie. BackstreetAtlanta?

Backstreet's days are numbered. The city has completely revamped the definition of a "private club."

According to a November 14 article in the Southern Voice (http://www.sovo.com/2003/11-14/news/localnews/backstreet.cfm):

The new city law redefines private clubs, requiring them to attain federal non-profit tax status, serve meals and not exist mainly for the purpose of selling alcohol.

Private clubs that fit the new definition may serve alcohol from 9 a.m. to 4 a.m. on weekdays, 9 a.m. Saturdays until 2:55 a.m. the following day, and 24 hours on Sundays.

This was before the closing-time vote so I don't know if the 4 a.m. still applies. In any case, Backstreet would not qualify as a private club, so it would have to close by 3 a.m.

LSyd
Dec 19, 2003, 3:59 PM
[QUOTE=cabasse ](if you can't hear the music playing, or if you have a slow connection click (http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~bmo02c/The%20Specials%20-%20Ghost%20Town.mp3).)

<EMBED src="http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~bmo02c/The%20Specials%20-%20Ghost%20Town.mp3" autostart=true hidden=true>

so that's what that crap is...I thought I was picking up some wierd interference...

so, this sucks for Atlanta. I hope the city gets its act together, and quick. I would like to see it succeed.

-



Forums Directory