|
| | You are viewing a trimmed-down version of the SkyscraperPage.com discussion forum. For the full version follow the link below.
View Full Version : Baltimore Tower
| |
|
RyanHayes1984
Aug 20, 2003, 2:12 AM
How do I add this to the pending approval?
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/data/500/177baltimoretower.jpg
Born Pure Philly
Aug 20, 2003, 11:43 PM
ugh...First you need to resize it. Then you have to make it transparent. What scale is that drawing? You'll probably need to do some work to it once you resize it.
Buck
Aug 21, 2003, 1:39 AM
You should draw on a white background, so it will be easier come time to make it transparent.
RyanHayes1984
Aug 25, 2003, 2:23 AM
I already have the image transparent, I just need to add it.
Tony
Aug 25, 2003, 3:29 AM
You need to resize it to the right scale first. (1 pixel = 1 meter)
mpls
Aug 25, 2003, 4:25 AM
you also may need to make a slot for it if it is not already represented in the diagram; go to the drawing request sub forum and find the building upload requests thread.
RyanHayes1984
Aug 25, 2003, 11:11 PM
I hope you all can view this:
http://www.msnusers.com/_Secure/0TgDUAvYYvf1aSxUVZGGKytnGXDgmL9GKuJ9aClJa*ZRcmkKIxqkC*TL1Ybc3y6!7JDUnuzDLJRjPzypxloQQJ1GCdXFgQ3NJYiWrnyxwzE1diBn6oOeU5w/BaltimoreTower.gif?dc=4675436068399742308
Thats the size, the tower is:
Status: Communication Tower (Radio)
Location: Baltimore, MD
Height: 400 ft tall
Width: 58 feet wide
Tony
Aug 25, 2003, 11:16 PM
can't see it.
mpls
Aug 25, 2003, 11:31 PM
i can see it but its one pixel to one meter, not one pixel to one foot. so you have resize it futher...
Born Pure Philly
Aug 25, 2003, 11:31 PM
First of all it is not to scale (1 pixel, 1 meter) a 400 footer would not be 400 pixels high.
What program do you use to draw this.
Buck
Aug 26, 2003, 12:01 AM
The correct dimensions would be 122.0 meters tall by 17.7 meters wide.
RyanHayes1984
Aug 26, 2003, 12:29 AM
I'm not good at meters, just feet. But yeah, I know the drawing is correct because the government told me that it was 400 feet tall and 58 feet wide. You sure thats right though, Buck?
RyanHayes1984
Aug 26, 2003, 12:30 AM
I used MSPaint, sir/ma'am.
Tony
Aug 26, 2003, 1:06 AM
I'm not good at meters, just feet. But yeah, I know the drawing is correct because the government told me that it was 400 feet tall and 58 feet wide. You sure thats right though, Buck?
Just resize it to what Buck said. It's of course correct.
It's looking pretty good btw.
Buck
Aug 26, 2003, 1:55 AM
Yes, very detailed. Nice job. But yes, all diagrams on the website are at a 1 meter = 1 pixel scale. Take the number of feet and divide it by 3.28 and then you got the height/width in meters.
RyanHayes1984
Aug 26, 2003, 2:24 AM
But....I don't have the program to do that.
BTW, the one without the black? It's done already, your looking at the finished one.
mpls
Aug 26, 2003, 2:52 AM
just make it so when you resize it, it goes to the dimensions buck provided, not the feet.
Tony
Aug 26, 2003, 3:31 AM
I cannot be accepted until it is resized to 1 pixel = 1 meter.
Buck
Aug 26, 2003, 12:08 PM
Silly Tony- we accept you! ;)
Tony
Aug 26, 2003, 1:24 PM
ooops.. silly me, I actually intended to write "It" :P
Thanks for accepting me anyway! :D
Buck
Aug 26, 2003, 1:27 PM
Yeah, I got it- but I couldn't pass up posting that. :D
RyanHayes1984
Aug 27, 2003, 6:23 PM
Wait a minute, how come the Cn Tower is 525 *I think* meters high and that was accepted?
Buck
Aug 27, 2003, 6:42 PM
no, your CN Tower has been properly resized.
Tony
Aug 28, 2003, 2:11 AM
Look Ryan, the simple answer is to resize your tower to what Buck specified and submit it instead of arguing and contemplating the subject to death.
RyanHayes1984
Aug 28, 2003, 2:39 AM
What I did to that tower is the same way I resized the Cn Tower. The size you are talking is 1 pixel and 1 meter, thats one ".". How are you supposed to see it if it is a dot? I'm not complaining, I am just trying to get some answers.
Tony
Aug 28, 2003, 3:25 AM
Ryan, the concept is simple:
1) EVERY REAL METER OF BUILDING is represented with ONE PIXEL on the diagram. Hence 1 pixel = 1 meter scale.
2) 1 meter = 3.28 ft. <---- this is an unalterable fact. THEREFORE, since your tower is 400 ft in real life, that's 400 ft / 3.28 ft =122 meters.
3) since the scale of ALL diagrams on this website are 1 pixel = 1 meter, your diagram must be 122 pixels tall to conform.
Tony
Aug 28, 2003, 3:31 AM
What I did to that tower is the same way I resized the Cn Tower. The size you are talking is 1 pixel and 1 meter, thats one ".". How are you supposed to see it if it is a dot? I'm not complaining, I am just trying to get some answers.
I never said your drawing should be 1 pixel and 1 meter, I don't know how you got that out of "1 pixel = 1 meter". If you're going to resize your drawing to 1 pixel of course it's going to be a itty-bitty dot.
RyanHayes1984
Sep 11, 2003, 5:11 PM
It's 122 pixels tall..
caw123
Sep 11, 2003, 5:29 PM
:nuts:
Born Pure Philly
Sep 11, 2003, 6:18 PM
Ryan, your drawing seem to not be top notch. You may need to get a new drawing style.
RyanHayes1984
Sep 12, 2003, 12:51 AM
This is all I can afford right now.
Born Pure Philly
Sep 12, 2003, 12:55 AM
You don't need to buy anything. Just use ms paint that comes with the computer.
FRED
Sep 12, 2003, 4:14 AM
ugh !
RyanHayes1984
Sep 12, 2003, 12:42 PM
thats what I've been using...
Tony
Sep 12, 2003, 4:32 PM
It's not the software. It's ability.
Also style is not based upon software, it's based upon what goes on in your head.
Buck
Sep 12, 2003, 8:35 PM
if you are going to draw at a larger size and then resize it down to the correct size, try drawing at a scale. Like draw at 2 pixels per meter or 3 pixels per meter. That way it will resize better and turn out much better.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.