Pages :
[
1]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Steely Dan
Jan 26, 2006, 8:04 PM
here's another 700 footer for the windy city.
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/3875/theelysian3qf.jpg
The Elysian
http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/images_2/500/6324the_elysian.jpg
(http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=188061)
this tower is proposed to stand 700'-5" with 60 floors (thanks to victor, our chicago super-slueth). currently, the site has been cleared of its existing buildings and some amount of site work has taken place. according to victor's latest info, caisson drilling should begin sometime in early march.
Marvel 33
Jan 26, 2006, 8:08 PM
It might not be the most original, unique and beautiful design of all the new projects in Chicago but I like the fact that is pretty slender, tall and it's in a great location!
Jularc
Jan 26, 2006, 8:09 PM
WOW... If it looks like that it will seem that it has always been there! It will have a defenetly beautiful style if is done the right way. Tall as well! Great job Chicago! :tup:
VivaLFuego
Jan 26, 2006, 8:52 PM
What materials will be used on the facade?
Is the crown copper that they will let oxidize?
If it turns out like the renderings, this will be truly lovely, and have some pretty nice views looking west, which will be basically unobstructed.
dvidler
Jan 26, 2006, 8:52 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but the 10 E. Delaware proposed project is on the block as the Elysian.
williamphilapa
Jan 26, 2006, 8:55 PM
Geez, yet another 700+ footer for Chicago. Man what a time for Chicago! Lucky bastards! :yes:
BVictor1
Jan 26, 2006, 9:03 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but the 10 E. Delaware proposed project is on the block as the Elysian.
Correct. Remember there was originally going to be a second phase, well that parcel was sold, and 10 E. Deleware is what's going to be built on that land.
What materials will be used on the facade?
The base I believe will be limestone, and the rest will be pre-cast. Think of this tower as the little sister to park tower.
Marvel 33
Jan 26, 2006, 9:03 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but the 10 E. Delaware proposed project is on the block as the Elysian.
The Elysian is at the corner of Rush and Walton and 10 E. Delaware is right behind on Delaware and State in the same block.
wanderer34
Jan 26, 2006, 9:08 PM
:previous: Looks very classy and distinguished, but Chicago should be more concerned about developing the Near South Side, starting with a 1000+ foot office building. How is the One Museum Park coming along???
Steely Dan
Jan 26, 2006, 9:10 PM
How is the One Museum Park coming along???
one museum park discussion should be taken to the following thread:
CHICAGO: One Museum Park – 720’/62 floors – U/C (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?threadid=59102)
Chi_Coruscant
Jan 26, 2006, 9:15 PM
Thank you, SteelyDan. For sure, the Elysian thread overwhelms other forummers outside Chicago.
spyguy
Jan 26, 2006, 11:44 PM
Ah, my favorite proposal. Such a beauty :)
LA21st
Jan 27, 2006, 2:37 AM
:previous: Looks very classy and distinguished, but Chicago should be more concerned about developing the Near South Side, starting with a 1000+ foot office building. How is the One Museum Park coming along???
Not really. You would be suprised how many sites are suited for silimar projects like this one in River North, Streeterville, and Gold Coast.
Fabb
Jan 27, 2006, 6:19 AM
Typical style of Lucien Lagrange. Impossible no to think of Park Tower that he also designed.
HK Chicago
Jan 27, 2006, 2:43 PM
^ that's what's great about it (no secret I have a soft spot for the LL style).
The good news is this looks like the next step up after Park Tower. The Pinnacle, even with it's great floorplates and windows, didn't build on what Park Tower had established.
Fabb
Jan 27, 2006, 2:51 PM
The rendedering is certainly not totally reliable, but the Elysian seems to have a texture that makes it look weathered.
It's probably intentional.
Stephenapolis
Jan 27, 2006, 3:08 PM
I really enjoy the look of this tower. It does look weathered. Hopefully it will resemble that when completed.
trvlr70
Jan 27, 2006, 3:13 PM
Honestly, the best part of the design is the Beaux-arts facade, the spires, and the European courtyard. When completed, this building is going to look very classy on the Gold Coast.
detroitismylove
Jan 27, 2006, 9:16 PM
This is a gorgeous design. Its so graceful and elegant. A real gem, almost Parisian looking.
Marvel 33
Jan 31, 2006, 5:21 AM
When I first saw the design of the Elysian I thought it would be the perfect design for a building facing Grant Park in Chicago or in Central Park in New York City.
I wasn't sure how it would look in the Chicago Gold Coast but it's growing on me.
VivaLFuego
Jan 31, 2006, 2:33 PM
The rendedering is certainly not totally reliable, but the Elysian seems to have a texture that makes it look weathered.
It's probably intentional.
Yes, I've wondered if it's going to look quite bland as it goes up, or if the material for the prefab facade will have this texture. After all, this weathered stone texture is what makes the rendering so appealing...otherwise, its just a differently colored, shorter Park Tower.
Steely Dan
Jan 31, 2006, 6:31 PM
^ my guess is that it will look every bit as bland as the others. i think this "aged" rendering that we've all been looking at for a while now has fooled a lot of people into believing that this project is going to be something that it is not.
BVictor1
Jan 31, 2006, 6:43 PM
Speaking of renderings. I got a new highresolution rendering yesterday. Now I have the original of what they sent me, and one that was edited just a little in photoshop for the contrast. I will post them both, then you guys choose which you prefer. The one you pick is the one I will upload to Emporis.
This is the original.
http://images.snapfish.com/345%3B9685%3A%7Ffp336%3Enu%3D3238%3E868%3E492%3EWSNRCG%3D32334%3A6495%3B4%3Cnu0mrj
This is the manipulated one.
http://images.snapfish.com/345%3B9685%3A%7Ffp338%3Enu%3D3238%3E868%3E492%3EWSNRCG%3D32334%3A6495%3B55nu0mrj
Steely Dan
Jan 31, 2006, 6:49 PM
^ the bottom one with the bluer sky defintiely makes the building look better.
SevenSevenThree
Jan 31, 2006, 6:51 PM
^ Ditto. It shows more detail.
Adam186
Jan 31, 2006, 7:02 PM
^same here, nice edit work vic.
the urban politician
Jan 31, 2006, 7:27 PM
Bottom one wins by a landslide
BVictor1
Feb 1, 2006, 10:41 PM
Well everyone asked for the 2nd image so here it is.
https://extranet.emporis.com/files/transfer/6/2006/02/433138.jpg
spyguy
Feb 1, 2006, 10:45 PM
If it really is gray, I don't think the tower will look as good as the green before. The gray roof will especially look weird on the ground level with courtyard - it looked more European with green.
StevenW
Feb 1, 2006, 10:50 PM
what's the total sq. footage of this new awesome tower anyway? :)
Steely Dan
Feb 2, 2006, 12:09 AM
looks good victor. the image is now up on page 1 of the boom rundown thread.
VivaLFuego
Feb 13, 2006, 3:34 PM
Any progress on the site? Havent been by in a few weeks.
Marvel 33
Feb 13, 2006, 11:46 PM
^ I drove by on Friday and there was some activity going on but I didn't pay attention. My girlfriend lives right down the street so I'll take a look tomorrow morning when I leave for work, from her condo.
Vicelord John
Feb 15, 2006, 10:43 PM
looks too much like the park hyatt
Marvel 33
Feb 16, 2006, 3:22 AM
^ Park Hyatt is a lot nicer!
spyguy
Feb 16, 2006, 3:35 AM
Joking right? :rolleyes:
Marvel 33
Feb 16, 2006, 3:55 AM
^ :dancing:
Steely Dan
Feb 23, 2006, 3:08 PM
so, with all of yesterday's craziness behind us, i guess it's about time that we start getting impatient with this one, right? ;)
VivaLFuego
Feb 23, 2006, 5:28 PM
progress on this always seemed tied to the Clare, so now that thats U/C...
spyguy
Feb 23, 2006, 9:46 PM
A few days will pass and BAM!
Rivernorth
Feb 23, 2006, 10:26 PM
this project seems to have been in the planned/approved stage of development forever... i wanna see cranes, damnit! :P
Wild Onion Mike
Mar 2, 2006, 6:04 AM
so, with all of yesterday's craziness behind us, i guess it's about time that we start getting impatient with this one, right? ;)
We have been spoiled by all the exciting news lately, but what is happening with this one?
simms3_redux
Mar 2, 2006, 4:07 PM
I really like the design of this building and can't wait for it to start? Where is this going to be ( I am familiar with the windy city so a street address is all I need).
spyguy
Mar 2, 2006, 9:38 PM
http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/1513/elysianlocationmap8vb.gif
zerokarma
Mar 3, 2006, 7:20 PM
any other pictures/renderings of it?
soleri
Mar 3, 2006, 7:43 PM
This design is the kind that makes me despair for Chicago. The great architectural heritage here ought to deliver less of these faux high-rise chateaux and something more striking and modernist. The River North area is awash in these insipid towers. I can't help but wonder about the consciousness of people who like this kind of architecture.
This design is the kind that makes me despair for Chicago. The great architectural heritage here ought to deliver less of these faux high-rise chateaux and something more striking and modernist. The River North area is awash in these insipid towers. I can't help but wonder about the consciousness of people who like this kind of architecture.
Right.
This one is not the worst though.
Steely Dan
Mar 3, 2006, 8:08 PM
^^ that's one of the big problems, these faux-historic throw-back towers win huge points with the old fuddy-duddy empty-nester crowd, who happen to be the main market demographic for many of these new residential super towers in chicago. they see a proposed rendering of something "old-timey" and they say "oh look dear, this one seems real nice and classy". it makes anyone with even an inkling of chicago's forward-looking architectural legacy want to retch.
Wild Onion Mike
Mar 3, 2006, 8:21 PM
I'm not aware of his official stance on this tower, but I can only imagine Blair Kamin pulling his hair out in frustration when he sees another one of these LaGrange retros.
Personally, I find this tower to be attractive. Yet, it is amazing when you realize how many towers LaGrange has put up north of the river. Pretty soon he won't need to send a resume. He'll just send a photo of the north half of Chicago's skyline. Maybe he wants that area to be renamed LaGrange in his honor, but someone should alert him to the fact that we already have one of those in the suburbs.
Elysian is not bad. His more modern designs capture my attention more though.
spyguy
Mar 3, 2006, 8:41 PM
Elysian is a beautiful tower, from top to bottom and the interiors should be classy too. There's nothing wrong with this tower and those against it should focus their energy on fighting the crap that has invaded Chicago from 2000 to present.
rds989
Mar 3, 2006, 10:35 PM
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with my "consciousness" for liking this tower (or Park Tower, or the one on the corner of Pearson & Lakeshore). This is a far cry from cr*pola like Millenium Centre and The Caravel.
Just like the difference between cruddy modernism and the good stuff. Do I prefer more forward looking designs? On balance, yes I do. But even more, I prefer to have a variety of different styles of well-executed buildings. So LaGrange's work mixes in well and adds a lot of value to the cityscape.
Wild Onion Mike
Mar 3, 2006, 11:02 PM
This is a far cry from cr*pola like Millenium Centre and The Caravel.
Completely agree.
VivaLFuego
Mar 4, 2006, 1:37 AM
Aw, I like Millenium Centre. It's unapologetically brutal.
VivaLFuego
Mar 4, 2006, 1:39 AM
This design is the kind that makes me despair for Chicago. The great architectural heritage here ought to deliver less of these faux high-rise chateaux and something more striking and modernist. The River North area is awash in these insipid towers. I can't help but wonder about the consciousness of people who like this kind of architecture.
I think that's overly harsh...not every tower will be groundbreaking, no does everyone want to live in a big piece of glass. Park Tower is not unattractive, and this will hearken to it.
HK Chicago
Mar 4, 2006, 2:36 AM
The Elysian is a fine tower (as is Park Tower) because they aren't just dead throwbacks - there's some real present day residential design put into these towers.
They are much different then the pomo-fuck-deco of Magellan or the personalityless Fifield work. Good architecture can be done with any materials.
Also, now is the least of times to despair for Chicago, we're on an amazing high.
jcchii
Mar 4, 2006, 2:49 AM
there are more modern plans in that area, which it needs.
I guess I don't hate it, but I do hate that other brand new one right in the 600 block of N Mich
Wild Onion Mike
Mar 10, 2006, 11:03 PM
Any progress reports for this building? Are they still waiting for "The Clare" to reach a certain stage of development. What a transformation that corner will have since losing its 7-Eleven.
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with my "consciousness" for liking this tower (or Park Tower, or the one on the corner of Pearson & Lakeshore). This is a far cry from cr*pola like Millenium Centre and The Caravel.
That and it has nothing on Grand Plaza Apartments across the street when it comes to ugly. That complex is in a class of its own. They even doubled up the ugly in case you overlooked just one tower.
In fact, I'd boost it up to fugly. Fugly squared even. Just a hair away from" hide the children from it."
Park Tower and Elysian are fine. They have that semi-retro victorian, praire (or whatever) look that is unique.
Aw, I like Millenium Centre. It's unapologetically brutal.
That and it has nothing on Grand Plaza Apartments across the street when it comes to ugly. That complex is in a class of its own. They even doubled up the ugly in case you overlooked just one tower.
In fact, I'd boost it up to fugly.
BTW since I've never done a shot explicitly showing Ely, here you go:
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/4475/tx12.th.jpg (http://img213.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tx12.jpg)
Tom In Chicago
Mar 11, 2006, 5:44 AM
^Great perspective. . .
Wild Onion Mike
Mar 11, 2006, 6:03 AM
That and it has nothing on Grand Plaza Apartments across the street when it comes to ugly. That complex is in a class of its own. They even doubled up the ugly in case you overlooked just one tower.
In fact, I'd boost it up to fugly.
]
Grand Plaza hurts even more than it should because the initial renderings looked so darn promising. A classic case of the final product bursting the hopes promised by a rendering.
The massing around JHC really looks nice BTW. Elysian should fit in well.
Lecom
Mar 11, 2006, 7:27 PM
Looks a lot like Park Imperial (or whatever that tower is called).
chicubs111
Mar 11, 2006, 7:51 PM
OK, whats going on with this tower...what is the delay...this thing has been approved for awhile...financing has already been declared a long time ago as well...the appropriate number of units have been sold...I mean this one should have started before waterview broke ground.:shrug:
TransitEngr
Mar 12, 2006, 8:50 PM
Who knows... I seem to remember there being a shortage of caisson drill rigs.... is this true? Could the white-hot construction market just have a shortage of equipment and labor that could be delaying some projects???
Any ideas??
Frankie
Mar 21, 2006, 10:57 AM
posted by danthediscoman @ SSC
I contacted Elysian sales center yesterday and they are saying within 6-12 weeks groundbreaking will take place or as soon as all permits are cleared. They say sales are also very good but no percentage was specified. Good news as I was worried financing fell through or some other obstacles may have arisen.
trvlr70
Mar 21, 2006, 3:06 PM
I nominate this as the official "Chicago snail" as a result of how long things are taking to materialize.
Maybe it is in competition with NYC's Freedom Tower?
Step on it!:whip:
Citizen
Mar 21, 2006, 3:18 PM
Yeah, this and the Clare. They will however be nice additions to the area.
Steely Dan
Mar 21, 2006, 3:24 PM
^ let's also not forget 1000 S michigan or park 1000, as it's now being called. i believe that is the oldest still active proposal of any significant size that has not begun construction.
but yes, the elysian has been quite the snail too. i've never been terribly enhamored with it, so its constant delays have never been too bothersome for me.
VivaLFuego
Mar 21, 2006, 5:01 PM
As long as Elysian is the last of these Lagrange faux-deco-pomo residenterial towers, I think it'll be a nice addition, and will be Park Tower's little sister. Precast concrete isnt necessarily ugly.
jcchii
Mar 21, 2006, 11:05 PM
both this and the clare will do a lot to bulk up that part of the skyline, as evidenced by STR's brilliant image there ^^^^
JTChi01
Mar 22, 2006, 3:52 AM
^ Yea that was a hot image. Thanks STR. I like the Elysian and agree that not all buildings planned or constructed today have to be ultra modern like 600 N. Fairbanks to be attractive. The Elysian is much better than the monstrosities that were built in the late 90's, early 00's. And it's French Art Deco exterior will be a beauty if executed right. Chicago does need a variety of buildings that will add to its character.
Thefigman
Mar 22, 2006, 1:06 PM
Ya know, last night I was surfing the DirecTV, and I hit upon Good Times on TV Land. During the opening sequence, they show this kid riding a bike down the street, and there's the John Hancock sticking out like it's giving the middle finger to Chicago. Thirty years later, it's becoming very difficult to see the lower thirty floors from any angle but the lake.
How times have changed.
Adam186
Mar 24, 2006, 1:33 AM
^Ya, just imagine what it will look like in another 30 years.
BVictor1
Mar 24, 2006, 3:11 AM
Ya know, last night I was surfing the DirecTV, and I hit upon Good Times on TV Land. During the opening sequence, they show this kid riding a bike down the street, and there's the John Hancock sticking out like it's giving the middle finger to Chicago. Thirty years later, it's becoming very difficult to see the lower thirty floors from any angle but the lake.
How times have changed.
Well yeah, we've all been enjoying the "GOOD TIMES" when it comes to architecture and construction.
Steely Dan
May 16, 2006, 4:36 PM
Are permits really holding this up ?
possibly. or maybe that's just a convenient cover for the fact that they still don't have all their finacial ducks in a row to begin construction.
either way, i wouldn't be too worried. this one seems like a "when", not an "if" at this point.
VivaLFuego
May 16, 2006, 4:50 PM
Are permits really holding this up ? I'm starting get my waterview jitters again on this one.
I'd be annoyed if I'd put a deposit on a unit years ago and knew i wasnt gonna get it delivered at least for another couple years...
BVictor1
May 16, 2006, 8:28 PM
http://w16.cityofchicago.org/permit/SilverStream/Pages/pgApplicationStatusOverview.html
Application Status
11 E WALTON ST
Description: ERECT AND INSTALL PERIMETER FOUNDATION WALLS, CAISSONS, SLURRY WALLS AND EARTH RETENTION FOR A NEW 60 STORY HOTEL AND PRIVATE RESIDENT HI-RISE BUILDING WITH FOUR BASEMENTS. BUILDING TO HAVE 51 CONDOS AND 188 HOTEL ROOMS.
Total Records: 8
Discipline
Status
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
APPROVED
CIVIL ENGINEERING REVIEW
APPROVED
ELECTRICAL REVIEW
APPROVED
FIRE PREVENTION REVIEW
APPROVED
MAYOR'S OFFICE/PEOPLE W/DISAB
APPROVED
STRUCTURAL PEER REPORT REVIEW
APPROVED
STRUCTURAL REVIEW
WAIVED
ZONING REVIEW
INCOMPLETE
colemonkee
May 16, 2006, 8:40 PM
They need to add a ninth category. It would read something like this:
SKYSCRAPERPAGE REVIEW
"BUILD IT NOW!"
VivaLFuego
May 16, 2006, 9:09 PM
http://w16.cityofchicago.org/permit/SilverStream/Pages/pgApplicationStatusOverview.html
Application Status
11 E WALTON ST
Description: ERECT AND INSTALL PERIMETER FOUNDATION WALLS, CAISSONS, SLURRY WALLS AND EARTH RETENTION FOR A NEW 60 STORY HOTEL AND PRIVATE RESIDENT HI-RISE BUILDING WITH FOUR BASEMENTS. BUILDING TO HAVE 51 CONDOS AND 188 HOTEL ROOMS.
Total Records: 8
Discipline
Status
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
APPROVED
CIVIL ENGINEERING REVIEW
APPROVED
ELECTRICAL REVIEW
APPROVED
FIRE PREVENTION REVIEW
APPROVED
MAYOR'S OFFICE/PEOPLE W/DISAB
APPROVED
STRUCTURAL PEER REPORT REVIEW
APPROVED
STRUCTURAL REVIEW
WAIVED
ZONING REVIEW
INCOMPLETE
four basements? wow. that'll be right up against the subway line running alongside.
SevenSevenThree
May 17, 2006, 12:56 AM
Whose ass am I gonna have to kick to get this one going? Screw my deposit. I wouldve walked away by now. But patience isnt one of my more appealing virtues.
ChicagoBruce
Jun 6, 2006, 6:03 PM
I’m sick of this building, I don’t care if it just goes away.
In fact, why doesn’t everyone who reserved a unit cancel and get one in Aqua or Mandarin, so we can get those built.
headcase
Jun 6, 2006, 7:57 PM
In fact, why doesn’t everyone who reserved a unit cancel and get one in Aqua or Mandarin, so we can get those built.
There is one big thing that the Elysian had/has over Aqua or the Mandarin, location, location, location.
jcchii
Jun 7, 2006, 4:02 AM
anyone been by the site lately?
Pandemonious
Jun 7, 2006, 5:05 AM
I will go check it out tomorrow, and bring a camera. I haven't been by it in quite a while.
BVictor1
Jun 7, 2006, 2:04 PM
anyone been by the site lately?
I was by the site 2 days ago
http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3C8%3C378%7Ffp342%3Enu%3D3233%3E6%3C8%3E754%3E23246%3C88454%3A%3Aot1lsi
Other than the sign there was nothing noticable. They were putting up a sign for 10 E. Deleware
UptownChiBoy
Jun 7, 2006, 2:29 PM
GEEZE, at this rate Fordham's gonna be finished before this!
VivaLFuego
Jun 7, 2006, 3:10 PM
I was by the site 2 days ago
http://images1.snapfish.com/346%3C8%3C378%7Ffp342%3Enu%3D3233%3E6%3C8%3E754%3E23246%3C88454%3A%3Aot1lsi
Other than the sign there was nothing noticable. They were putting up a sign for 10 E. Deleware
Has 10 E. Delaware sold enough units to warrant demo'ing what's left of that poor block?
hoosier
Jun 7, 2006, 3:14 PM
This building is very beautiful and reminds me of Park Tower. I have yet to find a Chicago high-rise that detracts from the skyline. Every new tower either under construction or proposed are unique and beautiful. Most cities have several highrises that should never have been built, such as the MetLife Building in New York, but Chicago has a knack for getting the best highrises. Kudos to you all.
BVictor1
Jun 7, 2006, 4:07 PM
Has 10 E. Delaware sold enough units to warrant demo'ing what's left of that poor block?
They haven't even began to market the units yet. They just have a website up I believe.
the urban politician
Jun 7, 2006, 5:38 PM
Just as banks require 50% sales before financing a project, the city of Chicago should have a similar rule: 50% sales of a development before issuing a demolition permit.
That sure would have saved us a lot of what was lost--the old Merc Exchange, Block 37, the list goes on and on....
Pandemonious
Jun 7, 2006, 9:22 PM
As BVictor already said, there is jack shit happening over at The Elysian site:
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b276/Pandemonious/elysian2.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b276/Pandemonious/elysian1.jpg
on the plus side, you can see that they are working on installing the top floor window wall on 30 W Oak, in the background...
SevenSevenThree
Jun 7, 2006, 9:39 PM
^ I was just about to say that since nothing is happening at the site that at least 30 W Oak is looking tasty.
Pandemonious
Jun 7, 2006, 9:47 PM
For sure. It isn't that tall, but is coming out pretty damned nice, and sticks out well for its location. The residents will have nice views of that park that is just a block or two south.
jcchii
Jun 8, 2006, 3:51 AM
thanks for running by there.
hopefully these guys can get going in the warm weather here. this one will have a nice skyline impact when it finally goes
BVictor1
Jun 10, 2006, 3:26 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
Plan Commission Meeting
June 15, 2006
1PM
A proposed Amendment to Residential-Business Planned Development No. 967
submitted by Ten East Delaware, LLC and First Elysian Properties, LLC for the property generally located at 912-920 North Rush Street. The applicants propose to increase the overall floor area ratio from 18.73 to 21.68, increase the number of parking spaces in Sub-Area II from 125 to 188 and decrease the number of dwelling units in Sub-Area II from 229 to 144. (42nd Ward)
jcchii
Jun 10, 2006, 3:41 PM
hmmmm
trvlr70
Jun 10, 2006, 3:41 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
Plan Commission Meeting
June 15, 2006
1PM
A proposed Amendment to Residential-Business Planned Development No. 967
submitted by Ten East Delaware, LLC and First Elysian Properties, LLC for the property generally located at 912-920 North Rush Street. The applicants propose to increase the overall floor area ratio from 18.73 to 21.68, increase the number of parking spaces in Sub-Area II from 125 to 188 and decrease the number of dwelling units in Sub-Area II from 229 to 144. (42nd Ward)
What does this all mean?
Adam186
Jun 10, 2006, 5:32 PM
They should've taken care of that a long time before now. It should've been approved before they even began marketing.
kevininlb
Jun 10, 2006, 7:25 PM
This building is very beautiful and reminds me of Park Tower. I have yet to find a Chicago high-rise that detracts from the skyline. Every new tower either under construction or proposed are unique and beautiful. Most cities have several highrises that should never have been built, such as the MetLife Building in New York, but Chicago has a knack for getting the best highrises. Kudos to you all.
You are absolutely right! I've been cringing at each new building in NYC, but psyched about Chicago development. It's a great city getting better. Oh and that new place on Oak is awesome.
BVictor1
Jun 10, 2006, 8:09 PM
They should've taken care of that a long time before now. It should've been approved before they even began marketing.
It was approved a long time ago. What they are going for is an amendment to the zoning. Because the number of units and parking spaces has changed, they need to go through the plan commission for the changes to be approved.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.