SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   JERSEY CITY | Urban Ready Living Phase I | 713 FT | 69 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=201027)

babybackribs2314 Aug 20, 2012 3:25 PM

JERSEY CITY | Urban Ready Living Phase I | 713 FT | 69 FLOORS
 
Three-Tower Megaproject Coming to Jersey City Waterfront

Quote:

The first phase of the project, dubbed 'Urban Ready Living,' will be a 69-story residential tower, containing 766 apartments. Construction of phase one is expected to be completed by the end of 2014, which is quite rapid. The developers are planning two more towers of a similar size, which will accompany phase one of the development.
http://resources.mack-cali.com/image...z=2012-08-20-1

Image via Mack Cali

Roadcruiser1 Aug 20, 2012 4:10 PM

Actually the tallest of these buildings only end up measuring to somewhere in the 900 foot zone. It's 100 feet shy of 1,000 feet.

Crawford Aug 20, 2012 4:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 (Post 5804613)
Actually the tallest of these buildings only end up measuring to somewhere in the 900 foot zone. It's 100 feet shy of 1,000 feet.

Are you sure? I would imagine that 3 roughly 70-floor residential buildings in JC would be around 700-800 ft. max. We're talking rental buildings here, so no super-high ceilings or anything like that.

There are also two 80-floor rental buildings in Journal Square, a separate 67 floor rental building in Journal Square, and the developers of the three 70-floor towers have a massive amount of adjacent land that they want to develop. They could build a dozen towers on that site.

Can you imagine if they build a dozen roughly 70-floor towers? That side of the Hudson will be insane.

scalziand Aug 20, 2012 4:54 PM

Thats kind of ugly...

sbarn Aug 20, 2012 5:21 PM

What is up with the name? Height sounds promising, not so sure about those renderings though...

Nexis4Jersey Aug 20, 2012 5:53 PM

It looks a little weird , the blocks are all over the place..

Roadcruiser1 Aug 20, 2012 7:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 5804637)
Are you sure? I would imagine that 3 roughly 70-floor residential buildings in JC would be around 700-800 ft. max. We're talking rental buildings here, so no super-high ceilings or anything like that.

There are also two 80-floor rental buildings in Journal Square, a separate 67 floor rental building in Journal Square, and the developers of the three 70-floor towers have a massive amount of adjacent land that they want to develop. They could build a dozen towers on that site.

Can you imagine if they build a dozen roughly 70-floor towers? That side of the Hudson will be insane.

Some of them would most certainly soar over 1,000 feet.

futuresooner Aug 20, 2012 8:10 PM

So basically a similar thing to the ghastly but thankfully failed Museum Plaza from Louisville? Yeah, no thanks.

Dac150 Aug 20, 2012 8:23 PM

These Jersey City proposals are always exciting - the area continues to become a hot-spot, especially among the young Manhattan working crowd. I'm keeping an open mind with respect to the design. Those renders seem very preliminary and I'm sure more detailed ones will emerge.

vandelay Aug 20, 2012 9:29 PM

Three messy, deconstructivist-lite tall towers will mar the JC skyline. I hope they come up with something better, and those are just placeholders. More traditional looking towers like GS, Merrill, and Trump look so much better than these.

Yorkie Aug 20, 2012 10:47 PM

:previous:..Awkward

Busy Bee Aug 20, 2012 11:06 PM

Looks like the stacks of books that are scattered all over my apartment!

Yeah these can improve.

Dylan Leblanc Aug 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Map location - http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/map...92635&z=17&t=k

More info - http://www.mack-cali.com/development-urban-ready-living

NYguy Aug 21, 2012 12:04 PM

I remember a proposal very similar to this one in that area of Jersey City, but the name of it escapes me right now. It'll come back...

JayPro Aug 21, 2012 7:20 PM

I think it was that Koolhaas(Sp?) proposal........

NYC GUY Aug 21, 2012 7:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 5805553)
I remember a proposal very similar to this one in that area of Jersey City, but the name of it escapes me right now. It'll come back...

Journal Square?

http://c214210.r10.cf3.rackcdn.com/f...083413140a.jpg

Duck From NY Aug 21, 2012 7:29 PM

I'm in the minority in that I actually think those renders look decent, although a little less grey and a little more metallic texture would be nice.

MolsonExport Aug 21, 2012 8:36 PM

love the height and density, hate the renderings.

summersm343 Aug 22, 2012 5:18 PM

Disgusting looking proposal and stupid name. Seems like a fantasy proposal too. :cool:

I like the phase two of 70-90 Columbus with the two 48 floor towers much better. Seems much more realistic and is much better looking.

Jersey City deserves better than this.

Crawford Nov 7, 2012 5:06 AM

This is breaking ground very shortly.

I think they're building one tower at a time, but not 100% sure. Still, three 70 floor towers will definitely change the skyline west of the Hudson.

And the overall project could eventually be much, much bigger. Mack-Cali owns adjacent land that had been planned for office towers, but demand in Jersey City has shifted in favor of highrise residential. They could eventually have a dozen or so residential towers along the waterfront.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.