SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Downtown & City of Portland (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=192)
-   -   The Collective on 4th (4th and Harrison) | 175' | 15 floors | Complete (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=213590)

maccoinnich Nov 23, 2014 3:35 AM

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...ps6e6ce205.jpg

RainDog Nov 23, 2014 4:43 AM

This is much larger than what I was picturing for some reason. The design does seem pretty chaotic, hopefully the finished product will be more cohesive.

PDXDENSITY Nov 24, 2014 1:54 AM

It certainly does look a bit hodge-podge. It could be cool if done right?

maccoinnich Dec 2, 2014 8:53 PM

Design Advice drawings [PDF, 112MB]. First hearing scheduled for December 11th.

WestCoast Dec 3, 2014 2:34 AM

^^^^^^^^

Holy god it's horrible :yuck:

maccoinnich Dec 4, 2014 8:35 PM

http://www.nextportland.com/wp-conte...n-vignette.jpg

http://www.nextportland.com/wp-conte...on-massing.jpg

http://www.nextportland.com/wp-conte...massing-02.jpg

I also put the floorplans and elevations up on Next Portland.

PDXDENSITY Dec 4, 2014 8:37 PM

I think it's tucked away enough that it will create an interesting street experience and not be too loud. It seems like it could be cool.

maccoinnich Dec 4, 2014 8:41 PM

Anyone could miss it. Kind of like Canada, all tucked away down there.

PDXDENSITY Dec 4, 2014 8:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccoinnich (Post 6831458)
Anyone could miss it. Kind of like Canada, all tucked away down there.

I'm trying to see the bright side. Maybe it'll apologize for its appearance everyday, like Canada.

urbanlife Dec 4, 2014 8:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PDXDENSITY (Post 6831469)
I'm trying to see the bright side. Maybe it'll apologize for its appearance everyday, like Canada.

The bright side is the built version will probably be a bland version of this mess of a building. Seriously, someone needs to slap an architect who clearly was at the bottom of their class with this kind of design work.

PDXDENSITY Dec 4, 2014 8:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urbanlife (Post 6831475)
The bright side is the built version will probably be a bland version of this mess of a building. Seriously, someone needs to slap an architect who clearly was at the bottom of their class with this kind of design work.

Let's commission a copyright-crazed artist to make a huge statue in front of it no one can take pictures of...

cab Dec 4, 2014 9:39 PM

Wait, did this guy really put blank walls facing an interior courtyard? That better be glass.

2oh1 Dec 4, 2014 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cab (Post 6831526)
Wait, did this guy really put blank walls facing an interior courtyard? That better be glass.

What the WHUT? Why did he/they do that? Why? Wow. Why?

I agree that this location is in an odd enough spot that a weird building would be fine. It's sort of tucked away, yet not. But this design is a mess. Maybe it's a fake. Maybe they have a real design that they think will get shot down or dumbed down, so they present this instead with the intention of presenting their real design as if it's actually a compromise. Otherwise... wtf?

maccoinnich Dec 4, 2014 10:21 PM

Looking at how the units are arranged in plan, I'm fairly confident that wont be blank facade.

As much as I'm recoiling at the facade treatment, I'm more concerned about the massing. A 15 story U-shaped building is going to be very very bulky.

PDXDENSITY Dec 4, 2014 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccoinnich (Post 6831605)
Looking at how the units are arranged in plan, I'm fairly confident that wont be blank facade.

As much as I'm recoiling at the facade treatment, I'm more concerned about the massing. A 15 story U-shaped building is going to be very very bulky.

Any ground retail?

maccoinnich Dec 4, 2014 10:31 PM

30,000 sq ft grocer.

PDXDENSITY Dec 4, 2014 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccoinnich (Post 6831622)
30,000 sq ft grocer.

Hey, that's good! I do think the building is beyond bulky. It would look so much better as fine-grained density-- several different dorm structures to make it look less like a superblock.

ThatDarnSacramentan Dec 5, 2014 3:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2oh1 (Post 6831564)
What the WHUT? Why did he/they do that? Why? Wow. Why?

I agree that this location is in an odd enough spot that a weird building would be fine. It's sort of tucked away, yet not. But this design is a mess. Maybe it's a fake. Maybe they have a real design that they think will get shot down or dumbed down, so they present this instead with the intention of presenting their real design as if it's actually a compromise. Otherwise... wtf?

Agreed. Portland already has one too many of those buildings in University Pointe. Time will tell.

zilfondel Dec 5, 2014 6:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThatDarnSacramentan (Post 6794030)
Our conclusion didn't so much have to do with customer or resident traffic, but it was based on the turning radii and ease of access by the supply trucks and delivery vans. Any kind of tractor-trailer needing to unload would completely block traffic on either 4th or Harrison (at least based on a site visit).

Reminds me of this article I read recently:

Is Portland ready to start building streets for smaller trucks?

http://bikeportland.org/2014/12/01/p...-trucks-114065

Quote:

The Federal Highway Administration suggests having traditional 30-foot trucks in mind when designing residential and local city streets and intersections. But in its latest design guide, the National Association of City Transportation Officials recommended preparing for a 23-foot vehicle in such situations. The City of Chicago has followed suit; its latest street guide (with Nelson\Nygaard as lead consultant) also introduced a 23-foot delivery van for neighborhood streets.
It goes on about various sized delivery trucks, although I don't think they were related to grocery store deliveries, which normally require larger trucks due to the amount of stuff they get delivered. Still, there is room for improvement.

There are other buildings in downtown Portland where semi truck trailers backup into the loading zone and end up blocking traffic. It seems like a fairly common thing, actually.

zilfondel Dec 5, 2014 7:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PDXDENSITY (Post 6831469)
I'm trying to see the bright side. Maybe it'll apologize for its appearance everyday, like Canada.

Har, har. Your humor is coming up a bit short, mate.

Considering the building is on 4th, one of the busiest streets in downtown... with a really weak SW corner, which will probably be one of the most visible corner views in downtown Portland, I'd have to disagree.

The streetcar makes its turn towards South Waterfront right there, and the PSU food carts are a block to the SW. This thing is way too massive to ignore.

It's a turd. :titanic:


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.