2300 Kingsway | 22fl | Completed
The Hills (El Dorado site at Nanaimo & Kingsway) has a display centre going up at Georgia & Seymour downtown (in the old Compucentre store).
The Georgia Straight has a story with rendering: http://www.straight.com/article-113433/the-midas-touch Quote:
|
Looks pretty nice. I like the circular windows running up the building.
|
Looks like it would be one of the taller buildings in the area by far. Perhaps this is the start of a trend - a string of condo towers along Kingsway in the city proper.
|
Yeah, but that strings of towers should really be along the Expo Line, not along Kingsway - or at least parallelled by a string of towers along the Expo Line.
|
yeah not good tie ins to the mass transit
but nice to see some of kingsway being made denser |
That site is only about 4-5 blocks from Nanaimo station.
Its not a great area though.. but that is probably because of the El Dorado, which will obviously be gone. |
i love it.
|
I like it. How many other highrises are in the area, or will it be paving a new district for highrises. I can't wait for False creek to be surrounded on all sides by towers... I'd even advocate sticking one in the middle of false creek by science wold, with pedestrian walkways leading to downtown, the olympic villiage, and to science world for access to mass transit.
as far as transit for this tower is concerned. with another 3 or 4 towers within a 1=2 block area, forming a little cluster, I'm sure the city would look into a streetcar network in that direction... who likes the idea of a streetcar along kingsway? |
^ there are quite a few corridors in Vancouver that are quite suitable for streetcar, and Kingsway is one of them. the others being Hastings, 41st Avenue, 4th Avenue, Main Street, and maybe Fraser Street?
|
I always welcome density outside of the core. This looks decent.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
does this location happen to be on a hill?
|
a lot better than I was expecting, very nice tower
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
it looks a bit tacky like some of the ones along the m-line in burnaby, but i'm not complaining.
|
^What's tacky about it?
|
Quote:
|
looks like before the Holborne group got involved in the Hills, the eldorado site was previously owned by the Chandler group now involved in pending legal law suit, according to the article below...
--------------------------- Court takes action against Mark Chandler Susan Lazaruk, The Province Published: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 B.C. Supreme Court has frozen $35 million of a developer's assets after investors alleged he misrepresented real-estate deals and forged a multimillion-dollar mortgage document. Mark Chandler, whose developments include the second phase of the Garden City complex about to go on sale in Richmond, the sold-out Tribeca Lofts in Yaletown and the Homer and Helmcken development in Vancouver, is being sued by investors Theodore "Ted" and Susan Freeman. They and their company, Susan Richards Investments, are suing for a return of their investments and a share of ownership and profits from the residential complexes or compensation up to $35 million. The freeze order prohibits Chandler from selling or diminishing the value of $35 million of his assets. The Freemans' lawyer, Katherine Ducey, said if units are still being sold, "we certainly don't want [the lawsuit or court order] to prejudice any of the sales of the unsold units." She agreed it is a buyer-beware situation. Ken Fraser of B.C.'s superintendent of real estate, which regulates the industry, said developers are required to amend disclosure statements if material changes are made. "A lawsuit may affect the financial stability of the property," he said, adding it is up to buyers and their lawyers to check for liens. Earlier this year, the superintendent scheduled a hearing into Chandler's developments after Vancouver condo marketing king Bob Rennie complained about improper disclosure statements on some of the same properties. That complaint came after a separate lawsuit from a former investor. It was settled out of court and the superintendent's hearing was cancelled after Chandler agreed to amend the disclosure statements. The Freemans' writ says Chandler told Ted Freeman in May 2004 he was expecting to make a $30-million profit on Homer and Helmcken and he needed an equity partner. Freeman invested $12.3 million for a 40-per-cent interest and Susan Richards Investments made a $6-million investment. Two years later, Freeman invested $4 million in another joint-venture partnership with Chandler for, in part, 50 per cent of a development on the yet-to-be-developed 1000-block Richards Street, on which Chandler said he expected to make a $40-million profit. SRI contributed about $2 million for the other half. The lawsuit details other deals involving the Richmond Garden City project and the Eldorado property on Kingsway at the site of the Eldorado Hotel in Vancouver. The writ alleges Chandler made the representations regarding the deals "knowing they were not true or were made recklessly." It claims Chandler gave Freeman a written mortgage for $19 million registered against the Eldorado property that "was in fact a forgery and has never been registered against the Eldorado property." It also alleges Chandler sold two Tribeca units to the Freemans for $800,000 but the title documents were forgeries. The plaintiffs allege breach of contract, saying Chandler failed to provide accurate financial information and his representations were "designed to deceive." The allegations have not been proven in court. Chandler has yet to file a statement of defence. Calls to his office weren't returned and yesterday an employee answering the phone said he had just stepped out. slazaruk@png.canwest.com © The Vancouver Province 2007 |
Not bad, will definitely stand out in that area.
|
Quote:
|
^I like those windows, something a bit different. At least it doesn't have any faux crap attached to it.
|
Quote:
anything is an improvement |
I'm in Regina all week so i can't look into it, but that is not a render for the hills. Things could've changed since I last saw it but that isn't even close. The presentation centre will be open in a couple of months, the strike slowed everything down. I do know the floorplans haven't been approved yet that's why the sales where delayed.
|
Damn!
Better not be a westside wanna-be like King Edward Village. |
Quote:
|
^^^^ I hope finally hearing something official on the Superstore site this week was good enough for you.
|
Quote:
Certainly good news indeed...I suspect you had a hand in it somehow. I do wish/hope the design is more "urban" something that would be more pedestrian friendly....but I suspect from intitial reports that it will resemble a typical big box centre with free standing buildings surrounded by ample parking. Anyword as to when we'll hear of the tenants? Some are new to Regina I've been told. Is there anywhere one could see some renderings of the site plan? Don't get me wrong, it's great that this site is getting some use after sitting vacant for years....but I this is a huge parcel of land, in a very visible area of the city,....it could have truly been a spot for something truly great with a mixture of uses...something that would tie the Warehouse district to the city centre. |
Wrong thread?
The Hills is at Nainamo and Kingsway in Vancouver and proposed to have a couple of mid-rise towers and a Save-on-Foods grocery store. |
*l* this thread has gone way off topic.
Anyways in regards to the Superstore site in Regina, there will be alot more streetfront retail, a couple of new national chain restaurants, lots of office and commercial space in the existing space. I will certainly improve the area. Back to the Hills, sales are now early 08 due to the civic strike. |
I still have yet to see a rendering of this entire project......anyone care to enlighten us? ;)
|
look at the first post in this topic.
|
I just don't see this building being very successful as an investor magnet.
Why, they may actually have to rely on LOCAL buyers! |
There has to be more to this project than just the one tower in the first rendering. The lot is just too big to only have one tower. Perhaps 4 level lowrise in addition to tower?
|
Quote:
B) as I think jlousa said in another thread the image posted is not the final rendering of what is going to be built. He seemed to say that the image posted is way off what is now going forward...... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I dont mean another tower you tower nut I mean the retail compnent and the mid rise + townhomes, etc |
Quote:
|
i've posted details on this one before, beleive in the general vancouver thread so someone can look it up. Off the top of my head I beleive it's a 22 storey tower on the corner, the city made them reduce the back tower from 15 down to 9 stories, mind you the front tower went from 17 to 22 to make up for it. The podium will be high at 7? stories, there will be townhouses on the back site, there will be a supermarket (originally Save-on foods, but with the rumour of a Save-ons opening at King Ed Village it could end up being a T&T that was originally scheduled for King Ed) there will also be a neighbourhood pub/cold beer wine store, a daycare and I think that's about it.
|
Quote:
|
Forgot about this thread, anyways a quick update, no more Supermarket, but there will be a large format drug store, not sure who but there is already 2 london drugs close by. The project has been redesigned yet again, but it looks really good. Should it make it thru the UDP and DPB they expect to start construction in Jan/09. The latest info is available in the following link. Maybe someone can capture the renderings and post them for everyone to see.
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/develop...sway/index.htm |
Went by the presentation centre on my lunch hour, it's at georgia and Seymour in the bay parkage building which holborn also owns. Anyways it looks really good. The units themselves are all on the small side, and the finishes are very mid-range. Looking at the model though the project really comes together nicely and will be a great addition to that area.
|
i dunno, judging by the renderings at the website (http://www.thehillsvancouver.ca/), im not so fond of the yellow and lime green blab. i could've easily mistaken it for a concord condo. i dont get whats the hype about gaudy colours. but i guess the building does suit the environs of colourful and flashy vancouver specials of baby blue, turquoise, barf tan, etc.:slob:
|
I would love to see some planning studies or detailed info on the "Little Mountain Lands" that Holburn is also developing..........anyone able to help with a link?
|
opps found it! >> http://www.littlemountainplan.ca/index.html
|
Little mountain will be a bit away still, they will need to go thru quite a few steps to get everything approved I don't expect them to acutally start construction till late 2010.
As for the hills, completion is set for 2012, so 3.5yrs from now. The colours acutally come together pretty well, at least on the model. Stop by and take a look, now what they'll look like in real life we'll need to wait and see. |
Based on the site plan at the website - there's no second tower?
Just the "El Dorado" midrise slab and the "Beacon" tower? It shows townhouses and a daycare to the south. |
Thats correct the second tower (7 storeys) will be a community garden for the time being, the tower will be built at a later date. I'm assuming they will be doing this to see if they can squeeze more height out of it at a later date.
|
Thanks.
In massing, it's a bit like the corner part of the King Edward Village, just separate blocks. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.