SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Never Built & Visionary Projects (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=342)
-   -   MIAMI | Miapolis | 3,200 FT / 975 M | 160 FLOORS | VISION (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=177793)

JDRCRASH Jan 22, 2010 6:49 AM

MIAMI | Miapolis | 3,200 FT / 975 M | 160 FLOORS | VISION
 
Quote:

975 Meter Superscraper In Miami Could Steal Dubai's Crown


20. JAN, 2010

Plans have been floated for a new superscraper in Miami that could steal the world’s tallest crown from Dubai’s Burj Khalifa.

Despite Miami’s financial woes, having a reported 100,000 plus properties in foreclosure according to the Miami Herald, Kobi Karp has submitted designs for Miapolis - a ‘city within a city’ planned for Watson Island.

The 160 storey building would be more than 183 metres higher than the Burj Khalifa if built and would house an amusement park, observatory, restaurants, 1.96 million sq ft of shops, over 1000 apartments, 1 million sq ft office space and a 792 room hotel.

The project has been around for more than a decade but it is reported that developer Guillermo Socarras has been in talks with the Federal Aviation Administration to secure approval for the height of the tower.

The project is currently looking for funding from investors.




Renders:


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...1/Miapolis.jpg



http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower1.jpg


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower2.jpg


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower3.jpg


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower4.jpg


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower5.jpg


http://www.decodedstuff.com/wp-conte...ami-tower6.jpg

Source: http://www.decodedstuff.com/975-mete...-dubais-crown/

RLS_rls Jan 22, 2010 10:56 AM

I'm still undecided on Burj Khalifa, but I still think it's light years ahead of this.

Tbh I'm disappointed the west can't come up with a better design. This is really, really bad.

Biff Jan 22, 2010 4:36 PM

bhhhhaaaa, in this one case i hope the FAA is able to enforce it's height restrictions. That thing is awful. I'm sure the chance of it getting built are slim however.

Lecom Jan 22, 2010 4:51 PM

Yeah right.

brickell Jan 22, 2010 4:59 PM

Slim to none.

Tom In Chicago Jan 22, 2010 5:05 PM

neat renderings. . . that's probably all we'll see of this though. . . for better or worse. . .

Steely Dan Jan 22, 2010 5:15 PM

holy eye-sore batman. if the US ever goes this tall, i hope we can come up with something better and more deserving than that pile. the base is just awful; what a nonsensical, disorganized, mish-mash.

Nowhereman1280 Jan 22, 2010 5:32 PM

^^^ I agree, I feel like people just can't figure out how to design aesthetically pleasing ultratalls. I mean there was a huge change in design theory when we first started designing highrises (good old Louie Sullivan and his base, shaft, and cornice theory) and then another change when we started designing Supertalls, adding necessary flow and gradually changing details from the bottom to the top. But I just haven't seen a cohesive plan for a building in the neighborhood of 2500' yet. In fact, the tallest design I've seen that "works" and doesn't look forced in some way is the Chicago Spire and that really just uses the same tricks that were used by supertalls all along. You have a well detailed building that starts with an interesting base and gradually tapers to a point as it gets taller. So that doesn't even really count as an effective ultratall design.

I can't wait to see a 3000' building that "works" because I have no idea how it will look.

Sulley Jan 22, 2010 6:11 PM

Yeah... no.

This is also right in the approach path of MIA.

volguus zildrohar Jan 22, 2010 7:41 PM

As sexy as cabbage. Next.

dave8721 Jan 22, 2010 8:51 PM

More of a vision/fantasy than a real proposal. For one the guy doesn't even own the land that he is proposing this on. Plus the FAA has a 1049 foot cap on Downtown Miami due to its proximity to the airport. Will never happen (thank god).

HomeInMyShoes Jan 22, 2010 8:52 PM

lol

SpawnOfVulcan Jan 22, 2010 10:38 PM

It's almost obscene!!! Oh wait... it is...

JDRCRASH Jan 23, 2010 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave8721 (Post 4662298)
Plus the FAA has a 1049 foot cap on Downtown Miami due to its proximity to the airport. Will never happen (thank god).

And the FAA still has a 2,000 foot cap throughout the whole country, if i'm correct.

WonderlandPark Jan 23, 2010 1:24 AM

Epic Fail

bobdreamz Jan 23, 2010 1:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave8721 (Post 4662298)
More of a vision/fantasy than a real proposal. For one the guy doesn't even own the land that he is proposing this on. Plus the FAA has a 1049 foot cap on Downtown Miami due to its proximity to the airport. Will never happen (thank god).

Not to mention the fact that the McCarthur causeway which runs through the island is a major hurricane evacuation route for the residents of Miami Beach. This will never happen.

llamaorama Jan 23, 2010 3:13 AM

Besides the amount of demand this would suck up might be better put towards continuing infill in Brickell and Downtown

FerrariEnzo Jan 23, 2010 4:34 AM

"looking for investors".... so basically this thread is a waste of bandwidth.

Nowhereman1280 Jan 23, 2010 5:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDRCRASH (Post 4662727)
And the FAA still has a 2,000 foot cap throughout the whole country, if i'm correct.

This is a myth. There is no cap. There is only the assumption that there is probably no good reason to build anything above 2000ft that will unecessarily intrude into the airspace. Thus the FAA and FCC have a policy of not issuing permits to build above 2000' unless the applicant presents a good arguement as to why they should be allowed to build so high. There is no cap or law preventing it.

In other words the only thing that happens at 2000' is that the developer now has the burden of proof to show that there is a need for a 2000' structure that outweighs the disadvantage of the intrusion on the airspace.

JDRCRASH Jan 23, 2010 5:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 4662991)
so basically this thread is a waste of bandwidth.

Not really. Like you said, it's looking for financial support.

..like countless others on this sub-forum...


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.