JERSEY CITY | 75 Park Lane & 2 Shore Drive North | 414 FT | 37 FLOORS
Jersey City development sites sold; condo buildings planned
http://www.njbiz.com/storyimage/NJ/2...W=430&maxH=430 Quote:
http://www.njbiz.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...ldings-planned |
I always thought that Jersey City commanded "Sky-High" real estate rates.
|
Usually near the waterfront, but its no where near Manhattan if we are to compare rates and even when it comes to property parcels. Although its approaching it as time goes by.
Journal Square is ripe for development. The sooner those crappy lowrises go in that area, the better. Then hopefully the gentrification train can ride over the Passaic and into Newark. A city that needs to have a JC style boom pronto! Untapped potential. |
Revealed: 75 Park Lane South, Jersey City :cheers:
http://www.yimbynews.com/wp-content/...h-777x1085.jpg Quote:
http://www.yimbynews.com/wp-content/...ne-south-3.jpg ======================== NYY |
I assume they are gonna build the red brick design rather than the top design? If that is the case, that is a shame, I like the top one more, but the red brick one will definitely blend into that area better.
|
The red brick renderings have been around for over a year, so I'm guessing what will be built is the other modern rendering.
These are the same guys, a state-owned affiliated company, building 99 Hudson so they have street cred. Can't wait to see this one rise. Another EB-5 play, maybe? Duh. Should have read the article. EB-5 is in play. |
I like the modern rendering more. We have enough buildings downtown that have that brick/glass combo but the modern one is different...has a more contemporary, outside the box feel. I wouldn't find the brick/glass version objectionable, but would like some more different styles to make it more individually stand out. 99 Hudson certainly does and though this would be far smaller and not nearly the tour de force on the skyline as that other tower by the same developer Jersey City developers need to stand out more, build towers that in the coming years will be style icons for Jersey City. We have a good number already of functional, perfectly nice but architecturally unambitious or mediocre in terms of aesthetics. Let's get some recognition for great architecture in our city...if we want to be the premiere mid size city in the country..be adventurous and daring regarding the skyline!
|
The rendering at the top is what will be built.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
JC's skyline and mass has gotten really big in the last couple of years. To the unsuspecting person, you'd almost think it's part of NYC. |
I was on the George Washington looking south yesterday. F*cking incredible! Best shot of 432 Park in my opinion.
This is an older pic thanks to Lydia2222@Flickr on a smoggy day. Anyone have something more recent? Can't wait to see 99 Hudson rise in this photo. Wish it was a supertall with a similar height to 432 Park. https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5609/...6d160fd4_b.jpg |
2561x3577 Rendering: http://mhsarchitects.com/wp-content/...k-Lane_new.jpg
|
Height on this one is 414ft and is ready to breakground within 60 days.
Another one. |
My sources were right. Heavy equipment and excavator now on site. Official groundbreaking will be any day now.
|
Great news CIA. Hopefully this will rise quickly like Ellipse. I remember in May it was like 2 floors, now its 25+ floors. A lot of good progress on that one in 4 months or so, and it's of a similar height range.
|
|
http://ny.curbed.com/2016/10/27/1343...park-and-shore
Jersey City will get two ‘ultra-luxury’ condo towers Park and Shore recently broke ground and will bring a total of 429 residences to the Hudson River waterfront Quote:
Good to see this one moving along and interesting to hear confirmation that this is indeed a China Construction America, which is a sister company of China Overseas America. I hope the Chinese $$$s continues to roll in. They're the only ones building luxury condos, and will add significantly to the tax base since they are not asking for an abatement. |
|
The rendering is somewhat outdated with its placement of the Ellipse in an earlier stage of development than present day but I like the style they chose, definitely different than most towers built these days in Jersey City. The other finalist looked too much like the brick/glass towers you find with the Morgan at Provost Square, the One and Marbella II. This one has some style and at over 400 feet nice height for the area.
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.