SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   NEW YORK | One World Trade Center | 1,776' Pinnacle / 1,373' Roof | 108 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=123628)

NewYorkSkyline117 Feb 28, 2012 10:44 PM

I'm confused. How tall is it with this steel, 1,240 feet right?

QUEENSNYMAN Feb 28, 2012 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marshall (Post 5608837)
It's absolutely thrilling to see that new steel! 1wtc is so close to being the tallest building in NYC!! :cool: Reclaiming the skyline baby!

Amen to that :worship:

http://www.youtube.com/user/NYBOY75

sw5710 Feb 28, 2012 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewYorkSkyline117 (Post 5609029)
I'm confused. How tall is it with this steel, 1,240 feet right?

Now we have columns up to floor 93 or 1,208' 4'' Floor 100 is at 1,240'

gramsjdg Feb 28, 2012 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 (Post 5609022)
Otie made this diagram. Credits to Otie.

http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6141/5...2b70e652_b.jpg

The only change is the 102nd floor is an observation deck.

May not look like much, but there's still 160 ft to go ;)

sw5710 Feb 28, 2012 11:27 PM

[QUOTE=CarlosV;5608731]A forest of steel....

http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7069/6...b1cd694f_b.jpg
DSC_0014 copy by Ceva321, on Flickr

.
Look at this picture and the diagram and you can see the 3 large floors from 89,90,91 and the next 3 smaller floors from future floor 92 and the columns and there mounts for 92M and 93.

10023 Feb 28, 2012 11:32 PM

Obviously I'm in no position to complain, but aesthetically this thing really does need to be taller. It's just such a fat building...

sw5710 Feb 28, 2012 11:34 PM

It will be taller 1792' Now it is 1216' to the splices.

10023 Feb 28, 2012 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sw5710 (Post 5609104)
It will be taller 1792' Now it is 1200'

How high is the actual building structure though? THe spire doesn't really count.

J_M_Tungsten Feb 28, 2012 11:37 PM

^ lol, uh oh, here we go....

Roadcruiser1 Feb 28, 2012 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 5609109)
How high is the actual building structure though? THe spire doesn't really count.

The height to roof is 1,368 feet. Most of the specifications matches the former North Tower of the old World Trade Center including the height.

sw5710 Feb 28, 2012 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 5609109)
How high is the actual building structure though? THe spire doesn't really count.

It does count do to pilots! The Building will look solid to 1,368'

sw5710 Feb 28, 2012 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J_M_Tungsten (Post 5609114)
^ lol, uh oh, here we go....

:haha:

Davidsam52 Feb 28, 2012 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 5609101)
Obviously I'm in no position to complain, but aesthetically this thing really does need to be taller. It's just such a fat building...

Wow what a gorgeous shot with the new DCL ship in the foreground being welcomed to Manhattan!:tup::tup::tup:

Roadcruiser1 Feb 28, 2012 11:48 PM

Found a nice old vs new photo online.

http://www.itechworldinfo.com/world-...r-rebuild.html
http://www.itechworldinfo.com/wp-con...ade-Center.jpg

This picture will settle the argument about the new building's width. The new One World Trade Center is essentially a modern sister of the old One World Trade Center. Even though their shape changed it is still extremely reminiscent of the old tower.

SoaringSkylines Feb 28, 2012 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 5609101)
Obviously I'm in no position to complain, but aesthetically this thing really does need to be taller. It's just such a fat building...

Agreed. I have to admit that it has made a SMALL change in the skyline, but not anything major.

marshall Feb 29, 2012 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoaringSkylines (Post 5609137)
Agreed. I have to admit that it has made a SMALL change in the skyline, but not anything major.


Give it a couple more months or so, when it's actually finished, it will look much taller and have a bigger, better impact than now. Visualize the finished tower reaching all the way to the tip of where those cranes are now. That's about where the roof will be. :cool:

1Boston Feb 29, 2012 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roadcruiser1 (Post 5609136)
Found a nice old vs new photo online.

http://www.itechworldinfo.com/world-...r-rebuild.html
http://www.itechworldinfo.com/wp-con...ade-Center.jpg

This picture will settle the argument about the new building's width. The new One World Trade Center is essentially a modern sister of the old One World Trade Center. Even though their shape changed it is still extremely reminiscent of the old tower.

I agree this completely shows the similarities. They almost look the same when you look just at the roof of the new one compared to the old north tower.

sbarn Feb 29, 2012 12:45 AM

Quote:

And just when we were talking about tenants. This article just came hot off the press this morning.

A Whole Lotta Space Up for the Takin’ in 2013
By Daniel Edward Rosen


http://www.observer.com/2012/02/a-wh...-2013-wsj-sez/
I don't see how that 13-story Minskoff Tower at Astor Place is going to blow the rental market. This news story seems to be pretty hyperbolic, the office market is not as dire as they proclaim.

DrNest Feb 29, 2012 1:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewYorkSkyline117 (Post 5608846)
There's no 94-99 floors

Why is there no floors 94-99? From the rendering posted there doesn't even appear to be room for mechanical floors. Other than just to claim there are over 100 floors I see no reason for missing out 94-99. Can anybody explain the actual logic and reasoning for this please?

Yankee fan for life Feb 29, 2012 1:19 AM

Cant believe i have never ask this question before what is the purpose for the communication platform ring ?


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.