SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/index.php)
-   Transportation & Infrastructure (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/forumdisplay.php?f=420)
-   -   Calgary Stoney Trail [Ring Road] (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=127346)

korzym Mar 15, 2007 4:24 AM

Calgary Stoney Trail [Ring Road]
 
*Newest Videos, High Definition*
Video Link

**2ND NEW VIDEO**
Video Link



Video Link
Video Link

construction starts in April...complete in november 2009. Update: Currently some outlets are claiming November 1st, 2009 as the opening date. A forum member personally spoke to the transport minister at a recent community meeting and he said the premier will be at a ribbon cutting ceremony on November 2nd.

Quote:

The Alberta government has signed a 30-year contract with the Stoney Trail Group to design, build, operate and partially finance Stoney Trail from its junction with Deerfoot Trail to 17 Avenue SE. The contract also includes maintenance of Stoney Trail NW from its junction with Deerfoot Trail to 16 Avenue NW.

Total length is 21 kilometres.

Six-lane sections from Deerfoot Trail to Metis Trail (44 Street NE) and McKnight Boulevard to 16 Avenue NE. Other sections are four-lane.

Interchanges at Deerfoot Trail, Metis Trail, Country Hills Boulevard, Airport Trail, McKnight Boulevard, and 16 Avenue NE.

Signalized t-intersection at 17 Avenue SE. An interchange will be built when Stoney Trail is extended south of 17 Avenue SE.

Construction of two new railway bridge structures and rehabilitation of two existing railway bridge structures.
Open house is March 29 from 2 to 8 pm at Sunridge Mall

Speed limits:
NE: 100 km/h at first, then 110 km/h around 2015
NW: 80 km/h or 60 km/h depending on construction zones. 100 km/h from bedington to deerfoot
SE & SW: TBD, indications that by 2015 it will be 110 km/h



Government Website with diagrams & pictures:
http://www.transportation.alberta.ca/804.htm


Chinook Roads Partnership website [the SE portion, under construction]:
http://www.sestproject.ca/photo-gallery

GoflamesGo Mar 15, 2007 4:28 AM

Is there any word on when any of the other extensions are going to be finished. for example stony trail in the SW, or SE?

JBinCalgary Mar 15, 2007 4:30 AM

good news, its a start

ctown.myth Mar 15, 2007 4:33 AM

Great! Now we just need one going east to west :D!

You Need A Thneed Mar 15, 2007 4:48 AM

I hope they create a Metis Trail/Airport Trail connection at the same time or sooner. It is silly that you have to drive on what is basically a country road to get up north to Deerfoot or Country Hills from the north-of-McKnight communities.

Calgarian Mar 15, 2007 5:04 AM

this will free up traffic for about a year, then it will cause more gridlock.

mersar Mar 15, 2007 5:14 AM

Metis Tr. will be connected (map)

The SW connection is a bit out, they are still neogotiating with the Tsuu Tina and the environmentalists are always going to be against it. I wouldn't expect to see that component for another decade at least. Even the stretch from 16th to Highway 8 is a ways off. The SE leg we'll likely see soon after the NE part is built.

skytowers Mar 15, 2007 3:08 PM

I wish environmentalists would get their heads out of their arse. It's a lot more environmentally unfriendly in the long haul to have thousands of vehicles idling and slowly moving through underdeveloped roads than it is to build routes to take people away from these problem areas.

Wooster Mar 15, 2007 3:14 PM

wow, I'm so excited.

I just hope this does help revitalize 16th, like some people seem to think.

You Need A Thneed Mar 15, 2007 3:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by josh white (Post 2691012)
wow, I'm so excited.

I just hope this does help revitalize 16th, like some people seem to think.

This, and the improvements on 16th itself (whenever they are done) should do a lot to revitalize 16th ave. I'm glad the city decided to add the nice landscaping along that stretch. I think the city want to increase density along that stretch too, the most density being right around the mojor intersections.

chuber Mar 15, 2007 3:59 PM

Good to see this starting!

This gives those of us from Edmonton heading to Banff (or further into BC) another way of bypassing the city and traffic.

Plus it will help me with my trips to Calgary since most of the people I visit are all in new suburbs each on different sides of the city. lol

niwell Mar 15, 2007 4:18 PM

As much as I hate Freeways, this is by and large a good thing. Truck traffic really needs to be rerouted around the city, as it 16th avenue is completely unsuited for it. Now all we need is for some major improvements along 16th, including higher densities. I'm thinking it could make a perfect urban boulevard, fronted by low - midrise buildings. The 16th/centre st. intersection has particular potential.

You Need A Thneed Mar 15, 2007 4:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuber (Post 2691163)
This gives those of us from Edmonton heading to Banff (or further into BC) another way of bypassing the city and traffic.

This road won't really help you do that, unless you like driving through more of the city than you had to before.

THE NW part of the ring road would help you out though. It'll be done next year.

Me&You Mar 15, 2007 4:35 PM

The SW section is taking waaaaaay too long. I say get negotiations done with the tsu-tina by Sept, or go around them. Use access to the new casino as a bargaining chip; no ring road, no casino access...

skrish Mar 15, 2007 4:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Me&You (Post 2691282)
The SW section is taking waaaaaay too long. I say get negotiations done with the tsu-tina by Sept, or go around them. Use access to the new casino as a bargaining chip; no ring road, no casino access...

:yes: They should have done that from the beginning

Me&You Mar 15, 2007 4:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skrish (Post 2691295)
:yes: They should have done that from the beginning

And I hit "submit" wondering how soon it would be until I got jumped on for my harsh opinion... so far, so good!

chenmau Mar 15, 2007 4:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Me&You (Post 2691326)
And I hit "submit" wondering how soon it would be until I got jumped on for my harsh opinion... so far, so good!

They were naive not to do it from the beginning

ProudlyCanadian Mar 15, 2007 4:55 PM

I'm really only worried about the SW portion and how it will interact with the Weaselhead, arguably one of the most important natural areas in Calgary.

mersar Mar 15, 2007 5:08 PM

My biggest concern over what has been proposed for the SW is the part that will require relocating part of the river (yes, they want to move the river) just so they can build a bridge easier. The logic behind why they'd take this approach is beyond me, since I can't imagine any scenario where this could not cause harm to the river versus spending a bit more on a bridge.

chuber Mar 15, 2007 5:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Need A Thneed (Post 2691233)
This road won't really help you do that, unless you like driving through more of the city than you had to before.

THE NW part of the ring road would help you out though. It'll be done next year.

I was refering to the NW portion. Although I didn't realize they weren't working on both at the same time.


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.