SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/index.php)
-   Supertall Construction (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/forumdisplay.php?f=323)
-   -   NEW YORK | 175 Greenwich St. | 1,079 FT | 80 FLOORS (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=130306)

M II A II R II K Apr 28, 2007 3:26 PM

NEW YORK | 175 Greenwich St. | 1,079 FT | 80 FLOORS
 
http://wtc.com/images/popup/img_down.../214000-pu.jpg

http://wtc.com/images/popup/img_down.../222000-pu.jpg

Lord Rogers’s Tower 3 at 175 Greenwich Street, between Dey and Cortlandt Streets, is a flat-topped building with asymmetrical shoulders and the diagonal beams of the exoskeletal framework seem to echo the rooftop of Tower 2. The building will rise 1,155 feet, reaching the higher pinnacle at the antennas. It will have five trading floors, three retail floors, nine mechanical floors and 54 floors of offices, for a total of 71 stories.

Cortlandt Street will be kept open between Tower 3 and Tower 4. The Port Authority had originally proposed constructing a shopping arcade that would join the buildings’ bases, but city officials objected to the loss of an open corridor between the memorial and the rest of Lower Manhattan.

Jularc Apr 28, 2007 4:37 PM

http://www.pbase.com/image/77334128.jpg

Scruffy Apr 28, 2007 7:47 PM

i understand why JP Morgan wants to control its own tower but its not an ideal situation at tower 5. Here they have 5 fully adaptable trading floors at their disposal. It seems like a great oppertunity. They have to stop their petty power plays (ooh, im gonna move to stamford) decide on tower 5 or decide on tower 2 before someone else comes in and swipes tower 2's trading floors away from them.

Dac150 Apr 28, 2007 7:57 PM

To me J.P. Morgan had a perfectly fine building a few blocks away. Why they sold it I don't know (possibly because it was too small). This can go either way for me. This can pan out to be a very nice tower if negotiations are worked out or they can pull out and a flimsy residential tower can go up. To me you want these guys hanging around because they'll ensure a large office tower for that spot. If they take tower 2, then the tower 5 spot could not be as large.

KevinFromTexas Apr 28, 2007 8:11 PM

Cool design. I love the facade.

Stephenapolis Apr 28, 2007 9:16 PM

2nd best design in the WTC complex. I really like how the tower is on the farside of the property, away from the memorial site.

pico44 Apr 28, 2007 9:37 PM

I'm a big Rogers fan but I can't think of anything he has done that is as good as the rendering for wtc3. New York is so damn lucky.

Stratosphere Apr 28, 2007 9:47 PM

I don't like this design. It reminds me of the NY Times tower which looked cool in renders but average in photos.

CoolCzech Apr 28, 2007 9:48 PM

Certain details of the facade - like the screens at the top - remind me of the NY Times tower. I hope Rogers considers how that building turned out before finalizing his plans.

Stratosphere 2020 Apr 28, 2007 10:04 PM

That is a handsome modern building! Good for NYC!

STERNyc Apr 28, 2007 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoolCzech (Post 2802077)
Certain details of the facade - like the screens at the top - remind me of the NY Times tower. I hope Rogers considers how that building turned out before finalizing his plans.

The screens at the top are not the problem with the NYTIMES. Its the rods. The screens here are glass and should look brilliant along with the rest of the tower. No rods, just steel and glass in a compact, gotham-modern design.

Lecom Apr 28, 2007 11:06 PM

Industrial factory aesthetic. Great for Gotham.

Aleks Apr 28, 2007 11:10 PM

dang it but yeah it is the second best of the towers!
i really like it
nice facade and for a flat roofed building it looks awesome

JMGarcia Apr 28, 2007 11:12 PM

It works well with the FT and is very "gotham modern" IMO. It should be a stunner.

DUBAI2015 Apr 28, 2007 11:38 PM

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/72105228/original.jpg

Looks like a cool tower for NYC.

NYguy Apr 29, 2007 4:48 AM

Probably my favorite of the new WTC towers...

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66811556/original.jpg

NYguy Apr 29, 2007 4:50 AM

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66466726/large.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66466726/original.jpg

NYguy Apr 29, 2007 4:51 AM

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66466720/original.jpg

NYguy Apr 29, 2007 5:06 AM

http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/66520872/original.jpg

Patrick Apr 29, 2007 5:10 AM

The problem with 3 WTC is it has too much detail. The Other towers are plain, but unique in their own way. The braceing on the tower is very cool, but dosnt belong in the complex. Maybe it would be better off without the exterior braceing.


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.