Oh come, do you really think it's more likely that people fear retribution for voicing their opinions on valuing architectural quality so much that they're sending dleung PM's for moral support, or that he's simply fishing for replies with some unsubstantiated admonishments of everyone else to bump up an uninteresting thread that no one's responded to in a week?
I actually agree with his general premise that poor architecture shouldn't be justified with "well at least it's filler"-type rationalizations, but guess what? No one cares. And even if they did, why would I care that anyone was bothered by that? It's a friggin' internet forum. |
Quote:
|
There's certainly a pressure towards some kind of group-think on this forum, similar to UT except of the Walmart variety. Ironically, it seems that the Toronto folks take dleung way too seriously... If u "don't care" for the topic, ignore it!!
FYI I didn't PM him |
Quote:
PMs? Gimme a break. Next time come with something more believable. There's no animosity in this thread. In fact, those that put more emphasis on stature over architectural quality are the smaller voice. |
Quote:
If I make shit up, there are far less-ridiculous-seeming ways to do it |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 7:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.