SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/index.php)
-   Supertall Construction (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/forumdisplay.php?f=323)
-   -   MECCA | Abraj Al-Bait | 601m | 1972ft | 95 fl | T/O (http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=129985)

OneWorldTradeCenter Jan 12, 2010 1:40 PM

I dislike this building.

eburress Jan 12, 2010 4:22 PM

I don't actually think it's that bad and it's a vast improvement over the architecture that surrounds it. ;)

HomeInMyShoes Jan 12, 2010 9:35 PM

It's scale still seems a bit off to me, but I'm liking it more and more. I'm not a big fan of the skywalks between the towers, but it's just so impressive from that side angle.

PhxPavilion Jan 12, 2010 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenratboy (Post 4645973)
How can there be only 1,000 rooms!? Seems like 5,000 would be easy, if not more.

When you have 11,811 sq foot rooms is it any wonder?

steveve Jan 12, 2010 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWorldTradeCenter (Post 4646304)
I dislike this building.

It's definitely different and something we haven't really seen before... It's got massive height and size... an enormous building..

I'm not so fond of this building either but it's unique in its own sense :shrug:

Pizzuti Jan 13, 2010 8:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eburress (Post 4646470)
I don't actually think it's that bad and it's a vast improvement over the architecture that surrounds it. ;)

What's that supposed to mean?

Duffstuff129 Jan 13, 2010 8:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pizzuti (Post 4648522)
What's that supposed to mean?

He doesn't like ugly, featureless, Brutalist architecture?

Pizzuti Jan 13, 2010 8:23 PM

I don't think that's what he meant; I've certainly never been in the Masjid al Haram but I think its about as far from "brutalist" as you can get.

Duffstuff129 Jan 13, 2010 8:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pizzuti (Post 4648545)
I don't think that's what he meant; I've certainly never been in the Masjid al Haram but I think its about as far from "brutalist" as you can get.

It's fun to be offended and stand up for the "little guy" (a religion with over a billion people) but I'm sure he was talking about the massive sea of concrete bunkers surrounding this building for miles than one relatively small piece of architecture.

kw5150 Jan 15, 2010 7:54 PM

How convoluted and irresponsible. Who gets to go inside? Only the rich and famous. What a drastic blow to a big city and the world. The excess of the rich in current society is disgusting.

Pizzuti Jan 16, 2010 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duffstuff129 (Post 4648572)
It's fun to be offended and stand up for the "little guy" (a religion with over a billion people) but I'm sure he was talking about the massive sea of concrete bunkers surrounding this building for miles than one relatively small piece of architecture.

Not offended, just wanted clarity. The wink thing made me think there was subtext beyond the surrounding low- and mid-rises.

eburress Jan 16, 2010 6:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duffstuff129 (Post 4648572)
It's fun to be offended and stand up for the "little guy" (a religion with over a billion people) but I'm sure he was talking about the massive sea of concrete bunkers surrounding this building for miles than one relatively small piece of architecture.

Sorry for the confusion, but no, there was no subtext or agenda. I was talking about much of the rest of the city - the ugly, featureless, Brutalist architecture.

747 Jan 16, 2010 7:43 AM

it sure is interesting

SkyscrapersOfNewYork Jan 19, 2010 6:31 PM

simply bad architecture of gargantuan proportions...

OneWorldTradeCenter Jan 19, 2010 6:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyscrapersOfNewYork (Post 4656721)
simply bad architecture of gargantuan proportions...

I agree 100%!!!

howardroark Jan 30, 2010 1:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vandelay (Post 4408840)

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

sammyg Jan 30, 2010 7:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pizzuti (Post 4648545)
I don't think that's what he meant; I've certainly never been in the Masjid al Haram but I think its about as far from "brutalist" as you can get.

The problem is that the Masjid al-Haram is the only thing left that isn't an ugly concrete box, thanks to the al-Sauds.

alex1 Jan 31, 2010 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eburress (Post 4652589)
Sorry for the confusion, but no, there was no subtext or agenda. I was talking about much of the rest of the city - the ugly, featureless, Brutalist architecture.

i don't know. Seems that the surrounding areas is quite rich in how the city reacts to the street. This mega-project doesn't have that going for it. I do think that architecture is more than just what something looks like.

eburress Feb 1, 2010 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alex1 (Post 4675993)
i don't know. Seems that the surrounding areas is quite rich in how the city reacts to the street. This mega-project doesn't have that going for it. I do think that architecture is more than just what something looks like.

Maybe so, but I was purely comparing the aesthetic.

newyorkthing10 Feb 22, 2010 5:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rise To The Top (Post 2789997)
Also, the renders don't look like 577m, it looks more like 400ish.

The rendering looks like 350 and with the pinnacle it looks like 420

OneWorldTradeCenter Feb 23, 2010 5:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newyorkthing10 (Post 4711751)
The rendering looks like 350 and with the pinnacle it looks like 420

This height would be enough. 577m is too tall for this one.

red-paladin Feb 28, 2010 12:00 PM

Wow. Talk about high density. I agree that it's kitschy and garish with the gigantic clock and the pseudo-Islamic architecture. I don't know enough about all the claims the Saudis are destroying many of the holy and historic places, but I'm pretty sure the Prophet watching from heaven is not impressed with a lot of what is going on in that country. I agree that the Vatican would never allow such a thing to be built next door.

kingsdl76 Mar 1, 2010 6:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redwhiteblack (Post 4646284)
The corrupted Wahabi Saudi Royal family have destroyed the Prophet's home along with other ancient sites to build multi-billion dollar skyscrapers. It goes against everything this area represented and looks completely out of place. Can you imagine a monster like this being built on the doorstep of the Christian Vatican??

Islamic architecture had always been innovative and tasteful, from Moorish Spain to Ottoman Turkey, now we have Saudi Royals drunk on oil putting up this insult....

"He said: 'Tell me about its signs'. The Prophet (pbuh) replied: '.....you shall see these bare footed, naked, and poor shepherds [of Arabia] competing with each other in making high buildings'"

What better place than on the doorstep of Makkah.

Everybody please read this: http://www.petitiononline.com/ma363724/petition.html



Interesting quote... it sort of mirrors the old Testament story regarding the Tower of Babel... about men trying to build a structure to reach the heavens. God subsequently stops the men by striking them all with different languages... etc. You may be familiar with the story..... just thought it was an interesting parallel.

malec Apr 1, 2010 6:01 PM

Update of the top of the tower

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rody69 (Post 54129353)
from (abumuhannadh's) update photo:

http://center.jeddahbikers.com/download.php?img=281636


OneWorldTradeCenter Apr 17, 2010 2:18 PM

GUYS, please have a look at that press release. Oh my godness, if that is true, it says that Abaraj Al Bait will only be 11 meters shorter than Burj Khalifa???!!

Is that a mistake?

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Secon...cca-18155.html

steveve Apr 18, 2010 3:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWorldTradeCenter (Post 4799198)
GUYS, please have a look at that press release. Oh my godness, if that is true, it says that Abaraj Al Bait will only be 11 meters shorter than Burj Khalifa???!!

Is that a mistake?

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Secon...cca-18155.html

it could be a mistake but if its true...

THATS INSANE!!!!!

Tom In Chicago Apr 18, 2010 9:29 PM

Quote:

he Mecca Royal Clock Tower (pictured) will consist of a reinforced concrete structure 662 meters high. . .
Burj Khalifa is 828 meters tall. . . 166 meters "taller" than MRCT. . .

Quote:

The skyscraper will be only 11 meters lower than the Burj Khalifa in Dubai. . .
Lower as in relation to what? Height to tip of building as measured from sea level perhaps?

. . .

SkyscrapersOfNewYork Apr 18, 2010 9:50 PM

this tower is so bad it literally makes me sick....

Indescribable Apr 18, 2010 10:13 PM

"The Mecca Royal Clock Tower (pictured) will consist of a reinforced concrete structure 662 meters high, to be completed by June. To this a metal spiral structure 155 meters high will be added, inside which a clock 45 feet wide and 43 high will be placed. Six feet larger than the famous Big Ben in London. The clock is to be set in motion in the middle of August, just days before the start of the holy month of Ramadan."

Given the comparison photo above, it looks like this quote is very inaccurate.

Aleks Apr 19, 2010 2:18 AM

yeah, why did they say its only 6 feet larger than big ben? this thing (by thing i mean clock) is massive, big ben doesnt even come close!

i didnt use to like this building, but it grew on me a lot. i actually like it a lot now. i still wish it was a kilometer away from the mosque, but it's not as hideous as people make it seem (imo). i would actually love to go to the top floors, they seem like they'll hold some cool exhibits and things. plus on this one you can actually go almost all the way up, just look at that outdoor viewing platform! i can only imagine what the ginormous crescent will look like from underneath!

muppet Apr 19, 2010 11:44 AM

they've confused metres with feet again

OneWorldTradeCenter Apr 19, 2010 1:36 PM

I don't think so. The newspaper is simply wrong. Have a look at the elevation drawing. 591m, 1939ft is the correct figure. The newspaper says that it will be complete by June 2010. Rediculous. That's not possible. It's still not topped-out. I guess that will happen by the end of this year.

leftopolis May 1, 2010 11:59 PM

A recent pic:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/...b3041f4a_o.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/...b3041f4a_o.jpg

Also, to clear up some confusion regarding the clock--it's being done by another company. I'm not sure, but it almost seems like it will be lifted into place, once it's been built...

More info and lots of close-up pics here:

http://www.pct.ae/composite_projects.php?project=1
Quote:

Premier Composite Technologies will supply the uppermost 200 metres of the tower, a project that involves 35,000m2 of cladding made from glass fibre composites.

Premier Composite Technologies will also laminate the Epoxy glassfibre foam sandwich clock faces that each measure 43m diameter. The massive clock hands, measuring 23m in length, will be produced from carbon fibre prepegs.

The Dokaae Tower will be covered in Italian mosaic titles, 13,000 of which are made from real gold. 700,000 LED lights will also be integrated into the composite cladding to light up the clock face by night.
It's too bad the intricate details won't be visible up close. Here's a sample pic from the above link:
http://www.pct.ae/gallery_images/project1_img18.jpg

OneWorldTradeCenter May 2, 2010 1:45 PM

Sorry but it's simply ugly!

That should not mean, that I dislike islamtic architecture. It's very interesting architecture, but not at such a huge complex. :yuck:

AtlantaMustang May 2, 2010 5:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftopolis (Post 4821425)

This pic actually makes it look interesting. I like how the lower buildings come to points on the front.

photoLith May 2, 2010 7:44 PM

I want to see what this tower looks like in the skyline or the lack thereof in Mecca. By the way, the detail in that clock looks incredible.

leftopolis May 2, 2010 9:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by photolitherland (Post 4822281)
I want to see what this tower looks like in the skyline or the lack thereof in Mecca. By the way, the detail in that clock looks incredible.

I know this isn't quite what you had in mind, but as I understand it, the city is a vast construction site right now. Evidently this billboard is at the construction site and has a countdown clock to when the actual clock will be installed. Although according to the DallasNews story below(which looks like a tranlation from an Arabic paper), it's a countdown to the 25 hotels. That's the corner of Abraj Al-Bait on the left side of the billboard--even the 48 story hotels will look puny next to the monolith!:

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/7928/s114.jpg
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/7928/s114.jpg
I think the series of similar buildings is this hotel project:
From: http://www.dallasnews.com/
Quote:

Dallas-based Wilson Associates, considered among the elite of the world's hospitality interior design firms, was chosen to design 19 hotels going up simultaneously in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of the Prophet Muhammad and the religion he founded.

Unlike other fantastic projects that have come her way – the Atlantis in the Bahamas, the Venetian Las Vegas and Venetian Macau and palaces for Middle Eastern royals – this project is spiritually unparalleled.

The hotels are part of a $6 billion redevelopment in Mecca, center of the Islamic world. More than 65,000 pilgrims from around the globe come to the Grand Mosque every day. And many of them need places to stay.
Quote:

The firm will design more than 10,500 rooms in 25 towers, ranging from 20 to 48 stories, all with views of the city and surrounding holy sites. It will also design 17 grand lobbies and 40 food and beverage outlets.

But there are no bars, spas or health clubs. "No elevator music – just the call to prayer via the PA system," Wilson says.

The hotel brands involved are Conrad, Westin, Sheraton, Marriott, Hilton, Radisson Blu, Mercure and Novotel.
Here's one more clock pic:
http://www.pct.ae/gallery_images/project1_img15.jpg

BTW, I'm getting some of this via Arabic sites, initially--so if I'm sounding a little vague, it's because I don't speak Arabic! It truly is a bummer that information is so limited on what's happening there.

Aleks May 2, 2010 10:16 PM

wow, that clock is beautiful. it'll make an amazing sight when seen from below.

jamesinclair May 3, 2010 2:57 AM

"The hotel brands involved are Conrad, Westin, Sheraton, Marriott, Hilton, Radisson Blu, Mercure and Novotel. "


Ah yes, just what the holy location needed, a Sheraton.

Lecom May 3, 2010 2:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftopolis (Post 4822399)
BTW, I'm getting some of this via Arabic sites, initially--so if I'm sounding a little vague, it's because I don't speak Arabic! It truly is a bummer that information is so limited on what's happening there.

Google Translation speaks Arabic, so go ahead and post the info you've got :tup:

leftopolis May 4, 2010 2:09 AM

Mecca Highrise Development Compared to Abraj Al-Bait
 
These were posted Aug. 31st 2008--so while a bit dated, they're the most spectacular collection I've seen thus far. The city is growing very rapidly. It's also very hilly--just no trees/shrubbery--so creating high-rises wil probably continue in clusters, wherever possible. Those tightly packed, shady alleys are probably a great relief in a city that can reach 100F+ throughout the year.

From Here:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3052/...b16b8733_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3094/...5f11254d_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3101/...6a75318d_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3192/...9d654270_o.jpg

leftopolis May 4, 2010 5:29 AM

Just a couple more tidbits...
 
Evidently the company doing the composite work of the clock face, including up to the crescent moon on top, is also doing some roofing shapes @ Foster's project(the HSR connecting Mecca, Medina, Jeddah):
PREMIER COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES BUILD HARAMAIN STATION MOCK UP FOR FOSTER+PARTNERS

***************************************

Also, the "guts" of the clock, have been worked on for 2 years already--there are a few fascinating pics at the link below:
Mar '08: Fabrication has started for the Makkah Clock Tower Project
Quote:

The structural steel works fabrication has been started at Cimtas Gemlik Works for the Makkah Clock Tower which is part of the DOKAAE project in KSA. Çimtaş’s scope includes detailing, modeling, supply, fabrication, and erection of 10,000 tons of structural steel with built-up columns and hot-rolled beams. The project comprises of a 245 m-tall steel structure clock tower will be built on top of a 346 m-tall concrete structure. The tower will support the world’s largest 4 clocks with a diameter of 43 meters each. When completed this tower will be 591 meters tall and will become one of the tallest buildings in the world.
This thing may actually be topped out by the end of the year--considering the final 200M are a separate project well under way.

OneWorldTradeCenter May 4, 2010 2:27 PM

Nice shots. This tower will contain of the heighest observation decks in the world. I guess it will be the second tallest at 558m, surpassed only by the one of Shanghai Tower.

muppet May 4, 2010 3:40 PM

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4006/...78e4207239.jpg
www.flickr.com/4006, www.skyscrapercity.com

leftopolis May 13, 2010 1:19 AM

Clock installation has begun!
 
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/832...472d46281o.jpg
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/832...472d46281o.jpg

http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/415...afff12bfdo.jpg
http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/415...afff12bfdo.jpg

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3812/mecd.jpg
http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/3812/mecd.jpg

http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/5599/mc2u.jpg
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/5599/mc2u.jpg

This pic is a couple of weeks older--for comparison purposes, but also it gives a sense of how "done" the project is looking:

http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/722...6b7c86151o.jpg
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/722...6b7c86151o.jpg

photoLith May 13, 2010 2:24 AM

I am sure that the scale of this thing cant be fully appreciated unless you were standing there. Its massive.

colemonkee May 13, 2010 4:30 AM

I think the people in the second picture give a pretty good idea of scale, which impressive to say the least.

leftopolis May 16, 2010 2:02 PM

4/18/2010 . . . sense of scale
 
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/...1e62c6b4_b.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/...1e62c6b4_b.jpg

On edit:
I don't know about anybody else, but I sure am frustrated with the challenge of finding any current construction pics. Big Mo is supposed to be up and running/keeping time (on all 4 sides)--by August. Seeing that portion of the building under construction--which already has been in progress for several weeks--is possibly the most exciting part(other than the topping out with the crescent moon).

John Hinds May 25, 2010 8:02 AM

Looking at the image above I can't help but think that they've replaced/overshadowed a religious temple with a new giant temple of wealth and tourism.

evanmack May 25, 2010 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Hinds (Post 4852426)
Looking at the image above I can't help but think that they've replaced/overshadowed a religious temple with a new giant temple of wealth and tourism.

agreed. hard to wrap my mind around it


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.