View Single Post
  #7  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2017, 7:43 PM
YannickTO YannickTO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Magog, QC
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Stats Can are fairly conservative in the way they count things. I'm quite comfortable with CMAs personally. CMAs may be imperfect too but to me they are less imperfect than urban areas.
I would love a diagram where the main category is the CMA/MA, the 2nd category is the urban area and the 3rd category is the subdivision.

That way, we could have a definite list, with all the layers underneath.

Example (those are obviously not the right numbers, just as an example);

1- Toronto CMA - 6,000,000 - 2000 sq km
a)- Toronto Urban - 5,000,000 - 1200 sq km
b.1)- Toronto city - 2,800,000 - 400 sq km
b.2)- Mississauga city - 775,000 - 300 sq km

2- Montréal CMA - 4,000,000 - 1800 sq km
a)- Montréal Urban - 3,400,000 - 1100 sq km
b.1)- Montréal city - 1,800,000 - 400 sq km
b.2)- Laval city - 450,000 - 250 sq km

Something along those lines. CMAs, urban areas and cities, all into 1 giant statistic and breakdowns for all of us to enjoy and analyze.
Reply With Quote