View Single Post
  #280  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2018, 12:19 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by eastcoastal View Post
The way I understand the current situation is that it's a Development Agreement, or Plan Amendment, process, which means that there aren't "existing practices." Staff recommended that the method proposed to evaluate "public benefit" for density bonusing in the centre plan be used to evaluate appropriate public benefit for this specific project.
And someone - probably Mason Council - decided that the Centre Plan's ridiculously low height limit of 20 floors should be applied as well, which led to the current mess, and which finally got bounced when Mason was on vacation last week.
Reply With Quote