View Single Post
  #51  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2010, 3:43 AM
fenwick16 fenwick16 is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toronto area (ex-Nova Scotian)
Posts: 5,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by planarchy View Post
Ignoring your bizarre personal vendetta, you are incorrect about the HRMbyDesign process. The Heritage Trust came out strong against it, were very vocal throughout the process and their disapproval of it, and still hold this view today.
I met Dawn Sloane on January 18 2010 at Halifax City Hall. Here is an article on Dawn Sloane http://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/best-...Of?oid=1366948 - read the last comment. According to this, she overrode the HRM by Design committee and had the Barrington South height lowered from the HRM by Design recommended height of 70 feet to 50 feet. Is this true or false? The comments don't seem very favourable.

PS: As someone else pointed out to you, this is a skyscraper forum - skyscraperpage.com. Does it surprise you that people on this forum aren't all for shorter buildings? Go to other sections and see that people on this forum like tall buildings! If you want positive statements then go to a heritage forum; I am sure your comments about building shorter buildings will be hailed as great intellectual thought.

Last edited by fenwick16; Mar 11, 2010 at 4:57 AM.
Reply With Quote