[Yuri]

And finally, the very big ones:

+14,000,000

-------------------- GDP 2011 (US$) -- Pop. 2011

Tokyo --------------- US$ 2.276 tri --- 40.6 mi

New York ------------ US$ 1,455.8 bi ---- 22.0 mi

London -------------- US$ 1,069.3 bi --- 22.7 mi

Osaka ---------------- US$ 901.5 bi --- 19.3 mi

Los Angeles ----------- US$ 897.2 bi ---- 18.1 mi

Rhein-Ruhr ------------ US$ 798.3 bi --- 17.6 mi

Seoul ----------------- US$ 535.8 bi --- 25.3 mi

São Paulo -------------- US$ 519.3 bi --- 22.6 mi

Moscow ---------------- US$ 451.4 bi --- 18.8 mi

Mexico City ------------ US$ 302.3 bi --- 24.5 mi

Shanghai -------------- US$ 297.0 bi --- 23.3 mi

Beijing ----------------- US$ 247.7 bi --- 20.1 mi

Bombay ---------------- US$ 112.5 bi --- 20.7 mi


^^
Tokyo: by far, the largest in the world. Comparable to Britain and Brazil, 6th and 7th largest GDP in the world. Osaka, very impressive as well;

New York: US$ 66,100 per capita. Very very impressive for a such large area;

For London, I had to use the whole Southeast England as its metro area definition. Although too large for European standards, it fits perfectly with the US CSA definitions. GDP per capita: US$ 47,100. Weak pound flattened London's GDP;

Los Angeles at "only" US$ 49,600 is way behind the Bay Area. Except for the Detroit and Miami, is the lowest amongst the US metro areas over 5 million people;

São Paulo with a very impressive US$ 23,000 per capita. Higher than developed countries like Portugal and Taiwan. By far, the largest economic hub of Latin America;

Moscow at US$ 24,000. The highest GDP per capita considering BRICS metro areas over 10 million people;

Mexico City GDP per capita (US$ 12,300) just above the national average and way behind Monterrey;

Shanghai (US$ 12,700) and Beijing (US$ 12,300) are behind the low-profile Tianjin (US$ 13,500). They are also far away from the BRICS competitors São Paulo and Moscow.