View Single Post
  #10  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2011, 10:25 PM
tayser's Avatar
tayser tayser is offline
Vires acquirit eundo
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,231
The nimby's are bitching about the 8m setback between the towers. Their body corp has formed a subcommitte to oppose this tower.

Their claims are ridiculous - suburban houses and many many many many 3-4 level apartment buildings have much less of a setback - in some cases only 1-2 metres.

But more importantly, we've since had another(!) application lodged on the same bloody block around 200m!!

Quote:
Southbank skyscrapers ire
Jason Dowling
November 24, 2011

http://theage.domain.com.au/real-est...#ixzz1eYmDCPl7



SOUTHBANK could soon be the precinct that skyscrapers killed, residents fear, with planning applications lodged for three giant towers - one almost as tall as Eureka Tower, Melbourne's tallest building.

Planning applications have been lodged in recent weeks for a 71-storey tower with 592 apartments and 566 car parking spaces at the site of the Queensbridge Hotel, Southbank.


The proposed Queensbridge Tower would be the second-tallest building in Melbourne at 275 metres.

A stone's throw away at 25 Queens Bridge Street, an application has been lodged for a 66-storey mixed-use development and at nearby 54-56 Clarke Street an application has been lodged for a 56-storey mixed-use development.
_________

Red = Prima
Yellow = QBH
Blue = 25 Queensbridge St (still not seen a render)
Purple = long term site, all owned by Mirvac - car park we used to take photos of E's construction from + the 3 original office campuses which are now approaching 20 years old. Theoretically a same sized building as Eureka can be built here... muahuah

Reply With Quote