I didn't realize that people had lost their jobs over the decision to go ahead. Still looking at it overall, the project would have to be considered a success regardless of how the leasing came about, or that some people lost their jobs. I don't know how these deals go down behind closed doors, but right now the people who wanted to build on spec don't look so bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster
The only reason EAP is fully leased is because they took awful rents to fill it up. The development was a complete failure financially and a lot of people at SITQ lost their jobs over it.
.
|