View Single Post
  #2213  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2012, 8:19 PM
pnapp1's Avatar
pnapp1 pnapp1 is offline
Brooklyn Baby!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: L.I. New York
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by 599GTO View Post
I'm curious as to why that now lame/bland 3WTC seems to be more of a priority than 2WTC!? I wish they built/prioritize them in chronological order. 1...2..3...then 4. UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2WTC is beautiful, unusual and striking and would transform the skyline. I want them all built, but I and I suspect most would be as upset if only 1 and 2 were the only ones to be built for the foreseeable future to be honest.
If a company wants to be the anchor tenant for 2 WTC before there is one for 3 WTC, (or doesn't want to be it for 3 WTC but 2 WTC) tower 2 would get built first. But since neither has an anchor tenant lined up ATM it only makes financial sens to go with the cheaper building first in terms of focus.
Reply With Quote