View Single Post
  #728  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2007, 1:07 AM
icescraper's Avatar
icescraper icescraper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Center of the GTA
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by neilioo View Post
your on crack..its a very nice looking tower, maybe not to your particular taste but that doesnt make you the be all and end all opinion on architecture.
I am only the be all and end all on my opinion on architecture.

First these towers are massvie. At 166m they will completely change the cityscape of North York. Mediocrity on such a large scale is a dismal proposal for this city borough. Is there anything architecturally novel about these towers or should North York accept that its a second rate neighbourhood in the scope of North America megacities and its main street's purpose is pruely to mass people conviniently on a subway line which connects to their work downtown? Forturately it has no chance of ever been approved by city planning under use and density in its current form. - ice.
Reply With Quote