Quote:
Originally Posted by beyeas
My problem with him is that you can not be against sprawl into the suburbs, and against density in the urban areas. It is one or the other. That is the reason why he comes across as anti-everything. His position overall in untenable, since he doesn't offer viable alternatives. That gives truth then to the argument that really what he is against is developers (read: evil capitalists) as a whole.
|
I was talking simply of the article and it's content, not of the context in which it sits. (Bosquet's previous articles). I still don't agree with Tim's entire belief system however I think that
this article has a good point. Still a bit whiney, but a point nonetheless.