Quote:
Originally Posted by lwill
Yes, pehaps my argument is a waste of time, but think im trying to say a little bit more about the overall planning of this city. Philadelphia seems to shun projects which would open us up to the world.
For example, how in the world do you piss Donald Trump to the point where not only do we lose a Trump Tower, but the man says "I will never attempt to do business in this city ever again"? Again, the casino waterfront project was an opportunity for this city to create a Las Vegas type strip on the eastern seaboard; instead we get a gambling box for our local market.
My argument is that this city seems to thwart progress, and building a tower which obscures two others in the process is just the type of planning which is perfect for keeping our city looking small to the world.
So again, I think Im hinting at a general pattern of deliberate planning which seeks to minimize this cities presence, and global friendliness.
I would have liked to see this tower be our John Hancock in contrast to the Sears Tower; demarcating a new distinct sector symbolizing this cities wish to
attract more super talls.
By the way, the ACC design was killer; this one is less than inspiring, even more so by clustering it together with other buildings. In the renderings it seems to have little distinction from the rest. A Comcast twin tower was definately not the way to go.
And I will do some more renderings as some of you asked shortly.
thanks.
|
That's not how towers work. Comcast is building this for jobs and business, not for your personal gain. They don't care that it blocks other buildings, hell, it helps them by making it look like the whole city is Comcast buildings. Sorry that a business, that does so much for Philadelphia, built their building in your 2nd favorite location and not your first... Boohoo.