Posted Dec 23, 2011, 2:04 AM
|
|
BANNED
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: D.C.
Posts: 3,125
|
|
That's a problem with Pittsburgh and other cities like it (read: poor) -- ANY "development" is seen as better than no development at all. Even though it often ends up being counterproductive in the near future.
How many times throughout this part of the country in particular have we seen prime, empty urban land (well, not really prime if there is no demand to warrant sound investment) used for completely inadequate purposes?
|